目的 探究基于卡诺模型的阶段性康复护理对脑梗死后偏瘫患者心理状态及肢体功能的影响。 方法 本研究回顾性纳入2024年3月—2025年3月我院收治的86例脑梗死后偏瘫患者，并按护理方案差异将其均分为观察组与对照组，每组各43例。对照组采用采用常规康复护理方案，观察组在此基础上采用基于卡诺模型的阶段性康复护理。干预后，统计对比两组心理状态[汉密尔顿焦虑量表（HAMA）、汉密尔顿抑郁量表（HAMD）]、神经功能[美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表(NIHSS)]、自我管理能力[中文版脑卒中自我管理能力量表(SSSMQ)]、日常生活能力[改良Barthel指数（MBI）]、肢体功能[Fugl-Meyer运动功能积分法（FMA）]、康复依从性、护理满意度。结果 干预后，观察组HAMA、HAMD评分均显著低于对照组，FMA各维度及总分均显著高于对照组（P＜0.05）；干预后，观察组NIHSS评分低于对照着，SSSMQ、MBI评分高于对照组（P＜0.05）；观察组治疗总依从率显著高于对照组，护理总满意度显著高于对照组（P＜0.05）。结论 基于卡诺模型的阶段性康复护理应用于脑梗死后偏瘫患者，能改善其心理状态，提高康复依从性及自我管理能力，有助于改善患者神经功能，增强肢体功能，恢复生活活动能力，提高护理满意度。

【摘要】目的：探讨器械护士术中分区精细化器械管理对心脏瓣膜置换术（HVR）手术效率及安全性的影响。方法：研究对象包括2024年6月~2026年5月至我院行HVR治疗的110例心脏瓣膜病（VHD）患者，以及同期参与手术的22名器械护士，采用随机数字表法将入组患者及护士分别列为常规组（55例患者、11名护士）、试验组（55例患者、11名护士），常规组内护士术中实施常规器械管理，试验组内护士术中实施分区精细化器械管理。比较两组患者的手术效率、围手术期安全事件，以及两组护士所参与手术的工作效率、术中器械管理情况。结果：在不同器械管理模式下，试验组内患者的主动脉阻断时间、体外循环时间、术中非必要等待时间、手术总耗时均低于常规组（t=8.817，5.730，20.609，9.632；P＜0.05）。试验组内患者的围手术期安全事件发生率9.09%（5/55）低于常规组25.45%（14/55）（x2=5.153；P＜0.05）。试验组内护士的器械摆台时间、器械传递反应时间、手术中断次数、器械整理时间、器械移交时间均低于常规组（t=3.347，6.505，5.971，3.795，5.838；P＜0.05）。试验组内护士的器械管理差错率低于常规组（x2=5.238；P＜0.05）。结论：器械护士术中分区精细化器械管理能提高HVR患者的手术效率并降低围手术期安全事件发生风险，对提高器械护士的器械管理质量、预防器械管理差错有积极影响

[Abstract]Objective:To explore the impact of refined intraoperative instrument management by operating room nurses on the efficiency and safety of HVR surgery.Methods:The study subjects included 110 patients with VHD who underwent HVR treatment at our hospital from June 2024 to May 2026, along with 22 instrument nurses who participated in the surgeries synchronously. Using the random number table method, the enrolled patients and nurses were divided into a control group (55 patients, 11 nurses) and an experimental group (55 patients, 11 nurses). Nurses in the conventional group implemented routine instrument management during surgery, while nurses in the experimental group implemented zoned and refined instrument management during surgery. The surgical efficiency, perioperative safety events of the two groups of patients, as well as the work efficiency and intraoperative instrument management of the surgeries participated by the nurses in the two groups were compared.Results:Under different instrument management modes, the aortic occlusion time, extracorporeal circulation time, intraoperative non-essential waiting time, and total surgical time of patients in the experimental group were all lower than the control group (t=8.817，5.730，20.609，9.632; P<0.05). The incidence of perioperative safety events in the experimental group was 9.09% (5/55) lower than that in the control group 25.45% (14/55) (x2=5.153; P<0.05). The instrument placement time, instrument delivery response time, number of surgical interruptions, instrument sorting time, and instrument handover time of nurses in the experimental group were lower than those in the control group (t=3.347，6.505，5.971，3.795，5.838; P<0.05). The error rate of nurses in the experimental group was lower than the control group (x2=5.238; P < 0.05).Conclusion:Refined intraoperative zone-specific instrument management by instrument nurses enhances surgical efficiency for HVR patients and reduces the risk of perioperative safety incidents, thereby positively impacting the quality of instrument care provided by nurses and preventing instrument-related adverse events.

摘要目的 探讨基于E-Coach健康管理模式的营养管理联合主动循环呼吸训练（ACBT）在非小细胞肺癌（NSCLC）化疗患者中的应用效果。方法 选取2023年6月至2025年8月我院收治的98例NSCLC化疗患者，采用随机数字表法将所有研究对象分为联合组和常规组，每组49例。常规组给予常规干预，联合组在常规组基础上予以E-Coach健康管理模式的营养管理联合ACBT干预。比较两组干预前后营养状况、肺功能、运动耐力、生活质量以及营养不良发生率。结果 干预12周后，两组BMI、ALB、PA、Hb均较干预前上升且联合组高于常规组（P<0.05）；联合组FVC、FEV1、MVV及6MWT均显著高于常规组（P＜0.05）；干预前两组6MWT组间对比差异无统计学意义（P>0.05），干预4周、6周、8周、12周后，两组6MWT均较干预前增加，且联合组远于常规组（P<0.05）；干预12周后，两组身体功能、社会或家庭功能、情感功能、功能性状况得分均较干预前上升，且联合组高于常规组（P<0.05）。结论基于E-Coach健康管理模式的营养管理联合ACBT能够有效改善NSCLC化疗患者的营养状况和肺功能，提高生活质量和运动耐力。

Abstract Objective To investigate the application effect of nutrition management based on the E-Coach health management model combined with active cycle of breathing technique (ACBT) in patients undergoing chemotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods A total of 98 NSCLC patients receiving chemotherapy in our hospital from June 2023 to August 2025 were selected and randomly divided into a combination group and a conventional group using a random number table method, with 49 cases in each group. The conventional group received routine intervention, while the combination group received nutrition management based on the E-Coach health management model combined with ACBT in addition to the routine intervention. The nutritional status, lung function, exercise endurance, quality of life, and incidence of malnutrition were compared between the two groups before and after the intervention. Results After 12 weeks of intervention, BMI, ALB, PA, and Hb in both groups increased compared with baseline, and the levels in the combination group were higher than those in the conventional group (P<0.05). The FVC, FEV1, MVV, and 6MWT in the combination group were significantly higher than those in the conventional group (P<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in 6MWT between the two groups before intervention (P>0.05); after 4, 6, 8, and 12 weeks of intervention, the 6MWT in both groups increased compared with baseline, and the walking distance in the combination group was significantly longer than that in the conventional group (P<0.05). After 12 weeks of intervention, the scores of physical function, social/family function, emotional function, and functional well-being in both groups increased compared with baseline, and the scores in the combination group were higher than those in the conventional group (P<0.05). Conclusion Nutrition management based on the E-Coach health management model combined with ACBT can effectively improve the nutritional status and lung function of NSCLC patients undergoing chemotherapy, and enhance their quality of life and exercise endurance.

【摘要】目的：探讨安全-行为双维度管理模式在儿童全麻舒适化口腔治疗中的应用效果。方法：选取2025年4月至2025年12月在本院接受全麻舒适化口腔治疗的80例患儿作为研究对象，根据围术期不同管理方式分为观察组和对照组，每组40例。对照组实施常规围术期管理，观察组实施安全-行为双维度管理模式。对比两组患儿牙科恐惧程度、治疗依从性、苏醒期躁动发生率及家属满意度。结果：术前检查、麻醉诱导、出院时观察组CFSS-DS评分均比对照组低（P＜0.05），FCS评分均比对照组高（P＜0.05）。与对照组苏醒期躁动发生率20.00%对比，观察组5.00%显著降低（P＜0.05）。与对照组家属满意度75.00%对比，观察组95.00%显著升高（P＜0.05）。结论：在儿童全麻舒适化口腔治疗中应用安全-行为双维度管理模式干预，可有效减轻患儿牙科恐惧程度，提高治疗依从性，减少苏醒期躁动发生，提升家属满意度，值得临床推广应用。

目的：本研究旨在调查广州市重点专科建设背景下护理管理者核心能力的现状，分析其主要影响因素，为护理管理者核心能力提升策略的制定提供参考。方法：采用便利抽样法，选取广州市某区联合申报市级重点专科单位的159名护理管理者作为研究对象。采用一般资料调查表和护士长岗位胜任力问卷进行调查。将搜集的数据使用 SPSS 27.0 软件进行描述性统计、独立样本 t 检验和单因素方差分析以及多元线性回归分析。结果：广州市区联合申报市级重点专科单位护理管理者综合素质总均分为（148.81±26.54）分，各维度得分从高到低依次为：个人性格特质（6.22±1.11）分、临床管理能力（6.20±1.12）分、团队影响能力（6.17±1.14）分。单因素分析显示，职称和工作职务对综合素质得分有显著影响（P＜0.05）。多元线性回归分析进一步表明，在控制其他变量后，年龄30-40岁组对核心能力有显著影响（P＜0.05）。结论：广州市区联合申报市级重点专科单位护理管理者岗位胜任力总体处于中等偏上水平，各维度表现均衡。建议重点专科建设单位重点关注不同职务层次护理管理者的能力发展需求，进一步优化管理体系，促进区域护理管理水平的整体提升。

摘要：目的 探讨重症急性胰腺炎患者在CRRT治疗期间液体平衡管理的体验与需求，为优化临床液体管理及护理支持策略提供依据。方法 采用描述性质性研究方法，运用目的抽样法选取2024年5月—2025年12月在我院重症医学科接受CRRT治疗的13例重症急性胰腺炎患者进行半结构式深入访谈。采用Colaizzi七步分析法对访谈资料进行整理、编码、归类与主题提炼。结果 本研究最终提炼出4个主题、11个亚主题，分别为：①强烈而持续的身体不适体验（强烈的口渴感、身体肿胀与沉重、治疗期间寒冷与束缚）；②液体管理限制下的认知行为冲突（对限液医嘱情绪复杂、出入量监测引发的复杂感受、配合行为背后的动力与障碍）；③治疗过程中的负性情绪与心理调适（治疗初期的强烈恐惧与不确定感、无助感与自主权被削弱、在病痛中重建希望与韧性）；④对疾病信息与多维照护支持的迫切需求（信息缺乏引发困惑与焦虑、照护支持需求）。结论 重症急性胰腺炎患者在CRRT治疗期间，临床护理不仅应关注液体出入量等客观指标，还应重视患者的口渴等主观不适、限液过程中的认知行为冲突、治疗相关情绪反应及信息支持需求。

探讨将 Root Cause Analysis（RCA）质量管理模式与心理资本理论相结合应用于手术核查团队，对改善沟通中断、提升沟通执行质量与团队协作能力的效果。方法 选取 2025年 1 月至 2025 年12 月某三级医院手术室手术团队成员 80 名，按手术间编号分为对照组与实验组，各 40 名。对照组实施常规手术核查流程；实验组在此基础上实施基于 RCA 的流程诊断与基于心理资本理论的综合沟通能力提升干预。干预结束后，比较两组沟通中断发生率、核查流程执行质量、沟通效率，以及心理资本量表（PCQ-24）和团队协作量表（T-TPQ）得分。结果 实验组沟通中断发生率显著低于对照组（P＜0.05），核查流程执行质量和沟通效率均显著优于对照组（P＜0.001）。实验组 PCQ-24 各维度及总分、T-TPQ 各维度及总分均显著高于对照组（均 P＜0.001）。结论 将 RCA 流程分析与心理资本理论干预相结合，可通过流程规范化与心理动力增强双路径同步改善手术团队沟通质量与协作水平，具有良好的临床应用价值与推广潜力。

To evaluate the effectiveness of an intervention combining Root Cause Analysis (RCA)–based quality management and Psychological Capital (PsyCap) theory in reducing communication interruptions and improving communication quality and teamwork in surgical safety check teams. Methods: Eighty surgical team members from a tertiary hospital (January 2025 - December 2025.) were assigned to a control group or an intervention group according to operating room allocation (40 per group). The control group followed routine surgical safety check procedures, whereas the intervention group additionally received an RCA-guided workflow analysis and a PsyCap-based communication enhancement program. Post-intervention outcomes included communication interruption rate, execution quality and efficiency of safety checks, Psychological Capital Questionnaire (PCQ-24) scores, and TeamSTEPPS Teamwork Perceptions Questionnaire (T-TPQ) scores. Results: The intervention group demonstrated a significantly lower communication interruption rate compared with the control group (P＜0.05). Execution quality and communication efficiency were significantly improved in the intervention group (P＜0.001). PCQ-24 total and subscale scores were significantly higher in the intervention group than in the control group (P＜0.001), as were T-TPQ total and subscale scores (P＜0.001). Conclusion: Integrating RCA-based workflow optimization with PsyCap-oriented psychological and behavioral training can effectively enhance communication quality, reduce interruptions, and strengthen teamwork in surgical safety check teams. The combined model has strong applicability and potential for wider clinical promotion.

探讨将 Root Cause Analysis（RCA）质量管理模式与心理资本理论相结合应用于手术核查团队，对改善沟通中断、提升沟通执行质量与团队协作能力的效果。方法 选取 2025年 1 月至 2025 年12 月某三级医院手术室手术团队成员 80 名，按手术间编号分为对照组与实验组，各 40 名。对照组实施常规手术核查流程；实验组在此基础上实施基于 RCA 的流程诊断与基于心理资本理论的综合沟通能力提升干预。干预结束后，比较两组沟通中断发生率、核查流程执行质量、沟通效率，以及心理资本量表（PCQ-24）和团队协作量表（T-TPQ）得分。结果 实验组沟通中断发生率显著低于对照组（P＜0.05），核查流程执行质量和沟通效率均显著优于对照组（P＜0.001）。实验组 PCQ-24 各维度及总分、T-TPQ 各维度及总分均显著高于对照组（均 P＜0.001）。结论 将 RCA 流程分析与心理资本理论干预相结合，可通过流程规范化与心理动力增强双路径同步改善手术团队沟通质量与协作水平，具有良好的临床应用价值与推广潜力。

To evaluate the effectiveness of an intervention combining Root Cause Analysis (RCA)–based quality management and Psychological Capital (PsyCap) theory in reducing communication interruptions and improving communication quality and teamwork in surgical safety check teams. Methods: Eighty surgical team members from a tertiary hospital (January 2025 - December 2025.) were assigned to a control group or an intervention group according to operating room allocation (40 per group). The control group followed routine surgical safety check procedures, whereas the intervention group additionally received an RCA-guided workflow analysis and a PsyCap-based communication enhancement program. Post-intervention outcomes included communication interruption rate, execution quality and efficiency of safety checks, Psychological Capital Questionnaire (PCQ-24) scores, and TeamSTEPPS Teamwork Perceptions Questionnaire (T-TPQ) scores. Results: The intervention group demonstrated a significantly lower communication interruption rate compared with the control group (P＜0.05). Execution quality and communication efficiency were significantly improved in the intervention group (P＜0.001). PCQ-24 total and subscale scores were significantly higher in the intervention group than in the control group (P＜0.001), as were T-TPQ total and subscale scores (P＜0.001). Conclusion: Integrating RCA-based workflow optimization with PsyCap-oriented psychological and behavioral training can effectively enhance communication quality, reduce interruptions, and strengthen teamwork in surgical safety check teams. The combined model has strong applicability and potential for wider clinical promotion.

目的 探讨将 Root Cause Analysis（RCA）质量管理模式与心理资本理论相结合应用于手术核查团队，对改善沟通中断、提升沟通执行质量与团队协作能力的效果。方法 选取 2025年 1 月至 2025 年12 月某三级医院手术室手术团队成员 80 名，按手术间编号分为对照组与实验组，各 40 名。对照组实施常规手术核查流程；实验组在此基础上实施基于 RCA 的流程诊断与基于心理资本理论的综合沟通能力提升干预。干预结束后，比较两组沟通中断发生率、核查流程执行质量、沟通效率，以及心理资本量表（PCQ-24）和团队协作量表（T-TPQ）得分。结果 实验组沟通中断发生率显著低于对照组（P＜0.05），核查流程执行质量和沟通效率均显著优于对照组（P＜0.001）。实验组 PCQ-24 各维度及总分、T-TPQ 各维度及总分均显著高于对照组（均 P＜0.001）。结论 将 RCA 流程分析与心理资本理论干预相结合，可通过流程规范化与心理动力增强双路径同步改善手术团队沟通质量与协作水平，具有良好的临床应用价值与推广潜力。

To evaluate the effectiveness of an intervention combining Root Cause Analysis (RCA)–based quality management and Psychological Capital (PsyCap) theory in reducing communication interruptions and improving communication quality and teamwork in surgical safety check teams. Methods: Eighty surgical team members from a tertiary hospital (January 2025 - December 2025.) were assigned to a control group or an intervention group according to operating room allocation (40 per group). The control group followed routine surgical safety check procedures, whereas the intervention group additionally received an RCA-guided workflow analysis and a PsyCap-based communication enhancement program. Post-intervention outcomes included communication interruption rate, execution quality and efficiency of safety checks, Psychological Capital Questionnaire (PCQ-24) scores, and TeamSTEPPS Teamwork Perceptions Questionnaire (T-TPQ) scores. Results: The intervention group demonstrated a significantly lower communication interruption rate compared with the control group (P＜0.05). Execution quality and communication efficiency were significantly improved in the intervention group (P＜0.001). PCQ-24 total and subscale scores were significantly higher in the intervention group than in the control group (P＜0.001), as were T-TPQ total and subscale scores (P＜0.001). Conclusion: Integrating RCA-based workflow optimization with PsyCap-oriented psychological and behavioral training can effectively enhance communication quality, reduce interruptions, and strengthen teamwork in surgical safety check teams. The combined model has strong applicability and potential for wider clinical promotion.

探讨将 Root Cause Analysis（RCA）质量管理模式与心理资本理论相结合应用于手术核查团队，对改善沟通中断、提升沟通执行质量与团队协作能力的效果。方法 选取 2025年 1 月至 2025 年12 月某三级医院手术室手术团队成员 80 名，按手术间编号分为对照组与实验组，各 40 名。对照组实施常规手术核查流程；实验组在此基础上实施基于 RCA 的流程诊断与基于心理资本理论的综合沟通能力提升干预。干预结束后，比较两组沟通中断发生率、核查流程执行质量、沟通效率，以及心理资本量表（PCQ-24）和团队协作量表（T-TPQ）得分。结果 实验组沟通中断发生率显著低于对照组（P＜0.05），核查流程执行质量和沟通效率均显著优于对照组（P＜0.001）。实验组 PCQ-24 各维度及总分、T-TPQ 各维度及总分均显著高于对照组（均 P＜0.001）。结论 将 RCA 流程分析与心理资本理论干预相结合，可通过流程规范化与心理动力增强双路径同步改善手术团队沟通质量与协作水平，具有良好的临床应用价值与推广潜力。

To evaluate the effectiveness of an intervention combining Root Cause Analysis (RCA)–based quality management and Psychological Capital (PsyCap) theory in reducing communication interruptions and improving communication quality and teamwork in surgical safety check teams. Methods: Eighty surgical team members from a tertiary hospital (January 2025 - December 2025.) were assigned to a control group or an intervention group according to operating room allocation (40 per group). The control group followed routine surgical safety check procedures, whereas the intervention group additionally received an RCA-guided workflow analysis and a PsyCap-based communication enhancement program. Post-intervention outcomes included communication interruption rate, execution quality and efficiency of safety checks, Psychological Capital Questionnaire (PCQ-24) scores, and TeamSTEPPS Teamwork Perceptions Questionnaire (T-TPQ) scores. Results: The intervention group demonstrated a significantly lower communication interruption rate compared with the control group (P＜0.05). Execution quality and communication efficiency were significantly improved in the intervention group (P＜0.001). PCQ-24 total and subscale scores were significantly higher in the intervention group than in the control group (P＜0.001), as were T-TPQ total and subscale scores (P＜0.001). Conclusion: Integrating RCA-based workflow optimization with PsyCap-oriented psychological and behavioral training can effectively enhance communication quality, reduce interruptions, and strengthen teamwork in surgical safety check teams. The combined model has strong applicability and potential for wider clinical promotion.