您的位置: 首页 > 文字全文
2023年7月 第38卷 第7期11
目录

器械护士术中分区精细化器械管理对心脏瓣膜置换术手术效率及安全性的影响研究

Study on the Impact of Refined Intraoperative Zone-Based Instrument Management by Scrub Nurses on the Efficiency and Safety of Cardiac Valve Replacement Surgery

来源期刊: 广州医药 | - 发布时间: 收稿时间:2026/6/15 13:05:18 阅读量:2
作者:
关键词:
器械护士;分区精细化器械管理;心脏瓣膜置换术;手术效率;手术安全性
Key Words:Instrumental nurse; Zoned refined instrument management; Cardiac valve replacement surgery; Surgical efficiency; Surgical safety
DOI:
收稿时间:
 
修订日期:
 
接收日期:
 
引用总数:
0  
【摘要】目的:探讨器械护士术中分区精细化器械管理对心脏瓣膜置换术(HVR)手术效率及安全性的影响。方法:研究对象包括2024年6月~2026年5月至我院行HVR治疗的110例心脏瓣膜病(VHD)患者,以及同期参与手术的22名器械护士,采用随机数字表法将入组患者及护士分别列为常规组(55例患者、11名护士)、试验组(55例患者、11名护士),常规组内护士术中实施常规器械管理,试验组内护士术中实施分区精细化器械管理。比较两组患者的手术效率、围手术期安全事件,以及两组护士所参与手术的工作效率、术中器械管理情况。结果:在不同器械管理模式下,试验组内患者的主动脉阻断时间、体外循环时间、术中非必要等待时间、手术总耗时均低于常规组(t=8.817,5.730,20.609,9.632;P<0.05)。试验组内患者的围手术期安全事件发生率9.09%(5/55)低于常规组25.45%(14/55)(x2=5.153;P<0.05)。试验组内护士的器械摆台时间、器械传递反应时间、手术中断次数、器械整理时间、器械移交时间均低于常规组(t=3.347,6.505,5.971,3.795,5.838;P<0.05)。试验组内护士的器械管理差错率低于常规组(x2=5.238;P<0.05)。结论:器械护士术中分区精细化器械管理能提高HVR患者的手术效率并降低围手术期安全事件发生风险,对提高器械护士的器械管理质量、预防器械管理差错有积极影响
[Abstract]Objective:To explore the impact of refined intraoperative instrument management by operating room nurses on the efficiency and safety of HVR surgery.Methods:The study subjects included 110 patients with VHD who underwent HVR treatment at our hospital from June 2024 to May 2026, along with 22 instrument nurses who participated in the surgeries synchronously. Using the random number table method, the enrolled patients and nurses were divided into a control group (55 patients, 11 nurses) and an experimental group (55 patients, 11 nurses). Nurses in the conventional group implemented routine instrument management during surgery, while nurses in the experimental group implemented zoned and refined instrument management during surgery. The surgical efficiency, perioperative safety events of the two groups of patients, as well as the work efficiency and intraoperative instrument management of the surgeries participated by the nurses in the two groups were compared.Results:Under different instrument management modes, the aortic occlusion time, extracorporeal circulation time, intraoperative non-essential waiting time, and total surgical time of patients in the experimental group were all lower than the control group (t=8.817,5.730,20.609,9.632; P<0.05). The incidence of perioperative safety events in the experimental group was 9.09% (5/55) lower than that in the control group 25.45% (14/55) (x2=5.153; P<0.05). The instrument placement time, instrument delivery response time, number of surgical interruptions, instrument sorting time, and instrument handover time of nurses in the experimental group were lower than those in the control group (t=3.347,6.505,5.971,3.795,5.838; P<0.05). The error rate of nurses in the experimental group was lower than the control group (x2=5.238; P < 0.05).Conclusion:Refined intraoperative zone-specific instrument management by instrument nurses enhances surgical efficiency for HVR patients and reduces the risk of perioperative safety incidents, thereby positively impacting the quality of instrument care provided by nurses and preventing instrument-related adverse events.
上一篇
下一篇
出版者信息








《广州医药》公众号
目录