目的 观察急性期脑卒中患者早期针刺结合康复训练的临床疗效。方法 采用单盲、分层、区组随机设计分组，随机分成针康组与康复组。针康组35例，康复组35例，按5 d为一个疗程，共4个疗程。采用Fug-Meyer运动功能评分法（FMA）、巴氏指数（BI）、脑卒中专用生活质量量表（SS-QOL）对治疗前及治疗后4周末、出院后8周末及随访期3个月、6个月末的死亡率、残疾率、复发率评估，比较两组的疗效。结果 两组基线比较差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）。组间比较：4周末 FMA、BI评分两组相比差异均无统计学意义（P＞0.05），8周末则具有统计学意义（P＜0.01）。SS-QOL评分在第4周末和第8周末相比差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）。随访3个月、6个月末的死亡率、致残率和复发率差异均无统计学意义（P＞0.05）。组间多重比较，两组4、8周末 FMA、 BI和SS-QOL评分较治疗前比较差异有统计学意义（P＜0.01）。针刺康复组8周末疗效优于4周末（P＜0.01），康复组8周末与4周末相比差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）。针刺康复组4、8周末SS-QOL评分显著高于治疗前（P＜0.01），8周末与4周末相比差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05），康复组各时间点SS-QOL评分两两比较差异有统计学意义（P＜0.01）。结论 对急性脑卒中患者进行早期针刺结合康复训练，可明显改善其肢体运动功能和日常生活活动能力。
Objective To observe the clinical efficacy of early acupuncture combined with rehabilitation training in acute-phase stroke patients．Methods Single-blind，stratified，zone group randomized design grouping was adopted，and randomly divided into acupuncture rehabilitation group and rehabilitation group．There were 35 cases in the acupuncture rehabilitation group and 35 cases in the rehabilitation group，received 4 courses，5 days in each course．Fugl-Meyer Assessment（FMA），Barthel Index（BI），Stroke Specific Quality of Life Scale（SS-QOL） scores and mortality，disability and recurrence rates at the end of 3 and 6 months of follow-up were used to compare the efficacy of the two groups．Results Comparing the basic conditions of the two groups，the difference was not significant（P＞0.05）．Comparison between groups：differences FMA and BI scores between two groups at the end of 4 weekends were not significant（P＞0.05），while differences were significant（P＜0.01）at the end of 8 weekends．SS-QOL scores at the end of 4 weekends and the end of 8 weekends were not significant different between two groups（P＞0.05）．Mortality，disability and recurrence rates at the end of 3 and 6 months of follow-up were not significantly different（P＞0.05）．Multiple comparisons between groups：there were significant differences in FMA，BI and SS-QOL scores at the end of 4 and 8 weeks between the two groups compared with the pre-treatment period（P＜0.01）．The efficacy of the acupuncture rehabilitation group at the end of 8 weekends was significantly better than that at the end of 4 weekends（P＜0.01），and there was no statistically significant difference between the rehabilitation group at the end of 8 weekends and that at the end of 4 weekends（P＞0.05）．The SS-QOL scores at the end of 4 and 8 weekends in the acupuncture rehabilitation group were significantly higher than those before treatment（P＜0.01），and there was no statistically significant difference at the end of 8 weekends compared with that at the end of 4 weekends（P＞0.05），and there was a statistically significant difference in the two-by-two comparisons of SS-QOL scores at each time point in the rehabilitation group（P＜0.01）．Conclusions Early acupuncture combined with rehabilitation training for acute stroke patients can significantly improve their extremities motor function and daily vitality．
目的 评估医院-社区-家庭一体化康复护理模式对慢性创面患者生活质量及创面愈合的潜在影响。方法 选择2023年1月—2024年6月在广州市第一人民医院接受治疗的慢性创面患者80例作为研究对象，所有患者在住院期间均接受基于溃疡面积、深度及是否合并感染等因素的综合治疗，包括彻底清创、创缘处理、负压治疗、感染控制等治疗，并接受常规护理。出院前，通过随机数字表法将患者分为两组，每组40例。两组患者在住院期间均接受常规护理，出院后，对照组接受延续护理并定期复查。干预组40例患者在出院后接受医院-社区-家庭一体化康复护理模式。入组时及护理3个月后，使用生活质量调查表（SF-36）对患者生活质量和创面愈合率进行评估。结果 干预组创面愈合率为（32.61±4.26）%，高于对照组（11.48±1.04）%，差异具有统计学意义（t=19.473，P＜0.05）。两组患者在护理3个月后的数字评定量表评分和创面疼痛频率评分均较入组时降低（P＜0.05）。其中干预组护理3个月后的创面VAS评分为（1.82±0.17）分，创面疼痛频率评分为（1.28±0.25）分；而对照组分别为（3.91±0.22）分和（2.63±0.37）分，干预组低于对照组（P＜0.05）。此外，干预组在护理后3个月的总体健康、生理功能、生理职能、精神健康、情感功能、社会功能评分均高于对照组（P＜0.05）。在居家3个月期间，干预组的感染发生率为5.00%，而对照组为17.50%，干预组感染发生率低于对照组（χ 2 =3.781，P＜0.05）。结论 本研究表明，医院-社区-家庭一体化康复护理模式干预能够促进慢性创面患者的创面愈合，降低居家期间感染的风险，并提升患者的生活质量。
Objective To assess the potential impact of the integrated hospital-community-home rehabilitation nursing model on the quality of life and wound healing in patients with chronic wounds．Methods A total of 80 patients with chronic wounds treated at the Guangzhou First People’s Hospital from January 2023 to June 2024 were selected as the study subjects．All patients received comprehensive treatment during their hospital stay，including thorough debridement，edge treatment，vacuum therapy，infection control and routine nursing care．Prior to discharge，the patients were randomly divided into two groups using a random number table，with 40 patients in each group．Both groups received routine nursing care during their hospital stay，and the control group received continuing nursing care and regular follow-up after discharge．Forty patients in the intervention group received the integrated hospital-community-home rehabilitation nursing model after discharge．Quality of life（QoL）and wound healing rates were assessed using the Short Form 36（SF-36）questionnaire at the time of enrollment and 3 months after nursing．Results The wound healing rate in the intervention group was significantly higher than that in the control group （［32.61±4.26］% vs ［11.48±1.04］%），with a statistical difference（t=19.473，P＜0.05）．The numerical rating scale（NRS）scores and frequency of wound pain scores decreased in both groups 3 months after nursing compared to the enrollment period（P＜0.05）．Specifically，the VAS score for wound pain in the intervention group 3 months after nursing was（1.82±0.17），and the frequency of wound pain was（1.28±0.25），in the control group，these scores were（3.91±0.22）and（2.63±0.37），respectively，with the intervention group scoring significantly lower than the control group（P＜0.05）．Furthermore，the scores for overall health，physical function，role physical，mental health，emotional function，and social function in the intervention group were higher than those in the control group 3 months after nursing（P＜0.05）．During the 3-month home recovery period，the incidence of infection in the intervention group was 5.00%，whereas it was 17.50% in the control group，with the intervention group showing a lower incidence of infection（χ 2 =3.781，P＜0.05）．Conclusions This study demonstrates that the hospital-community-home integrated rehabilitation care model intervention can promote wound healing in chronic wound patients，reduce the risk of infection during home care，and significantly improve patients’ quality of life．
