论著

超声引导下胸膜活检联合胸腔积液检验对结核性胸膜炎的诊断价值

Diagnostic value of ultrasound-guided pleural biopsy combined with pleural effusion examination for tuberculosis pleurisy

:505-508
 
      目的   探讨分析超声引导下胸膜活检(USPB)联合胸腔积液检验对于临床确诊结核性胸膜炎的应用价值。方法   选取2021年6月—2023年6月广州市胸科医院收治的96例临床诊断为结核性胸膜炎(渗出性胸膜炎)的患者为研究对象,分别使用胸腔积液检验(包含胸腔积液腺苷脱氨酶及细菌培养)、USPB、两者联合三种方法诊断,计算其准确率、特异度及灵敏度并进行分析。结果   胸腔积液诊断准确率73.96%、灵敏度72.84%,USPB诊断准确率为85.42%、灵敏度82.71%,两者联合诊断准确率为88.54%,灵敏度90.12%,较胸腔积液检验单独诊断准确率及灵敏度明显升高(P<0.05),胸腔积液、USPB、两者联合诊断特异度差异(P>0.05)无统计学意义。结论  USPB联合胸腔积液检验对结核性胸膜炎的确诊具有较高临床价值。
       Objective  To investigate the value of ultrasound-guided pleural biopsy(USPB)combined with  pleural effusion test in the diagnosis of tuberculous pleurisy.Methods  A total of 96 patients with tuberculous pleurisy(exudative pleurisy)admitted to the Guangzhou Chest Hospital from June 2021 to June 2023 were selected.The accuracy,specificity,and sensitivity of pleural effusion test(including adenosine deaminase and bacterial culture),USPB,and their combination were calculated and analyzed.Results  The diagnostic accuracy of pleural effusion was 73.96% and the sensitivity was 72.84%.The diagnostic accuracy of USPB was 85.42% and the sensitivity was 82.71%.The diagnostic accuracy 88.54% and sensitivity 90.12% of USPB combined with pleural effusion test were significantly higher than that of pleural effusion alone(P<0.05),but there was no significant difference in the diagnostic specificity of pleural effusion,USPB and combination of them(P>0.05).Conclusions  USPB combined with pleural effusion test has high clinical value in the diagnosis of tuberculous pleurisy.
论著

宫腔镜病灶切除术与超声监测下吸宫术治疗剖宫产瘢痕部位妊娠的有效性比较

Comparison of effectiveness between hysteroscopic resection surgery and ultrasound-guided uterine aspiration in the treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy

:500-504
 
       目的   比较宫腔镜病灶切除术与超声监测下吸宫术治疗剖宫产瘢痕部位妊娠(CSP)的有效性。   回顾性分析2021年7月—2023年10月在南宁市妇幼保健院确诊为I、Ⅱ型CSP并接受治疗的129例患者,停经时间在38~83 d,中位停经时间48 d。其中42例患者接受了宫腔镜病灶切除术治疗(A组),87例患者接受超声监测下吸宫术治疗(B组),比较两组患者术后1、3、7、14 d的人绒毛膜促性腺激素水平以及手术出血量、手术时间、住院时间、住院花费。结果   两组患者在术后1 d,血清HCG水平下降,下降幅度均超过50%,且A组患者术后1 d血清HCG的下降幅度及下降速率大于B组患者(P<0.05);术后3、7、14 d,两组血清HCG水平仍持续下降。另外,A组患者手术出血量、手术时间、住院时间、住院花费分别为(15.35±14.53)mL、(60.73±53.05)min、(4.33±1.90)d、(6 689.23±2 216.19)元;B组患者手术出血量、手术时间、住院时间、住院费用分别为(26.09±29.24)mL、(51.59±54.46)min、(4.82±1.83)d、(6 270.34±2 547.85)元。A组患者术中出血量低于B组、住院时间短于B组(P<0.05),手术时间及住院费用与B组比较差异无统计学意义(P均>0.05)。结论   宫腔镜病灶切除术与超声监测下吸宫术均能有效治疗CSP,但宫腔镜病灶切除术在术后血清HCG的下降幅度及下降速率、术中出血量、住院时间等方面优于超声监测下吸宫术,而且手术时间和住院费用并没有显著增加。
       Objective  To compare the efficacy between hysteroscopic  resection surgery and ultrasound-guided uterine aspiration in the treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy(CSP).Methods  A  retrospective analysis was performed in 129 patients diagnosed with CSP(type I or Ⅱ)and treated in Nanning Maternal and Child Health Hospital from July 2021 to October 2023.Their duration of amenorrhea was between 38~83 d,with a median of 48 days.Among them,42  patients were treated with hysteroscopic resection surgery therapy(group A),87 patients were treated with ultrasound-guided uterine aspiration therapy and(group B).Then,the levels of human chorionic gonadotropin(HCG),the amount of the intraoperative bleeding volume,surgical time,hospitalization time,and hospitalization expenses were compared between the two groups at one,three,seven and 14 days postoperativey.Results  After one day of surgery,the serum HCG levels of two groups significantly decreased,with a decrease of more than 50%,and the magnitude and  rate of  decrease in  serum HCG levels of group A were  significantly larger than those of group B(P<0.05);After three,seven,and 14 day of surgery,serum HCG levels continued to decrease.Furthermore,the intraoperative bleeding volume,surgical time,hospitalization time,hospitalization expenses in group A were(15.35±14.53)mL,(60.73±53.05)min,(4.33±1.90)d,(6 689.23±2 216.19)yuan,respectively.That in group B were(26.09±29.24)mL,(51.59±54.46)min,(4.82±1.83)d,(6 270.34±2 547.85)yuan,respectively.Compared to group B,the intraoperative bleeding volume of group A was significantly lower(P<0.05),and the hospitalization time is shorter,while there was no significant difference in surgical time and hospitalization expenses.Conclusions  Both of hysteroscopic resection surgery and ultrasound-guided uterine aspiration can treat cesarean scar pregnancy effectively,but the former is superior to the latter in terms of the magnitude and rate of decrease in serum HCG levels after surgery,intraoperative bleeding volume,and hospitalization time,with no significant increase in surgical time and hospitalization expenses.
出版者信息








《广州医药》公众号