目的 探讨广州地区儿童2019新型冠状病毒(2019 novel coronavirus, 2019-nCoV)感染筛查/疑似病例的流行病学特点、发病特点、可能的原因及防控建议。方法 回顾性分析2020年1月20日—2020年2月29日广州市唯一一家儿童2019-nCoV感染隔离定点医疗单位隔离病房收治住院的符合儿童2019-nCoV感染筛查/疑似病例129例,对其流行病学、发病特点、临床特征、实验室检查及转归、随访等进行总结分析。 结果 男 79例,女 50例,最小1个月,最大13岁,中位数2岁,51例(39.5%)有武汉疫区旅游或居住史,20例(15.5%)有与来自疫区有呼吸道症状人员接触史,17例(13.1%)周边或社区有确诊病例,3例(2.3%)有确诊病人接触史(其中2例为家庭确诊病例密切接触史),38例(29.5%)为临床符合或聚集性发病;临床症状:发热121例(93.8%),咳嗽92例(71.3%),流涕50例(38.8%),32例伴有腹泻、呕吐/腹痛(24.8%),102例(79.0%)白细胞降低或正常,C反应蛋白(C-reactive protein,CRP)＜20 mg/L有103例(79.8%),57例(44.2%)胸片或CT示肺部斑片状影或实变;病原学检查:2019-nCoV实时荧光定量反转录PCR检测结果:所有患儿及陪同家属都有行咽拭子检查,只有21例患儿(16.3%)有行肛拭子检查,仅有1例(0.78%)家庭确诊病例密切接触者肛拭子阳性,但连续多次咽拭子结果阴性,余患者肛拭子和咽拭子及陪同家属咽拭子结果均阴性。其他病原学检查结果61例(47.3%),包括14例RSV阳性,9例流感病毒A,8例人偏肺病毒,6例肠道病毒,6例流感病毒B,6例肺炎支原体,4例副流感病毒1型,1例副流感病毒3型,2例人博卡病毒,3例腺病毒,1例肺炎克雷伯菌,1例人型葡萄球菌,其中1例合并副流感病毒1型及人博卡病毒。跟踪唯一1例确诊患者咽拭子多次检查均阴性,肛拭子持续19天后才转阴,一直无任何症状。其余患者好转出院后第3天、7天及14天进行随访,无异常发现。结论 儿童2019-nCoV感染筛查/疑似病例临床多表现为呼吸道或消化道症状,确诊主要依靠核酸检测,新冠病毒感染确诊率极低,而其将近50%病例能找到除新冠病毒外的其它相关病原体;高危患者为密切接触者,但存在漏诊的可能,肛拭子阳性率或高于咽拭子。

Objective To explore the epidemiological characteristics, onset characteristics, pathogenic mechanism of 2019-nCoV infection in children, and its control and prevention in Guangzhou. Methods From January 20, 2020 to February 29, 2020, a retrospective analysis was carried out on 129 suspected cases of 2019-nCoV infection admitted to the isolation ward of the only medical unit designated for children in Guangzhou. The epidemiology, disease characteristics, clinical characteristics, laboratory examination, outcome and follow-up were summarized and analyzed. Results There were 79 males and 50 females, with a minimum age of 1 month and a maximum age of 13 years. Anong them, 51 cases (39.5%) had a history of tourism or residence in the epidemic area of Wuhan, 20 cases (15.5%) had a history of contact with people with respiratory symptoms from the epidemic area, 17 cases (13.1%) with a confirmed case in the surrounding area or community, 3 cases (2.3%) had a history of contact with a confirmed patient (2 of them were family clustering cases), 38 cases (29.5%) were clinically suspected cases. Clinical symptoms: 121 cases with fever (93.8%), 92 cases with coughing (71.3%), 50 cases with runny nose (38.8%), 32 cases with diarrhea, vomiting or abdominal pain (24.8%). In 102 cases (79.0%), white blood cells were decreased or normal, 103 cases (79.8%) with CRP＜20 mg/L, and 57 cases (44.2%) showed focal infection on chest X-ray or CT scan. Etiological examination: only one case (0.78%) of the family confirmed cases had positive anal swab result, but the throat swab results were negative all the time. The anal swab and throat swab results of other patients and the throat swab results of their accompanying family members were negative. Other pathogens were detected in 61 cases (47.3%), including 14 RSV positive cases, 9 influenza A positive cases, 8 human metapneumovirus positive cases, 6 enterovirus positive cases, 6 influenza B positive cases, 6 Mycoplasma pneumoniae positive cases, 4 parainfluenza virus type 1 positive cases, 1 parainfluenza virus type 3 positive cases, 2 human bocavirus positive cases, 3 adenovirus positive cases, 1 Klebsiella pneumoniae positive cases, 1 Human Staphylococcus positive case, and 1 case with parainfluenza virus type 1 and human bocavirus. The only confirmed patient was followed up while multiple pharyngeal swab results were negative, and the positive anal swab results lasted for 19 days before turning negative and remained asymptomatic. Other patients were followed up on the 3rd, 7th and 14th day after discharge, and no abnormal findings were found. Conclusion Screening/suspected cases of 2019-nCoV infection in children were mostly clinically manifested as respiratory or gastrointestinal symptoms. The diagnosis rate of nucleic acids was extremely low, and there was a possibility of missed diagnosis. Nearly 50% of cases could find other relevant pathogens excluding the 2019-nCoV. The positive rate of anal swab results was higher than that of pharyngeal swab.

目的 本文主要对接受两种不同的甲氨蝶呤治疗方式与腹腔镜保守治疗输卵管妊娠患者治疗效果进行比较,了解不同治疗方案所具有的优势。方法 选择参与者为收治的输卵管妊娠患者200例(时间选择:2018年1月—2020年12月),以治疗方案进行分组(共2组,各100例)。对照组进行腹腔镜下输卵管线性切开术治疗,术中应用甲氨蝶呤治疗;研究组在术前进行甲氨蝶呤肌注,48小时后进行腹腔镜输卵管线性切开术治疗;比较治疗结果。结果 2组输卵管通畅率、术后持续异位妊娠率比较有差异,2组比对有统计学意义(P<0.05)。 2组手术指标(手术时长、术中出血量、β-hCG恢复至正常时间)比较有差异,2组比对有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 输卵管妊娠患者选择腹腔镜下输卵管线性切开术治疗时联合术前肌注甲氨蝶呤或术中应用甲氨蝶呤治疗,均可有助于输卵管妊娠症状的进一步缓解。但在此次治疗中患者术前接受甲氨蝶呤肌注+腹腔镜输卵管线性切开术联合治疗取得的疗效比常规的术中应用甲氨蝶呤更具有治疗优势,患者手术时长明显缩短,术中出血量明显降低,有效的避免反复电凝止血造成对输卵管造成的伤害,对输卵管功能进行有效保护,可推广。

目的 分析CT肺动脉栓塞指数(PAOI)与急性肺栓塞(APE)患者右心功能与预后的相关性。方法 以收治的86例疑似患者为研究对象,均行CT肺动脉成像(CTPA)检查,共60例APE患者,依据患者病情严重程度分为轻度、中度与重度,而无APE患者26例(对照组),分析左右心室最大短轴内径(RVd/LVd)、左右心室最大截面积比(RVA/LVA)、右心室短轴最大直径(RVMSA)、左心室短轴最大内径(LVMSA)、主肺动脉直径(MPAd)、上腔静脉直径(SVCd)、奇静脉直径(AZd)、动脉血氧分压(PaO₂)、动脉血二氧化碳分压(PaCO₂)以及动脉血氧饱和度(SaO₂)与PAOI的相关性,并分析患者预后情况。结果 经比较,中、重度患者RVd/LVd、RVA/LVA、RVMSA、MPAd与AZd水平高于轻度患者,而LVMSA低于轻度患者(P<0.05);且重度患者RVd/LVd、RVMSA水平高于中度,而RVA/LVA、LVMSA、MPAd与AZd水平比较无意义(P>0.05);3组SVCd水平比较P>0.05,其他参数指标比较差异明显(P<0.05);APE患者的PaO₂、PaCO₂以及SaO₂水平随着患者病情的加重呈现出逐渐下降趋势,且3组患者的PaO₂对比差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);PaO₂、PaCO₂和SaO₂与PAOI均呈负相关,且仅有PaO₂的差异存在统计学意义(P<0.05);POAI对APE患者的死亡有着一定的预测价值(P<0.05),最佳切点值58.91%,敏感度为85.29%,特异度为89.93%,其他数据未见明显诊断预测价值(P>0.05)。故RVd/LVd、RVA/LVA、RVMSA、MPAd与AZd水平与PAOI成正相关,而LVMSA水平与PAOI成负相关,与SCVd无关。结论 PAOI与APE患者的右心功能各参数以及动脉血气各参数均有密切关联性,可将其作为患者预后评估的有效指标。

目的 探讨急性胆囊炎患者术后胆管损伤发生的诊治及影响因素分析。方法 随机选取2019年3月—2020年6月经腹腔镜胆囊切除术后发生胆管损伤的86例急性胆囊炎患者作为观察组,另选同期腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗未发生胆管损伤的56例患者作为对照组,观察2组患者的影响因素将其进行对比分析。结果 2组患者病历资料中的胆囊壁厚度≥ 4 mm、Calot三角充血、Calot三角水肿经统计学分析有差异(P＜0.01);手术情况中比较发现,胆囊三角区的解剖变异、术中操作不当、术中经验不足情况,经统计学分析有差异(P＜0.05);胆囊壁厚度≥ 4 mm、Calot三角充血、Calot三角水肿、胆囊三角区的解剖变异、术中操作不当、术中经验不足均为急性胆囊炎术后胆管损伤的独立影响因素(P＜0.05)。结论 急性胆囊炎患者术后发生胆管损伤的影响因素较多,应制定精准化的手术方案,在最大程度上减少胆管损伤的发病率,从而确保手术的安全性。

目的 分析心力衰竭伴快速心房颤动(简称:心衰伴快速房颤)患者接受胺碘酮急诊抢救治疗的效果及对24 h心室率的影响。方法 将2017年1月—2020年12月急诊接诊且行西地兰治疗的60例心衰伴快速房颤患者作为对照组,将同期急诊接诊且行胺碘酮治疗的60例心衰伴快速房颤患者作为观察组,对组间心功能指标、炎症因子水平、心室率、临床疗效、药物不良反应展开分析。结果 ①组间心功能指标、炎症因子水平在治疗前无差异,P>0.05;观察组心功能指标、炎症因子水平在治疗后优于对照组,P<0.05;②组间心室率在治疗前无差异,P>0.05;观察组治疗后4 h、12 h、24 h心室率均低于对照组,P<0.05;③观察组5例无效(8.33%),对照组14例无效(23.33%),P<0.05;④观察组药物不良反应率(3.33%)与对照组药物不良反应率(5.00%)无差异,P>0.05。结论 在急诊抢救心衰伴快速房颤患者时采用胺碘酮,可以改善患者心功能、炎症反应、心室率,加之无明显不良反应,值得推广。

Objective To analyze the efficacy of emergency treatment with amiodarone and its influence on 24-hour ventricular rate in patients with heart failure and rapid atrial fibrillation. Methods From January 2017 to December 2020, 60 patients with heart failure and rapid atrial fibrillation who received emergency treatment and cedilanide treatment were selected as the control group, and 60 patients with heart failure and rapid atrial fibrillation who received emergency treatment and amiodarone treatment at the same period were selected as the observation group. Results ① There was no significant difference in cardiac function index and inflammatory factors level between the two groups before treatment, P>0.05.The cardiac function index and inflammatory factors level of the observation group were more improved than those of the control group after treatment, P<0.05. ② There was no significant difference in ventricular rate between the two groups before treatment, P>0.05.The ventricular rates of the observation group at 4 h, 12 h and 24 h after treatment were lower than those of the control group, P< 0.05. ③ Treatment for 5 cases (8.33%) in the observation group, 14 cases (23.33%) in the control group were ineffective, P<0.05. ④ There was no significant difference in the adverse drug reaction incidence between the observation group (3.33%) and the control group (5.00%), P>0.05. Conclusion Amiodarone could improve the cardiac function, inflammatory reaction and ventricular rate of patients with heart failure and rapid atrial fibrillation in emergency treatment, and there was no obvious adverse reaction, so it is worthy of promotion.

目的 探讨老年吸入性肺炎的危险因素,建立风险预测模型,以期降低老年吸入性肺炎的发病率。方法 选取2017年8月28日—2020年 10月30日广州市第一人民医院老年病科住院治疗的老年肺炎患者205例,按照是否发生吸入性肺炎分为吸入性肺炎组和非吸入性肺炎组,对比2组患者的各项指标,分析老年吸入性肺炎的危险因素,建立风险预测模型,采用ROC曲线对模型进行预测效果检验。结果 多因素Logistic回归分析结果显示,脑梗塞、帕金森、留置胃管、长期卧床为老年吸入性肺炎的危险因素(P<0.05)。模型公式为Logit(P)=-2.952+1.221X₂+2.417X₃+2.388X₈+1.683X₁₀。该模型ROC曲线下面积为0.894。结论 本研究中的模型预测效果良好,可为医护人员预测老年患者发生吸入性肺炎的概率,及时采取相应的预见性护理及干预性治疗。

Objective To explore the risk factors of aspiration pneumonia in the elderly and establish the risk prediction model, in order to reduce the incidence of aspiration pneumonia in the elderly. Methods A total of 205 elderly patients with pneumonia who were hospitalized in the department of geriatrics, Guangzhou First People's Hospital from August 28, 2017 to October 30, 2020, were divided into aspiration pneumonia group and non-aspiration pneumonia group according to whether aspiration pneumonia occurred. The indicators of the two groups of patients were compared, the risk factors of aspiration pneumonia in the elderly were analyzed, the risk prediction model was established, and the prediction effect of the model was tested by receiver operating characteristic curve. Results Multivariate Logistic regression analysis showed that cerebral infarction, Parkinson's disease, indwelling nasogastric tube, and being bedridden were risk factors for aspiration pneumonia in elderly patients (P<0.05). The model formula was Logit (P)=-2.952+1.221X₂+2.417X₃+2.388X₈+1.683X₁₀. The area under receiver operating characteristic curve of this model was 0.894. Conclusion The prediction effect of the model in this study was good, which could predict the probability of aspiration pneumonia in elderly patients for medical staff, and to timely take the corresponding predictive care and interventional treatment.

目的 探究2型糖尿病患者的肾糖阈(RTG)及相关因素。方法 本院对2014年12月—2018年9月466例2型糖尿病患者为研究对象,正常肾糖阀值为8.9～10 mmol/L,据此将患者分为高阀值组、中等阀值组以及低阀值组,不同组肾糖范围分别为RTG＞10 mmol/L、8.9 mmol/L≤RTG≤10 mmol/L、RTG＜8.9 mmol/L,以此对各组生化特征进行分析。结果 高阀值组与中等阀值组相比,RTG值、年龄、病程、空腹血糖(FPG)、体质量指数(BMI)、总胆固醇(TC)、血糖均值(MBG)、24 h血糖对比差异明显,P＜0.05。高阀值组与低阀值组相比,RTG值、性别、FPG、BMI、TC、MBG、糖化血红蛋白(HbA1C)对比有差异,P＜0.05。性别、年龄、BMI、HbA1C、TC以及低密度酶蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)与2型糖尿病相关,且呈正比关系,P＜0.05;通过多元线性回归分析发现,2型糖尿病的影响因素主要有BMI、HbA1C、LDL-C,数据具有统计学意义,P＜0.05。结论 较多2型糖尿病患者肾糖阀值较高,且肾糖阀值与HbA1C、LDL-C相关。

目的 对比分析电视胸腔镜手术与传统开胸手术在胸腺瘤治疗中的临床疗效。方法 将我院2018年11月—2020年11月间收治的92例胸腺瘤患者作为本次实验案例,根据随机双盲原则进行分组,其中对照组46例患者采用传统开胸手术治疗,观察组46例患者采用电视胸腔镜手术治疗,对于2组患者治疗中的临床疗效进行对比分析。结果 观察组术后的肺功能指标下降幅度小于对照组,且观察组的手术时间、胸管引流时间、下床活动时间、住院时间均短于对照组,出血量、引流量低于对照组,切口长度小于对照组,P＜0.05,组间指标数据存在统计学差异。结论 电视胸腔镜手术与传统开胸手术在胸腺瘤治疗中的临床疗效相比,前者具有明显的优势,创伤小、恢复快、对于患者肺功能的影响更小。

目的 使用金标免疫层析法检测儿童腹泻粪便标本,将其轮状病毒的结果进行分析汇总。方法 选取本院2020年1月—2021年1月收治的86例儿童腹泻者,根据金标免疫层析法的检测方式,将检测结果为阳性者的轮状病毒粪便标本进行回顾性分析。将86例阳性者的轮状病毒粪便标本送往我市疾控中心,采用逆转录-聚合酶链式反应(RT-PCR)进行检测,分析对比检测情况。结果 86例儿童腹泻感染经金标免疫检测为阳性者80例,阳性率为93.02%,同时将86例粪便标本送往本市疾控中心采用RT-PCR检测验证70例阳性,轮状病毒阳性率为81.39%,两种检测方法相比,金标免疫检测结果其准确度更高;80例阳性者中,1岁以下的婴幼儿为31例,占38.75%,较为多见,其次为1岁、2岁的儿童,各占23.75%、25.00%。季节性以秋季和冬季为轮状病毒的高发期,11-12月份36例,占45.00%,1-2月、9-10月18例、16例,占22.50%、20.00%;男女性别比中2组阳性率比较,经统计学分析无明显差异性(χ²=2.500,P＞0.05)。结论 轮状病毒多以5岁以下的婴幼儿为主,秋冬季节较为常见,采取金标免疫层析法的检测方式,来检测儿童的粪便标本,其操作简单,可快速准确地检测出轮状病毒,且该方法具有一定的临床诊断价值,值得推广应用。

目的 系统评价胰岛素联用α-葡萄糖苷酶抑制剂(AGIs)治疗成人1型糖尿病(T1DM)的疗效和安全性。方法 检索中英文数据库,纳入关于胰岛素联用AGIs治疗成人T1DM患者的随机或非随机对照试验。使用Review Manager 5.3软件进行Meta分析。结果 共纳入10项研究,616例患者。与安慰剂或空白对照相比,在有效性方面,胰岛素联合AGIs可改善成人T1DM患者的糖化血红蛋白;降低平均血糖、空腹血糖和餐后2小时血糖;改善血糖波动情况,包括平均血糖波动幅度和最大血糖波动幅度(均P<0.05)。在安全性方面,AGIs增加总不良反应发生的风险(P<0.05),其中主要是胃肠道不适,但未增加低血糖的发生率和发生次数(均P>0.05)。胰岛素联合AGIs减少了每日胰岛素总剂量(P<0.05),但对体重、甘油三酯和高密度脂蛋白胆固醇无显著影响(均P>0.05)。结论 胰岛素联合AGIs可降低成人T1DM患者的糖化血红蛋白,改善血糖水平和血糖波动情况。AGIs不会增加低血糖的风险,但需重视其不良反应,特别是胃肠道不良反应。

Objective To systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of adding alpha-glucosidase inhibitors (AGIs) to insulin therapy in adult patients with type 1 diabetes (T1DM). Methods Articles about randomized or non-randomized controlled trials of insulin combined with AGIs in adult patients with T1DM were retrieved from Chinese and English database. Meta-analyses were performed by using Review Manager 5.3. Results A total of 616 patients were included from 10 clinical trials. Compared with adding placebo or nothing, in terms of efficacy, the addition of AGIs resulted in decreased HbA1c, mean blood glucose, fasting plasma blood glucose and 2-hour postprandial blood glucose levels (all P<0.05). And this scheme improved the glucose variability including mean amplitude of glycemic excursions and the largest amplitude of glycemic excursions (P<0.05, respectively). As to safety, AGIs increased the risk of total adverse reactions (P<0.05), most of them were gastrointestinal complaints, while the occurrence and the frequency of hypoglycemia were similar (P>0.05, respectively). This scheme could also lead to the reduced total daily insulin dose (P<0.05) but had no significant effect on body weight, triglyceride or cholesterol concentration (P>0.05, respectively). Conclusions The addition of AGIs to insulin therapy in adult patients with T1DM may reduce HbA1c and improve the glucose levels and glucose variability. But total adverse effects especially the gastrointestinal complaints should also be considered in the use of AGIs although it does not increase the risk of hypoglycemia.