目的 探讨基于态度-定义-开放思维-计划-实施（ADOPT）模式的健康教育联合情绪引导对消化内镜诊疗患者配合度的影响。方法 选取2020年1月—2023年1月在我院准备行消化内镜诊疗的80例住院患者,随机分为观察组与对照组各40例。对照组患者在检查前采取常规护理,观察组患者在常规护理基础上增加基于ADOPT模式的健康教育联合情绪引导,在护理前后应用简明心境量表（POMS-SF）分别评估两组患者负面情绪、诊疗配合度、基础值（T₁）、入镜时（T₂）、检查开始后5 min（T₃）、检查结束时（T₄）的Ramsay镇静评分和舒适度评分,并对比两组患者的护理满意度。结果 护理后两组患者的困惑、活力、疲劳、抑郁、生气和紧张方面的POMS-SF评分降低,且观察组低于对照组（P<0.05）;观察组患者配合度为95.00%,高于对照组75.00%（P<0.05）;两组患者T1时间Ramsay镇静评分与舒适度评分比较差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）,观察组T₂、T₃、T₄时间Ramsay镇静评分高于对照组,舒适度评分优于对照组（P<0.05）;观察组患者的总满意度高于对照组（P<0.05）。结论 对消化内镜诊疗患者采取基于ADOPT模式的健康教育联合情绪引导可改善患者内镜诊疗过程前的负面情绪,提升患者配合度,同时能够改善患者诊疗过程中的镇静程度和舒适度,患者护理满意度较高。

Objective To explore the value of health education based on the ADOPT model combined with emotional guidance on the cooperation of patients undergoing digestive endoscopy diagnosis and treatment．Methods From January 2020 to January 2023,80 hospitalized patients who were going to have digestive endoscopy diagnosis and treatment in our hospital were selected as the research subjects．All patients were divided into observation group and control group,with 40 patients in each group．The control group patients received routine care before the examination,while the observation group patients added ADOPT based health education combined with emotional guidance on the basis of routine care．The Profile of Mood States-Short Form（POMS-SF）was used to evaluate the negative emotions of the two groups of patients before and after the examination．The diagnostic and treatment cooperation,basic value（T₁）,at the time of endoscopy（T₂）,and 5 minutes after the examination（T₃）,at the end of the examination（T₄）,the Ramsay sedation score and comfort score were compared between the two groups,and the nursing satisfaction of the two groups of patients was compared．Results After nursing,the POMS-SF scores of confusion,vitality,fatigue,depression,anger,and tension in the two groups of patients were significantly reduced,and the observation group was lower（P<0.05）．The cooperation rate of 95.00% in the observation group was significantly higher than that of 75.00% in the control group（P<0.05）．There was no significant difference in the Ramsay sedation score and comfort score between the two groups of patients at T₁ time（P>0.05）．The Ramsay sedation scores of the observation group at T₂,T₃,and T₄ time were higher,while the comfort score was lower（P<0.05）．The overall satisfaction of the observation group patients was higher（P<0.05）．Conclusions Adopting ADOPT based health education combined with emotional guidance for patients undergoing endoscopic diagnosis and treatment can improve their negative emotions before the endoscopic diagnosis and treatment process,enhance their cooperation level,and improve their level of sedation and comfort during the process．Patients have a high level of nursing satisfaction．

目的 探讨多学科整合护理路径联合手术室优质护理对下肢骨折的应用效果及对术后下肢静脉血栓发生率的影响。方法 选择2021年1月—2022年10月我院收治的70例下肢骨折患者,随机分为联合组与常规组,每组各35例。常规组患者实施常规护理,联合组患者实施多学科整合护理路径联合手术室优质护理,对比两组患者护理效果。结果 联合组患者首次下床活动时间、术后视觉模拟量表（VAS）评分低于常规组（P<0.05）,二者住院时间以及引流管拔除时间比较差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）;经过护理干预后,两组的凝血酶原时间（PT）、活化部分凝血活酶时间（APTT）均延长,血浆纤维蛋白原（FIB）降低,联合组优于常规组（P<0.05）,且联合组下肢静脉血栓发生率低于常规组（0% vs 17.14%,P<0.05）;联合组患者护理满意度更高（P<0.05）;术后1个月两组患者日常生活活动能力（ADL）评分、Fugl-Meyer评分均升高,联合组高于常规组（P<0.05）。结论 多学科整合护理路径联合手术室优质护理可改善下肢骨折患者围术期指标和血液高凝状态,降低患者下肢静脉血栓发生率,提升护理满意度及患者远期日常生活能力、肢体运动功能。

Objective To explore the application effect of multidisciplinary integrated nursing path combined with high-quality nursing in operating room on patients with lower limb fracture and the effect on postoperative lower limb venous thrombosis．Methods From January 2021 to October 2022,70 patients with lower limb fracture admitted to our hospital were randomly divided into combination group and conventional group,with 35 cases in each group．Patients in the conventional group received routine nursing,and patients in the combined group received multidisciplinary integrated nursing path combined with high-quality nursing in the operating room．The nursing effect of the two groups was compared．Results The first time of getting out of bed in the combined group was earlier and postoperative VAS score was lower than those in the conventional group（P<0.05）,and the length of hospital stay and drainage tube removal time were not significantly different between the two groups（P>0.05）．After nursing intervention,the prothrombin time（PT）and activated partial thromboplastin time（APTT）of the two groups were prolonged,and the plasma fibrinogen（FIB）decreased,and the change range of the combined group was greater（P<0.05）．The incidence of venous thrombosis in the combined group was significantly lower than that in the conventional group（0.00% vs 17.14%,P<0.05）．The nursing satisfaction of patients in combination group was higher（P<0.05）．The activities of daily living score and Fugl-Meyer score of both groups increased one month after surgery,and the combined group was higher than the conventional group（P<0.05）．Conclusions Multidisciplinary integrated nursing path combined with high-quality nursing in operating room can improve perioperative indicators and blood hypercoagulability of patients with lower limb fractures,reduce the incidence of lower limb venous thrombosis,improve nursing satisfaction,long-term daily living ability and limb motor function of patients．

目的 探讨头位分娩评分法在孕妇分娩过程中的应用价值。方法 选取2020年1月—2022年12月于郑州市妇幼保健院进行建档住院的4 000例待产分娩孕妇作为研究对象,所有孕妇在宫口已开时都给予头位分娩评分,观察与记录所有孕妇的分娩方式与头位分娩评分法状况,记录新生儿出生1 min与出生5 min的Apgar评分,记录所有孕妇的产后并发症发生情况。结果 在4 000例孕妇中,Apgar评分≤8分者156例、9~10分者894例、≥11分者2 950例。不同头位分娩评分法孕妇的年龄、孕周、孕次、产次对比差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。≤8分者的剖宫产率为100.0%,9~10分者、≥11分者分别为35.3%、5.7%,对比差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。≤8分者、9~10分者、≥11分者的新生儿出生1 min与出生5 min的Apgar评分对比差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。≤8分者、9~10分者、≥11分者的产后发热、产后出血、产后血肿、产后尿潴留等并发症发生率为分别为13.5%、2.0%、0.2%,对比差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。结论 头位分娩评分法在产科中处理头位分娩时具有指导价值,值得推广应用。

Objective To explore and analyze the application values of the head position delivery scoring method in the delivery process of 4 000 pregnant women．Methods Selected 4 000 cases of pregnant women as the study object,all pregnant women gave head delivery score,observed and recorded the delivery mode and head delivery scoring method,recorded the Apgar score of 1 min and 5 min,and recorded the occurrence of postpartum complications of all pregnant women．Results Among the 4 000 pregnant women,156 scored ≤8,894 scored 9-10,and 2 950 scored ≥11．There was no significant difference in the age,gestational age,pregnancy time and delivery status of pregnant women in different head delivery scoring methods（P>0.05）．The cesarean section of patients with ≤8 score was 100.0%,those with 9-10 score and those with ≥11 score were 35.3% and 5.7%,respectively,and there were significant differences（P<0.05）．There was no significant difference in Apgar score between newborns with ≤8 scores,9-10 scores and ≥11 scores at 1 min and 5 min after birth（P>0.05）．The incidence rates of puerperal fever,postpartum hemorrhage,postpartum hematoma and postpartum urinary retention were 13.5%,2.0% and 0.2% in patients with ≤8 score,9~10 score and ≥11 score,respectively,and there were significant differences（P<0.05）．Conclusions The head delivery scoring method has guiding value in handling head delivery in obstetrics and is worth promoting and applying．

目的 分析阿莫西林克拉维酸钾与第三代头孢类抗菌药联合应用于新生儿肺炎患儿的应用效果及其对患儿肠道菌群的影响。方法 选择在2021年2月—2022年11月期间于我院新生儿科接受相关治疗的100例新生儿肺炎患儿,依照简单随机化法将患儿分为研究组（n=50）及参照组（n=50）。给予参照组常规新生儿肺炎治疗,在此基础上给予研究组患者阿莫西林克拉维酸钾与第三代头孢类抗菌药的联合治疗。治疗结束后对比两组患儿的血清因子水平、肠道菌落情况、临床疗效以及不良反应发生情况。结果 治疗前,两组患儿的血清因子水平、肠道内菌群数量比较差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）,治疗后两组患儿的降钙素原（procalcitonin,PCT）、C-反应蛋白（C-reactive protein,CRP）、白细胞计数（white blood cell count,WBC）、肠球菌、肠杆菌、双歧杆菌以及乳酸杆菌水平均有改善（P<0.05）,其中研究组的PCT、CRP、WBC、肠球菌、双歧杆菌以及乳酸杆菌数量低于参照组,而研究组的肠杆菌数量高于参照组;同时研究组的临床有效率（94.00%）与参照组的临床有效率（86.00%）比较差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）;两组患儿的不良反应发生率比较差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）,但其中研究组腹泻的发生率高于参照组（P<0.05）。结论 在对新生儿肺炎患儿进行治疗时采取阿莫西林克拉维酸钾单纯治疗与阿莫西林克拉维酸钾+第三代头孢类抗菌药（头孢他啶）的临床疗效相当,联合用药虽能更为显著地减少患儿机体的细菌数量,改善血清因子水平,但更易发生腹泻的并发症,且为了减少耐药性,应适当采用单独用药。

Objective To analyze the application effect of amoxicillin clavulanate potassium combined with third-generation cephalosporin antibiotics in children with neonatal pneumonia and its impact on the intestinal microbiota．Methods From February 2021 to November 2022,100 newborns with pneumonia who received relevant treatment in the Department of Neonatology at the First People’s Hospital of Shangqiu City were randomly divided into a study group（n=50）and a reference group（n=50）using a simple randomization method．Routine treatment was provided for neonatal pneumonia in the reference group,and on this basis,a combination treatment of amoxicillin,clavulanate potassium,and third-generation cephalosporin antibiotics was applied on the study group patients．After treatment,the serum factor levels,intestinal colony status,clinical efficacy,and incidence of adverse reactions were compared between the two groups of children．Results Before treatment,there were no statistically significant differences in serum factor levels and intestinal microbiota between the two groups of children（P>0.05）．After treatment,the levels of procalcitonin（PCT）,C-reactive protein（CRP）,white blood cell count（WBC）,Enterococcus,Enterobacter,Bifidobacterium,and Lactobacillus in the two groups of children improved（P<0.05）,with the levels of PCT,CRP,WBC,the number of Enterococcus,Bifidobacterium,and Lactobacillus in the study group was lower than that in the reference group,while the number of Enterobacter in the study group was higher．There was no statistically significant difference（P>0.05）in the clinical response rate between the study group（94.00%）and the reference group（86.00%）．There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of adverse reactions between the two groups of children（P>0.05）,but the incidence of diarrhea in the study group was higher than that in the reference group（P<0.05）．Conclusions The clinical efficacy of amoxicillin clavulanate potassium alone and amoxicillin clavulanate potassium+third-generation cephalosporin antibiotics（ceftazidime）in the treatment of newborns with pneumonia is comparable．Although the combination therapy can significantly reduce the number of bacteria in the body of children and improve serum factor levels,it is more prone to complications of diarrhea．In order to reduce drug resistance,separate medication should be appropriately used．

目的 探讨积极综合护理措施对早期宫颈癌术后患者性功能、抑郁和主观幸福感的影响。方法 对我院收治的84例50岁以下宫颈癌患者的临床资料进行回顾性分析,将行常规护理的43例患者作为对照组、行综合护理的41例患者作为治疗组,治疗组除了常规护理内容,还采用幸福理论框架模型下（PERMA模型）的性健康管理多学科团队干预方案。分别在干预前、干预后3个月、干预后6个月采用女性性功能指数、抑郁自评量表评分和幸福感指数,对性功能指数、抑郁评分和幸福指数进行评估。结果 与对照组相比,治疗组干预3个月及6个月患者的性功能改善（F=91.08,P<0.001）。干预3个月及6个月后,治疗组抑郁评分低于对照组（F=1 092.59,P<0.001）,幸福感改善指数高于对照组（F=107.90,P<0.001）。Spearman相关分析结果显示,女性性功能指数同抑郁自评量表得分呈负相关（r_s=-0.918,P<0.001）,同幸福感指数得分呈正相关（r_s=0.844,P<0.001）。结论 综合护理在性功能、抑郁和主观幸福感方面均有明显改善。通过PERMA模式下性健康管理的多学科团队干预方案,可以提高患者的性生活质量,降低患者的抑郁程度,及改善患者的主观幸福感。

Objective To explore the effects of active and comprehensive care measures on sexual function,depression and subjective well-being of patients after early cervical cancer surgery．Methods The clinical data of 84 cervical cancer patients（under 50 years old）admitted to our hospital were retrospectively analyzed．There were 43 cases with conventional care in control group and 41 cases with comprehensive care group in treatment group．Besides the conventional care components,the comprehensive care group also adopted a multidisciplinary team intervention program for sexual health management under the framework model of well-being theory（PERMA model）．We used the female sexual function index,depression self-rating scale score and happiness index to assess the sexual function index,depression score and happiness index before,3 months and 6 months after the intervention,respectively．Results In comparison with the control group,the patients in the treatment group had a significant improvement in sexual function at 3 and 6 months of intervention（F=91.08,P<0.001）．After 3 and 6 months of intervention,the depression score was significantly lower in the comprehensive care group than in the control group（F=1 092.59,P<0.001）,and the happiness improvement index was significantly higher than in the control group（F=107.90,P<0.001）．Spearman’s correlation analysis showed that the female sexual function index was negatively correlated with the depression self-rating scale score（r_s=-0.918,P<0.001）and positively correlated with the well-being index（r_s=0.844,P<0.001）．Conclusions The comprehensive care group showed significant improvements in sexual function,depression,and subjective well-being．A multidisciplinary team intervention program for sexual health management under the PERMA model can improve the quality of patients’ sexual life,reduce their depression,and improve their subjective well-being．

目的 观察布托啡诺联合舒芬太尼镇痛方案在重症监护病房（ICU）机械通气患者中的效果及对血流动力学的影响。方法 采用前瞻性、随机对照研究,选取2021年3月—2023年3月商丘市第三人民医院ICU收治的118例机械通气患者,按1∶1随机分为观察组、对照组各59例。观察组采取布托啡诺联合舒芬太尼镇痛方案,对照组采取舒芬太尼镇痛方案。比较两组镇静、镇痛情况（镇静起效时间、停药后苏醒时间、机械通气时间、ICU住院时间、丙泊酚总用量）。以用药前（T0）、用药后6 h（T1）、12 h（T2）、24 h（T3）为时间节点,比较两组血流动力学指标[心率（HR）、平均动脉压（MAP）]。以用药后6 h（t1）、12 h（t2）、18 h（t3）、24 h（t4）为时间节点,比较两组Ricker镇静-躁动评分（SAS）、重症监护疼痛观察工具（CPOT）评分。比较两组不良反应发生情况。结果 用药后观察组镇静起效、停药后苏醒、机械通气、ICU住院时间均短于对照组,丙泊酚总用量少于对照组（P<0.05）;t1~t4时观察组CPOT评分均低于对照组,SAS评分均高于对照组（P<0.05）;T1、T2、T3时观察组HR、MAP波动幅度小于对照组（P<0.05）;观察组不良反应总发生率为10.17%,与对照组15.25%相比,差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。结论 布托啡诺、舒芬太尼联合治疗ICU机械通气患者,可有效增强镇静、镇痛效果,维持血流动力学稳定,且安全性较高,有利于促进患者病情转归。

Objective To observe the effect of butorphanol and sufentanil combined analgesia regimen in patients with mechanical ventilation in intensive care unit（ICU）and its influence on hemodynamics．Methods A prospective,randomized controlled study was carried out on 118 patients with mechanical ventilation in ICU from March 2021 to March 2023,and the enrolled patients were randomly divided into observation group and control group with 59 cases in each group．The observation group received butorphanol combined with sufentanil analgesia regimen,and the control group received sufentanil analgesia regimen．The conditions of sedation and analgesia（sedation onset time,recovery time after drug withdrawal,mechanical ventilation time,ICU stay length,total dosage of propofol）were compared between the two groups．The hemodynamic indexes [heart rate（HR）and mean arterial pressure（MAP）] of the two groups were compared before medication（T0）,6 h（T1）,12 h（T2）and 24 h（T3）after medication as time nodes．At 6 h（t1）,12 h（t2）,18 h（t3）,24 h（t4）after medication,Ricker Sedation-Agitation Scale（SAS）and Critical Care Pain Observation Tool（CPOT）score were compared between the two groups．The occurrence of adverse reactions was compared between the two groups．Results The onset of sedation,recovery after drug withdrawal,mechanical ventilation and ICU stay in the observation group were shorter than those in the control group,and the total dosage of propofol was lower than that in the control group（P<0.05）．At t1 to t4,CPOT score of observation group was lower than that of control group,and SAS score was higher than that of control group（P<0.05）．The fluctuation amplitude of HR and MAP in the observation group was smaller than that in the control group at T1,T2 and T3（P<0.05）．The total incidence of adverse reactions in the observation group was 10.17%,compared with 15.25% in the control group,the difference was not statistically significant（P>0.05）．Conclusions The combination of butorphanol and sufentanil in the treatment of patients with mechanical ventilation in ICU can effectively enhance sedation and analgesia,maintain hemodynamic stability,and have high safety,which is conducive to promote the outcome of the disease．

目的 探讨计划-实施-检查-处理（PDCA）循环法及根本原因分析法在持续正压通气治疗重症肺炎患儿中的应用效果。方法 选取2021年1月—2023年1月医院收治并接受鼻塞式持续正压通气治疗的重症肺炎患儿80例,基于随机数字表法分为两组,每组各40例。对照组接受常规护理,观察组采用PDCA循环法联合根本原因分析法护理干预。比较两组临床症状改善时间、血气指标[动脉血氧分压（PaO₂）、动脉血氧饱和度（SaO₂）、动脉血二氧化碳分压（PaCO₂）]、肺功能指标[第1秒用力呼气容积（FEV₁）、潮气量（VT）]、炎症免疫指标[单核细胞趋化蛋白-1（MCP-1）、可溶性髓系细胞触发受体-1（sTREM-1）、可溶性细胞间黏附分子-1（sICAM-1）]水平变化,比较两组患儿家属满意度情况。结果 观察组患儿咳嗽、气促、哮鸣音、心率恢复及紫绀等症状改善用时均低于对照组,比较差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。干预前,两组患儿PaO₂、SaO₂、PaCO₂、FEV₁、VT、MCP-1、sTREM-1、sICAM-1水平比较差异均无统计学意义（P>0.05）;干预后,两组患儿上述指标水平均有不同程度变化（P<0.05）,观察组PaO₂（97.18±7.90 mmHg vs 90.30±7.12 mmHg）、SaO₂（93.58±3.82% vs 86.30±4.21%）、FEV₁（2.66±0.46 L vs 1.97±0.34 L）、VT（11.92±1.89% vs 9.83±1.10%）水平均高于对照组,观察组PaCO₂（36.70±3.97 mmHg vs 40.65±3.79 mmHg）、MCP-1（58.45±11.94 ng/L vs 74.46±16.69 ng/L）、sTREM-1（36.25±8.30 ng/L vs 51.57±9.51 ng/L）、sICAM-1（187.52±31.22 mg/L vs 243.73±46.79 mg/L）水平低于对照组,差异均有统计学意义（P<0.05）。观察组患儿家属满意度整体优于对照组（P<0.05）;观察组总满意率（97.5% vs 77.5%）高于对照组,差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。结论 PDCA循环法及根本原因分析法应用于接受持续正压通气治疗的重症肺炎患儿,能够有效促进患儿临床症状改善,有利于血气及肺功能恢复,且可降低炎症反应,患儿家属满意度较高。

Objective To explore the application effect of Plan-Do-Check-Action（PDCA）circulation method and root cause analysis method in the treatment of children with severe pneumonia with continuous positive pressure ventilation．Methods From January 2021 to January 2023,80 children with severe pneumonia who were admitted to hospital and received nasal plug continuous positive pressure ventilation treatment were enrolled in this study．Based on the random number table method,they were divided into two groups,with 40 cases in each group．The control group received routine nursing,while the observation group received PDCA circulation method combined with root cause analysis nursing intervention．The improvement time of clinical symptoms,changes in blood gas indicators[arterial partial oxygen pressure（PaO₂）,arterial oxygen saturation（SaO₂）,arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide（PaCO₂）],lung function indicators [（forced expiratory volume in 1 second,FEV₁）,tidal volume（VT）],and inflammatory immune indicators [monocyte chemotactic protein-1（MCP-1）,soluble myeloid cell trigger receptor-1（sTREM-1）,soluble intercellular adhesion molecule-1（sICAM-1）] levels between the two groups were compared,and the family members’ satisfaction of the two groups was also compared．Results The improvement time for symptoms such as cough,shortness of breath,wheezing,heart rate recovery and cyanosis in the observation group was lower than that in the control group,and the difference was statistically significant（P<0.05）．Before intervention,there was no statistically significant difference in the levels of PaO₂,SaO₂,PaCO₂,FEV₁,VT,MCP-1,sTREM-1 and sICAM-1 between the two groups of children（P>0.05）．After intervention,the levels of the above indicators in both groups of children showed varying degrees of change（P<0.05）．The levels of PaO₂（97.18±7.90 mmHg vs 90.30±7.12 mmHg）,SaO₂（93.58±3.82% vs 86.30±4.21%）,FEV₁（2.66±0.46 L vs 1.97±0.34 L）,VT（11.92±1.89% vs 9.83±1.10%）in the observation group were higher than those in the control group．The levels of PaCO₂（36.70±3.97 mmHg vs 40.65±3.79 mmHg）,MCP-1（58.45±11.94 ng/L vs 74.46±16.69 ng/L）,sTREM-1（36.25±8.30 ng/L vs 51.57±9.51 ng/L）and sICAM-1（187.52±31.22 mg/L vs 243.73±46.79 mg/L）in the observation group were lower than those of the control group,with statistically significant differences（P<0.05）．The overall satisfaction of the observation group was better than that of the control group（P<0.05）,the total family members’ satisfaction rate of the observation group was higher than that of the control group（97.5% vs 77.5%）,with a statistically significant difference（P<0.05）．Conclusions PDCA circulation method and root cause analysis method applied to children with severe pneumonia who receive continuous positive pressure ventilation treatment,can effectively promote the improvement of clinical symptoms,be conducive to the recovery of blood gas and lung function,and reduce inflammatory reaction,with high family members’ satisfaction．

目的 观察利伐沙班对心力衰竭（HF）合并心房颤动（AF）患者凝血因子及预后情况的影响。方法 采用前瞻性研究,纳入平顶山市第二人民医院2021年1月—2022年4月期间收治的123例HF合并AF患者,以数字随机表法将入组患者分为常规组（61例）和试验组（62）例,两组均行起搏器植入术（CRTD）治疗,常规组予以常规抗凝治疗辅助CRTD,试验组予以利伐沙班辅助CRTD,所有患者术后均开展一年随访,比较两组患者治疗前后的抗Xa凝血因子、心肌损伤标志物、心功能指标变化情况,以及术后血栓栓塞、心血管死亡事件发生情况。结果 治疗前,两组患者的Xa凝血因子,心肌损伤标志物,心功能指标比较差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）;在不同抗凝方案下,观察组治疗1 d后的抗Xa凝血因子为（130.44±20.18）IU/mg,治疗3 d后的抗Xa凝血因子为（115.36±20.77）IU/mg,治疗7 d的抗Xa凝血因子为（90.25±20.44）IU/mg,均低于常规组[（145.33±20.19）IU/mg、（128.45±20.16）IU/mg、（103.34±20.17）IU/mg],差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。治疗后,试验组的肌酸激酶同工酶为（7.52±2.16）U/L,心肌肌钙蛋白Ⅰ为（0.52±0.12）ng/mL,乳酸脱氢酶为（126.41±20.45）U/L,均低于常规组[（8.44±2.28）U/L、（0.94±0.31）ng/mL、（140.33±20.25）U/L],差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。治疗后,观察组的左室射血分数为（56.12±10.41）%,高于常规组（50.24±10.33）%,左室舒张末期内径为（47.11±10.25）mm,左室舒张末期容积为（36.72±10.43）mL,均低于常规组（53.28±10.14）mm、（42.77±10.36）mL,差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。随访期间,试验组的血栓栓塞事件发生率为4.84%（3/62）,心血管死亡事件发生率为3.23%（2/62）,均低于常规组[19.67%（12/61）、14.75%（9/61）],差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。结论 利伐沙班辅助CRTD能有效增强HF合并AF患者的抗Xa凝血因子活性,对减轻心肌损伤、改善心功能并降低血栓栓塞或心血管死亡风险均有积极意义。

Objective To observe the effect of rivaroxaban on coagulation factors and prognosis in patients of heart failure（HF）with atrial fibrillation（AF）．Methods This is a prospective study．The patients were included from January 2021 to April 2022 in Pingdingshan Second People’s Hospital．The study subjects were 123 patients with HF and AF．The enrolled patients were divided into the conventional group（61 cases）and the experimental group（62 cases）by the method of digital random table．Both groups were treated with cardiac resynchronization therapy with defibrillator（CRTD）．The conventional group was treated with conventional anticoagulation therapy to assist CRTD,and the experimental group was treated with rivaroxaban to assist CRTD．All patients were followed up for one year after surgery,the changes in anti-Xa coagulation factors,myocardial injury markers,cardiac function indicators,as well as the incidence of postoperative thromboembolism and cardiovascular death events between the two groups of patients before and after treatment were compared．Results Before treatment,there were no statistically significant differences in Xa coagulation factor,myocardial injury markers and cardiac function indicators between the two groups of patients（P>0.05）．Under different anticoagulation regimens,the anti-Xa coagulation factor levels in the observation group were（130.44±20.18）IU/mg after 1 day of treatment,（115.36±20.77）IU/mg after 3 days of treatment,and（90.25±20.44）IU/mg after 7 days of treatment,which were lower than that in the conventional group [（145.33±20.19）IU/mg,（128.45±20.16）IU/mg,（103.34±20.17）IU/mg]（P<0.05）．After treatment,the CK-MB level of the experimental group was（7.52±2.16）U/L,cTnI was（0.52±0.12）ng/mL,and LDH was（126.41±20.45）U/L,which were lower than that of the conventional group [（8.44±2.28）U/L,（0.94±0.31）ng/mL,（140.33±20.25）U/L]（P<0.05）．After treatment,the left ventricular ejection fraction of the observation group was（56.12±10.41）%,which was higher than the conventional group（50.24±10.33）%,left ventricular diameter was（47.11±10.25）mm,left ventricular end disastolic volume was（36.72±10.43）mL,which were lower than the conventional group（53.28±10.14）mm,（42.77±10.36）mL（P<0.05）．During the follow-up period,the incidence of thromboembolism events in the experimental group was 4.84%（3/62）,and the incidence of cardiovascular death events was 3.23%（2/62）,which was lower than the conventional group [19.67%（12/61）,14.75%（9/61）]（P<0.05）．Conclusions Rivaroxaban assisted CRTD can effectively enhance the activity of anti-Xa coagulation factors in patients with HF and AF,which has positive significance in reducing myocardial injury,improving cardiac function and reducing the risk of thromboembolism or cardiovascular death．

目的 观察托烷司琼预处理配合丙泊酚全身麻醉对预防术后恶心呕吐（PONV）的应用价值。方法 采用前瞻性研究,纳入融通集团信阳154医院在2021年6月—2022年12月期间收治的接受腹腔镜手术治疗的122例患者,所有患者均实施含丙泊酚的全身麻醉辅助手术,采用随机数字表法对入组患者进行分组,分别列为预处理组（61例）和常规组（61例）,常规组术后予以常规止吐,预处理组采用托烷司琼预处理,比较两组患者术后6 h、术后12 h、术后24 h及术后48 h等不同时间点的PONV发生率、呕吐症状改善情况,麻醉苏醒后的疼痛、镇静情况,以及术后48 h内的麻醉相关不良反应发生情况。结果 预处理组术后6 h的PONV发生率为3.28%（2/61）,术后12 h的PONV发生率为4.92%（3/61）,术后24 h的PONV发生率为3.28%（2/61）,术后48 h的PONV发生率为0.00%（0/61）,均低于常规组[16.39%（10/61）、18.03%（11/61）、16.39%（10/61）、13.11%（8/61）],差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。预处理组术后6 h的恶心呕吐干呕症状评估量表（INVR）评分为（20.15±5.41）分,术后12 h的INVR评分为（17.66±4.42）分,术后24 h的INVR评分为（13.29±4.17）分,术后48 h的INVR评分为（10.22±3.35）分,均低于常规组[（23.32±5.13）分、（20.12±4.35）分、（16.33±4.24）分、（12.75±3.06）分],差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。预处理组苏醒后的视觉模拟疼痛量表（VAS）评分为（4.04±1.06）分,Ramsay镇静评分为（3.11±0.25）分,与常规组[（3.87±0.25）分、（3.06±0.35）分]比较差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。术后48 h内,预处理组的麻醉相关不良反应发生率为9.84%（6/61）,与常规组8.20%（5/61）比较差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。结论 托烷司琼预处理辅助含丙泊酚腔镜全身麻醉腹手术可有效降低PONV发生风险并改善患者PONV相关症状,联合应用此药未对麻醉镇静、镇痛效果产生明显影响,且未明显增加术后麻醉相关不良反应发生风险,安全性较高。

Objective To observe the application value of tropisetron preconditioning combined with propofol general anesthesia in the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting（PONV）．Methods This is a prospective cohort study．The patients were included from June 2021 to December 2022．The subjects of the study were 122 patients who received laparoscopy．All patients received general anesthesia assisted surgery containing propofol．The enrolled patients were divided into preconditioning group（61 cases）and conventional group（61 cases）by random number table．The conventional group was given routine antiemesis after surgery,and the preconditioning group was given tropisetron preconditioning．The incidence of PONV,improvement of vomiting symptoms,pain and sedation after anesthesia awakening,and occurrence of anesthesia related adverse reactions within 48 hours after surgery were compared between two groups of patients at different time points,including 6 hours,12 hours,24 hours,and 48 hours after surgery．Results Under different treatment regimens,the PONV incidence rates in the preconditioning group were 3.28%（2/61）after 6 hours,4.92%（3/61）after 12 hours,3.28%（2/61）after 24 hours,and 0.00%（0/61）after 48 hours．Compared with the conventional group [16.39%（10/61）,18.03%（11/61）,16.39%（10/61）,and 13.11%（8/61）],the incidence rates were lower（P<0.05）．The preconditioning group had an Index of Nausea and Vomiting and Retching（INVR）score of（20.15±5.41）points after 6 hours,（17.66±4.42）points after 12 hours,（13.29±4.17）points after 24 hours,and（10.22±3.35）points after 48 hours．Compared with（23.32±5.13）points,（20.12±4.35）points,（16.33±4.24）points,and（12.75±3.06）points）of the preconditioning group ,the INVR score at each time point was lower（P<0.05）．Under different treatment regimens,the VAS score of the preconditioning group after awakening was（4.04±1.06）points,and the Ramsay score was（3.11±0.25）points,which was similar to the conventional group [（3.87±0.25）points,（3.06±0.35）points]（P>0.05）．Within 48 hours after surgery,the incidence of anesthesia related adverse reactions in the preconditioning group was 9.84%（6/61）,which was similar to 8.20%（5/61）in the conventional group（P>0.05）．Conclusions Tropisetron preconditioning assisted laparoscopy under general anesthesia with propofol can effectively reduce the risk of PONV and improve the PONV related symptoms of patients．The combined use of this drug has no significant impact on the sedation and analgesia effects of anesthesia,and does not significantly increase the risk of postoperative anesthesia related adverse reactions,with high safety．

目的 探讨全身麻醉（全麻）髋关节置换术后苏醒期患者家属迁移应激水平及其相关影响因素。方法 选取2021年4月—2022年10月在南昌市洪都中医院行全麻髋关节置换术苏醒期的108例患者,使用ICU转出患者家属应激压力评估量表评价患者家属迁移应激水平,调查患者及家属相关资料,分析全麻髋关节置换术后苏醒期患者家属迁移应激水平的相关影响因素。结果 108例全麻髋关节置换术后苏醒期患者家属迁移应激得分为（56.35±5.86）分,家属迁移应激水平中等;经多元线性回归分析显示,患者麻醉重症监护室（AICU）住院时间≥24 h、女性、文化水平初中及以下、消极应对是全麻髋关节置换术后苏醒期患者家属迁移应激水平升高的危险因素（P<0.05）。结论 全麻髋关节置换术后苏醒期患者家属迁移应激水平中等,受患者AICU住院时间、家属性别、文化水平、应对方式因素影响。

Objective To analyze the levels of relocation anxiety and its related influencing factors in the family members of patients during the recovery period after hip arthroplasty under general anesthesia．Methods From April 2021 to October 2022,108 patients in Nanchang Hongdu Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital undergoing total hip arthroplasty under general anesthesia were selected．The levels of relocation anxiety in their families were evaluated using the ICU transferred out patient family stress assessment scale,and the relevant data of the patients and their families were investigated．The relevant factors affecting the levels of relocation anxiety in their families during the recovery period after total hip arthroplasty under general anesthesia were analyzed．Results The relocation anxiety score of 108 patients’ family members during the recovery period after hip arthroplasty under general anesthesia was（56.35±5.86）,with a moderate level．Multiple linear regression analysis showed that patients’ AICU hospitalization time≥24 hours,women,education level of junior high school or below and negative coping were the influencing factors for the level of relocation anxiety of family members of patients during the recovery period after hip replacement under general anesthesia（P<0.05）．Conclusions The level of relocation anxiety in family members of patients undergoing general anesthesia and hip arthroplasty during the recovery period is moderate,which is influenced by factors such as length of patients’ stay in AICU,family members’ gender,educational level and coping styles．