目的 探讨将 Root Cause Analysis（RCA）质量管理模式与心理资本理论相结合应用于手术核查团队，对改善沟通中断、提升沟通执行质量与团队协作能力的效果。方法 选取 2025年 1 月至 2025 年12 月某三级医院手术室手术团队成员 80 名，按手术间编号分为对照组与实验组，各 40 名。对照组实施常规手术核查流程；实验组在此基础上实施基于 RCA 的流程诊断与基于心理资本理论的综合沟通能力提升干预。干预结束后，比较两组沟通中断发生率、核查流程执行质量、沟通效率，以及心理资本量表（PCQ-24）和团队协作量表（T-TPQ）得分。结果 实验组沟通中断发生率显著低于对照组（P＜0.05），核查流程执行质量和沟通效率均显著优于对照组（P＜0.001）。实验组 PCQ-24 各维度及总分、T-TPQ 各维度及总分均显著高于对照组（均 P＜0.001）。结论 将 RCA 流程分析与心理资本理论干预相结合，可通过流程规范化与心理动力增强双路径同步改善手术团队沟通质量与协作水平，具有良好的临床应用价值与推广潜力。

Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of an intervention combining Root Cause Analysis (RCA)–based quality management and Psychological Capital (PsyCap) theory in reducing communication interruptions and improving communication quality and teamwork in surgical safety check teams. Methods: Eighty surgical team members from a tertiary hospital (January 2025 - December 2025.) were assigned to a control group or an intervention group according to operating room allocation (40 per group). The control group followed routine surgical safety check procedures, whereas the intervention group additionally received an RCA-guided workflow analysis and a PsyCap-based communication enhancement program. Post-intervention outcomes included communication interruption rate, execution quality and efficiency of safety checks, Psychological Capital Questionnaire (PCQ-24) scores, and TeamSTEPPS Teamwork Perceptions Questionnaire (T-TPQ) scores. Results: The intervention group demonstrated a significantly lower communication interruption rate compared with the control group (P＜0.05). Execution quality and communication efficiency were significantly improved in the intervention group (P＜0.001). PCQ-24 total and subscale scores were significantly higher in the intervention group than in the control group (P＜0.001), as were T-TPQ total and subscale scores (P＜0.001). Conclusion: Integrating RCA-based workflow optimization with PsyCap-oriented psychological and behavioral training can effectively enhance communication quality, reduce interruptions, and strengthen teamwork in surgical safety check teams. The combined model has strong applicability and potential for wider clinical promotion.

目的 探讨将 Root Cause Analysis（RCA）质量管理模式与心理资本理论相结合应用于手术核查团队，对改善沟通中断、提升沟通执行质量与团队协作能力的效果。方法 选取 2025年 1 月至 2025 年12 月某三级医院手术室手术团队成员 80 名，按手术间编号分为对照组与实验组，各 40 名。对照组实施常规手术核查流程；实验组在此基础上实施基于 RCA 的流程诊断与基于心理资本理论的综合沟通能力提升干预。干预结束后，比较两组沟通中断发生率、核查流程执行质量、沟通效率，以及心理资本量表（PCQ-24）和团队协作量表（T-TPQ）得分。结果 实验组沟通中断发生率显著低于对照组（P＜0.05），核查流程执行质量和沟通效率均显著优于对照组（P＜0.001）。实验组 PCQ-24 各维度及总分、T-TPQ 各维度及总分均显著高于对照组（均 P＜0.001）。结论 将 RCA 流程分析与心理资本理论干预相结合，可通过流程规范化与心理动力增强双路径同步改善手术团队沟通质量与协作水平，具有良好的临床应用价值与推广潜力。

Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of an intervention combining Root Cause Analysis (RCA)–based quality management and Psychological Capital (PsyCap) theory in reducing communication interruptions and improving communication quality and teamwork in surgical safety check teams. Methods: Eighty surgical team members from a tertiary hospital (January 2025 - December 2025.) were assigned to a control group or an intervention group according to operating room allocation (40 per group). The control group followed routine surgical safety check procedures, whereas the intervention group additionally received an RCA-guided workflow analysis and a PsyCap-based communication enhancement program. Post-intervention outcomes included communication interruption rate, execution quality and efficiency of safety checks, Psychological Capital Questionnaire (PCQ-24) scores, and TeamSTEPPS Teamwork Perceptions Questionnaire (T-TPQ) scores. Results: The intervention group demonstrated a significantly lower communication interruption rate compared with the control group (P＜0.05). Execution quality and communication efficiency were significantly improved in the intervention group (P＜0.001). PCQ-24 total and subscale scores were significantly higher in the intervention group than in the control group (P＜0.001), as were T-TPQ total and subscale scores (P＜0.001). Conclusion: Integrating RCA-based workflow optimization with PsyCap-oriented psychological and behavioral training can effectively enhance communication quality, reduce interruptions, and strengthen teamwork in surgical safety check teams. The combined model has strong applicability and potential for wider clinical promotion.

目的 探讨将 Root Cause Analysis（RCA）质量管理模式与心理资本理论相结合应用于手术核查团队，对改善沟通中断、提升沟通执行质量与团队协作能力的效果。方法 选取 2025年 1 月至 2025 年12 月某三级医院手术室手术团队成员 80 名，按手术间编号分为对照组与实验组，各 40 名。对照组实施常规手术核查流程；实验组在此基础上实施基于 RCA 的流程诊断与基于心理资本理论的综合沟通能力提升干预。干预结束后，比较两组沟通中断发生率、核查流程执行质量、沟通效率，以及心理资本量表（PCQ-24）和团队协作量表（T-TPQ）得分。结果 实验组沟通中断发生率显著低于对照组（P＜0.05），核查流程执行质量和沟通效率均显著优于对照组（P＜0.001）。实验组 PCQ-24 各维度及总分、T-TPQ 各维度及总分均显著高于对照组（均 P＜0.001）。结论 将 RCA 流程分析与心理资本理论干预相结合，可通过流程规范化与心理动力增强双路径同步改善手术团队沟通质量与协作水平，具有良好的临床应用价值与推广潜力。

Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of an intervention combining Root Cause Analysis (RCA)–based quality management and Psychological Capital (PsyCap) theory in reducing communication interruptions and improving communication quality and teamwork in surgical safety check teams. Methods: Eighty surgical team members from a tertiary hospital (January 2025 - December 2025.) were assigned to a control group or an intervention group according to operating room allocation (40 per group). The control group followed routine surgical safety check procedures, whereas the intervention group additionally received an RCA-guided workflow analysis and a PsyCap-based communication enhancement program. Post-intervention outcomes included communication interruption rate, execution quality and efficiency of safety checks, Psychological Capital Questionnaire (PCQ-24) scores, and TeamSTEPPS Teamwork Perceptions Questionnaire (T-TPQ) scores. Results: The intervention group demonstrated a significantly lower communication interruption rate compared with the control group (P＜0.05). Execution quality and communication efficiency were significantly improved in the intervention group (P＜0.001). PCQ-24 total and subscale scores were significantly higher in the intervention group than in the control group (P＜0.001), as were T-TPQ total and subscale scores (P＜0.001). Conclusion: Integrating RCA-based workflow optimization with PsyCap-oriented psychological and behavioral training can effectively enhance communication quality, reduce interruptions, and strengthen teamwork in surgical safety check teams. The combined model has strong applicability and potential for wider clinical promotion.

目的 探讨将 Root Cause Analysis（RCA）质量管理模式与心理资本理论相结合应用于手术核查团队，对改善沟通中断、提升沟通执行质量与团队协作能力的效果。方法 选取 2025年 1 月至 2025 年12 月某三级医院手术室手术团队成员 80 名，按手术间编号分为对照组与实验组，各 40 名。对照组实施常规手术核查流程；实验组在此基础上实施基于 RCA 的流程诊断与基于心理资本理论的综合沟通能力提升干预。干预结束后，比较两组沟通中断发生率、核查流程执行质量、沟通效率，以及心理资本量表（PCQ-24）和团队协作量表（T-TPQ）得分。结果 实验组沟通中断发生率显著低于对照组（P＜0.05），核查流程执行质量和沟通效率均显著优于对照组（P＜0.001）。实验组 PCQ-24 各维度及总分、T-TPQ 各维度及总分均显著高于对照组（均 P＜0.001）。结论 将 RCA 流程分析与心理资本理论干预相结合，可通过流程规范化与心理动力增强双路径同步改善手术团队沟通质量与协作水平，具有良好的临床应用价值与推广潜力。

目的 探讨将 Root Cause Analysis（RCA）质量管理模式与心理资本理论相结合应用于手术核查团队，对改善沟通中断、提升沟通执行质量与团队协作能力的效果。方法 选取 2025年 1 月至 2025 年12 月某三级医院手术室手术团队成员 80 名，按手术间编号分为对照组与实验组，各 40 名。对照组实施常规手术核查流程；实验组在此基础上实施基于 RCA 的流程诊断与基于心理资本理论的综合沟通能力提升干预。干预结束后，比较两组沟通中断发生率、核查流程执行质量、沟通效率，以及心理资本量表（PCQ-24）和团队协作量表（T-TPQ）得分。结果 实验组沟通中断发生率显著低于对照组（P＜0.05），核查流程执行质量和沟通效率均显著优于对照组（P＜0.001）。实验组 PCQ-24 各维度及总分、T-TPQ 各维度及总分均显著高于对照组（均 P＜0.001）。结论 将 RCA 流程分析与心理资本理论干预相结合，可通过流程规范化与心理动力增强双路径同步改善手术团队沟通质量与协作水平，具有良好的临床应用价值与推广潜力。

Operating Room, Qidong People's Hospital, Jiangsu Province, Qidong 226200, Jiangsu, China Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of an intervention combining Root Cause Analysis (RCA)–based quality management and Psychological Capital (PsyCap) theory in reducing communication interruptions and improving communication quality and teamwork in surgical safety check teams. Methods: Eighty surgical team members from a tertiary hospital (January 2025 - December 2025.) were assigned to a control group or an intervention group according to operating room allocation (40 per group). The control group followed routine surgical safety check procedures, whereas the intervention group additionally received an RCA-guided workflow analysis and a PsyCap-based communication enhancement program. Post-intervention outcomes included communication interruption rate, execution quality and efficiency of safety checks, Psychological Capital Questionnaire (PCQ-24) scores, and TeamSTEPPS Teamwork Perceptions Questionnaire (T-TPQ) scores. Results: The intervention group demonstrated a significantly lower communication interruption rate compared with the control group (P＜0.05). Execution quality and communication efficiency were significantly improved in the intervention group (P＜0.001). PCQ-24 total and subscale scores were significantly higher in the intervention group than in the control group (P＜0.001), as were T-TPQ total and subscale scores (P＜0.001). Conclusion: Integrating RCA-based workflow optimization with PsyCap-oriented psychological and behavioral training can effectively enhance communication quality, reduce interruptions, and strengthen teamwork in surgical safety check teams. The combined model has strong applicability and potential for wider clinical promotion.

目的 探讨将 Root Cause Analysis（RCA）质量管理模式与心理资本理论相结合应用于手术核查团队，对改善沟通中断、提升沟通执行质量与团队协作能力的效果。方法 选取 2025年 1 月至 2025 年12 月某三级医院手术室手术团队成员 80 名，按手术间编号分为对照组与实验组，各 40 名。对照组实施常规手术核查流程；实验组在此基础上实施基于 RCA 的流程诊断与基于心理资本理论的综合沟通能力提升干预。干预结束后，比较两组沟通中断发生率、核查流程执行质量、沟通效率，以及心理资本量表（PCQ-24）和团队协作量表（T-TPQ）得分。结果 实验组沟通中断发生率显著低于对照组（P＜0.05），核查流程执行质量和沟通效率均显著优于对照组（P＜0.001）。实验组 PCQ-24 各维度及总分、T-TPQ 各维度及总分均显著高于对照组（均 P＜0.001）。结论 将 RCA 流程分析与心理资本理论干预相结合，可通过流程规范化与心理动力增强双路径同步改善手术团队沟通质量与协作水平，具有良好的临床应用价值与推广潜力。

目的 探讨将 Root Cause Analysis（RCA）质量管理模式与心理资本理论相结合应用于手术核查团队，对改善沟通中断、提升沟通执行质量与团队协作能力的效果。方法 选取 2025年 1 月至 2025 年12 月某三级医院手术室手术团队成员 80 名，按手术间编号分为对照组与实验组，各 40 名。对照组实施常规手术核查流程；实验组在此基础上实施基于 RCA 的流程诊断与基于心理资本理论的综合沟通能力提升干预。干预结束后，比较两组沟通中断发生率、核查流程执行质量、沟通效率，以及心理资本量表（PCQ-24）和团队协作量表（T-TPQ）得分。结果 实验组沟通中断发生率显著低于对照组（P＜0.05），核查流程执行质量和沟通效率均显著优于对照组（P＜0.001）。实验组 PCQ-24 各维度及总分、T-TPQ 各维度及总分均显著高于对照组（均 P＜0.001）。结论 将 RCA 流程分析与心理资本理论干预相结合，可通过流程规范化与心理动力增强双路径同步改善手术团队沟通质量与协作水平，具有良好的临床应用价值与推广潜力。

目的 探讨子午流注穴位按摩联合颈椎功能康复训练对神经根型颈椎病（CSR）患者的康复效果。方法 以2023年1月-2025年6月我院收治的CSR患者（154例）为研究对象进行回顾性分析，根据干预方案分为参照组（77例，采取颈椎功能康复训练）、研究组（77例，采取子午流注穴位按摩联合颈椎功能康复训练）。比较两组临床疗效、复发率及干预前、后中医证候积分、疼痛视觉模拟评分（VAS）与颈椎功能障碍指数量表评分（NDI）、颈椎功能活动度、血液流变学指标［血浆黏度（PV）、全血低切黏度（LSWBV）、纤维蛋白原（FIB）、全血高切黏度（HSWBV）］。结果 与参照组总有效率（83.12%）相比，研究组（96.10%）明显升高（P＜0.05）；研究组干预后各中医证候积分均较参照组低（P＜0.05）；干预后，研究组VAS、NDI评分均低于参照组（P＜0.05）；研究组干预后颈椎活动度高于参照组（P＜0.05）；干预后，研究组LSWBV、PV、FIB、HSWBV水平均较参照组低（P＜0.05）；研究组干预后3个月复发率为2.72%（2/74），低于参照组的14.06%（9/64）（χ2=4.588，P＜0.05）。结论 子午流注穴位按摩联合颈椎功能康复训练可提高CSR患者康复效果，改善临床症状、颈椎功能、颈椎活动度，调节血液流变学，降低颈椎疼痛程度、复发率。

Objective To explore the rehabilitation efficacy of midnight-noon ebb-flow acupoint massage combined with cervical function rehabilitation training on patients with cervical spondylotic radiculopathy (CSR). Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on CSR patients (154 cases) admitted to our hospital from January 2023 to June 2025, who were selected as the research subjects. According to the intervention plan, they were divided into reference group (77 cases, received cervical functional rehabilitation training) and study group (77 cases, received midnight-noon ebb-flow acupoint massage combined with cervical functional rehabilitation training). The clinical efficacy and recurrence rate were compared between the two groups, as well as the TCM syndrome scores, pain visual analogue score (VAS) and cervical dysfunction index score (NDI) scores, cervical spine function activity, hemorheology indexes [plasma viscosity (PV), whole blood low shear viscosity (LSWBV), fibrinogen (FIB), whole blood high shear viscosity (HSWBV)] before and after intervention. Results Compared with the total effective rate of the reference group (83.12%), the study group (96.10%) was significantly higher (P<0.05); after intervention, the scores of all?TCM syndromes in the study group were lower than those in the reference group (P<0.05), after intervention, the VAS and NDI scores of the study group were lower than those in the reference group (P<0.05); the cervical spine activity of the study group was higher than that of the reference group after intervention (P<0.05); after intervention, the levels of LSWBV, PV, FIB and HSWBV in the study group were lower than those in the reference group (P<0.05); the recurrence rate of the study group at 3 months after intervention was 2.72% (2/74), which was lower than 14.06% (9/64) in the reference group (χ2=4.588, P<0.05). Conclusion Midnight-noon ebb-flow acupoint massage combined with cervical function rehabilitation training can improve the rehabilitation efficacy of CSR patients, improve clinical symptoms, cervical function, cervical mobility, regulate hemorheology, and reduce cervical pain and recurrence rate.

目的 探讨子午流注穴位按摩联合颈椎功能康复训练对神经根型颈椎病（CSR）患者的康复效果。方法 以2023年1月-2025年6月我院收治的CSR患者（154例）为研究对象进行回顾性分析，根据干预方案分为参照组（77例，采取颈椎功能康复训练）、研究组（77例，采取子午流注穴位按摩联合颈椎功能康复训练）。比较两组临床疗效、复发率及干预前、后中医证候积分、疼痛视觉模拟评分（VAS）与颈椎功能障碍指数量表评分（NDI）、颈椎功能活动度、血液流变学指标［血浆黏度（PV）、全血低切黏度（LSWBV）、纤维蛋白原（FIB）、全血高切黏度（HSWBV）］。结果 与参照组总有效率（83.12%）相比，研究组（96.10%）明显升高（P＜0.05）；研究组干预后各中医证候积分均较参照组低（P＜0.05）；干预后，研究组VAS、NDI评分均低于参照组（P＜0.05）；研究组干预后颈椎活动度高于参照组（P＜0.05）；干预后，研究组LSWBV、PV、FIB、HSWBV水平均较参照组低（P＜0.05）；研究组干预后3个月复发率为2.72%（2/74），低于参照组的14.06%（9/64）（χ2=4.588，P＜0.05）。结论 子午流注穴位按摩联合颈椎功能康复训练可提高CSR患者康复效果，改善临床症状、颈椎功能、颈椎活动度，调节血液流变学，降低颈椎疼痛程度、复发率。

Objective To explore the rehabilitation efficacy of midnight-noon ebb-flow acupoint massage combined with cervical function rehabilitation training on patients with cervical spondylotic radiculopathy (CSR). Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on CSR patients (154 cases) admitted to our hospital from January 2023 to June 2025, who were selected as the research subjects. According to the intervention plan, they were divided into reference group (77 cases, received cervical functional rehabilitation training) and study group (77 cases, received midnight-noon ebb-flow acupoint massage combined with cervical functional rehabilitation training). The clinical efficacy and recurrence rate were compared between the two groups, as well as the TCM syndrome scores, pain visual analogue score (VAS) and cervical dysfunction index score (NDI) scores, cervical spine function activity, hemorheology indexes [plasma viscosity (PV), whole blood low shear viscosity (LSWBV), fibrinogen (FIB), whole blood high shear viscosity (HSWBV)] before and after intervention. Results Compared with the total effective rate of the reference group (83.12%), the study group (96.10%) was significantly higher (P<0.05); after intervention, the scores of all?TCM syndromes in the study group were lower than those in the reference group (P<0.05), after intervention, the VAS and NDI scores of the study group were lower than those in the reference group (P<0.05); the cervical spine activity of the study group was higher than that of the reference group after intervention (P<0.05); after intervention, the levels of LSWBV, PV, FIB and HSWBV in the study group were lower than those in the reference group (P<0.05); the recurrence rate of the study group at 3 months after intervention was 2.72% (2/74), which was lower than 14.06% (9/64) in the reference group (χ2=4.588, P<0.05). Conclusion Midnight-noon ebb-flow acupoint massage combined with cervical function rehabilitation training can improve the rehabilitation efficacy of CSR patients, improve clinical symptoms, cervical function, cervical mobility, regulate hemorheology, and reduce cervical pain and recurrence rate.

目的：分析血脑屏障标志物闭合蛋白（Occludin，OCLN）、密封蛋白-5（Claudin-5，CLDN5）与帕金森病（PD）患者神经功能损伤程度及不良预后的关联。方法：研究对象选择2024年6月~2025年6月就诊于我院的180例PD患者，及同期接受检查的180例健康志愿者，将其分别列为病例组、对照组，比较两组OCLN、CLDN5间差异。依据病情严重程度不同，将PD患者分别列为早期组（50例）、中期组（65例）和晚期组（65例），比较三组患者OCLN、CLDN5，神经损伤标志物间差异，分析晚期组患者OCLN、CLDN5与神经损伤标志物的相关性。统计入组患者不良预后发生情况，比较不同预后患者OCLN、CLDN5及神经损伤标志物间差异，分析PD患者预后影响因素，验证OCLN、CLDN5对PD患者不良预后的预测效能。结果：病例组的外周血OCLN、CLDN5均高于对照组（t=50.450，51.670；P＜0.05）。晚期组外周血OCLN、CLDN5、神经元特异性烯醇化酶（NSE）、泛素羧基末端水解酶L1（UCH-L1）、神经丝轻链蛋白（NfL）、胶质纤维酸性蛋白（GFAP）均高于中期组、早期组（F=280.611，378.453，82.254，122.413，185.272，257.733；P＜0.05）。晚期组的OCLN、CLDN5均与NSE、UCH-L1、NfL、GFAP正相关（r=0.411，0.457，0.505，0.494，0.465，0.425，0.491，0.503；P＜0.05）。180例PD患者的不良预后发生率为28.89%（52/180）。预后不良组的外周血OCLN、CLDN5、NSE、UCH-L1、NfL、GFAP均高于预后良好组（t=17.096，14.405，7.632，6.903，11.695，10.702；P＜0.05）。Logistic多因素回归分析结果显示，外周血OCLN、CLDN5、NfL、GFAP高表达为PD患者发生不良预后的危险因素。经ROC检验，外周血OCLN、CLDN5联合检测对于PD不良预后的预测AUC高于外周血OCLN、CLDN5单独检测（DeLong检验，P＜0.05）。结论：外周血OCLN、CLDN5可随PD患者神经损伤程度加剧而不断升高，联合检测外周血OCLN、CLDN5或可作为预测患者不良预后的重要辅助手段。

Objective:To analysis of the association between blood-brain barrier markers Occludin (OCLN), Claudin-5 (CLDN5) and the degree of neurological damage and poor prognosis in PD patients.Methods:The research subjects selected 180 PD patients who visited our hospital from June 2024 to June 2025, as well as 180 healthy volunteers who underwent examinations during the same period. They were divided into a case group and a control group, and the differences between the two groups in terms of OPLN and CLDN5 were compared. According to the severity of the disease, PD patients were divided into early group (50 cases), middle group (65 cases), and late group (65 cases). The differences in OCLN, CLDN5, and nerve injury markers among the three groups of patients were compared, and the correlation between OCLN, CLDN5, and nerve injury markers in the late group of patients was analyzed. Statistically analyze the occurrence of poor prognosis in enrolled patients, compare the differences in OCLN, CLDN5, and nerve injury markers among patients with different prognoses, analyze the factors affecting the prognosis of PD patients, and verify the predictive power of OCLN and CLDN5 for poor prognosis in PD patients.Results:The peripheral blood levels of OCLN and CLDN5 in the case group were higher than the control group (t=50.450，51.670; P<0.05). The levels of OCLN, CLDN5 NSE,UCH-L1,NfL, and GFAP in peripheral blood of the late stage group were higher than those of the mid stage and early stage groups (F=280.611，378.453，82.254，122.413，185.272，257.733; P<0.05). The OCLN and CLDN5 in the late stage group were positively correlated with NSE, UCH-L1, NfL, and GFAP (r=0.411，0.457，0.505，0.494，0.465，0.425，0.491，0.503; P<0.05). The incidence of poor prognosis in 180 PD patients was 28.89% (52/180). The peripheral blood levels of OCLN, CLDN5, NSE, UCH-L1, NfL, and GFAP in the poor prognosis group were higher than those in the good prognosis group (t=17.096，14.405，7.632，6.903，11.695，10.702; P<0.05). The results of logistic multiple regression analysis showed that high expression of peripheral blood OCLN, CLDN5, NfL, and GFAP were risk factors for poor prognosis in PD patients. According to ROC test, the combined detection of peripheral blood OCLN and CLDN5 has a higher AUC for predicting poor prognosis of PD than the detection of peripheral blood OCLN and CLDN5 alone (DeLong test, P<0.05).Conclusion:Peripheral blood OCLN and CLDN5 can exacerbate and continuously increase the degree of nerve damage in PD patients. Combined detection of peripheral blood OCLN and CLDN5 may serve as an important auxiliary tool for predicting poor prognosis in patients.