目的  探讨通过优化病案首页质控体系提高误入DRG低权重组病例转出率的效果。方法  采用PDCA循环法，通过实施分层级编码培训、基于AI赋能的专项质控模式及智能化反馈机制构建等系统性地改进措施优化质控体系。通过对比分析质控系统优化前后（2022年1—7月和2023年1—7月）DRG低权重组病例的病案首页质控过程、“经质控低权重病例入组率”和“误入低权重组病例转出率”等指标，评估质控体系优化的实施效果。结果  质控体系优化后，低权重组病例转出率由3.27%提升至4.15%（P=0.018），经质控低权重病例入组率由16.98%降至14.96%（P＜0.001）。结论  AI赋能的专项质控、分层级编码培训与智能化反馈机制三项措施并举可以系统优化质控体系，进而提升DRG低权重组病例转出率。

       Objective  To investigate the effect of optimizing the medical  record front  page  quality control  system on improving the transfer-out rate of cases mistakenly assigned to low-weight DRG groups．Methods  The Plan-Do-Check-Act（PDCA）cycle methodology was employed．Systemic improvements were implemented to  optimize the medical  record front page quality control system，including hierarchical coding training，innovation of a  specialized quality control model based on AI empowerment，and establishment of an intelligent feedback mechanism．The implementation effectiveness was evaluated by comparative analysis of the following indicators before（January-July 2022）and after（January-July 2023）optimization：the medical record quality control process for low-weight DRG cases，the  rate of low-weight cases assigned to groups after quality control，and the transfer-out rate of cases mistakenly entering low-weight groups．Results  After optimizing the medical record front page quality control system，the transfer-out rate of cases from low-weight groups increased from 3.27% to 4.15%（P=0.018），while the rate of low-weight cases assigned to groups after quality control decreased from 16.98% to 14.96%（P＜0.001）．Conclusions  Implementing a three-pronged approach—AI-powered specialized quality control，hierarchical coding training，and an intelligent feedback mechanism—can systematically optimize the medical record front page quality control system，thereby improving the transfer-out rate of cases mistakenly assigned to low-weight DRG groups．

       目的   通过对压疮不同治疗方式的分析，探讨疾病诊断相关分组（DRG）组合的特征，提高核心疾病诊断相关组（ADRG）的入组率和提升相对权重值，从而提升医疗服务效率和水平。方法   使用医院DRGs分析评价系统以及EXCEL软件筛选出2023—2024年广州市第一人民医院主要诊断压疮疾病病例，分析ADRG组合的特征。结果   根据压疮疾病不同治疗方式，主要诊断为压疮（L89）的176病例进入相对的外科治疗组和内科治疗组，ADRG组分别为JD1组合、JJ1组合、JV1组合。JJ1组合治疗方案以创面封闭式负压引流为主；JD1组合的外科治疗方式均是以皮肤和皮下坏死组织的切除清创术+创面封闭式负压引流术（VSD）的手术治疗方案。JD13组、JD15组比JJ13组、JJ15组，相对权重分别高2.35和1.48。26例患者的住院时间均超过60 d，导致进入了QY组合。结论   利用好DRGs工具能有效地提高压疮的入组率，结合精细化的首页质量管理，提升DRGs的组合权重值及医疗服务效率和水平。

       Objective  To analyze  different treatment methods for  pressure  ulcers and explore the characteristics of Diagnosis-Related Groups（DRGs）to improve the admission rate of Adjacent DRGs（ADRGs）and enhance the  relative weight value，thereby improving the efficiency and level of medical services．Methods  Using the DRGs management system and EXCEL software，cases of pressure ulcer disease from Class A tertiary hospital in Guangzhou from 2023 to 2024 were selected，with pressure ulcers as the primary diagnosis，and analyzed the characteristics of ADRG combinations．Results  Based on different treatment methods for pressure ulcers，176 cases primarily diagnosed with pressure ulcers（L89）were categorized into  relative surgical and medical treatment groups，with ADRG groups being JD1，JJ1，and JV1 combinations．The JJ1 group’s treatment plan primarily focused on closed wound negative pressure drainage，the surgical treatment method for JD1 group involved skin and subcutaneous necrotic tissue excision and debridement surgery combined with closed wound negative pressure drainage（VSD）．The  relative weights of JD13 and JD15 groups were 2.35 and 1.48，higher than those of JJ13 and JJ15 groups．Twenty-six cases had an average hospital stay exceeding 60 days，leading to their categorization into the QY group．Conclusions  Utilizing the DRG tool effectively improves the admission rate for pressure ulcer diseases．By combining it with refined quality management on the first page of medical records，the combination weight value of DRGs and the efficiency and level of medical services can be enhanced．

目的 探寻病案首页国际疾病分类(ICD)编码的准确率对按疾病诊断相关分组(DRGs)分值付费影响。方法 整体抽取2019年心血管内科和脊柱关节外科医保病例,分析DRGs分值付费存在的问题,对全院病案首页ICD编码采取相应的干预措施。结果 2019年病案首页ICD编码准确率为81.55%,DRGs分值付费亏损2 812 804.7元,经干预后,2020年病案首页ICD编码准确率为97.13%,DRGs分值付费结余14 089 039.36元。结论 准确、规范的填写病案首页ICD编码,提高病案首页ICD编码的准确率,避免医院在DRGs分值付费模式下出现亏损有重要意义。

Objective To investigate the influence of the front page International Classification of Diseases(ICD) coding accuracy of medical records on diagnosis related groups(DRGs) score payment system.Methods Medical insurance cases of cardiovascular medicine and spine and joint surgery in 2019 were totally selected,the problems of DRGs score payment system were investigated and analyzed,and managements improving the ICD coding on the medical records of discharged patients were carried out.Results In 2019,the accuracy of ICD coding of medical records was 81.55%,and the DRGs score payment system had lost 2 812 804.7 yuan.After improving,in 2020,the ICD coding accuracy achieved 97.13%,and DRGs score payment system had a positive balance of 14 089 039.36 yuan.Conclusions The accuracy and standardization of ICD coding on the medical records is of great significance in avoiding losses on DRGs score payment system.

目的 运用DRG分析临床路径管理对患者住院费用的影响。方法 采用BJ-DRGs分组器,选取2016年广州某三级综合医院的出院患者病案首页信息及DRG分组信息,对比是否实施临床路径管理对患者的总体住院费用影响及各DRG组的住院费用差异。结果 路径组中位住院费用为9 239.41元,低于对照组的12 358.06元,差异有统计学意义(P<0.001)。费用构成分析发现,路径组的治疗费、检查费、药品费、手术费和其他费低于对照组,而材料费用相对较高。比较的14个DRG组中,6个DRG组的路径组住院费用低于对照组。结论 实行临床路径管理可降低患者住院费用、改变费用构成。结合DRG积极推进临床路径精细化管理,可有效控制病种成本,遏制医疗费用的不合理增长。

Objective Using DRG to analyze the impacts on inpatient costs of a hospital in Guangzhou as incurred by clinical pathway management. Methods As performed by BJ-DRGs, we selected DRG grouping information and medical record homepage information of the inpatients discharged from a tertiary hospital in Guangzhou in 2016. Then we compared the impacts of clinical pathway management on overall inpatients costs and the difference of inpatient costs for the DRG group. Results The median of inpatient costs in the clinical pathway group was 9239.41 yuan, was lower than that of control group which was 12358.06 yuan, and the difference was statistical difference (P<0.001). Cost composition analysis found that the costs of treatment, examination, medicine, surgery and the others in the clinical pathway group were much lower than that of the control group, while the cost of materials was relatively high. Among the 14 DRG group study, there were 6 DRG groups which the inpatient costs of the clinical path group was obviously lower than the control group. Conclusion The implementation of clinical pathway management may reduce the inpatient costs and change the makeup of costs. Therefore, combining with DRG, we actively promote the refined management of clinical pathway, which may effectively control the costs of diseases and the unreasonable growth of medical expenses.