目的 探讨社区护理干预指导在糖尿病中的临床护理效果。方法 采取回顾分析法对我市3个街道的居民资料,选取其中有分析价值的100例糖尿病患者资料进行临床分析,根据不同护理方法将患者分为对照组和观察组,对照组实施常规护理,观察组进行社区护理干预指导,比较两组护理效果。结果 实验组体重指数为(22.9±2.48)kg/m²、FBG指标为(7.24±1.68)mmol/L、2hBG指标为(9.72±2.14)mmol/L、HbALc指标为(7.26±1.08)%,低于对照组(P<0.05);实验组96%合理饮食、98%生活具有规律性,92%患者能够定期运动,94%患者能够自我监测病情,高于对照组(P<0.05)。结论 对社区糖尿病患者进行护理指导时,常识性问题、危险性因素、并发症预防问题认识不足是护理督促的要点。因此应提升社区糖尿病患者的自我管理能力,对糖尿病患者进行心理护理、饮食治疗、运动养生、定期服药等方面的进行护理干预,提高社区居民的预防意识和督促指导。

Objective To investigate the guidance of community nursing intervention in diabetes clinical care effect. Methods A retrospective analysis of the city's three neighborhood offices resident data to be analyzed, select one of the analytical value of 100 patients with diabetes clinical data analysis, according to the different methods of care patients were divided into a control group and observation group.Control implementation of routine care group, observation group of community nursing intervention guidance, care and effect between the two groups. Results Body mass index in the experimental group (22.9±2.48) kg/m², FBG indicators (7.24±1.68) mmol/L, 2hBG indicators (9.72±2.14) mmol/L, HbALc indicators (7.26±1.08)%, significantly were lower than the control group (P<0.05); the experimental group, 96% of a reasonable diet, 98% had a regular life, 92% of patients can do exercise regularly, 94% of patients were able to self-monitoring disease.It was significantly higher (P<0.05). Conclusion Diabetic patients in community care and guidance, common sense, risk factors, lack of awareness of the issue of prevention of complications is the point of care supervise, and also one of the main problems exist. It should enhance self-management of diabetes, psychological care, diet therapy, exercise regimen, regular medication and other aspects of nursing intervention guidance. It should be increasing community awareness of prevention, improve supervision and guidance role.

目的 评价自我管理小组干预对社区2型糖尿病患者的管理效果。方法 在2013年底选取本区社区卫生服务中心100例患者研究,运用自身对照方法,管理1年后对其自我管理效能、生化指标、空腹血糖、糖化血红蛋白进行比较。结果 管理一年后饮食控制、运动控制、药物依从性、监测依从性、足部护理等指标差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。空腹血糖、糖化血红蛋白、总胆固醇、尿酸下降,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。空腹血糖达标率由12%上升到37%,糖化血红蛋白达标率由10%上升到34%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 自我管理小组干预提高了社区2型糖尿病患者自我管理水平,改善了主要的生化指标,值得社区推广应用。

Objective To evaluate the function of self-management group program on patients with type 2 diabetes in community. Methods Self-management was carried out for one year among 100 patients with type 2 diabetes, the effect of management was analyzed. Results There was statistically significant difference in diet control, motion control, drug compliance, monitoring compliance, and foot care after one year intervention (P<0.05). GLU, HbA1c, CHOL, UA were decreased. The difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion Self-management of group intervention is effective in patients with type 2 diabetes, is worthy of further popularization and application.

目的 探讨社区老年高血压病人直立性低血压的药物影响。方法 通过对辖区内897例社区老年高血压病人开展体检,将年轻老年和老老年高血压两组分为直立性低血压组和非直立性低血压组两组。分析降压药物对社区老年高血压病人直立性低血压的影响。结果 OH组的降压药物使用率稍高于非OH组的降压药物使用率,经统计分析P>0.05。OH组联合两种以上及联合三种以上降压药物使用率略高于非OH的药物使用率, P>0.05。利尿剂OH发生率稍高于其他组的OH发生率,P>0.05。结论 社区老年高血压OH的发病可能与目前常用的5大类降压药物无关。

       目的   评估医院-社区-家庭一体化康复护理模式对慢性创面患者生活质量及创面愈合的潜在影响。方法   选择2023年1月—2024年6月在广州市第一人民医院接受治疗的慢性创面患者80例作为研究对象，所有患者在住院期间均接受基于溃疡面积、深度及是否合并感染等因素的综合治疗，包括彻底清创、创缘处理、负压治疗、感染控制等治疗，并接受常规护理。出院前，通过随机数字表法将患者分为两组，每组40例。两组患者在住院期间均接受常规护理，出院后，对照组接受延续护理并定期复查。干预组40例患者在出院后接受医院-社区-家庭一体化康复护理模式。入组时及护理3个月后，使用生活质量调查表（SF-36）对患者生活质量和创面愈合率进行评估。结果   干预组创面愈合率为（32.61±4.26）%，高于对照组（11.48±1.04）%，差异具有统计学意义（t=19.473，P＜0.05）。两组患者在护理3个月后的数字评定量表评分和创面疼痛频率评分均较入组时降低（P＜0.05）。其中干预组护理3个月后的创面VAS评分为（1.82±0.17）分，创面疼痛频率评分为（1.28±0.25）分；而对照组分别为（3.91±0.22）分和（2.63±0.37）分，干预组低于对照组（P＜0.05）。此外，干预组在护理后3个月的总体健康、生理功能、生理职能、精神健康、情感功能、社会功能评分均高于对照组（P＜0.05）。在居家3个月期间，干预组的感染发生率为5.00%，而对照组为17.50%，干预组感染发生率低于对照组（χ ² =3.781，P＜0.05）。结论   本研究表明，医院-社区-家庭一体化康复护理模式干预能够促进慢性创面患者的创面愈合，降低居家期间感染的风险，并提升患者的生活质量。

       Objective  To assess the potential impact of the integrated hospital-community-home  rehabilitation nursing model on the quality of life and wound healing in patients with chronic wounds．Methods  A total of 80 patients with chronic wounds treated at the Guangzhou First People’s Hospital from January 2023 to June 2024 were selected as the study subjects．All patients received comprehensive treatment during their hospital stay，including thorough debridement，edge treatment，vacuum therapy，infection control and routine nursing care．Prior to discharge，the patients were  randomly divided into two groups using a random number table，with 40 patients in each group．Both groups received routine nursing care during their hospital stay，and the control group received continuing nursing care and regular follow-up after discharge．Forty patients in the intervention group received the integrated hospital-community-home rehabilitation nursing model after discharge．Quality of life（QoL）and wound healing rates were assessed using the Short Form 36（SF-36）questionnaire at the time of enrollment and 3 months after nursing．Results  The wound healing rate in the intervention group was significantly higher than that in the control group （［32.61±4.26］% vs ［11.48±1.04］%），with a statistical difference（t=19.473，P＜0.05）．The numerical rating scale（NRS）scores and frequency of wound pain scores decreased in both groups 3 months after nursing compared to the enrollment period（P＜0.05）．Specifically，the VAS score for wound pain in the intervention group 3 months after nursing was（1.82±0.17），and the frequency of wound pain was（1.28±0.25），in the control group，these scores were（3.91±0.22）and（2.63±0.37），respectively，with the intervention group scoring significantly lower than the control group（P＜0.05）．Furthermore，the scores for overall health，physical function，role physical，mental health，emotional function，and social function in the intervention group were higher than those in the control group 3 months after nursing（P＜0.05）．During the 3-month home recovery period，the incidence of infection in the intervention group was 5.00%，whereas it was 17.50% in the control group，with the intervention group  showing a lower incidence of infection（χ ² =3.781，P＜0.05）．Conclusions  This study demonstrates that the hospital-community-home integrated rehabilitation care model intervention can promote wound healing in chronic wound patients，reduce the risk of infection during home care，and significantly improve patients’ quality of life．