目的 观察动静平衡康复训练对胫骨平台骨折术后患者平衡和行走功能的影响。方法 将2012年7月—2014年12月100例胫骨平台骨折患者,随机分为两组,每组50例。对照组术后展开常规康复训练,观察组实施动静平衡康复训练,观察两组膝关节功能、康复效果以及肌力恢复情况。结果 观察组患者的膝关节功能优良率为98.0%,高于对照组的60.0%,差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05)。观察组患者的Lysholm评分,高于对照组(P＜0.05)。观察组患者的肌力恢复情况,优于对照组(P＜0.05)。结论 基于“动静平衡”理念针对胫骨平台骨折患者实施术后康复指导与训练,有利于促进患者关节功能以及肌力恢复,巩固康复疗效,在训练过程中实现动态平衡,具有积极的临床意义。
Objective To investigate the static and dynamic balance rehabilitation training on the tibial plateau fracture patients balance and walking functions. Methods 100 cases of patients with tibial plateau fractures from July 2012 to December 2014, were randomly divided into two groups, 50 cases of each group. The control group was launched conventional rehabilitation, observation group received static and dynamic balance rehabilitation training. The knee function, rehabilitation and muscle recovery of the two groups were observed and statistically analyzed. Results The knee function excellent rate of observation group was 98.0%, significantly higher than control group 60.0%, there was statistical significance(P＜0.05). Lysholm score of observation group was higher than control group(P＜0.05). Muscle recovery of observation group was better than control group(P＜0.05). Conclusion Based on the “static and dynamic balance” concept for tibial plateau fractures postoperative rehabilitation for patients with guidance and training, and it will be promoting joint function in patients with muscle recovery and consolidate the recovery effect, to achieve dynamic equilibrium in the training process, with positive clinical significance.
股骨转子间骨折是最常见的髋部骨折,内固定手术为其目前治疗的首选方式。头颈钉位置是评估手术效果和判断治疗预后的重要因素,合适的置钉位置有利于稳定骨折、加速康复以及改善预后。目前头颈钉位置最经典的评估方式为尖顶距（TAD）,但TAD至今仍存在较多争议。近年来提出的轴刀角、尖颈距离比、偏心距（ED）以及标准化TAD（STAD）为临床实践拓展了新视野。文章通过对上述头颈钉位置的评估方法及局限性进行文献综述,旨在为临床手术置钉时提供相应的参考。ED和STAD的提出,为未来人工智能评估头颈钉位置提供了可能。
Femoral intertrochanteric fracture is one of the most common hip fractures, and the internal fixation is the preferred treatment. The position of cephalic fixator is an important factor to evaluate the effect of operation and the prognosis of treatment. Tip-apex-distance（TAD）is the most classical method to evaluate the position of cephalic fixator, but it is still controversial. In recent years, the axis-blade angle,tip-neck distance ratio, eccentric distance（ED）and standardized TAD（STAD）have been proposed,though with limitations, they also provide a new perspective for clinical practice. In this study, we reviewed the literature on the evaluation of the position of cephalic fixator in order to provide the corresponding references and guidance for the clinical operation of internal fixation. Both STAD and ED may be the theoretical possibility of artificial intelligence evaluation of the position of cephalic fixator in the future.
目的 对比分析双极半髋关节置换术（BHA）与全髋关节置换术（THR）治疗股骨颈骨折（FNF）的效果。方法 回顾性收集北京中医药大学东直门医院洛阳医院2019年6月—2023年4月90例FNF患者临床资料，依照手术治疗方案差异分为两组，BHA组（45例）行BHA治疗，THR组（45例）行THR治疗，比较两组围术期指标、术前及术后3 d炎症因子水平、术后6个月髋关节活动度、术前及术后6个月生活质量［欧洲生活质量评分（EQ-5D评分）］。结果 THR组手术时间（108.76±15.33）min、下床活动时间（40.37±10.24）h、住院时间（19.02±5.11）d均较BHA组［（53.49±10.12）min、（25.92±7.15）h、（15.16±4.87）d］长（t分别为20.184、7.761、3.668，均P＜0.05），术中失血量（318.69±35.14）mL、术后引流量（129.74±21.03）mL均较BHA组［（224.07±29.35）mL、（90.35±17.48）mL］多（t分别为13.863、9.663，均P＜0.001）；组间并发症发生率比较差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）；术后3 d，BHA组血清白细胞介素-1为（17.35±3.06）pg/L、白细胞介素-6为（24.82±4.31）pg/L、C-反应蛋白为（26.17±4.59）pg/L，低于THR组的（20.16±3.48）pg/L、（27.04±5.06）pg/L、（28.90±5.12）pg/L（t分别为4.068、2.241、2.663，均P＜0.05）；两组术后6个月髋关节内旋、屈曲、外旋、外展、内收活动度及EQ-5D评分对比差异均无统计学意义（均P＞0.05）。结论 与THR相比，BHA能减少FNF患者围术期失血量，降低术后炎症因子表达水平，缩短手术及下床活动时间，促进恢复。
Objective To compare and analyze the effects of bipolar hemihip replacement（BHA）and total hip replacement（THR）in the treatment of femoral neck fracture（FNF）．Methods The clinical data of 90 patients with FNF in the Luoyang Hospital，Dongzhimen Hospital，Beijing University of Chinese Medicine，from June 2019 to April 2023 were retrospectively collected．The patients were divided into two groups according to the difference in surgical treatment plan．The BHA group（45 cases）received BHA treatment，and the THR group（45 cases）received THR treatment．The perioperative indicators，preoperative and postoperative inflammatory factor levels，postoperative hip joint mobility at six months，preoperative and postoperative quality of life ［European Quality of Life Scale（EQ-5D score）］were compared between the two groups．Results The operation time（108.76±15.33）min，ambulation time（40.37±10.24）h，and hospitalization time（19.02±5.11）d in the THR group were longer than those in the BHA group ［（53.49±10.12）min，（25.92±7.15）h，（15.16±4.87）d］（t=20.184，8.630，3.668，respectively，all P＜0.05）．The intraoperative blood loss（318.69±35.14）mL and postoperative drainage volume（129.74±21.03）mL were both higher than those in the BHA group ［（224.07±29.35）mL，（90.35±17.48）mL］（t=13.863，9.663，respectively，all P＜0.001）．There was no significant difference in the incidence of complications between the groups（P＞0.05）．Three days after surgery，the serum levels of interleukin-1，interleukin-6，and C-reactive protein in the BHA group were（17.35±3.06）pg/L，（24.82±4.31）pg/L，and（26.17±4.59）pg/L，respectively，which were lower than those in the THR group（20.16±3.48）pg/L，（27.04±5.06）pg/L，and（28.90±5.12）pg/L（t=4.068，2.241，2.663，respectively，all P＜0.05）．There was no significant difference in the range of motion of internal rotation，flexion，external rotation，abduction，and adduction of the hip joint and EQ-5D scores between the two groups at six months after surgery（all P＞0.05）．Conclusions Compared with THR，BHA can reduce perioperative blood loss in FNF patients，reduce postoperative inflammatory factor expression level，shorten operation and ambulation time，and promote recovery．
