目的 探讨便携式超声仪超声重点评估（e-FAST）技术在批量伤员军地联合院前救治中的应用效果。方法 抽取2021年5月—2023年10月中国人民解放军联勤保障部队第九八八医院中心急诊科收治的80例批量伤员,均开展军地联合院前救治,按照治疗方案不同分为观察组和对照组,每组患者40例,其中对照组在救治现场行基于创伤严重程度（CRAMS）评分,进行常规急救处置,救护车返院后行CT检查并进行相应伤情治疗,观察组救治现场行CRAMS评分,进行常规急救处置,院前接诊医师在现场或救护车上使用便携式超声仪按照e-FAST流程检查相应部位,初步诊断后进行相应伤情治疗,对比两组患者治疗效果,两组患者诊断时间、初次医疗接触—进入手术室时间及入院诊断与出院时确定性诊断的符合率、两组患者治疗前后CRAMS评分及CRAMS≤8分抢救成功率。结果 观察组治疗有效率为95.0%,对照组为85.0%,对比差异无统计学意义（χ²=2.222,P=0.136）;观察组患者的诊断时间（13.56±2.36）min、初次医疗接触—进入手术室时间（30.42±8.99）min均短于对照组[（23.64±5.69）、（52.27±12.60）min],差异有统计学意义（t=10.349、8.928,P<0.05）;观察组患者入院诊断与出院时确定性诊断的符合为97.5%,对照组患者入院诊断与出院时确定性诊断的符合为95.0%,差异无统计学意义（χ²=0.346,P=0.556）;治疗后两组患者的CRAMS评分均升高,且观察组（9.87±2.62）分高于对照组（8.60±2.98）分,差异有统计学意义（t=2.024,P=0.046）;观察组患者CRAMS≤8分的抢救成功率为97.50%,对照组CRAMS≤8抢救成功率为85.00%,观察组患者CRAMS≤8分的抢救成功率高于对照组（χ²=3.914,P=0.048）。结论 本研究从军地联合救治批量伤员切入,瞄准部队医院军民融合战略发展路线,本文针对便携式超声仪e-FAST应用范围前移,明显地提高急救人员院前救治能力,提高抢救成功率,值得临床参考。

Objective To explore the application effect of portable ultrasound e-FAST technology in the pre hospital treatment of batch wounded soldiers in military civilian joint hospitals．Methods Eighty batch wounded patients admitted to the emergency department of 988 Hospital from May 2021 to October 2023 were selected,all of whom underwent military civilian joint pre hospital treatment．They were divided into an observation group and a control group according to different treatment plans,with 40 patients in each group．The control group received CRAMS scores at the treatment site for routine first aid treatment,CT scans after ambulance return to the hospital for corresponding injury treatment,the observation group received CRAMS scores at the treatment site for routine first aid treatment,and the pre-hospital attending physician used a portable ultrasound instrument to examine the corresponding parts on site or in the ambulance according to the e-FAST process．After preliminary diagnosis,corresponding injury treatment was carried out．The treatment effects of the two groups of patients were compared,and the diagnosis time and initial diagnosis of the two groups of patients were compared．The time from medical contact to entering the operation room,the compliance rate of discharge and admission diagnoses,the CRAMS score before and after treatment,and the success rate of rescue with CRAMS ≤ 8 for both groups of patients were compared．Results The effective rate of treatment in the observation group was 95.0%,while in the control group it was 85.0%,which difference was not statistically significant（χ²=2.222,P=0.136）．The time to diagnosis（13.56±2.36）min,time to the operating room（30.42±8.99）min were shorter than that in the control group[（23.64±5.69）,（52.27±12.60）min],with significant difference（t=10.349,8.928,P<0.05）．The consistency between the admission diagnosis and the definitive diagnosis at discharge of the observation group patients was 97.5%,while the consistency of the control group patients was 95.0%．There was no significant difference between the groups（χ²=0.346,P=0.556）．After treatment,the CRAMS scores of both groups of patients increased,the observation group（9.87±2.62）was higher than that of the control group（8.60±2.98）（t=2.024,P=0.046）．The success rate of CRAMS ≤ 8 rescue in the observation group was 97.50%,while the success rate in the control group was 85.00%．The success rate of CRAMS ≤ 8 rescue in the observation group was higher than that in the control group（χ²=3.914,P=0.048）．Conclusions This study focuses on the joint treatment of batch wounded soldiers by military and civilian forces,aiming at the development path of military civilian integration strategy in military hospitals．The application scope of portable ultrasound e-FAST has been moved forward,which significantly improves the pre hospital treatment ability of emergency personnel and improves the success rate of rescue．It is worth clinical reference．

目的 分析华北地区某医院院前急救医疗服务的资源利用状况,并依据相关影响因素针对院前急救医疗服务过程中存在问题提出相应对策。方法 收集2021年3月—2022年4月期间就诊于华北地区某医院急诊科患者的一般资料、就诊过程、症状特征。依据是否接受过院前急救服务、是否为疾病急性发作的危重症患者将患者分为4组,分析比较4组患者在一般资料、疾病病症特点两个方面是否存在统计学差异,探索影响院前急救医疗资源合理利用的相关因素。结果 本研究总计收纳患者病例5 800例,其中接受院前急救医疗服务的患者共840例占总调查人数的14.5%,其中危重症患者530例（63.1%）,非危重症患者310例（36.9%）;未接受院前急救医疗服务的患者为4 960例占总调查人数的85.5%,其中危重症患者803例（16.2%）。对所得数据采用多因素回归方法分析得知,在急诊科接受的危重症患者中急性胸痛与突发性头痛是选择不使用院前急救医疗措施的独立影响因素。在非危重症患者中发热、外伤、腹痛是非急重症患者接受院前急救医疗服务的独立影响因素。结论 院前急救医疗服务资源的提供与利用在实际应用的过程中存在资源闲置与服务空缺的问题。危重症患者在入院前仍有较大比例的患者没有选择接受院前急救医疗服务。该情况表明当前居民对危重症患者危重症状及院前急救医疗服务了解与认知不足,对此有必要加强对居民关于院前急救服务的科普宣教工作,并借助现有医疗服务力量支持院前急救医疗服务的规范与准则,这对保障患者生命安全,争取危重症患者存活机会,促进急救资源合理利用具有重要意义。

Objective To analyze the resource utilization status of pre-hospital emergency medical services in a hospital in North China,and to propose corresponding countermeasures for problems in the process of pre-hospital emergency medical services according to relevant influencing factors．Methods From March 2021 to April 2022,the general data,treatment process and symptom characteristics of patients who were treated in the emergency department of a hospital in North China were collected．According to whether they had received pre-hospital emergency services and whether they were critically ill patients with acute onset of disease,the patients were divided into four groups．Whether there were statistical differences in the general data and disease characteristics of the four groups of patients,and the relevant factors affecting the rational utilization of pre-hospital emergency medical resources were explored．Results This study included 5 800 patients,of which 840 patients receiving pre-hospital emergency medical services,accounted for 14.5% of the total survey,including 530（63.1%）and 310 non-critically ill patients（36.9%）;4 960 patients not receiving pre-hospital emergency medical services accounted for 85.5% of the total survey,including 803（16.2%）of critically ill patients．Analysis by multivariate regression methods on the obtained data showed that acute chest pain and sudden headache in critically ill patients in the emergency department were independent influencing factors in choosing not to use pre-hospital emergency medical measures．Fever,trauma,and abdominal pain in non-critically ill patients were independent factors influencing the reception of pre-hospital emergency medical services．Conclusions The provision and utilization of pre-hospital emergency medical service resources have the problem of idle resources and service vacancies in the process of practical application．A significant proportion of critically ill patients still do not choose to receive pre-hospital emergency medical services before admission．This situation shows that the current residents have insufficient understanding and cognition of critical symptoms and pre-hospital emergency medical services,and it is necessary to strengthen the scientific popularization and education of residents on pre-hospital emergency services,and support the norms and guidelines of pre-hospital emergency medical services with the help of existed medical services,which is of great significance for ensuring the safety of patients' lives,striving for the survival opportunities of critically ill patients,and promoting the rational use of emergency resources．

目的 探讨市区院前急救流行病学特征,为制定院前急救策略和合理调配急救资源提供参考依据。方法 采用回顾性资料收集方法选取我院2013—2014年院前急救患者14000例(对照组),2017年院前急救患者9 630例(观察组)作为研究对象,对两组的性别、年龄、死亡原因等建立数据库,采用描述性研究和圆形分布方法进行统计分析,并对比两组数据,分析院前急救患者变化趋势。结果 对照组急救患者性别男性所占比例高于女性,年龄45~55岁所占比例最高,死亡原因创伤所占比例最高,心脑血管疾病其次;观察组急救患者性别男性所占比例高于女性,但低于对照组男性所占比例,年龄45~55岁所占比例最高,但比例低于对照组,死亡原因创伤所占比例最高,心脑血管疾病其次。结论 根据院前急救时间分布规律合理调配急救资源,充分发挥院前急救功能,提高院前急救水平。

目的 探讨降低院前病情识别风险的护理研究。方法 对106例患者进行院前急救护理,53例患者使用简单临床评分(SCS)作为对照组,53例患者采用改良早期预警评分(MEWS)模式作为观察组,并按照院前危重患者救治护理模式实施院前急救护理。比较救治结果。结果 观察组患者院前急救总耗时间缩短,转运成活率和满意度提高,转运并发症发生率低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。MEWS评分评估28 d生存率的AUC为0.861(P＜0. 001),临界值为6.98分,敏感度87.2%,特异度91.6%,优于SCS。结论 早期预警评分模式可以降低院前病情识别风险,提高救治成功率和护理质量,对患者预后有较好的敏感性和准确性。

Objective To explore the nursing in reducing risk of patients' pre-hospital condition recognition. Methods 106 patients were treated by emergency care in pre-hospital period. Among all patients a simple clinical scoring condition assessment(SCS) were given to 53 patients, who were in control group, and other 53 cases were treated by modified early warning score model (MEWS), who were in observation group. Emergency care was given to all critical patients in pre-hospital period. Then we compared the effects. Results The pre-hospital consumed time was significantly less, transportation survival rate and satisfaction rate of patients were both higher, complication rate was lower in observation group than control group(P＜0.05). The AUC was 0.861(P＜0. 001) of MEWS for evaluating survival rate after 28 days by the ROC curve analysis. The score of cutoff value was 6.98, sensitivity was 87.2%, specificity was 91.6%, which were all better than SCS. Conclusion Early warning score model may decrease the risk of condition recognition in pre-hospital period, improve rescue success rate and nursing quality, providing a better sensitivity and accuracy for prognosis evaluation.

目的 探讨标准化沟通模式在重症孕产妇院前转运前评估与交接环节中的应用效果。方法 设计转运前标准化沟通信息登记表,用以标准化转运前评估与交接环节,护士按照登记表中的项目逐条交接,对方未交代的项目护士进行主动评估,并将结果登记并汇报接诊医生。结果 运用标准化沟通模式后,有效缩短了转诊的通话时间和抵院后的处理时间,护士评估信息的错漏率由13.84%降低至4.23%,交接不清导致的不良事件发生率由7.41%降至1.21%,并在改善母婴结局等方面均取得较好效果。结论 SBAR 沟通模式在重症孕产妇孕前转运的评估和交接环节中保证了重要信息的准确传递,为重症孕产妇的救治争取宝贵时间,值得临床上推广应用。

Objective To explore the application effects of SBAR (situation, background, assessment and recommendation) communication mode in the transfer of critically ill obstetric women. Methods A transfer from based on SBAR communication mode was designed and used to assess the psychological status and illness condition of critically ill obstetric women. Results After the application of SBAR communication transfer model, the communication time and hospital action time were both shortened and the occurrence of transfer problems decreased,while the pregnancy outcomes were improved (P＜0.05). Conclusion Applying SBAR communication mode in the transfer of critically ill obstetric women is helpful to reduce the transfer time and the occurrence of transfer problems,and improve the quality of patient handover.

       目的   探讨、对比休克指数（SI）与血乳酸水平预测院前创伤性休克患者预后中的应用。方法   于2020年12月—2023年12月收治80例创伤性休克患者，均接受SI、乳酸水平的监测。结合监测的结果进行分组：乳酸正常组：乳酸水平在2 mmol/L以下，升高组：2 mmol/L以上；SI正常组：SI在0.9以下，升高组：SI在0.9以上。观察、记录患者入院7 d后的序贯性器官功能衰竭评分（SOFA），对多器官功能障碍综合征（MODS）情况进行评估。同时观察、记录机械通气、血管活性药物的使用和住院等情况。结果   乳酸水平升高组60例，正常组20组；SI升高组58例，正常组22例，女性乳酸水平、SI，与男性比较差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）。是否发生多器官功能障碍者的年龄、性别、SI指数比较差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）；格拉斯哥昏迷评分（GCS）评分［（4.22±1.53）分 vs （9.46±3.82）分，t=7.816，P＜0.001］、住院时间［（23.34±5.71）d vs （12.26±2.11）d，t=11.830，P＜0.001］、基础乳酸值［（4.75±2.36）mmol/L vs （2.04±1.11）mmol/L，t=6.721，P＜0.001］与发生MODS在组间对比差异有统计学意义。SI升高组的容量复苏收缩压＞80 mmHg（%）有27例，与乳酸水平升高组比较差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）（46.55% vs 18.18%，χ ² =12.237，P＜0.001）。乳酸水平升高组中，11例患者接受机械通气，乳酸水平均升高（P＜0.05）；9例患者使用血管活性药物，乳酸水平均升高，比较差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）；38例住院患者，24例乳酸水平升高（P＜0.05）。13例患者接受机械通气，12例SI升高，比较差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）；11例患者接受血管活性物治疗，8例SI升高，比较差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）；39例患者住院，SI升高22例，比较差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。结论   针对重症的创伤性休克患者，当血乳酸水平升高时会大大增加MODS发生的概率，乳酸水平在对重症创伤性休克患者预后进行预测时，应用价值更高。

       Objective  To explore and compare the application of shock index（SI）and  blood lactic acid level in predicting the prognosis of patients with pre-hospital traumatic shock．Methods  From December 2020 to December 2023，80 patients with traumatic shock were enrolled，and their SI and levels of lactic acid were monitored．Patients were grouped according to the monitoring results：normal group：lactic acid level below 2 mmol/L，increased group：above 2 mmol/L；normal group：SI below 0.9，and increased group：SI above 0.9．The sequential organ failure score（SOFA）was observed and recorded 7 days after hospitalization，and the situation of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome（MODS）was evaluated．At the same time，mechanical ventilation，the use of vasoactive substances and hospitalization were observed and recorded．Results  There were 60 cases in the group with increased lactic acid level and 20 cases in the normal group．There were 58 cases of increased SI and 22 cases of normal．The lactic acid level and SI index in women were higher than those in men，with no difference（P＞0.05）．There were no differences in age，sex，SI index and the incidence of MODS（P＞0.05）．GCS score（4.22±1.53 vs 9.46±3.82），hospitalization days（23.34±5.71 vs 12.26±2.11）d，basal lactate value（4.75±2.36 vs 2.04±1.11）mmol L-1 were significantly different from those of MODS（t=11.830，P＜0.001；t=6.721，P＜0.001，P＜0.05）．There were 27 cases with volume  resuscitation systolic blood pressure ＞ 80 mmhg（%）in the group with increased SI，which was different from that of SI and lactic acid（46.55% vs18.18%，χ ² =12.237，P＜0.001；P＜0.05）．Lactic acid increased group：11 patients received mechanical ventilation，and the lactic acid levels of all 11 patients increased（P＜0.05）．Nine patients used vasoactive substances，and their lactic acid levels all increased，with no significant difference（P＞0.05）．Of the 38 inpatients，24 cases had elevated lactic acid levels（P＜0.05）．Thirteen patients received mechanical ventilation，and 12 patients had elevated SI，with no statistical significance（P＞0.05）．Eleven patients were treated with vasoactive agents，and 8 patients had increased SI，with no difference（P＞0.05）．Among the 39 patients hospitalized，22 cases had increased SI，and the difference was statistically significant（P＜0.05）．Conclusions  For patients with severe traumatic shock，when the blood lactic acid level increases，the probability of MODS will be greatly increased．Compared with SI index，lactic acid level has higher application value in predicting the prognosis of patients with severe traumatic shock．

          目的   探讨便携式超声仪超声重点评估（e-FAST）技术在批量伤员军地联合院前救治中的应用效果。方法    抽取2021年5月—2023年10月中国人民解放军联勤保障部队第九八八医院中心急诊科收治的80例批量伤员，均开展军地联合院前救治，按照治疗方案不同分为观察组和对照组，每组患者40例，其中对照组在救治现场行基于创伤严重程度（CRAMS）评分，进行常规急救处置，救护车返院后行CT检查并进行相应伤情治疗，观察组救治现场行CRAMS评分，进行常规急救处置，院前接诊医师在现场或救护车上使用便携式超声仪按照e-FAST流程检查相应部位，初步诊断后进行相应伤情治疗，对比两组患者治疗效果，两组患者诊断时间、初次医疗接触—进入手术室时间及入院诊断与出院时确定性诊断的符合率、两组患者治疗前后CRAMS评分及CRAMS≤8分抢救成功率。结果   观察组治疗有效率为95.0%，对照组为85.0%，对比差异无统计学意义（χ ² =2.222，P=0.136）；观察组患者的诊断时间（13.56±2.36）min、初次医疗接触—进入手术室时间（30.42±8.99）min均短于对照组［（23.64±5.69）、（52.27±12.60）min］，差异有统计学意义（t=10.349、8.928，P＜0.05）；观察组患者入院诊断与出院时确定性诊断的符合为97.5%，对照组患者入院诊断与出院时确定性诊断的符合为95.0%，差异无统计学意义（χ ² =0.346，P=0.556）；治疗后两组患者的CRAMS评分均升高，且观察组（9.87±2.62）分高于对照组（8.60±2.98）分，差异有统计学意义（t=2.024，P=0.046）；观察组患者CRAMS≤8分的抢救成功率为97.50%，对照组CRAMS≤8抢救成功率为85.00%，观察组患者CRAMS≤8分的抢救成功率高于对照组（χ ² =3.914，P=0.048）。结论    本研究从军地联合救治批量伤员切入，瞄准部队医院军民融合战略发展路线，本文针对便携式超声仪e-FAST应用范围前移，明显地提高急救人员院前救治能力，提高抢救成功率，值得临床参考。

       Objective  To explore the application effect of portable ultrasound e-FAST technology in the pre hospital treatment of batch wounded soldiers in military civilian joint hospitals．Methods  Eighty batch wounded patients admitted to the emergency department of 988 Hospital from May 2021 to October 2023 were selected，all of whom underwent military civilian joint pre hospital treatment．They were divided into an observation group and a control group according to different treatment plans，with 40 patients in each group．The control group received CRAMS scores at the treatment site for routine first aid treatment，CT scans after ambulance return to the hospital for corresponding injury treatment，the observation group  received CRAMS scores at the treatment site for routine first aid treatment，and the pre-hospital attending physician used a portable ultrasound instrument to examine the corresponding parts on site or in the ambulance according to the e-FAST process．After preliminary diagnosis，corresponding injury treatment was carried out．The treatment effects of the two groups of patients were compared，and the diagnosis time and initial diagnosis of the two groups of patients were compared．The time from medical contact to entering the operation room，the compliance rate of discharge and admission diagnoses，the CRAMS score before and after treatment，and the success rate of rescue with CRAMS ≤ 8 for both groups of patients were compared．Results  The effective rate of treatment in the observation group was 95.0%，while in the control group it was 85.0%，which difference was not statistically significant（χ ² =2.222，P=0.136）．The time to diagnosis（13.56±2.36）min，time to the operating room（30.42±8.99）min were shorter than that in the control group［（23.64±5.69），（52.27±12.60）min］，with significant difference（t=10.349，8.928，P＜0.05）．The consistency  between the admission diagnosis and the definitive diagnosis at discharge of the observation group patients was 97.5%，while the consistency of the control group patients was 95.0%．There was no significant difference between the groups（χ ² =0.346，P=0.556）．After treatment，the CRAMS scores of both groups of patients increased，the observation group（9.87±2.62）was higher than that of the control group（8.60±2.98）（t=2.024，P=0.046）．The success rate of CRAMS ≤ 8 rescue in the observation group was 97.50%，while the success rate in the control group was 85.00%．The success rate of CRAMS ≤ 8 rescue in the observation group was higher than that in the control group（χ ² =3.914，P=0.048）．Conclusions  This study focuses on the joint treatment of batch wounded soldiers by military and civilian forces，aiming at the development path of military civilian integration strategy in military hospitals．The application scope of portable ultrasound e-FAST has been moved forward，which significantly improves the pre hospital treatment ability of emergency personnel and improves the success rate of rescue．It is worth clinical reference．