目的 探讨超声引导双侧眶下神经阻滞对鼻中隔偏曲矫正术患者术后镇痛效果、麻醉苏醒质量的影响。方法 回顾性选取2021年8月至2025年8月我院收治的行鼻中隔偏曲矫正术治疗的患者120例，按麻醉方案不同，分为全麻组和眶下神经阻滞组，各60例。全麻组进行气管插管全身麻醉和术后镇痛泵镇痛，眶下神经阻滞组在全麻基础上进行超声引导双侧眶下神经阻滞+术后镇痛泵镇痛。比较两组麻醉前、拔管即刻、拔管后5 min血流动力学（心率、平均动脉压）水平、术后麻醉苏醒质量（苏醒时间、苏醒期躁动发生情况）、术后24 h按压镇痛泵次数、术后3 h、6 h、12 h、24 h镇痛效果[数字分级评分（NRS）]及麻醉前、拔管后5 min时血清应激指标水平及不良反应发生情况。结果 拔管即刻、拔管后5 min，眶下神经阻滞组平均动脉压、心率均低于全麻组（P＜0.05）；眶下神经阻滞组躁动发生率、术后24 h按压镇痛泵次数低于全麻组（P＜0.05）；术后3 h、6 h、12 h，眶下神经阻滞组NRS评分均低于全麻组（P＜0.05）；拔管后5 min，眶下神经阻滞组血清皮质醇（Cor）、去甲肾上腺素（NE）水平低于全麻组（P＜0.05）；两组麻醉相关不良反应总发生率比较，差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）。结论 超声引导双侧眶下神经阻滞可有效减轻患者鼻中隔矫正术后循环波动、术后疼痛及应激反应，减少麻醉药物用量，降低躁动发生率。

1994年中国引进患者自控镇痛（PCA）,经过国人改造升级如今已取得了令人瞩目的成绩：2007年《术后患者自控镇痛临床研究与推广应用》获教育部科学技术进步奖二等奖和中华医学科技奖三等奖;2011年具有中国自主专利产权和创新数字医疗的智能化患者自控镇痛（Ai-PCA）诞生,2019年《智能化术后患者自控镇痛管理关键技术及其临床应用》获得中国抗癌协会科技奖二等奖;2023年《中国分娩镇痛规范及推广应用》获得华夏医学科技奖二等奖。笔者撰写述评,提出努力推进Ai-PCA高水平高质量发展的措施,呼吁国内学者重视引领数智镇痛医疗规范化,于2024年在《中华疼痛学杂志》刊出由余守章教授牵头制定的《患者自控镇痛临床应用规范专家共识》,助力中国数智镇痛医疗技术向智慧化前行,为人民群众切实享受到舒适镇痛提供更优质的服务。

Since the introduction of Patient-Controlled Analgesia（PCA）in China in 1994,the domain has witnessed its substantial advancements．The project,Clinical Research and Promotion of Postoperative Patient-Controlled Analgesia,achieved the Ministry of Education’s Second Prize for Scientific and Technological Progress and the Chinese Medical Association’s Third Prize in 2007．The innovation continued in 2011 with the development of an intelligent PCA system（Ai-PCA）endowed with Chinese independent patent rights and innovative digital medical technology．In 2019,the Key Technologies and Clinical Application of Intelligent Postoperative Patient-Controlled Analgesia Management was honored with the second-class Science and Technology Award by the Chinese Anti-Cancer Association．Furthering this trend．In 2023,the Standards and Promotion of Labor Analgesia in China secured the second-class prize in Medical Science and Technology from Huaxia Medical Science and Technology．This commentary suggest strategies for the qualitative enhancement of Ai-PCA and urge domestic scholars to spearhead the standardization of Ai-PCA．Expert Consensus on Clinical Application Standards for Patient-Controlled Analgesia leaded and edited by Pro．She has published,in 2024,which fervently supports the advancement of China’s Ai-PCA technology towards a more intelligent future,to provide the public with higher quality and more comfortable pain management services．

目的 观察布托啡诺联合舒芬太尼镇痛方案在重症监护病房（ICU）机械通气患者中的效果及对血流动力学的影响。方法 采用前瞻性、随机对照研究,选取2021年3月—2023年3月商丘市第三人民医院ICU收治的118例机械通气患者,按1∶1随机分为观察组、对照组各59例。观察组采取布托啡诺联合舒芬太尼镇痛方案,对照组采取舒芬太尼镇痛方案。比较两组镇静、镇痛情况（镇静起效时间、停药后苏醒时间、机械通气时间、ICU住院时间、丙泊酚总用量）。以用药前（T0）、用药后6 h（T1）、12 h（T2）、24 h（T3）为时间节点,比较两组血流动力学指标[心率（HR）、平均动脉压（MAP）]。以用药后6 h（t1）、12 h（t2）、18 h（t3）、24 h（t4）为时间节点,比较两组Ricker镇静-躁动评分（SAS）、重症监护疼痛观察工具（CPOT）评分。比较两组不良反应发生情况。结果 用药后观察组镇静起效、停药后苏醒、机械通气、ICU住院时间均短于对照组,丙泊酚总用量少于对照组（P<0.05）;t1~t4时观察组CPOT评分均低于对照组,SAS评分均高于对照组（P<0.05）;T1、T2、T3时观察组HR、MAP波动幅度小于对照组（P<0.05）;观察组不良反应总发生率为10.17%,与对照组15.25%相比,差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。结论 布托啡诺、舒芬太尼联合治疗ICU机械通气患者,可有效增强镇静、镇痛效果,维持血流动力学稳定,且安全性较高,有利于促进患者病情转归。

Objective To observe the effect of butorphanol and sufentanil combined analgesia regimen in patients with mechanical ventilation in intensive care unit（ICU）and its influence on hemodynamics．Methods A prospective,randomized controlled study was carried out on 118 patients with mechanical ventilation in ICU from March 2021 to March 2023,and the enrolled patients were randomly divided into observation group and control group with 59 cases in each group．The observation group received butorphanol combined with sufentanil analgesia regimen,and the control group received sufentanil analgesia regimen．The conditions of sedation and analgesia（sedation onset time,recovery time after drug withdrawal,mechanical ventilation time,ICU stay length,total dosage of propofol）were compared between the two groups．The hemodynamic indexes [heart rate（HR）and mean arterial pressure（MAP）] of the two groups were compared before medication（T0）,6 h（T1）,12 h（T2）and 24 h（T3）after medication as time nodes．At 6 h（t1）,12 h（t2）,18 h（t3）,24 h（t4）after medication,Ricker Sedation-Agitation Scale（SAS）and Critical Care Pain Observation Tool（CPOT）score were compared between the two groups．The occurrence of adverse reactions was compared between the two groups．Results The onset of sedation,recovery after drug withdrawal,mechanical ventilation and ICU stay in the observation group were shorter than those in the control group,and the total dosage of propofol was lower than that in the control group（P<0.05）．At t1 to t4,CPOT score of observation group was lower than that of control group,and SAS score was higher than that of control group（P<0.05）．The fluctuation amplitude of HR and MAP in the observation group was smaller than that in the control group at T1,T2 and T3（P<0.05）．The total incidence of adverse reactions in the observation group was 10.17%,compared with 15.25% in the control group,the difference was not statistically significant（P>0.05）．Conclusions The combination of butorphanol and sufentanil in the treatment of patients with mechanical ventilation in ICU can effectively enhance sedation and analgesia,maintain hemodynamic stability,and have high safety,which is conducive to promote the outcome of the disease．

目的 对比分析在产程不同阶段对妊娠期高血压产妇给予分娩镇痛的效果差异。方法 选择2021年1月—2022年12月在福清市妇幼保健院接受无痛分娩治疗的240例妊娠期高血压产妇,随机分为在产程活跃期实施镇痛的对照组（n=120）和产程潜伏期实施镇痛的实验组（n=120）,比较两组产妇的产程时间、子宫动脉、胎儿脐动脉血流动力学参数、镇痛效果以及母婴结局。结果 实验组的第一、第二、第三产程时间分别为（389.71±35.05）（58.62±5.26）（8.71±0.69）min,略低于对照组的（403.72±42.19）（60.74±7.22）（8.91±1.62）min,但组间比较差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）;实验组镇痛前、活跃期、第二产程的疼痛评分分别为（9.18±0.13）（1.16±0.22）（2.83±1.16）分,与对照组的（9.22±0.16）（1.24±0.32）（2.72±1.09）分比较差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）,但在潜伏期,实验组产妇疼痛评分为（3.32±0.36）分,低于对照组的（8.11±0.32）分（P<0.05）;关闭镇痛泵后,实验组胎儿脐动脉阻力指数、搏动指数、收缩期峰值流速/舒张期流速分别为（0.58±0.09）（0.81±0.14）（2.31±0.29）,与对照组的（0.54±0.11）（0.79±0.13）（2.24±0.27）比较差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）,实验组产妇子宫动脉阻力指数、搏动指数、收缩期峰值流速/舒张期流速分别为（0.42±0.08）（0.64±0.08）（2.31±0.29）,均高于对照组的（0.39±0.06）（0.58±0.11）（1.65±0.08）（P<0.05）;实验组自然分娩、中转剖宫产、阴道助产例数及新生儿Apgar评分分别为87例、23例、10例、（8.88±0.15）分,与对照组的83例、28例、9例、（8.81±0.19）分比较差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。结论 潜伏期与活跃期对妊娠期高血压产妇实施分娩镇痛对产程时间以及母婴结局的影响不大,但潜伏期镇痛可改善产妇潜伏期的疼痛,可尽早缓解产妇痛苦,且对产妇子宫动脉血流灌注的影响更小。

目的 分析艾司氯胺酮对剖宫产术后镇痛及肾素-血管紧张素-醛固酮系统（RAAS）、产后抑郁情况发生的影响。方法 研究对象为2020年5月—2021年6月在我院行剖宫产的96例孕产妇,根据麻醉药物的不同分为研究组50例和对照组46例,2组孕产妇均给予腰硬联合麻醉行剖宫产术,研究组于手术切皮前5 min静脉注射艾司氯胺酮0.2 mg/kg,对照组静脉注射等量生理盐水。比较2组孕产妇术后疼痛评分（VAS评分）、肾素活性（PRA）、血管紧张素-II（AT-II）、醛固酮（ALD）、爱丁堡产后抑郁量表（EPDS）、不良反应的发生情况。结果 与对照组比较,术后各时间点研究组孕产妇VAS评分均明显较低,差异具有统计学意义（P<0.01）。2组T1、T2、T3各时间点RAAS各指标均明显低于T0时间点（P<0.05）;研究组在T1、T2时间点RAAS各指标均明显低于对照组,差异具有统计学意义（P<0.05）。研究组术后3 d、术后6周EPDS评分均明显低于对照组（P<0.01）。2组不良反应总发生率比较无差异（P>0.05）。结论 艾司氯胺酮用于剖宫产术后镇痛效果显著,对产妇RAAS影响较小,并可缓解产妇抑郁症状,且不良反应发生率较低。

Objective To analyze the effect of esketamine on analgesia and renin angiotensin aldosterone system（RAAS）and the occurrence of postpartum depression after cesarean delivery．Methods The subjects were 96 pregnant women who underwent cesarean section in our hospital from May 2020 to June 2021,they were divided into 50 cases in the study group and 46 cases in the control group．Both groups of pregnant women were given combined spinal epidural anesthesia for cesarean section．The patients in study group were injected with esmketamine 0.2 mg/kg intravenously 5 minutes before skin incision,and those in control group were injected with the same amount of saline intravenously．The postoperative pain scores（VAS score）,plasma renin activity（PRA）,angiotensin-II（AT-II）,aldosterone（ALD）,Edinburgh Postpartum Depression Scale（EPDS）,and the occurrence of adverse effects were compared between the two groups．Results Compared with the control group,maternal VAS scores were significantly lower in the study group at all postoperative time points,and the differences were statistically significant（P<0.01）．The indexes of RAAS were significantly lower in both groups at T1,T2 and T3 time points than at T0 time point（P<0.05）;the indexes of RAAS were significantly lower in the study group at T1 and T2 time points than in the control group,and the differences were statistically significant（P<0.05）．The postoperative EPDS scores in the study group were significantly lower than those in the control group at 3 d and 6 weeks（P<0.01）．There was no difference in the overall incidence of adverse reactions between the two groups（P>0.05）．Conclusions Esketamine is effective for postoperative analgesia after cesarean section,with less effect on maternal RAAS,and can relieve maternal depressive symptoms,and has a low incidence of adverse reactions．

目的 探讨腰-硬联合阻滞分娩镇痛方式对初产妇在产程进展及产时发热的影响,为临床实践提供理论依据。方法 回顾性分析2020年12月—2021年12月在广州市某三甲医院产科分娩产妇535例的基本资料。观察组（285例）采用腰-硬联合阻滞麻醉分娩镇痛,对照组（250例）选择常规无干预分娩。结果 观察组中的产妇第一产程和第二产程的时间比对照组更长,且产后2 h出血量高于对照组,差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）,除此之外,2组产妇产时发热率比较差异也有统计学意义（P<0.01）。结论 腰硬联合阻滞分娩镇痛在一定程度上会延长产程,且产后2 h的出血量较多,同时也会增加产时发热的概率,存在一定不良反应,故需要密切观察,保证母儿安全。

Objective To investigate the effect of combined spinal-epidural block anesthesia on the progress of labor and intrapartum fever in primipara,and to provide a theoretical basis for clinical practice．Methods The basic data of 535 pregnant women who gave birth in the obstetrics department of a tertiary hospital in Guangzhou from December 2020 to December 2021 were retrospectively analyzed．The observation group（285 cases）was given labor analgesia,and the control group（250 cases）was given routine non-intervention delivery．Results The time of the first stage of labor and the second stage of labor in the observation group was significantly longer than that in the control group,and the bleeding volume 2 hours after delivery was higher than that in the control group,and the difference was statistically significant（P<0.05）．The maternal fever rate during delivery also had statistical significance（P<0.01）．Conclusions Combined spinal-epidural block anesthesia will prolong the labor process to a certain extent,and the amount of bleeding in 2 hours after delivery will be more,and it will also increase the probability of intrapartum fever,with certain adverse reactions．Therefore,close observation is needed to ensure the mother and child safety．

目的 探讨臂丛神经阻滞和关节腔内注射局麻药联合应用在肩关节镜手术中的应用价值。方法 对肩关节镜手术患者100例进行研究,2018年8月—2020年8月入组,根据随机数字表法分组处理,对照组和观察组各为50例,前者用臂丛神经阻滞,后者与关节腔内注射局麻药联合,比较2组麻醉效果、不同阶段疼痛程度、肩关节功能。另对比2组不良反应。结果 观察组麻醉起效时间、苏醒时间和拔管时间分别为(10.72±2.45)min、(8.21±1.32)min和(9.52±1.12)min,与对照组对应指标有差异(P<0.05);2组术前疼痛程度和肩关节功能对比无差异(P>0.05),观察组术后6 h、术后24 h和术后48 h疼痛评分依次为(1.31±0.27)分、(2.87±0.52)分和(3.44±0.42)分,术后6 h、术后12 h、术后24 h和术后48 h镇静评分分别为(2.92±0.32)分、(2.54±0.24)分、(2.38±0.12)分和(2.27±0.15)分,术后1周、1个月和3个月的肩关节功能评分分别为(50.12±4.54)分、(56.18±4.12)分和(73.16±4.78)分,较之于对照组有差异(P<0.05);对照组和观察组出现不良反应的概率分别为18.00%和4.00%(P<0.05)。 结论 在肩关节镜手术中联合应用臂丛神经阻滞联合关节腔内注射局麻药麻醉方式,可提高麻醉效果,术后镇痛和镇静效果明显,也可减少不良反应,对患者肩关节功能改善作用明显,存在广泛应用价值。

目的 对比中成药镇痛活络酊和非甾体抗炎药(Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs,NSAIDs)治疗肱骨外上髁炎(lateral epicondylitis,LE)的短期临床疗效差异。方法 筛选后符合纳入标准的LE患者60例,随机分为镇痛活络酊组(n=30)和NSAIDs组(n=30)。镇痛活络酊组外用镇痛活络酊,NSAIDs组外用法斯通凝胶(酮洛芬),两组均连续用药3周,3次/d。用药后3 周、6 周和12 周连续随访,主要观测指标包括视觉模拟评分(visual analog scale,VAS);肩、肘和手的功能评分(Disabilities of the arm, Shoulder And Hand,DASH);无痛握力(Pain-free grip strength,PFGS)。VAS评分分别测量患者1周前用力活动时的VAS评分和正常休息时的VAS评分,记为VAS(活动时)和VAS(休息时)。运用统计学方法对比分析两组患者在VAS评分(活动时)、VAS评分(休息时)、DASH评分和PFGS上的差异。结果 两组患者在VAS评分(活动时)、VAS评分(休息时)和DASH评分上均未见组间差异(P>0.05)。两组患者在用药前、用药后3周、用药后6周的PGFS对比同样无组间差异(P=0.91,P=0.42,P=0.13)。但是,在用药后12周,镇痛活络酊组的PFGS高于NSAIDs组(P=0.02)。结论 镇痛活络酊缓解LE疼痛的效果与外用NSAIDs相当,对提升伸肌力效果则更优。

Objective To compare the short-term clinical effects difference between analgesic tincture and topical nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in the treatment of lateral epicondylitis (LE). Methods 60 cases of LE patients were randomly divided into an analgesic tincture group (n=30) and a NSAIDs group (n=30). Analgesic tincture was chosen for the analgesic tincture group and topical ketoprofen gel for the NSAIDs group to treat LE. Two groups were treated continuously for 3w, 3 times/day. Clinical results of each drug were followed-up at the time point of 3w, 6w and 12w after usage. Observational indexes included the visual analogue scale (VAS), disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand questionnaire (DASH) and pain-free grip strength (PFGS). The inter-group difference of VAS (at activity), VAS (at rest), DASH score and PFGS were compared subsequently. Results No difference of the VAS (at activity), VAS (at rest), DASH score were ascertained (P> 0.05) between groups. Inter-group difference of PGFS was also not discerned at the time points of pre-treatment and 3 weeks and 6 weeks (P=0.91, P=0.42, P=0.13) post-treatment. However, PFGS of the analgesic tincture group was found to be higher than that of the NSAIDs group (P=0.02) after 12 weeks post-treatment. Conclusion Effect of analgesic tincture in releasing pain is almost the same to that of tropical NSAIDs, but a better effect in improving muscle strength.

目的 研究罗哌卡因阻滞用于胸腹腔镜联合食管癌根治术后镇痛的临床效果。方法 胸腹腔镜联合食管癌根治术患者60例,分为: 观察组(n=30),缝合切口时用0.25%盐酸罗哌卡因10 mL于切口局部浸润;对照组(n=30) 不做局部浸润麻醉处理;记录二组术后2 h、6 h、12 h、24 h、48 h的疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS)及血浆皮质醇浓度。结果 观察组术后2 h、6 h、12 h VAS评分优于对照组,术后12 h观察组血浆皮质醇浓度低于对照组。结论 罗哌卡因术终阻滞术后12 h内镇痛效果明显。

Objective To evaluate the efficiency of postoperative analgesia with ropivacaine block after thoracoscopic-lapacoscopic esophagectomy (TLE). Methods Totally 60 patients with esophageal cancer underwent TLE were divided into two groups: observation group(n=30)with 0.25% ropivacaine hydrochloride solution 10 mL injection around incision before end of the operation; control group(n=30)without the treatment. The VAS and the plasma Cortisol concentration at 2 h、6 h、12 h、24 h、48 h after surgery were recorded. Results The VAS at 2 h、6 h、12 h after surgery in observation group was higher than that of the control group,but not at 24 h、48 h after surgery. The plasma Cortisol concentration in the observation group was higher than that of in the control at 12 hours postoperatively. Conclusion Ropivacaine block of incision is helpful to have analgesic effect within 12 hours after TLE.

目的 初步研究木棉花水提取物抗炎镇痛作用。方法 采用二甲苯和醋酸作为致炎和致痛因子,通过小鼠耳廓肿胀实验、腹腔毛细血管通透性实验与扭体实验,考察灌胃高、中、低剂量的木棉花水提取物的抗炎、镇痛作用。结果 小鼠对于木棉花水提取物的最大耐受量为300 g/kg;木棉花水提取物高剂量(150 g/kg)和中剂量(100 g/kg)均能抑制小鼠耳廓肿胀,降低小鼠腹腔血管通透性;木棉花水提取液各剂量组均能有效地减少小鼠的扭体次数,且作用随剂量增加而增强。结论 木棉花水提取物具有抗炎镇痛作用。

Objective To study the anti-inflammatory and analgesic effect of water extract of Bombax malabaricum DC. Flower. Methods The xylene and acetic acid were used as inflammation and pain factors. The auricle swelling test,intraperitoneal capillary permeability test and writhing experiment were performed to study the anti-inflammatory and analgesic effect with high,medium and low dose of water extract of Bombax malabaricum DC. Flower. Results The maximum tolerated dose of mice for Bombax malabaricum DC. Flower was 300 g/kg. High dose (150 g/kg) and medium dose (100 g/kg) of water extract of Bombax malabaricum DC. Flower could both inhibit mouse auricle swelling and reduce mouse peritoneal vascular permeability. All dosages of the water extract of Bombax malabaricum DC. Flower were effective in reducing the number of writhing in mice,and the effect is strengthened with the increase of dosage. Conclusion Water extract of Bombax malabaricum DC. Flower has anti-inflammatory and analgesic effects.