目的 探讨利拉鲁肽与二甲双胍对新诊断2型糖尿病患者骨代谢的影响。方法 选取2016年1月—2017年6月在我院就诊并确诊为新诊断2型糖尿病患者50例,按照随机数字表法将研究对象随机分为利拉鲁肽组及二甲双胍组,每组各25人。两组患者均单药治疗24周后比较两组患者骨密度、骨代谢指标变化情况。结果 两组患者骨密度、血清ALP以及BGP、PINP水平治疗前后相比,无改变(P>0.05);而利拉鲁肽组患者的β-CTx水平较治疗前降低(P<0.05);两组患者治疗后FPG、2hFPG、HOMA-IR、HbA1c均较治疗前下降(P<0.05),而空腹胰岛素较治疗前上升(P<0.05);利拉鲁肽组患者治疗24周后BMI值低于治疗前(P<0.05)。结论 利拉鲁肽与二甲双胍对新诊断2型糖尿病患者骨密度的影响均不明显,两种药物可有效降低血糖,改善胰岛素抵抗,利拉鲁肽在使用过程中可明显降低患者血清β-CTx水平,但其是否存在骨质保护作用仍需进一步研究。

Objective To explore the effect of liraglutide and metformin on bone metabolism in newly diagnosed type 2 diabetic patients. Methods From January 2016 to June 2017, 50 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus admitted to our hospital were selected. According to the random number table method, the subjects were randomly divided into liraglutide group and metformin group, 25 in each group. Changes in bone mineral density and bone metabolism were compared between the two groups after 24 weeks of monotherapy. Results That there was no significant change in bone mineral density, serum ALP, TPINP,and BGP levels before and after treatment (P>0.05). The β-CTx levels in patients in the liraglutide group were lower than that before treatment (P<0.05); FPG, 2hFPG, HOMA-IR, and HbA1c levels in the two groups were lower than that before treatment (P<0.05). Fasting insulin was higher than that before treatment (P<0.05); BMI was lower in the liraglutide group after 24 weeks of treatment than that before treatment (P<0.05). Conclusion The effects of liraglutide and metformin on the bone mineral density of patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes are not obvious. Liraglutide may reduce serum β-CTx levels during use. We need to have further study whether it has a bone protection.

目的 探讨二甲双胍和胰高糖素样多肽-1对2型糖尿病患者并发骨折恢复的影响。方法 选取2016年5月—2017年4月我院骨科收治的2型糖尿病并发骨折患者120例,按随机原则分为5组,每组24例,单药低剂量二甲双胍组(A1)、单药高剂量二甲双胍组(A2)、单药GLP-1组(B)、低剂量二甲双胍联合GLP-1组(C1)和高剂量二甲双胍联合GLP-1组(C2)。二甲双胍低剂量用药量为0.5 g/次,每日2次口服,高剂量用药量为0.5 g/次,每日4次口服。皮下注射利拉鲁肽每日1次,起始量为每日0.6 mg,1周增加为每日1.2 mg,再1周后增加为每日1.8 mg。血糖控制在理想水平后按照标准的手术方法和规程行相应的手术治疗。同时给予饮食控制及其它对症治疗。分别在1、3、6个月时检测其股骨颈骨密度值(BMD)和Harris系统评分。结果 随着治疗时间延长,A1组、C1组、C2组BMD值和Harris系统评分均增高, 在术后3月和6月时,C1组骨密度值和Harris评分高于A1组(P<0.05), C1组骨密度值和Harris评分高于C2组(P<0.05)。结论 胰高糖素样多肽-1可促进2型糖尿病患者骨折愈合、功能恢复,且与低剂量二甲双胍联用促进骨折愈合效果优于与高剂量二甲双胍联用。

Objective To investigate the effects of metformin and glucagon like polypeptide -1 on fracture recovery in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus(DM). Methods We selected 120 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus from May 2016 to April 2017 in department of orthopedicsin in our hospital and randomly divided them into 5 groups, 24 cases in each group,includingthe low dose of metformin monotherapy group (A1), the high dose of metformin monotherapy group (A2), single drug GLP-1 group (B), and GLP-1 group low dose of metformin combination (C1) and high dose of metformin combination with GLP-1 group (C2). The low dose of metformin was 0.5 g / time, 2 times a day for oral administration. The high dose was 0.5 g / time, 4 times a day. Subcutaneous injection of liraglutide was once daily, starting at a daily dose of 0.6 mg, 1.2 mg daily after 1 week and 1.8 mg daily after another week. After an ideal level of blood glucose control, corresponding surgical procedures should be performed according to standard surgical methods and procedures. Diet control and other symptomatic treatments were also given. The femoral neck bone mineral density (BMD) and the Harris system score were examined at the first, third, and sixth month respectively. Results With the prolongation of treatment time, the BMD value and Harris system score in the A1 group, C1 group, C2 group were increased. After surgery in March and June, the BMD and Harris score of C1 group were higher than that of A1 group (P<0.05). The bone mineral density and Harris score of C1 group was significantly higher than that of group C2 (P<0.05). Conclusion Glucagon like peptide -1 may promote the fracture recovery and functional recovery in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, and with combination of low dose metformin is more effective than that with high dose metformin.

目的 探讨一种适合社区糖尿病患者健康素养的干预方法,并进一步探讨提高糖尿病患者健康素养对社区卫生服务利用的影响。方法 选择2014年—2015年在我社区卫生服务中心建档的210例糖尿病居民为调查研究对象,对糖尿病患者进行健康素养干预后,比较其健康素养、基本医疗服务利用、社区卫生服务利用情况。结果 对社区糖尿病人进行健康素养干预后,患者的健康理念、传染病预防、健康行为、基本医疗知识、安全素养得分均比干预前高,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。首次就诊医疗机构首选社区率及区县级医疗机构就诊的比例干预后比干预前高(P<0.05),最近两周内在社区医疗机构就诊率、签约全科医生率均比健康素养干预前高,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。而糖尿病患者过去1年住院例数干预前后无差别,差异没有统计学意义(P>0.05)。患者参与社区健康教育活动的次数干预后比干预前多(P<0.05),参加免费体检及接受社区医生健康生活方式的指导的比例比干预前高(P<0.05)。结论 利用健康促进模式可提高糖尿病患者的健康素养,健康素养的提高可使其对卫生服务的利用有所增加,使其自身的健康状况得以改善。

目的 探讨糖尿病自我管理支持对社区2型糖尿病患者生化指标控制的影响。方法 2015年1月1日前已确诊为2型糖尿病患者,随机分为对照组和干预组,对照组303例按照广州市基本公共卫生服务包要求进行定期随访、体检及健康教育,干预组130例进行自我管理支持干预,观察两组生化指标的变化。结果 与对照组比较,自我管理支持组的空腹血糖、总胆固醇、甘油三酯、谷丙转氨酶、尿酸控制效果较好,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 自我管理支持对社区2型糖尿病患者生化指标控制的效果良好,值得推广。

Objective To evaluate the control effect of biochemical criterion in patients with type 2 diabetes under diabetes self-management support in community. Methods 130 patients with type 2 diabetes in community from January 2015 to December 2015 accepting the diabetes self-management support were chosen as research group, another 303 diabetic patients without the diabetes self-management support were set as control group, the effect of management was analyzed. Results There was statistically significant difference (P<0.05) in biochemical criterion including blood sugar (BS), total cholesterol (TC), triglyceride (TG), alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and uric acid (UA). Conclusion Control effect of biochemical criterion was good in the diabetes self- management support for people with type 2 diabetes, which was worth to be popularized.

目的 探讨老年2型糖尿病患者牙周病发生情况及相关因素,为开展综合预防和治疗措施提供参考。方法 选取到我院住院治疗的老年2型糖尿病患者273例,检查其牙周病患病情况,同时收集年龄、性别、文化程度、体重指数、病程、吸烟、空腹血糖、糖化血红蛋白、刷牙习惯等资料,比较牙周病患病组与未患病组之间上述资料的差异,探讨导致牙周病发生的影响因素。结果 273例研究对象中患有牙周病154例(56.41%),其中,牙龈炎60例,牙周炎94例。牙周病组平均存留牙数(18.54±6.31)颗,未患牙周病组平均存留牙数(21.62±7.48)颗(t=3.679,P<0.001)。年龄较大(P<0.001)、病程较长(P<0.001)、吸烟(P<0.001)、空腹血糖(P<0.001)和糖化血红蛋白(P<0.001)水平较高是老年2型糖尿病患者发生牙周病的危险因素,而文化程度高(P=0.017),刷牙>1次/d(P<0.001),竖刷(P=0.004),使用牙线(P=0.004)是其保护因素。结论 老年2型糖尿病患者中牙周病患病率较高,临床上应做好三级预防措施,降低牙周病发生风险因素的暴露。

Objective To explore the periodontal disease occurrence and its factors for elderly type 2 diabetes patients, providing reference for comprehensive prevention and treatment measures. Methods 273 cases of elderly in-patients with type 2 diabetes in our hospital were enrolled. We checked their periodontal disease conditions, collected information including age, sex, educational level, body mass index, disease duration, smoking, fasting blood glucose, glycosylated hemoglobin, brushing habits. These values were compared between periodontal disease group and no periodontal disease group. Results People with periodontal disease in 273 cases of the object of study included 154 patients (56.41%), among them, gingivitis 60 cases, 94 cases of periodontitis. The teeth number was (18.54±6.31) for periodontal disease group on average, with (21.62 ±7.48) for no periodontal disease group (t=3.679, P<0.001). Older (P<0.001), longer course of disease (P<0.001), smoking (P<0.001), higher fasting blood glucose (P<0.001) and higher glycosylated hemoglobin (P<0.001) were risk factors of periodontal disease for elderly patients with type 2 diabetes. And well-educated (P=0.017), brushing teeth frequency > 1 / d (P<0.001), vertical brush mode (P=0.004), the use of dental floss (P=0.004) were the protective factors. Conclusion Periodontal disease prevalence is high in elderly patients with type 2 diabetes. The three level preventive measures should be strengthened to reduce the exposure of the periodontal disease risk factors.

目的 探讨CAl99在T2DM患者与健康人群中的差异及CAl99与糖化血红蛋白(HBAlc)的相关性。方法 收集2013年1月—9月T2DM患者382例,选择同期健康体检者90例作为对照组,分别检测血清CA199与HbA1c水平,根据HbA1c水平将T2DM患者分为血糖控制组(HbA1c<7.5%),控制不佳组(HbA1C≧7.5%),T2DM患者CA199水平与对照组比较,以体重指数、空腹血糖、HbA1c等为自变量,比较各变量对CA199的影响程度。结果 T2DM患者中CA199水平高于对照组,两者比较差异有统计学意义(t=3.45,P=0.005),血糖控制不佳组CA199阳性率(21.4%)高于血糖控制组(4%),差异有统计学意义(χ²=43.33,P=0.006),HBAlc控制组(4%)与健康体检者(0.9%)无显著差异(t=0.347,P=0.254,),CA199水平与HbA1c的相关系数最高(r=0.573,P=0.004)。结论 T2DM患者CA199水平和HbA1c存在相关性, 2型糖尿病患者CAl99升高与长期血糖控制不佳有关。

Objective To explore the differences in patients with T2DM and healthy people and to explore the correlation between CA199 and HbA1c in patients with T2DM. Methods 382 patients with T2DM and 90 healthy subjects for control group were collected from January to September in 2013.The level of CA199 and HbA1c were measured by chemiluminescence method and high performance liquid chromatography assay respectively. Accordingto the level of HbA1c,patients were divided in to blood glucose controlled group(HbA1c<7.5%) and blood glucose uncontrolled group (HbA1c≧7.5%).The level of CA199 were compared with control group. Sex, age, course of disease, body mass index, fasting blood glucose and HbA1c were included as independent variables for multiple stepwise regression analysis, to compare of influences of the variables on the CA199. Results The level of CA199 in T2DM patients was significantly higher than those of healthy subjects(t=3.45, P=0.005) and the positive rate of CA199 in blood glucose uncontrolled group(21.4%) was significantly higher than those of controlled group(4.0%)(χ²=43.33,P=0.006),there is no significant difference between in blood glucose controlled group(4.0%) and healthy people group(0.9%)(t=0.347,P=0.254).Among the many variables, the level of CA199 and HbA1c correlation coefficient was the highest (r=0.573, P=0.004. Conclusion There was a close correlation between CA199 level and HbA1c.There was a correlation between the positive level of CA199 and uncontrolled blood glucose.

目的 探讨农村地区糖尿病患者在镇卫生院—村卫生站一体化管理模式下的效果。方法 于2013年10月—2014年9月对花山镇26个村1267名糖尿病患者实行镇卫生院—乡村卫生站一体化管理,镇卫生院定期组织医疗队到村卫生站健康宣教、义诊、体检,村卫生站乡医为本村糖尿病患者开展跟踪随访、血糖监测、用药及饮食运动指导。一年后比较患者的规范管理率、血糖控制率。结果 实施管理后农村糖尿病患者的规范管理率和血糖控制达标率均有提高,尤以血糖控制达标率为明显。结论 对农村社区糖尿病患者实施镇卫生院—村卫生站一体化管理能更好地跟踪监测患者血糖水平,增强患者防病意识,有效提高农村社区糖尿病患者血糖控制率。

目的 探讨社区护理干预指导在糖尿病中的临床护理效果。方法 采取回顾分析法对我市3个街道的居民资料,选取其中有分析价值的100例糖尿病患者资料进行临床分析,根据不同护理方法将患者分为对照组和观察组,对照组实施常规护理,观察组进行社区护理干预指导,比较两组护理效果。结果 实验组体重指数为(22.9±2.48)kg/m²、FBG指标为(7.24±1.68)mmol/L、2hBG指标为(9.72±2.14)mmol/L、HbALc指标为(7.26±1.08)%,低于对照组(P<0.05);实验组96%合理饮食、98%生活具有规律性,92%患者能够定期运动,94%患者能够自我监测病情,高于对照组(P<0.05)。结论 对社区糖尿病患者进行护理指导时,常识性问题、危险性因素、并发症预防问题认识不足是护理督促的要点。因此应提升社区糖尿病患者的自我管理能力,对糖尿病患者进行心理护理、饮食治疗、运动养生、定期服药等方面的进行护理干预,提高社区居民的预防意识和督促指导。

Objective To investigate the guidance of community nursing intervention in diabetes clinical care effect. Methods A retrospective analysis of the city's three neighborhood offices resident data to be analyzed, select one of the analytical value of 100 patients with diabetes clinical data analysis, according to the different methods of care patients were divided into a control group and observation group.Control implementation of routine care group, observation group of community nursing intervention guidance, care and effect between the two groups. Results Body mass index in the experimental group (22.9±2.48) kg/m², FBG indicators (7.24±1.68) mmol/L, 2hBG indicators (9.72±2.14) mmol/L, HbALc indicators (7.26±1.08)%, significantly were lower than the control group (P<0.05); the experimental group, 96% of a reasonable diet, 98% had a regular life, 92% of patients can do exercise regularly, 94% of patients were able to self-monitoring disease.It was significantly higher (P<0.05). Conclusion Diabetic patients in community care and guidance, common sense, risk factors, lack of awareness of the issue of prevention of complications is the point of care supervise, and also one of the main problems exist. It should enhance self-management of diabetes, psychological care, diet therapy, exercise regimen, regular medication and other aspects of nursing intervention guidance. It should be increasing community awareness of prevention, improve supervision and guidance role.

目的 评价自我管理小组干预对社区2型糖尿病患者的管理效果。方法 在2013年底选取本区社区卫生服务中心100例患者研究,运用自身对照方法,管理1年后对其自我管理效能、生化指标、空腹血糖、糖化血红蛋白进行比较。结果 管理一年后饮食控制、运动控制、药物依从性、监测依从性、足部护理等指标差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。空腹血糖、糖化血红蛋白、总胆固醇、尿酸下降,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。空腹血糖达标率由12%上升到37%,糖化血红蛋白达标率由10%上升到34%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 自我管理小组干预提高了社区2型糖尿病患者自我管理水平,改善了主要的生化指标,值得社区推广应用。

Objective To evaluate the function of self-management group program on patients with type 2 diabetes in community. Methods Self-management was carried out for one year among 100 patients with type 2 diabetes, the effect of management was analyzed. Results There was statistically significant difference in diet control, motion control, drug compliance, monitoring compliance, and foot care after one year intervention (P<0.05). GLU, HbA1c, CHOL, UA were decreased. The difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion Self-management of group intervention is effective in patients with type 2 diabetes, is worthy of further popularization and application.

目的 探讨2型糖尿病患者发生医院感染危险因素。方法 收集2010年1月—2015年1月我院收治890例2型糖尿病患者临床资料行回顾性分析,根据是否发生医院感染分为感染组(75例)和非感染组(815例),对两组患者相关因素进行分析。结果 2型糖尿病医院感染发生率为8.43%,好发于呼吸系统感染。年龄、病程、住院时间、血糖控制差、侵袭性操作、合并并发症、合并基础疾病为2型糖尿病患者发生感染的危险因素。结论 2型糖尿病患者发生医院感染危险因素较多,临床针对高危患者应重点进行预防,降低感染率,提高患者治疗效果。