目的 探讨便携式超声仪超声重点评估（e-FAST）技术在批量伤员军地联合院前救治中的应用效果。方法 抽取2021年5月—2023年10月中国人民解放军联勤保障部队第九八八医院中心急诊科收治的80例批量伤员,均开展军地联合院前救治,按照治疗方案不同分为观察组和对照组,每组患者40例,其中对照组在救治现场行基于创伤严重程度（CRAMS）评分,进行常规急救处置,救护车返院后行CT检查并进行相应伤情治疗,观察组救治现场行CRAMS评分,进行常规急救处置,院前接诊医师在现场或救护车上使用便携式超声仪按照e-FAST流程检查相应部位,初步诊断后进行相应伤情治疗,对比两组患者治疗效果,两组患者诊断时间、初次医疗接触—进入手术室时间及入院诊断与出院时确定性诊断的符合率、两组患者治疗前后CRAMS评分及CRAMS≤8分抢救成功率。结果 观察组治疗有效率为95.0%,对照组为85.0%,对比差异无统计学意义（χ²=2.222,P=0.136）;观察组患者的诊断时间（13.56±2.36）min、初次医疗接触—进入手术室时间（30.42±8.99）min均短于对照组[（23.64±5.69）、（52.27±12.60）min],差异有统计学意义（t=10.349、8.928,P<0.05）;观察组患者入院诊断与出院时确定性诊断的符合为97.5%,对照组患者入院诊断与出院时确定性诊断的符合为95.0%,差异无统计学意义（χ²=0.346,P=0.556）;治疗后两组患者的CRAMS评分均升高,且观察组（9.87±2.62）分高于对照组（8.60±2.98）分,差异有统计学意义（t=2.024,P=0.046）;观察组患者CRAMS≤8分的抢救成功率为97.50%,对照组CRAMS≤8抢救成功率为85.00%,观察组患者CRAMS≤8分的抢救成功率高于对照组（χ²=3.914,P=0.048）。结论 本研究从军地联合救治批量伤员切入,瞄准部队医院军民融合战略发展路线,本文针对便携式超声仪e-FAST应用范围前移,明显地提高急救人员院前救治能力,提高抢救成功率,值得临床参考。

Objective To explore the application effect of portable ultrasound e-FAST technology in the pre hospital treatment of batch wounded soldiers in military civilian joint hospitals．Methods Eighty batch wounded patients admitted to the emergency department of 988 Hospital from May 2021 to October 2023 were selected,all of whom underwent military civilian joint pre hospital treatment．They were divided into an observation group and a control group according to different treatment plans,with 40 patients in each group．The control group received CRAMS scores at the treatment site for routine first aid treatment,CT scans after ambulance return to the hospital for corresponding injury treatment,the observation group received CRAMS scores at the treatment site for routine first aid treatment,and the pre-hospital attending physician used a portable ultrasound instrument to examine the corresponding parts on site or in the ambulance according to the e-FAST process．After preliminary diagnosis,corresponding injury treatment was carried out．The treatment effects of the two groups of patients were compared,and the diagnosis time and initial diagnosis of the two groups of patients were compared．The time from medical contact to entering the operation room,the compliance rate of discharge and admission diagnoses,the CRAMS score before and after treatment,and the success rate of rescue with CRAMS ≤ 8 for both groups of patients were compared．Results The effective rate of treatment in the observation group was 95.0%,while in the control group it was 85.0%,which difference was not statistically significant（χ²=2.222,P=0.136）．The time to diagnosis（13.56±2.36）min,time to the operating room（30.42±8.99）min were shorter than that in the control group[（23.64±5.69）,（52.27±12.60）min],with significant difference（t=10.349,8.928,P<0.05）．The consistency between the admission diagnosis and the definitive diagnosis at discharge of the observation group patients was 97.5%,while the consistency of the control group patients was 95.0%．There was no significant difference between the groups（χ²=0.346,P=0.556）．After treatment,the CRAMS scores of both groups of patients increased,the observation group（9.87±2.62）was higher than that of the control group（8.60±2.98）（t=2.024,P=0.046）．The success rate of CRAMS ≤ 8 rescue in the observation group was 97.50%,while the success rate in the control group was 85.00%．The success rate of CRAMS ≤ 8 rescue in the observation group was higher than that in the control group（χ²=3.914,P=0.048）．Conclusions This study focuses on the joint treatment of batch wounded soldiers by military and civilian forces,aiming at the development path of military civilian integration strategy in military hospitals．The application scope of portable ultrasound e-FAST has been moved forward,which significantly improves the pre hospital treatment ability of emergency personnel and improves the success rate of rescue．It is worth clinical reference．

目的 探讨脊柱外科围术期康复指导方案的临床疗效。方法 选取毕节市第三人民医院脊柱外科184例行择期手术治疗的患者,对照组继续脊柱外科原康复方案行术前及术后管理,观察组使用新的康复行为规范方案,即系统行术前预康复指导和术后规范管理。对患者的术后起床活动、在院时间、住院费用、疼痛恢复情况、满意调查情况进行对比。结果 术前,患者的性别、年龄、病种分布对比差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。术后,观察组的术后下床活动时间（3.09±1.02）d、住院时间（10.73±3.96）d、住院费用（17 388±5 217）元、术后2天VAS评分（3.04±1.19）分、出院时VAS评分（2.36±1.25）分、住院患者满意度（89.80±8.20）分,均优于对照组的术后起床活动时间（4.44±1.58）d、住院时间（13.38±2.73）d、住院费用（23 242±7 971）元、术后2天VAS评分（4.01±1.44）分、出院时VAS评分（3.39±1.38）分、住院满意度（80.27±11.45）分。新的康复指导方案在脊柱外科患者中较对照组减轻术后疼痛、减少患者卧床时间及缩短住院时间（P<0.05）。结论 围手术期加快患者术后康复及提高术后恢复优良率,提高患者就医满意度,使医患关系更加融洽。

Objective To investigate the clinical effect of the rehabilitation guidance protocol of spinal surgery in perioperative period．Methods A total of 184 patients undergoing selective surgery in the spine surgery department of the Third People's Hospital of Bijie City were selected．The conventional rehabilitation group was the control group,which preoperative and postoperative management was continued with the original rehabilitation program of spine surgery;the rehabilitation guidance group was the observation group：the new rehabilitation behavior code program was used to provide systematic preoperative pre-rehabilitation guidance and postoperative standardized management．The patients' activities of getting up after surgery,days in hospital,economic use,pain recovery and satisfaction survey were compared．Results Before surgical treatment,the gender,age and disease distribution of patients were compared（P>0.05）．After surgical treatment,observation group：Postoperative time of getting out of bed（3.09±1.02）d,length of hospitalization（10.73±3.96）d,hospitalization expenses（17 388±5 217）yuan,VAS score of 2 days after surgery（3.04±1.19）,VAS score of discharge（2.36±1.25）,inpatient satisfaction（89.80±8.12）,were significantly better than the control group：Postoperative activity time（4.44±1.58）d,length of hospitalization（13.38±2.73）d,hospitalization expenses（23 242±7 971）yuan,VAS score（4.01±1.44）,VAS score at discharge（3.39±1.38）,hospitalization satisfaction（80.27±11.45）．Compared with the control group,the new rehabilitation guidelines significantly reduced postoperative pain,bed time and hospital days in spinal surgery patients（P<0.05）．Conclusions Speeding up the postoperative rehabilitation of patients and improving the rate of postoperative recovery,improving patients' sense of access to medical treatment,can make the doctor-patient relationship more harmonious．

目的 探究尿毒症继发性甲状旁腺功能亢进经甲状旁腺切除术治疗效果及安全性分析。方法 选取2017年6月—2019年5月于我院就诊的90例尿毒症继发性甲状旁腺功能亢进患者为研究对象,随机分为对照组与观察组,两组各45例。均采取同一药物治疗,对照组行次全切除治疗,观察组行甲状旁腺全切除术+前臂移植术。对比分析两组治疗效果、血生化指标及并发症。结果 观察组疗效优于对照组(P<0.05);观察组术后1周、1个月钙、iPTH、磷、钙磷乘积及ALP水平均低于对照组(P<0.05);观察组并发症发生率低于对照组(P<0.05)。结论 甲状旁腺全切除+前臂移植治疗尿毒症继发性甲状旁腺功能亢进疗效显著,并发症风险低,值得推广。

目的 对比紫杉醇脂质体(LEP)与紫杉醇(PTX)联合顺铂(DDP)治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的临床疗效及安全性。方法 晚期NSCLC患者48例,随机分为对照组和试验组,对照组采用紫杉醇175 mg/m²,试验组采用紫杉醇脂质体175 mg/m²,均联合顺铂75 mg/m²化疗,21天为1个周期,治疗2个周期后评价疗效,记录近期疗效与治疗期间不良反应。结果 近期疗效:对照组有效率37.50%,疾病控制率为79.17%,试验组有效率为41.67%,疾病控制率为83.33%,两组差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。不良反应:白细胞减少、贫血及血小板减少的发生率两组差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),脱发和恶心、呕吐的发生率两组差异亦无统计学意义(P>0.05),但试验组皮疹、呼吸困难、肌肉痛及周围神经炎的发生率明显低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 紫杉醇脂质体治疗晚期NSCLC与紫杉醇疗效相当,但周围神经炎及过敏反应较紫杉醇为轻。

Objective To compare the efficacy and safety of paclitaxel liposome combined with cisplatin and paclitaxel combined with cisplatin in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods 48 patients with advanced NSCLC were randomized into two groups, experimental group were given paclitaxel liposome at 175 mg/m²,and control group were given paclitaxel at 175 mg/m². Both groups combined with DDP at 75 mg/m² per cycle every 21 days.The efficacy and safety were evaluated after two cycles. Results The overall response rate was 37.50% in experimental group and 41.67% in control group, and the disease control rate was 79.17% in experimental group and 83.33% in control group. There was no significant difference between two groups(P>0.05). Though there was no significant difference in incidence of neutropenia,anemia, thrombocytopenia and alopecia, nausea and vomiting, but the occurred rates of rash、muscle pain and peripheral neuritis were significantly lower in experimental group than those in control group. Conclusion In the treatment of advanced NSCLC, both paclitaxel liposome combined with cisplatin and paclitaxel combined with cisplatin have similar efficacy, but paclitaxel liposome can significantly reduce the incidence of peripheral neuritis and serious hypersensitive reactions.

       目的   分析原发性肾病综合征（PNS）患儿在糖皮质激素（激素）治疗后淋巴细胞亚群及免疫因子的水平变化，以探讨PNS耐药机制。方法   选取PNS患儿共71例，正常对照组108例，收集PNS患者在激素治疗前、后及正常对照组儿童的淋巴细胞亚群［CD4⁺ 、CD8⁺ 、CD4⁺ /CD8⁺ 、CD19⁺ 和自然杀伤（NK）细胞］及免疫因子水平，并分析激素治疗后激素敏感患儿和激素耐药患儿相关指标的差异。结果  PNS患儿淋巴细胞亚群及免疫因子水平异常，激素治疗后PNS患儿总免疫球蛋白E（IgE）水平［767.50（270.25，1 937.50）IU/mL vs 311.00（62.70，757.00）IU/mL］（P=0.008）下降，而CD4⁺ T细胞比例［（33.88±7.42）% vs（38.25±7.16）%］（P=0.004）升高，激素治疗敏感患儿NK细胞比例高于激素治疗耐药患儿［（8.39±4.60）% vs（4.72±1.99）%］（P=0.034），IgE水平低于耐药患儿［311.00（62.70，633.00）IU/mL vs783.00（88.05，1 290.00）IU/mL］（P＜0.001）。结论  PNS患儿淋巴细胞亚群分布及免疫球蛋白水平异常，激素治疗可影响患儿CD4⁺ T细胞比例及IgE水平，并且NK细胞比例和IgE水平与患儿激素耐药相关。

       Objective  To evaluate the changes of lymphocyte subsets and immune factors levels in children with primary nephrotic syndrome（PNS），and explore the pathogenesis of PNS．Methods  A total of 71 patients with PNS and 108 normal control cases were selected．Flow cytometry was used to detect the concentration of lymphocyte subsets（CD4⁺ ，CD8⁺ ，CD4⁺ /CD8⁺ ，CD19⁺  and natural killer［NK］ cells）and immune factors before and after treatment．The difference of  related factors between steroid-sensitive and steroid-resistant children after therapy were analyzed．Results  Lymphocyte subsets and immune molecule levels were abnormal in children with NPS．The level of IgE（767.50［270.25，1 937.50］IU/mL vs 311.00［62.70，757.00］IU/mL，P=0.008）was significantly decreased after therapy（P＜0.05），while CD4⁺  T cells（［33.88±7.42］% vs［38.25±7.16］%，P=0.004）were significantly increased．The level of NK cells in steroid-sensitive children was significantly higher than that in steroid-resistant children（［8.39±4.60］% vs［4.72±1.99］%，P=0.034），while the level of  IgE was significantly lower than that of steroid -resistant children（311.00［62.70，633.00］IU/mL vs 783.00［88.05，1 290.00］IU/mL，P＜0.001）．Conclusions  The distribution of lymphocyte subsets and the level of immune factors in PNS children were abnormal．Steroid therapy could affect the levels of CD4⁺  T cells and IgE，and the levels of NK cells and IgE were related to steroid-resistance in PNS children．

       目的   探讨、对比休克指数（SI）与血乳酸水平预测院前创伤性休克患者预后中的应用。方法   于2020年12月—2023年12月收治80例创伤性休克患者，均接受SI、乳酸水平的监测。结合监测的结果进行分组：乳酸正常组：乳酸水平在2 mmol/L以下，升高组：2 mmol/L以上；SI正常组：SI在0.9以下，升高组：SI在0.9以上。观察、记录患者入院7 d后的序贯性器官功能衰竭评分（SOFA），对多器官功能障碍综合征（MODS）情况进行评估。同时观察、记录机械通气、血管活性药物的使用和住院等情况。结果   乳酸水平升高组60例，正常组20组；SI升高组58例，正常组22例，女性乳酸水平、SI，与男性比较差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）。是否发生多器官功能障碍者的年龄、性别、SI指数比较差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）；格拉斯哥昏迷评分（GCS）评分［（4.22±1.53）分 vs （9.46±3.82）分，t=7.816，P＜0.001］、住院时间［（23.34±5.71）d vs （12.26±2.11）d，t=11.830，P＜0.001］、基础乳酸值［（4.75±2.36）mmol/L vs （2.04±1.11）mmol/L，t=6.721，P＜0.001］与发生MODS在组间对比差异有统计学意义。SI升高组的容量复苏收缩压＞80 mmHg（%）有27例，与乳酸水平升高组比较差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）（46.55% vs 18.18%，χ ² =12.237，P＜0.001）。乳酸水平升高组中，11例患者接受机械通气，乳酸水平均升高（P＜0.05）；9例患者使用血管活性药物，乳酸水平均升高，比较差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）；38例住院患者，24例乳酸水平升高（P＜0.05）。13例患者接受机械通气，12例SI升高，比较差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）；11例患者接受血管活性物治疗，8例SI升高，比较差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）；39例患者住院，SI升高22例，比较差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。结论   针对重症的创伤性休克患者，当血乳酸水平升高时会大大增加MODS发生的概率，乳酸水平在对重症创伤性休克患者预后进行预测时，应用价值更高。

       Objective  To explore and compare the application of shock index（SI）and  blood lactic acid level in predicting the prognosis of patients with pre-hospital traumatic shock．Methods  From December 2020 to December 2023，80 patients with traumatic shock were enrolled，and their SI and levels of lactic acid were monitored．Patients were grouped according to the monitoring results：normal group：lactic acid level below 2 mmol/L，increased group：above 2 mmol/L；normal group：SI below 0.9，and increased group：SI above 0.9．The sequential organ failure score（SOFA）was observed and recorded 7 days after hospitalization，and the situation of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome（MODS）was evaluated．At the same time，mechanical ventilation，the use of vasoactive substances and hospitalization were observed and recorded．Results  There were 60 cases in the group with increased lactic acid level and 20 cases in the normal group．There were 58 cases of increased SI and 22 cases of normal．The lactic acid level and SI index in women were higher than those in men，with no difference（P＞0.05）．There were no differences in age，sex，SI index and the incidence of MODS（P＞0.05）．GCS score（4.22±1.53 vs 9.46±3.82），hospitalization days（23.34±5.71 vs 12.26±2.11）d，basal lactate value（4.75±2.36 vs 2.04±1.11）mmol L-1 were significantly different from those of MODS（t=11.830，P＜0.001；t=6.721，P＜0.001，P＜0.05）．There were 27 cases with volume  resuscitation systolic blood pressure ＞ 80 mmhg（%）in the group with increased SI，which was different from that of SI and lactic acid（46.55% vs18.18%，χ ² =12.237，P＜0.001；P＜0.05）．Lactic acid increased group：11 patients received mechanical ventilation，and the lactic acid levels of all 11 patients increased（P＜0.05）．Nine patients used vasoactive substances，and their lactic acid levels all increased，with no significant difference（P＞0.05）．Of the 38 inpatients，24 cases had elevated lactic acid levels（P＜0.05）．Thirteen patients received mechanical ventilation，and 12 patients had elevated SI，with no statistical significance（P＞0.05）．Eleven patients were treated with vasoactive agents，and 8 patients had increased SI，with no difference（P＞0.05）．Among the 39 patients hospitalized，22 cases had increased SI，and the difference was statistically significant（P＜0.05）．Conclusions  For patients with severe traumatic shock，when the blood lactic acid level increases，the probability of MODS will be greatly increased．Compared with SI index，lactic acid level has higher application value in predicting the prognosis of patients with severe traumatic shock．

          目的   探讨便携式超声仪超声重点评估（e-FAST）技术在批量伤员军地联合院前救治中的应用效果。方法    抽取2021年5月—2023年10月中国人民解放军联勤保障部队第九八八医院中心急诊科收治的80例批量伤员，均开展军地联合院前救治，按照治疗方案不同分为观察组和对照组，每组患者40例，其中对照组在救治现场行基于创伤严重程度（CRAMS）评分，进行常规急救处置，救护车返院后行CT检查并进行相应伤情治疗，观察组救治现场行CRAMS评分，进行常规急救处置，院前接诊医师在现场或救护车上使用便携式超声仪按照e-FAST流程检查相应部位，初步诊断后进行相应伤情治疗，对比两组患者治疗效果，两组患者诊断时间、初次医疗接触—进入手术室时间及入院诊断与出院时确定性诊断的符合率、两组患者治疗前后CRAMS评分及CRAMS≤8分抢救成功率。结果   观察组治疗有效率为95.0%，对照组为85.0%，对比差异无统计学意义（χ ² =2.222，P=0.136）；观察组患者的诊断时间（13.56±2.36）min、初次医疗接触—进入手术室时间（30.42±8.99）min均短于对照组［（23.64±5.69）、（52.27±12.60）min］，差异有统计学意义（t=10.349、8.928，P＜0.05）；观察组患者入院诊断与出院时确定性诊断的符合为97.5%，对照组患者入院诊断与出院时确定性诊断的符合为95.0%，差异无统计学意义（χ ² =0.346，P=0.556）；治疗后两组患者的CRAMS评分均升高，且观察组（9.87±2.62）分高于对照组（8.60±2.98）分，差异有统计学意义（t=2.024，P=0.046）；观察组患者CRAMS≤8分的抢救成功率为97.50%，对照组CRAMS≤8抢救成功率为85.00%，观察组患者CRAMS≤8分的抢救成功率高于对照组（χ ² =3.914，P=0.048）。结论    本研究从军地联合救治批量伤员切入，瞄准部队医院军民融合战略发展路线，本文针对便携式超声仪e-FAST应用范围前移，明显地提高急救人员院前救治能力，提高抢救成功率，值得临床参考。

       Objective  To explore the application effect of portable ultrasound e-FAST technology in the pre hospital treatment of batch wounded soldiers in military civilian joint hospitals．Methods  Eighty batch wounded patients admitted to the emergency department of 988 Hospital from May 2021 to October 2023 were selected，all of whom underwent military civilian joint pre hospital treatment．They were divided into an observation group and a control group according to different treatment plans，with 40 patients in each group．The control group received CRAMS scores at the treatment site for routine first aid treatment，CT scans after ambulance return to the hospital for corresponding injury treatment，the observation group  received CRAMS scores at the treatment site for routine first aid treatment，and the pre-hospital attending physician used a portable ultrasound instrument to examine the corresponding parts on site or in the ambulance according to the e-FAST process．After preliminary diagnosis，corresponding injury treatment was carried out．The treatment effects of the two groups of patients were compared，and the diagnosis time and initial diagnosis of the two groups of patients were compared．The time from medical contact to entering the operation room，the compliance rate of discharge and admission diagnoses，the CRAMS score before and after treatment，and the success rate of rescue with CRAMS ≤ 8 for both groups of patients were compared．Results  The effective rate of treatment in the observation group was 95.0%，while in the control group it was 85.0%，which difference was not statistically significant（χ ² =2.222，P=0.136）．The time to diagnosis（13.56±2.36）min，time to the operating room（30.42±8.99）min were shorter than that in the control group［（23.64±5.69），（52.27±12.60）min］，with significant difference（t=10.349，8.928，P＜0.05）．The consistency  between the admission diagnosis and the definitive diagnosis at discharge of the observation group patients was 97.5%，while the consistency of the control group patients was 95.0%．There was no significant difference between the groups（χ ² =0.346，P=0.556）．After treatment，the CRAMS scores of both groups of patients increased，the observation group（9.87±2.62）was higher than that of the control group（8.60±2.98）（t=2.024，P=0.046）．The success rate of CRAMS ≤ 8 rescue in the observation group was 97.50%，while the success rate in the control group was 85.00%．The success rate of CRAMS ≤ 8 rescue in the observation group was higher than that in the control group（χ ² =3.914，P=0.048）．Conclusions  This study focuses on the joint treatment of batch wounded soldiers by military and civilian forces，aiming at the development path of military civilian integration strategy in military hospitals．The application scope of portable ultrasound e-FAST has been moved forward，which significantly improves the pre hospital treatment ability of emergency personnel and improves the success rate of rescue．It is worth clinical reference．