目的 观察慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重期（AECOPD）患者应用基于Caprini量表评估的干预模式联合充气加压泵（IPC）预防静脉血栓（VTE）的效果。方法 选取河南省人民医院在2023年11月—2024年11月收入的82例AECOPD患者作为研究对象，经随机数表法分为对照组41例予以VTE常规干预，观察组41例在对照组的基础上接受基于Caprini量表评估的干预模式联合IPC预防。比较两组AECOPD患者肢体情况及深静脉血栓（VTE）发生情况、凝血指标及股静脉血流速度。结果 观察组肢体肿胀率、肢体疼痛率及VTE发生率均低于对照组（P＜0.05）。干预前，两组AECOPD患者凝血酶时间（TT）、凝血酶原时间（PT）、活化部分凝血活酶时间（APTT）、D-二聚体水平比较差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）；干预后，两组患者TT、PT、APTT、D-二聚体水平均降低，观察组较低（P＜0.05）。干预前，两组AECOPD患者平均流速、血流峰速及阻力指数比较差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）；干预后，两组患者平均流速、血流峰速均升高，观察组高于对照组（P＜0.05）；阻力指数均降低，观察组低于对照组（P＜0.05）。结论 AECOPD患者应用基于Caprini量表评估的干预模式联合IPC能有效降低肢体肿胀率、肢体疼痛率及VTE发生率，改善凝血指标与股静脉血流速。

   Objective To observe the effect of a Caprini score?based intervention model combined with intermittent pneumatic compression（IPC）in preventing venous thromboembolism（VTE）in patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease（AECOPD）．Methods A total of 82 AECOPD patients admitted to Henan Provincial People’s Hospital from November 2023 to November 2024 were selected as subjects and randomly divided into a control group（41 cases）and an observation group（41 cases）using a random number table．The control group received routine VTE prevention，while the observation group received the Caprini score?based intervention combined with IPC in addition to the routine care．The extremity conditions，occurrence of VTE，coagulation parameters，and femoral venous blood flow velocity were compared between the two groups．Results The rates of extremity swelling，extremity pain，and VTE incidence in the observation group were lower than those in the control group（P＜0.05）．Before the intervention，there were no statistically significant differences in thrombin time（TT），prothrombin time（PT），activated partial thromboplastin time（APTT），or D?dimer levels between the two groups（P＞0.05）．After the intervention，TT，PT，APTT，and D?dimer levels decreased in both groups，with lower values in the observation group（P＜0.05）．Before the intervention，there were no statistically significant differences in mean flow velocity，peak flow velocity，or resistance index between the two groups（P＞0.05）．After the intervention，mean flow velocity and peak flow velocity increased in both groups，with higher values in the observation group（P＜0.05），while the resistance index decreased，with a lower value in the observation group（P＜0.05）．Conclusions The application of a Caprini score?based intervention model combined with IPC in AECOPD patients can effectively reduce the rates of extremity swelling，extremity pain，and VTE incidence，and improve  coagulation parameters and femoral venous blood flow velocity．

摘要目的 探讨基于E-Coach健康管理模式的营养管理联合主动循环呼吸训练（ACBT）在非小细胞肺癌（NSCLC）化疗患者中的应用效果。方法 选取2023年6月至2025年8月我院收治的98例NSCLC化疗患者，采用随机数字表法将所有研究对象分为联合组和常规组，每组49例。常规组给予常规干预，联合组在常规组基础上予以E-Coach健康管理模式的营养管理联合ACBT干预。比较两组干预前后营养状况、肺功能、运动耐力、生活质量以及营养不良发生率。结果 干预12周后，两组BMI、ALB、PA、Hb均较干预前上升且联合组高于常规组（P<0.05）；联合组FVC、FEV1、MVV及6MWT均显著高于常规组（P＜0.05）；干预前两组6MWT组间对比差异无统计学意义（P>0.05），干预4周、6周、8周、12周后，两组6MWT均较干预前增加，且联合组远于常规组（P<0.05）；干预12周后，两组身体功能、社会或家庭功能、情感功能、功能性状况得分均较干预前上升，且联合组高于常规组（P<0.05）。结论基于E-Coach健康管理模式的营养管理联合ACBT能够有效改善NSCLC化疗患者的营养状况和肺功能，提高生活质量和运动耐力。

Abstract Objective To investigate the application effect of nutrition management based on the E-Coach health management model combined with active cycle of breathing technique (ACBT) in patients undergoing chemotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods A total of 98 NSCLC patients receiving chemotherapy in our hospital from June 2023 to August 2025 were selected and randomly divided into a combination group and a conventional group using a random number table method, with 49 cases in each group. The conventional group received routine intervention, while the combination group received nutrition management based on the E-Coach health management model combined with ACBT in addition to the routine intervention. The nutritional status, lung function, exercise endurance, quality of life, and incidence of malnutrition were compared between the two groups before and after the intervention. Results After 12 weeks of intervention, BMI, ALB, PA, and Hb in both groups increased compared with baseline, and the levels in the combination group were higher than those in the conventional group (P<0.05). The FVC, FEV1, MVV, and 6MWT in the combination group were significantly higher than those in the conventional group (P<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in 6MWT between the two groups before intervention (P>0.05); after 4, 6, 8, and 12 weeks of intervention, the 6MWT in both groups increased compared with baseline, and the walking distance in the combination group was significantly longer than that in the conventional group (P<0.05). After 12 weeks of intervention, the scores of physical function, social/family function, emotional function, and functional well-being in both groups increased compared with baseline, and the scores in the combination group were higher than those in the conventional group (P<0.05). Conclusion Nutrition management based on the E-Coach health management model combined with ACBT can effectively improve the nutritional status and lung function of NSCLC patients undergoing chemotherapy, and enhance their quality of life and exercise endurance.

【摘要】目的：探讨安全-行为双维度管理模式在儿童全麻舒适化口腔治疗中的应用效果。方法：选取2025年4月至2025年12月在本院接受全麻舒适化口腔治疗的80例患儿作为研究对象，根据围术期不同管理方式分为观察组和对照组，每组40例。对照组实施常规围术期管理，观察组实施安全-行为双维度管理模式。对比两组患儿牙科恐惧程度、治疗依从性、苏醒期躁动发生率及家属满意度。结果：术前检查、麻醉诱导、出院时观察组CFSS-DS评分均比对照组低（P＜0.05），FCS评分均比对照组高（P＜0.05）。与对照组苏醒期躁动发生率20.00%对比，观察组5.00%显著降低（P＜0.05）。与对照组家属满意度75.00%对比，观察组95.00%显著升高（P＜0.05）。结论：在儿童全麻舒适化口腔治疗中应用安全-行为双维度管理模式干预，可有效减轻患儿牙科恐惧程度，提高治疗依从性，减少苏醒期躁动发生，提升家属满意度，值得临床推广应用。

【摘要】目的：探讨HEART五步沟通模式对突发性耳聋（SSHL）患者心理状态及恢复情况的影响。方法：将2024年3月~2025年9月就诊于本院的110例SSHL患者作为研究对象，经抛币法将入组患者随机列为常规组、试验组，55例为一组。常规组实施常规临床护理，试验组在常规组的护理基础上联合实施HEART五步沟通模式，比较两组患者的心理状态，治疗依从性，护理结束后开展为期3个月短期随访，比较两组患者的听力改善情况及生活质量。结果：护理后，试验组的医院焦虑抑郁量表（HADS）、疾病不确定感（MUIS）评分分别为（8.25±1.39）分、（20.34±5.49）分，均低于常规组[（10.28±2.46）分、（25.52±6.67）分]（t=5.328，4.447；P＜0.05）。护理后，试验组的用药依从性、康复依从性、随访依从性均高于常规组（x2=9.429，11.733，11.282；P＜0.05）。试验组随访1个月、随访3个月时气导1kHz下平均听阈（PTA）及2kHz下PTA分别为（25.62±5.41）dB HL、（18.35±3.69）dB HL、（28.52±5.44）dB HL、（20.18±5.24）dB HL，均低于常规组[（30.67±6.35）dB HL、（21.33±4.25）dB HL、（33.69±6.37）dB HL、（25.49±6.33）dB HL]（t=4.490，3.927，4.577，4.792；P＜0.05）。截至随访结束时，试验组的成人听力障碍量表（HHIA）中社交维度、情绪维度、躯体维度评分均低于常规组（t=3.787，5.562，12.132；P＜0.05）。结论：HEART五步沟通模式可改善SSHL患者的不良心理状态并提升治疗依从性，对促进患者听力水平恢复及生活质量提升均有积极影响

[Abstract]Objective:To explore the impact of the HEART five step communication model on the psychological state and recovery of patients with sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSHL).Methods:110 patients with SSHL who visited our hospital from March 2024 to September 2025 were selected as the research subjects. The enrolled patients were randomly divided into a control group and an experimental group using a coin toss method, with 55 patients in each group. The routine group received routine clinical nursing care, while the experimental group received the HEART five step communication model in addition to the routine nursing care. The psychological status and treatment compliance of the two groups of patients were compared. After the nursing was completed, a 3-month short-term follow-up was conducted to compare the hearing improvement and quality of life of the two groups of patients.Results:After nursing, the HADS and MUIS scores of the experimental group were (8.25 ± 1.39) points and (20.34 ± 5.49) points, respectively, which were lower than those of the control group [(10.28 ± 2.46) points and (25.52 ± 6.67) points] (t=5.328，4.447; P<0.05). After nursing, the medication compliance, rehabilitation compliance, and follow-up compliance of the experimental group were higher than those of the conventional group (x2=9.429，11.733，11.282; P<0.05). The PTA of the experimental group at 1kHz and 2kHz were (25.62 ± 5.41) dB HL, (18.35 ± 3.69) dB HL, (28.52 ± 5.44) dB HL, and (20.18 ± 5.24) dB HL, respectively, during a 1-month and 3-month follow-up, which were lower than those of the control group [(30.67 ± 6.35) dB HL, (21.33 ± 4.25) dB HL, (33.69 ± 6.37) dB HL, and (25.49 ± 6.33) dB HL] (t=4.490，3.927，4.577，4.792; P<0.05). As of the end of the follow-up, the scores of social, emotional, and physical dimensions in the HHIA of the experimental group were lower than those of the control group (t=3.787，5.562，12.132; P<0.05).Conclusion:The HEART five step communication model can improve the adverse psychological state of SSHL patients and enhance treatment compliance, which has a positive impact on promoting the recovery of patients' hearing level and improving their quality of life.

随着公立医院免陪照护试点推进，家属由床旁陪伴转为院外等待，信息不对称、分离焦虑及信任弱化等问题日益凸显。本文围绕国际免陪照护实践，梳理家属数字化参与从虚拟探视、信息共享到共同决策的演进路径，并总结住院门户、电子日记、代理访问等工具在维系家庭支持、提升照护透明度中的作用。在此基础上，提出我国应依托智慧病房构建医护患属闭环沟通机制，完善授权分级、隐私保护、数字公平与人文支持制度，推动免陪照护兼具效率与温度。

With the advancement of pilot programs for accompaniment-free care in public hospitals, family members have shifted from bedside companionship to waiting outside the ward, giving rise to increasingly prominent problems such as information asymmetry, separation anxiety and weakened trust. Focusing on international practices of accompaniment-free care, this paper reviews the evolutionary path of digital family participation from virtual visits and information sharing to shared decision-making, and summarizes the role of tools such as inpatient portals, electronic diaries and proxy access in maintaining family support and improving care transparency. On this basis, it proposes that hospitals in China should rely on smart ward construction to establish a closed-loop communication mechanism integrating healthcare professionals, patients and family members, and improve institutional arrangements for hierarchical authorization, privacy protection, digital equity and humanistic support, so as to promote accompaniment-free care that combines efficiency with warmth.

探讨将 Root Cause Analysis（RCA）质量管理模式与心理资本理论相结合应用于手术核查团队，对改善沟通中断、提升沟通执行质量与团队协作能力的效果。方法 选取 2025年 1 月至 2025 年12 月某三级医院手术室手术团队成员 80 名，按手术间编号分为对照组与实验组，各 40 名。对照组实施常规手术核查流程；实验组在此基础上实施基于 RCA 的流程诊断与基于心理资本理论的综合沟通能力提升干预。干预结束后，比较两组沟通中断发生率、核查流程执行质量、沟通效率，以及心理资本量表（PCQ-24）和团队协作量表（T-TPQ）得分。结果 实验组沟通中断发生率显著低于对照组（P＜0.05），核查流程执行质量和沟通效率均显著优于对照组（P＜0.001）。实验组 PCQ-24 各维度及总分、T-TPQ 各维度及总分均显著高于对照组（均 P＜0.001）。结论 将 RCA 流程分析与心理资本理论干预相结合，可通过流程规范化与心理动力增强双路径同步改善手术团队沟通质量与协作水平，具有良好的临床应用价值与推广潜力。

To evaluate the effectiveness of an intervention combining Root Cause Analysis (RCA)–based quality management and Psychological Capital (PsyCap) theory in reducing communication interruptions and improving communication quality and teamwork in surgical safety check teams. Methods: Eighty surgical team members from a tertiary hospital (January 2025 - December 2025.) were assigned to a control group or an intervention group according to operating room allocation (40 per group). The control group followed routine surgical safety check procedures, whereas the intervention group additionally received an RCA-guided workflow analysis and a PsyCap-based communication enhancement program. Post-intervention outcomes included communication interruption rate, execution quality and efficiency of safety checks, Psychological Capital Questionnaire (PCQ-24) scores, and TeamSTEPPS Teamwork Perceptions Questionnaire (T-TPQ) scores. Results: The intervention group demonstrated a significantly lower communication interruption rate compared with the control group (P＜0.05). Execution quality and communication efficiency were significantly improved in the intervention group (P＜0.001). PCQ-24 total and subscale scores were significantly higher in the intervention group than in the control group (P＜0.001), as were T-TPQ total and subscale scores (P＜0.001). Conclusion: Integrating RCA-based workflow optimization with PsyCap-oriented psychological and behavioral training can effectively enhance communication quality, reduce interruptions, and strengthen teamwork in surgical safety check teams. The combined model has strong applicability and potential for wider clinical promotion.

探讨将 Root Cause Analysis（RCA）质量管理模式与心理资本理论相结合应用于手术核查团队，对改善沟通中断、提升沟通执行质量与团队协作能力的效果。方法 选取 2025年 1 月至 2025 年12 月某三级医院手术室手术团队成员 80 名，按手术间编号分为对照组与实验组，各 40 名。对照组实施常规手术核查流程；实验组在此基础上实施基于 RCA 的流程诊断与基于心理资本理论的综合沟通能力提升干预。干预结束后，比较两组沟通中断发生率、核查流程执行质量、沟通效率，以及心理资本量表（PCQ-24）和团队协作量表（T-TPQ）得分。结果 实验组沟通中断发生率显著低于对照组（P＜0.05），核查流程执行质量和沟通效率均显著优于对照组（P＜0.001）。实验组 PCQ-24 各维度及总分、T-TPQ 各维度及总分均显著高于对照组（均 P＜0.001）。结论 将 RCA 流程分析与心理资本理论干预相结合，可通过流程规范化与心理动力增强双路径同步改善手术团队沟通质量与协作水平，具有良好的临床应用价值与推广潜力。

To evaluate the effectiveness of an intervention combining Root Cause Analysis (RCA)–based quality management and Psychological Capital (PsyCap) theory in reducing communication interruptions and improving communication quality and teamwork in surgical safety check teams. Methods: Eighty surgical team members from a tertiary hospital (January 2025 - December 2025.) were assigned to a control group or an intervention group according to operating room allocation (40 per group). The control group followed routine surgical safety check procedures, whereas the intervention group additionally received an RCA-guided workflow analysis and a PsyCap-based communication enhancement program. Post-intervention outcomes included communication interruption rate, execution quality and efficiency of safety checks, Psychological Capital Questionnaire (PCQ-24) scores, and TeamSTEPPS Teamwork Perceptions Questionnaire (T-TPQ) scores. Results: The intervention group demonstrated a significantly lower communication interruption rate compared with the control group (P＜0.05). Execution quality and communication efficiency were significantly improved in the intervention group (P＜0.001). PCQ-24 total and subscale scores were significantly higher in the intervention group than in the control group (P＜0.001), as were T-TPQ total and subscale scores (P＜0.001). Conclusion: Integrating RCA-based workflow optimization with PsyCap-oriented psychological and behavioral training can effectively enhance communication quality, reduce interruptions, and strengthen teamwork in surgical safety check teams. The combined model has strong applicability and potential for wider clinical promotion.

目的 探讨将 Root Cause Analysis（RCA）质量管理模式与心理资本理论相结合应用于手术核查团队，对改善沟通中断、提升沟通执行质量与团队协作能力的效果。方法 选取 2025年 1 月至 2025 年12 月某三级医院手术室手术团队成员 80 名，按手术间编号分为对照组与实验组，各 40 名。对照组实施常规手术核查流程；实验组在此基础上实施基于 RCA 的流程诊断与基于心理资本理论的综合沟通能力提升干预。干预结束后，比较两组沟通中断发生率、核查流程执行质量、沟通效率，以及心理资本量表（PCQ-24）和团队协作量表（T-TPQ）得分。结果 实验组沟通中断发生率显著低于对照组（P＜0.05），核查流程执行质量和沟通效率均显著优于对照组（P＜0.001）。实验组 PCQ-24 各维度及总分、T-TPQ 各维度及总分均显著高于对照组（均 P＜0.001）。结论 将 RCA 流程分析与心理资本理论干预相结合，可通过流程规范化与心理动力增强双路径同步改善手术团队沟通质量与协作水平，具有良好的临床应用价值与推广潜力。

To evaluate the effectiveness of an intervention combining Root Cause Analysis (RCA)–based quality management and Psychological Capital (PsyCap) theory in reducing communication interruptions and improving communication quality and teamwork in surgical safety check teams. Methods: Eighty surgical team members from a tertiary hospital (January 2025 - December 2025.) were assigned to a control group or an intervention group according to operating room allocation (40 per group). The control group followed routine surgical safety check procedures, whereas the intervention group additionally received an RCA-guided workflow analysis and a PsyCap-based communication enhancement program. Post-intervention outcomes included communication interruption rate, execution quality and efficiency of safety checks, Psychological Capital Questionnaire (PCQ-24) scores, and TeamSTEPPS Teamwork Perceptions Questionnaire (T-TPQ) scores. Results: The intervention group demonstrated a significantly lower communication interruption rate compared with the control group (P＜0.05). Execution quality and communication efficiency were significantly improved in the intervention group (P＜0.001). PCQ-24 total and subscale scores were significantly higher in the intervention group than in the control group (P＜0.001), as were T-TPQ total and subscale scores (P＜0.001). Conclusion: Integrating RCA-based workflow optimization with PsyCap-oriented psychological and behavioral training can effectively enhance communication quality, reduce interruptions, and strengthen teamwork in surgical safety check teams. The combined model has strong applicability and potential for wider clinical promotion.

探讨将 Root Cause Analysis（RCA）质量管理模式与心理资本理论相结合应用于手术核查团队，对改善沟通中断、提升沟通执行质量与团队协作能力的效果。方法 选取 2025年 1 月至 2025 年12 月某三级医院手术室手术团队成员 80 名，按手术间编号分为对照组与实验组，各 40 名。对照组实施常规手术核查流程；实验组在此基础上实施基于 RCA 的流程诊断与基于心理资本理论的综合沟通能力提升干预。干预结束后，比较两组沟通中断发生率、核查流程执行质量、沟通效率，以及心理资本量表（PCQ-24）和团队协作量表（T-TPQ）得分。结果 实验组沟通中断发生率显著低于对照组（P＜0.05），核查流程执行质量和沟通效率均显著优于对照组（P＜0.001）。实验组 PCQ-24 各维度及总分、T-TPQ 各维度及总分均显著高于对照组（均 P＜0.001）。结论 将 RCA 流程分析与心理资本理论干预相结合，可通过流程规范化与心理动力增强双路径同步改善手术团队沟通质量与协作水平，具有良好的临床应用价值与推广潜力。

To evaluate the effectiveness of an intervention combining Root Cause Analysis (RCA)–based quality management and Psychological Capital (PsyCap) theory in reducing communication interruptions and improving communication quality and teamwork in surgical safety check teams. Methods: Eighty surgical team members from a tertiary hospital (January 2025 - December 2025.) were assigned to a control group or an intervention group according to operating room allocation (40 per group). The control group followed routine surgical safety check procedures, whereas the intervention group additionally received an RCA-guided workflow analysis and a PsyCap-based communication enhancement program. Post-intervention outcomes included communication interruption rate, execution quality and efficiency of safety checks, Psychological Capital Questionnaire (PCQ-24) scores, and TeamSTEPPS Teamwork Perceptions Questionnaire (T-TPQ) scores. Results: The intervention group demonstrated a significantly lower communication interruption rate compared with the control group (P＜0.05). Execution quality and communication efficiency were significantly improved in the intervention group (P＜0.001). PCQ-24 total and subscale scores were significantly higher in the intervention group than in the control group (P＜0.001), as were T-TPQ total and subscale scores (P＜0.001). Conclusion: Integrating RCA-based workflow optimization with PsyCap-oriented psychological and behavioral training can effectively enhance communication quality, reduce interruptions, and strengthen teamwork in surgical safety check teams. The combined model has strong applicability and potential for wider clinical promotion.

探讨将 Root Cause Analysis（RCA）质量管理模式与心理资本理论相结合应用于手术核查团队，对改善沟通中断、提升沟通执行质量与团队协作能力的效果。方法 选取 2025年 1 月至 2025 年12 月某三级医院手术室手术团队成员 80 名，按手术间编号分为对照组与实验组，各 40 名。对照组实施常规手术核查流程；实验组在此基础上实施基于 RCA 的流程诊断与基于心理资本理论的综合沟通能力提升干预。干预结束后，比较两组沟通中断发生率、核查流程执行质量、沟通效率，以及心理资本量表（PCQ-24）和团队协作量表（T-TPQ）得分。结果 实验组沟通中断发生率显著低于对照组（P＜0.05），核查流程执行质量和沟通效率均显著优于对照组（P＜0.001）。实验组 PCQ-24 各维度及总分、T-TPQ 各维度及总分均显著高于对照组（均 P＜0.001）。结论 将 RCA 流程分析与心理资本理论干预相结合，可通过流程规范化与心理动力增强双路径同步改善手术团队沟通质量与协作水平，具有良好的临床应用价值与推广潜力。

To evaluate the effectiveness of an intervention combining Root Cause Analysis (RCA)–based quality management and Psychological Capital (PsyCap) theory in reducing communication interruptions and improving communication quality and teamwork in surgical safety check teams. Methods: Eighty surgical team members from a tertiary hospital (January 2025 - December 2025.) were assigned to a control group or an intervention group according to operating room allocation (40 per group). The control group followed routine surgical safety check procedures, whereas the intervention group additionally received an RCA-guided workflow analysis and a PsyCap-based communication enhancement program. Post-intervention outcomes included communication interruption rate, execution quality and efficiency of safety checks, Psychological Capital Questionnaire (PCQ-24) scores, and TeamSTEPPS Teamwork Perceptions Questionnaire (T-TPQ) scores. Results: The intervention group demonstrated a significantly lower communication interruption rate compared with the control group (P＜0.05). Execution quality and communication efficiency were significantly improved in the intervention group (P＜0.001). PCQ-24 total and subscale scores were significantly higher in the intervention group than in the control group (P＜0.001), as were T-TPQ total and subscale scores (P＜0.001). Conclusion: Integrating RCA-based workflow optimization with PsyCap-oriented psychological and behavioral training can effectively enhance communication quality, reduce interruptions, and strengthen teamwork in surgical safety check teams. The combined model has strong applicability and potential for wider clinical promotion.