目的 探究基于卡诺模型的阶段性康复护理对脑梗死后偏瘫患者心理状态及肢体功能的影响。 方法 本研究回顾性纳入2024年3月—2025年3月我院收治的86例脑梗死后偏瘫患者，并按护理方案差异将其均分为观察组与对照组，每组各43例。对照组采用采用常规康复护理方案，观察组在此基础上采用基于卡诺模型的阶段性康复护理。干预后，统计对比两组心理状态[汉密尔顿焦虑量表（HAMA）、汉密尔顿抑郁量表（HAMD）]、神经功能[美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表(NIHSS)]、自我管理能力[中文版脑卒中自我管理能力量表(SSSMQ)]、日常生活能力[改良Barthel指数（MBI）]、肢体功能[Fugl-Meyer运动功能积分法（FMA）]、康复依从性、护理满意度。结果 干预后，观察组HAMA、HAMD评分均显著低于对照组，FMA各维度及总分均显著高于对照组（P＜0.05）；干预后，观察组NIHSS评分低于对照着，SSSMQ、MBI评分高于对照组（P＜0.05）；观察组治疗总依从率显著高于对照组，护理总满意度显著高于对照组（P＜0.05）。结论 基于卡诺模型的阶段性康复护理应用于脑梗死后偏瘫患者，能改善其心理状态，提高康复依从性及自我管理能力，有助于改善患者神经功能，增强肢体功能，恢复生活活动能力，提高护理满意度。

目的：探讨孕期心理弹性支持与产后患者应对方式的关系，并检验心理弹性在其中的中介效应。方法：采用便利抽样法，于2025年3月-2026年3月选取350例产后1～6个月的患者为研究对象。采用一般资料调查表、孕期心理弹性支持量表、心理弹性量表及简易应对方式量表进行回顾性调查。采用Pearson相关分析变量间关系，分层回归检验总效应，PROCESS宏Model 4结合Bootstrap法检验中介效应。结果：孕期心理弹性支持与积极应对呈显著正相关（r=0.30，P<0.01），与消极应对呈显著负相关（r=-0.21，P<0.01）。孕期心理弹性支持对积极应对的正向预测作用显著（β=0.28，P<0.001），对消极应对的负向预测作用显著（β=-0.19，P<0.001）。心理弹性在孕期心理弹性支持与积极应对间的间接效应为0.12（95%CI：0.08～0.17），在消极应对间的间接效应为-0.07（95%CI：-0.11～-0.04）。结论：孕期心理弹性支持对产后应对方式的影响完全通过心理弹性的中介作用实现，提示围产期心理保健应将外部支持内化为产妇心理资源，增强心理弹性，以促进产后积极应对。

Objective: To explore the relationship between prenatal psychological resilience support and coping styles of postpartum patients, and to examine the mediating effect of psychological resilience. Methods: Convenience sampling was used to recruit 350 patients at 1-6 months postpartum from March 2025 to March 2026. A retrospective survey was conducted using a general information questionnaire, the Prenatal Psychological Resilience Support Scale, the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC), and the Simplified Coping Style Questionnaire (SCSQ). Pearson correlation analysis was performed to examine relationships among variables, hierarchical regression analysis was conducted to test the total effect, and the PROCESS macro Model 4 with bootstrapping was employed to test the mediating effect. Results: Prenatal psychological resilience support was significantly positively correlated with positive coping (r = 0.30, P<0.01) and significantly negatively correlated with negative coping (r=?0.21, P<0.01). Prenatal psychological resilience support significantly and positively predicted positive coping (β = 0.28, P<0.001) and significantly and negatively predicted negative coping (β=?0.19, P<0.001). The indirect effect of psychological resilience between prenatal psychological resilience support and positive coping was 0.12 (95% CI: 0.08-0.17), and the indirect effect between prenatal psychological resilience support and negative coping was ?0.07 (95% CI: ?0.11 to ?0.04); the direct effects were not significant, indicating a full mediating role of psychological resilience. Conclusion: The impact of prenatal psychological resilience support on postpartum coping styles is fully mediated by psychological resilience, suggesting that perinatal mental health care should focus on internalizing external support into maternal psychological resources and enhancing psychological resilience to promote positive postpartum coping.

【摘要】目的：探讨HEART五步沟通模式对突发性耳聋（SSHL）患者心理状态及恢复情况的影响。方法：将2024年3月~2025年9月就诊于本院的110例SSHL患者作为研究对象，经抛币法将入组患者随机列为常规组、试验组，55例为一组。常规组实施常规临床护理，试验组在常规组的护理基础上联合实施HEART五步沟通模式，比较两组患者的心理状态，治疗依从性，护理结束后开展为期3个月短期随访，比较两组患者的听力改善情况及生活质量。结果：护理后，试验组的医院焦虑抑郁量表（HADS）、疾病不确定感（MUIS）评分分别为（8.25±1.39）分、（20.34±5.49）分，均低于常规组[（10.28±2.46）分、（25.52±6.67）分]（t=5.328，4.447；P＜0.05）。护理后，试验组的用药依从性、康复依从性、随访依从性均高于常规组（x2=9.429，11.733，11.282；P＜0.05）。试验组随访1个月、随访3个月时气导1kHz下平均听阈（PTA）及2kHz下PTA分别为（25.62±5.41）dB HL、（18.35±3.69）dB HL、（28.52±5.44）dB HL、（20.18±5.24）dB HL，均低于常规组[（30.67±6.35）dB HL、（21.33±4.25）dB HL、（33.69±6.37）dB HL、（25.49±6.33）dB HL]（t=4.490，3.927，4.577，4.792；P＜0.05）。截至随访结束时，试验组的成人听力障碍量表（HHIA）中社交维度、情绪维度、躯体维度评分均低于常规组（t=3.787，5.562，12.132；P＜0.05）。结论：HEART五步沟通模式可改善SSHL患者的不良心理状态并提升治疗依从性，对促进患者听力水平恢复及生活质量提升均有积极影响

[Abstract]Objective:To explore the impact of the HEART five step communication model on the psychological state and recovery of patients with sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSHL).Methods:110 patients with SSHL who visited our hospital from March 2024 to September 2025 were selected as the research subjects. The enrolled patients were randomly divided into a control group and an experimental group using a coin toss method, with 55 patients in each group. The routine group received routine clinical nursing care, while the experimental group received the HEART five step communication model in addition to the routine nursing care. The psychological status and treatment compliance of the two groups of patients were compared. After the nursing was completed, a 3-month short-term follow-up was conducted to compare the hearing improvement and quality of life of the two groups of patients.Results:After nursing, the HADS and MUIS scores of the experimental group were (8.25 ± 1.39) points and (20.34 ± 5.49) points, respectively, which were lower than those of the control group [(10.28 ± 2.46) points and (25.52 ± 6.67) points] (t=5.328，4.447; P<0.05). After nursing, the medication compliance, rehabilitation compliance, and follow-up compliance of the experimental group were higher than those of the conventional group (x2=9.429，11.733，11.282; P<0.05). The PTA of the experimental group at 1kHz and 2kHz were (25.62 ± 5.41) dB HL, (18.35 ± 3.69) dB HL, (28.52 ± 5.44) dB HL, and (20.18 ± 5.24) dB HL, respectively, during a 1-month and 3-month follow-up, which were lower than those of the control group [(30.67 ± 6.35) dB HL, (21.33 ± 4.25) dB HL, (33.69 ± 6.37) dB HL, and (25.49 ± 6.33) dB HL] (t=4.490，3.927，4.577，4.792; P<0.05). As of the end of the follow-up, the scores of social, emotional, and physical dimensions in the HHIA of the experimental group were lower than those of the control group (t=3.787，5.562，12.132; P<0.05).Conclusion:The HEART five step communication model can improve the adverse psychological state of SSHL patients and enhance treatment compliance, which has a positive impact on promoting the recovery of patients' hearing level and improving their quality of life.

探讨将 Root Cause Analysis（RCA）质量管理模式与心理资本理论相结合应用于手术核查团队，对改善沟通中断、提升沟通执行质量与团队协作能力的效果。方法 选取 2025年 1 月至 2025 年12 月某三级医院手术室手术团队成员 80 名，按手术间编号分为对照组与实验组，各 40 名。对照组实施常规手术核查流程；实验组在此基础上实施基于 RCA 的流程诊断与基于心理资本理论的综合沟通能力提升干预。干预结束后，比较两组沟通中断发生率、核查流程执行质量、沟通效率，以及心理资本量表（PCQ-24）和团队协作量表（T-TPQ）得分。结果 实验组沟通中断发生率显著低于对照组（P＜0.05），核查流程执行质量和沟通效率均显著优于对照组（P＜0.001）。实验组 PCQ-24 各维度及总分、T-TPQ 各维度及总分均显著高于对照组（均 P＜0.001）。结论 将 RCA 流程分析与心理资本理论干预相结合，可通过流程规范化与心理动力增强双路径同步改善手术团队沟通质量与协作水平，具有良好的临床应用价值与推广潜力。

To evaluate the effectiveness of an intervention combining Root Cause Analysis (RCA)–based quality management and Psychological Capital (PsyCap) theory in reducing communication interruptions and improving communication quality and teamwork in surgical safety check teams. Methods: Eighty surgical team members from a tertiary hospital (January 2025 - December 2025.) were assigned to a control group or an intervention group according to operating room allocation (40 per group). The control group followed routine surgical safety check procedures, whereas the intervention group additionally received an RCA-guided workflow analysis and a PsyCap-based communication enhancement program. Post-intervention outcomes included communication interruption rate, execution quality and efficiency of safety checks, Psychological Capital Questionnaire (PCQ-24) scores, and TeamSTEPPS Teamwork Perceptions Questionnaire (T-TPQ) scores. Results: The intervention group demonstrated a significantly lower communication interruption rate compared with the control group (P＜0.05). Execution quality and communication efficiency were significantly improved in the intervention group (P＜0.001). PCQ-24 total and subscale scores were significantly higher in the intervention group than in the control group (P＜0.001), as were T-TPQ total and subscale scores (P＜0.001). Conclusion: Integrating RCA-based workflow optimization with PsyCap-oriented psychological and behavioral training can effectively enhance communication quality, reduce interruptions, and strengthen teamwork in surgical safety check teams. The combined model has strong applicability and potential for wider clinical promotion.

探讨将 Root Cause Analysis（RCA）质量管理模式与心理资本理论相结合应用于手术核查团队，对改善沟通中断、提升沟通执行质量与团队协作能力的效果。方法 选取 2025年 1 月至 2025 年12 月某三级医院手术室手术团队成员 80 名，按手术间编号分为对照组与实验组，各 40 名。对照组实施常规手术核查流程；实验组在此基础上实施基于 RCA 的流程诊断与基于心理资本理论的综合沟通能力提升干预。干预结束后，比较两组沟通中断发生率、核查流程执行质量、沟通效率，以及心理资本量表（PCQ-24）和团队协作量表（T-TPQ）得分。结果 实验组沟通中断发生率显著低于对照组（P＜0.05），核查流程执行质量和沟通效率均显著优于对照组（P＜0.001）。实验组 PCQ-24 各维度及总分、T-TPQ 各维度及总分均显著高于对照组（均 P＜0.001）。结论 将 RCA 流程分析与心理资本理论干预相结合，可通过流程规范化与心理动力增强双路径同步改善手术团队沟通质量与协作水平，具有良好的临床应用价值与推广潜力。

To evaluate the effectiveness of an intervention combining Root Cause Analysis (RCA)–based quality management and Psychological Capital (PsyCap) theory in reducing communication interruptions and improving communication quality and teamwork in surgical safety check teams. Methods: Eighty surgical team members from a tertiary hospital (January 2025 - December 2025.) were assigned to a control group or an intervention group according to operating room allocation (40 per group). The control group followed routine surgical safety check procedures, whereas the intervention group additionally received an RCA-guided workflow analysis and a PsyCap-based communication enhancement program. Post-intervention outcomes included communication interruption rate, execution quality and efficiency of safety checks, Psychological Capital Questionnaire (PCQ-24) scores, and TeamSTEPPS Teamwork Perceptions Questionnaire (T-TPQ) scores. Results: The intervention group demonstrated a significantly lower communication interruption rate compared with the control group (P＜0.05). Execution quality and communication efficiency were significantly improved in the intervention group (P＜0.001). PCQ-24 total and subscale scores were significantly higher in the intervention group than in the control group (P＜0.001), as were T-TPQ total and subscale scores (P＜0.001). Conclusion: Integrating RCA-based workflow optimization with PsyCap-oriented psychological and behavioral training can effectively enhance communication quality, reduce interruptions, and strengthen teamwork in surgical safety check teams. The combined model has strong applicability and potential for wider clinical promotion.

目的 探讨将 Root Cause Analysis（RCA）质量管理模式与心理资本理论相结合应用于手术核查团队，对改善沟通中断、提升沟通执行质量与团队协作能力的效果。方法 选取 2025年 1 月至 2025 年12 月某三级医院手术室手术团队成员 80 名，按手术间编号分为对照组与实验组，各 40 名。对照组实施常规手术核查流程；实验组在此基础上实施基于 RCA 的流程诊断与基于心理资本理论的综合沟通能力提升干预。干预结束后，比较两组沟通中断发生率、核查流程执行质量、沟通效率，以及心理资本量表（PCQ-24）和团队协作量表（T-TPQ）得分。结果 实验组沟通中断发生率显著低于对照组（P＜0.05），核查流程执行质量和沟通效率均显著优于对照组（P＜0.001）。实验组 PCQ-24 各维度及总分、T-TPQ 各维度及总分均显著高于对照组（均 P＜0.001）。结论 将 RCA 流程分析与心理资本理论干预相结合，可通过流程规范化与心理动力增强双路径同步改善手术团队沟通质量与协作水平，具有良好的临床应用价值与推广潜力。

To evaluate the effectiveness of an intervention combining Root Cause Analysis (RCA)–based quality management and Psychological Capital (PsyCap) theory in reducing communication interruptions and improving communication quality and teamwork in surgical safety check teams. Methods: Eighty surgical team members from a tertiary hospital (January 2025 - December 2025.) were assigned to a control group or an intervention group according to operating room allocation (40 per group). The control group followed routine surgical safety check procedures, whereas the intervention group additionally received an RCA-guided workflow analysis and a PsyCap-based communication enhancement program. Post-intervention outcomes included communication interruption rate, execution quality and efficiency of safety checks, Psychological Capital Questionnaire (PCQ-24) scores, and TeamSTEPPS Teamwork Perceptions Questionnaire (T-TPQ) scores. Results: The intervention group demonstrated a significantly lower communication interruption rate compared with the control group (P＜0.05). Execution quality and communication efficiency were significantly improved in the intervention group (P＜0.001). PCQ-24 total and subscale scores were significantly higher in the intervention group than in the control group (P＜0.001), as were T-TPQ total and subscale scores (P＜0.001). Conclusion: Integrating RCA-based workflow optimization with PsyCap-oriented psychological and behavioral training can effectively enhance communication quality, reduce interruptions, and strengthen teamwork in surgical safety check teams. The combined model has strong applicability and potential for wider clinical promotion.

探讨将 Root Cause Analysis（RCA）质量管理模式与心理资本理论相结合应用于手术核查团队，对改善沟通中断、提升沟通执行质量与团队协作能力的效果。方法 选取 2025年 1 月至 2025 年12 月某三级医院手术室手术团队成员 80 名，按手术间编号分为对照组与实验组，各 40 名。对照组实施常规手术核查流程；实验组在此基础上实施基于 RCA 的流程诊断与基于心理资本理论的综合沟通能力提升干预。干预结束后，比较两组沟通中断发生率、核查流程执行质量、沟通效率，以及心理资本量表（PCQ-24）和团队协作量表（T-TPQ）得分。结果 实验组沟通中断发生率显著低于对照组（P＜0.05），核查流程执行质量和沟通效率均显著优于对照组（P＜0.001）。实验组 PCQ-24 各维度及总分、T-TPQ 各维度及总分均显著高于对照组（均 P＜0.001）。结论 将 RCA 流程分析与心理资本理论干预相结合，可通过流程规范化与心理动力增强双路径同步改善手术团队沟通质量与协作水平，具有良好的临床应用价值与推广潜力。

To evaluate the effectiveness of an intervention combining Root Cause Analysis (RCA)–based quality management and Psychological Capital (PsyCap) theory in reducing communication interruptions and improving communication quality and teamwork in surgical safety check teams. Methods: Eighty surgical team members from a tertiary hospital (January 2025 - December 2025.) were assigned to a control group or an intervention group according to operating room allocation (40 per group). The control group followed routine surgical safety check procedures, whereas the intervention group additionally received an RCA-guided workflow analysis and a PsyCap-based communication enhancement program. Post-intervention outcomes included communication interruption rate, execution quality and efficiency of safety checks, Psychological Capital Questionnaire (PCQ-24) scores, and TeamSTEPPS Teamwork Perceptions Questionnaire (T-TPQ) scores. Results: The intervention group demonstrated a significantly lower communication interruption rate compared with the control group (P＜0.05). Execution quality and communication efficiency were significantly improved in the intervention group (P＜0.001). PCQ-24 total and subscale scores were significantly higher in the intervention group than in the control group (P＜0.001), as were T-TPQ total and subscale scores (P＜0.001). Conclusion: Integrating RCA-based workflow optimization with PsyCap-oriented psychological and behavioral training can effectively enhance communication quality, reduce interruptions, and strengthen teamwork in surgical safety check teams. The combined model has strong applicability and potential for wider clinical promotion.

探讨将 Root Cause Analysis（RCA）质量管理模式与心理资本理论相结合应用于手术核查团队，对改善沟通中断、提升沟通执行质量与团队协作能力的效果。方法 选取 2025年 1 月至 2025 年12 月某三级医院手术室手术团队成员 80 名，按手术间编号分为对照组与实验组，各 40 名。对照组实施常规手术核查流程；实验组在此基础上实施基于 RCA 的流程诊断与基于心理资本理论的综合沟通能力提升干预。干预结束后，比较两组沟通中断发生率、核查流程执行质量、沟通效率，以及心理资本量表（PCQ-24）和团队协作量表（T-TPQ）得分。结果 实验组沟通中断发生率显著低于对照组（P＜0.05），核查流程执行质量和沟通效率均显著优于对照组（P＜0.001）。实验组 PCQ-24 各维度及总分、T-TPQ 各维度及总分均显著高于对照组（均 P＜0.001）。结论 将 RCA 流程分析与心理资本理论干预相结合，可通过流程规范化与心理动力增强双路径同步改善手术团队沟通质量与协作水平，具有良好的临床应用价值与推广潜力。

To evaluate the effectiveness of an intervention combining Root Cause Analysis (RCA)–based quality management and Psychological Capital (PsyCap) theory in reducing communication interruptions and improving communication quality and teamwork in surgical safety check teams. Methods: Eighty surgical team members from a tertiary hospital (January 2025 - December 2025.) were assigned to a control group or an intervention group according to operating room allocation (40 per group). The control group followed routine surgical safety check procedures, whereas the intervention group additionally received an RCA-guided workflow analysis and a PsyCap-based communication enhancement program. Post-intervention outcomes included communication interruption rate, execution quality and efficiency of safety checks, Psychological Capital Questionnaire (PCQ-24) scores, and TeamSTEPPS Teamwork Perceptions Questionnaire (T-TPQ) scores. Results: The intervention group demonstrated a significantly lower communication interruption rate compared with the control group (P＜0.05). Execution quality and communication efficiency were significantly improved in the intervention group (P＜0.001). PCQ-24 total and subscale scores were significantly higher in the intervention group than in the control group (P＜0.001), as were T-TPQ total and subscale scores (P＜0.001). Conclusion: Integrating RCA-based workflow optimization with PsyCap-oriented psychological and behavioral training can effectively enhance communication quality, reduce interruptions, and strengthen teamwork in surgical safety check teams. The combined model has strong applicability and potential for wider clinical promotion.

探讨将 Root Cause Analysis（RCA）质量管理模式与心理资本理论相结合应用于手术核查团队，对改善沟通中断、提升沟通执行质量与团队协作能力的效果。方法 选取 2025年 1 月至 2025 年12 月某三级医院手术室手术团队成员 80 名，按手术间编号分为对照组与实验组，各 40 名。对照组实施常规手术核查流程；实验组在此基础上实施基于 RCA 的流程诊断与基于心理资本理论的综合沟通能力提升干预。干预结束后，比较两组沟通中断发生率、核查流程执行质量、沟通效率，以及心理资本量表（PCQ-24）和团队协作量表（T-TPQ）得分。结果 实验组沟通中断发生率显著低于对照组（P＜0.05），核查流程执行质量和沟通效率均显著优于对照组（P＜0.001）。实验组 PCQ-24 各维度及总分、T-TPQ 各维度及总分均显著高于对照组（均 P＜0.001）。结论 将 RCA 流程分析与心理资本理论干预相结合，可通过流程规范化与心理动力增强双路径同步改善手术团队沟通质量与协作水平，具有良好的临床应用价值与推广潜力。

To evaluate the effectiveness of an intervention combining Root Cause Analysis (RCA)–based quality management and Psychological Capital (PsyCap) theory in reducing communication interruptions and improving communication quality and teamwork in surgical safety check teams. Methods: Eighty surgical team members from a tertiary hospital (January 2025 - December 2025.) were assigned to a control group or an intervention group according to operating room allocation (40 per group). The control group followed routine surgical safety check procedures, whereas the intervention group additionally received an RCA-guided workflow analysis and a PsyCap-based communication enhancement program. Post-intervention outcomes included communication interruption rate, execution quality and efficiency of safety checks, Psychological Capital Questionnaire (PCQ-24) scores, and TeamSTEPPS Teamwork Perceptions Questionnaire (T-TPQ) scores. Results: The intervention group demonstrated a significantly lower communication interruption rate compared with the control group (P＜0.05). Execution quality and communication efficiency were significantly improved in the intervention group (P＜0.001). PCQ-24 total and subscale scores were significantly higher in the intervention group than in the control group (P＜0.001), as were T-TPQ total and subscale scores (P＜0.001). Conclusion: Integrating RCA-based workflow optimization with PsyCap-oriented psychological and behavioral training can effectively enhance communication quality, reduce interruptions, and strengthen teamwork in surgical safety check teams. The combined model has strong applicability and potential for wider clinical promotion.

探讨将 Root Cause Analysis（RCA）质量管理模式与心理资本理论相结合应用于手术核查团队，对改善沟通中断、提升沟通执行质量与团队协作能力的效果。方法 选取 2025年 1 月至 2025 年12 月某三级医院手术室手术团队成员 80 名，按手术间编号分为对照组与实验组，各 40 名。对照组实施常规手术核查流程；实验组在此基础上实施基于 RCA 的流程诊断与基于心理资本理论的综合沟通能力提升干预。干预结束后，比较两组沟通中断发生率、核查流程执行质量、沟通效率，以及心理资本量表（PCQ-24）和团队协作量表（T-TPQ）得分。结果 实验组沟通中断发生率显著低于对照组（P＜0.05），核查流程执行质量和沟通效率均显著优于对照组（P＜0.001）。实验组 PCQ-24 各维度及总分、T-TPQ 各维度及总分均显著高于对照组（均 P＜0.001）。结论 将 RCA 流程分析与心理资本理论干预相结合，可通过流程规范化与心理动力增强双路径同步改善手术团队沟通质量与协作水平，具有良好的临床应用价值与推广潜力。

To evaluate the effectiveness of an intervention combining Root Cause Analysis (RCA)–based quality management and Psychological Capital (PsyCap) theory in reducing communication interruptions and improving communication quality and teamwork in surgical safety check teams. Methods: Eighty surgical team members from a tertiary hospital (January 2025 - December 2025.) were assigned to a control group or an intervention group according to operating room allocation (40 per group). The control group followed routine surgical safety check procedures, whereas the intervention group additionally received an RCA-guided workflow analysis and a PsyCap-based communication enhancement program. Post-intervention outcomes included communication interruption rate, execution quality and efficiency of safety checks, Psychological Capital Questionnaire (PCQ-24) scores, and TeamSTEPPS Teamwork Perceptions Questionnaire (T-TPQ) scores. Results: The intervention group demonstrated a significantly lower communication interruption rate compared with the control group (P＜0.05). Execution quality and communication efficiency were significantly improved in the intervention group (P＜0.001). PCQ-24 total and subscale scores were significantly higher in the intervention group than in the control group (P＜0.001), as were T-TPQ total and subscale scores (P＜0.001). Conclusion: Integrating RCA-based workflow optimization with PsyCap-oriented psychological and behavioral training can effectively enhance communication quality, reduce interruptions, and strengthen teamwork in surgical safety check teams. The combined model has strong applicability and potential for wider clinical promotion.