目的 观察喉罩通气下全凭七氟醚吸入麻醉在妇科宫腔镜手术中的应用价值。方法 60例拟行妇科宫腔镜手术的患者随机分为七氟醚和丙泊酚组,每组30例,记录不同时间点两组患者的平均动脉压(MAP),脉搏血氧饱和度(SpO₂)、苏醒时间以及术后恶心,呕吐、躁动的发生率。结果 A组患者血流动力学指标波动较少,苏醒时间A组明显短于B组,差异有显著性(P<0.05)。两组患者诱导后MAP,HR均较诱导前显著下降(P<0.05)。B组患者术中MAP,HR值显著低于A组(P<0.05),拔除喉罩即刻两组MAP,HR差异无显著性(P>0.05)。结论 喉罩下全凭七氟醚吸入麻醉对患者的血流动力学的影响较小,适用于妇科宫腔镜手术。

Objective To observe the effect of laryngeal mask airway(LMA) combined with sevoflurane inhalation anaesthesia in gynecological hysteroscopy operation. Methods Sixty patients, classified from ASAⅠtoⅡscheduled for hysteroscopic operation were randomly divided into sevoflurane inhalation anesthesia group (group A) and propofol intravenous anesthesia group(group B).The mean arterial pressure (MAP), pulse oxygen saturation (SpO₂), recovery time and the incidence of nausea, vomiting and recovery time were recorded at different time points of the two groups. Results The hemodynamic index of the patient in the group A fluctuated seldom,and the recovery time was significantly shorter than that in the B group, and the differences were significant (P<0.05).The MAP and the HR were all decreased after anesthesia induction compared with those of before in both groups (P<0.05).The MAP and the HR in the group B was significantly lower than that in the group A (P<0.05), there were no significant differences in MAP and HR between the two groups of patients with laryngeal mask airway removal. Conclusion Small hemodynamic influence is taken with the technique of laryngeal mask airway(LMA) combined with sevoflurane inhalation anesthesia. It is suitable for gynecological hysteroscopic operation.

       目的   比较宫腔镜病灶切除术与超声监测下吸宫术治疗剖宫产瘢痕部位妊娠（CSP）的有效性。方法   回顾性分析2021年7月—2023年10月在南宁市妇幼保健院确诊为I、Ⅱ型CSP并接受治疗的129例患者，停经时间在38～83 d，中位停经时间48 d。其中42例患者接受了宫腔镜病灶切除术治疗（A组），87例患者接受超声监测下吸宫术治疗（B组），比较两组患者术后1、3、7、14 d的人绒毛膜促性腺激素水平以及手术出血量、手术时间、住院时间、住院花费。结果   两组患者在术后1 d，血清HCG水平下降，下降幅度均超过50%，且A组患者术后1 d血清HCG的下降幅度及下降速率大于B组患者（P＜0.05）；术后3、7、14 d，两组血清HCG水平仍持续下降。另外，A组患者手术出血量、手术时间、住院时间、住院花费分别为（15.35±14.53）mL、（60.73±53.05）min、（4.33±1.90）d、（6 689.23±2 216.19）元；B组患者手术出血量、手术时间、住院时间、住院费用分别为（26.09±29.24）mL、（51.59±54.46）min、（4.82±1.83）d、（6 270.34±2 547.85）元。A组患者术中出血量低于B组、住院时间短于B组（P＜0.05），手术时间及住院费用与B组比较差异无统计学意义（P均＞0.05）。结论   宫腔镜病灶切除术与超声监测下吸宫术均能有效治疗CSP，但宫腔镜病灶切除术在术后血清HCG的下降幅度及下降速率、术中出血量、住院时间等方面优于超声监测下吸宫术，而且手术时间和住院费用并没有显著增加。

       Objective  To compare the efficacy between hysteroscopic  resection surgery and ultrasound-guided uterine aspiration in the treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy（CSP）．Methods  A  retrospective analysis was performed in 129 patients diagnosed with CSP（type I or Ⅱ）and treated in Nanning Maternal and Child Health Hospital from July 2021 to October 2023．Their duration of amenorrhea was between 38～83 d，with a median of 48 days．Among them，42  patients were treated with hysteroscopic resection surgery therapy（group A），87 patients were treated with ultrasound-guided uterine aspiration therapy and（group B）．Then，the levels of human chorionic gonadotropin（HCG），the amount of the intraoperative bleeding volume，surgical time，hospitalization time，and hospitalization expenses were compared between the two groups at one，three，seven and 14 days postoperativey．Results  After one day of surgery，the serum HCG levels of two groups significantly decreased，with a decrease of more than 50%，and the magnitude and  rate of  decrease in  serum HCG levels of group A were  significantly larger than those of group B（P＜0.05）；After three，seven，and 14 day of surgery，serum HCG levels continued to decrease．Furthermore，the intraoperative bleeding volume，surgical time，hospitalization time，hospitalization expenses in group A were（15.35±14.53）mL，（60.73±53.05）min，（4.33±1.90）d，（6 689.23±2 216.19）yuan，respectively．That in group B were（26.09±29.24）mL，（51.59±54.46）min，（4.82±1.83）d，（6 270.34±2 547.85）yuan，respectively．Compared to group B，the intraoperative bleeding volume of group A was significantly lower（P＜0.05），and the hospitalization time is shorter，while there was no significant difference in surgical time and hospitalization expenses．Conclusions  Both of hysteroscopic resection surgery and ultrasound-guided uterine aspiration can treat cesarean scar pregnancy effectively，but the former is superior to the latter in terms of the magnitude and rate of decrease in serum HCG levels after surgery，intraoperative bleeding volume，and hospitalization time，with no significant increase in surgical time and hospitalization expenses．