活动与固定平台单髁置换早期疗效对比分析

Comparative Analysis of Early Clinical Efficacy Between Mobile-Bearing and Fixed-Bearing Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty

:-
 
摘要 目的 分析固定(FB)和活动平台(MB)单髁置换术(UKA)在膝关节内侧间室骨关节炎早期阶段的临床效果与影像学差异,以指导临床假体选择。 方法 本研究回顾性纳入41例确诊为单侧膝关节内侧间室骨关节炎的患者,按照假体类型分为两组:FB组(20例,使用春立XG假体)和MB组(21例,使用春立XK假体)。分别在术前、术后及随访终点统计膝关节屈伸活动范围(ROM)、VAS 疼痛评分、美国特种外科医院膝关节评分(HSS );测量并比较股胫角(FTA)、胫骨假体内外翻角(TCVA)、胫骨假体后倾角(TCPSA);记录围手术期指标及并发症情况。 结果 两组患者术后ROM、VAS、HSS 评分均较术前显著改善(P均<0.0001);末次随访时固定平台组 VAS 评分显著低于活动平台组(P<0.05),而两组间的ROM、HSS 评分无统计学差异(均 P>0.05)。两组术后 FTA、TCVA、TCPSA 均恢复至理想范围,组间均无统计学差异(均 P>0.05)。固定平台组手术时间更短(P<0.05),两组均无严重并发症,假体生存率均为 100%。 结论 活动平台与固定平台单髁置换术均可显著改善膝关节内侧间室骨关节炎患者疼痛、活动度及功能,下肢力线恢复效果相当;固定平台假体在疼痛控制与手术便捷性方面更具优势,临床可根据患者情况与术者经验个体化选择。 关键词 单髁置换术;活动平台假体;固定平台假体;骨关节炎;并发症
Abstract Objective To investigate the early clinical outcomes and radiological differences between fixed-bearing (FB) and mobile-bearing (MB) unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) in the treatment of medial compartment knee osteoarthritis (OA), and to provide evidence for clinical prosthesis selection. Methods Clinical data of 41 patients with unilateral medial compartment knee OA were retrospectively analyzed. The FB group comprised 20 patients (using Chunli XG prosthesis), and the MB group comprised 21 patients (using Chunli XK prosthesis). Knee range of motion (ROM), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) pain score, and Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) knee score were compared between the two groups preoperatively, postoperatively, and at the final follow-up. Femorotibial angle (FTA), tibial component valgus angle (TCVA), and tibial component posterior slope angle (TCPSA) were measured and compared. Perioperative indicators and complications were recorded. Results Postoperative ROM, VAS, and HSS scores significantly improved compared with preoperative values in both groups (all P < 0.0001). At the final follow-up, the VAS score in the FB group was significantly lower than that in the MB group (P < 0.05), while no significant differences were observed in ROM or HSS scores between the two groups (all P > 0.05). Postoperative FTA, TCVA, and TCPSA values returned to the ideal range in both groups, with no significant intergroup differences (all P > 0.05). The FB group had a significantly shorter operative time (P < 0.05). No severe complications occurred in either group, and the prosthesis survival rate was 100% in both groups. Conclusion Both FB-UKA and MB-UKA significantly improve pain, range of motion, and function in patients with medial compartment knee OA, with comparable efficacy in restoring lower limb alignment. The FB prosthesis offers advantages in pain control and surgical convenience. Clinical selection may be individualized based on patient characteristics and surgeon experience. Keywords Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty; Mobile-bearing prosthesis; Fixed-bearing prosthesis; Osteoarthritis; Complications

活动与固定平台单髁置换早期疗效对比分析

Comparative Analysis of Early Clinical Efficacy Between Mobile-Bearing and Fixed-Bearing Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty

:-
 
目的 探讨固定平台(FB)与活动平台(MB)单髁置换术(UKA)治疗膝关节内侧间室骨关节炎(OA)的早期临床疗效及影像学差异,为临床假体选择提供依据。 方法 回顾性分析41 例单侧膝关节内侧间室骨关节炎患者临床资料,其中 FB 组 20例(采用春立XG假体),MB 组 21 例(采用春立XK假体)。比较两组患者术前、术后和末次随访的膝关节活动度(ROM)、疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS)、美国特种外科医院膝关节评分(HSS);测量并比较股胫角(FTA)、胫骨假体内外翻角(TCVA)、胫骨假体后倾角(TCPSA);记录围手术期指标及并发症情况。 结果 两组患者术后ROM、VAS、HSS 评分均较术前显著改善(P均<0.0001);末次随访时固定平台组 VAS 评分显著低于活动平台组(P<0.05),ROM、HSS 评分两组差异无统计学意义(均 P>0.05)。两组术后 FTA、TCVA、TCPSA 均恢复至理想范围,组间差异均无统计学意义(均 P>0.05)。固定平台组手术时间更短(P<0.05),两组均无严重并发症,假体生存率均为 100%。 结论 固定平台与活动平台单髁置换术均可显著改善膝关节内侧间室骨关节炎患者疼痛、活动度及功能,下肢力线恢复效果相当;固定平台假体在疼痛控制与手术便捷性方面更具优势,临床可根据患者情况与术者经验个体化选择。 关键词 单髁置换术;活动平台假体;固定平台假体;骨关节炎;并发症
Abstract Objective To investigate the early clinical outcomes and radiological differences between fixed-bearing (FB) and mobile-bearing (MB) unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) in the treatment of medial compartment knee osteoarthritis (OA), and to provide evidence for clinical prosthesis selection. Methods Clinical data of 41 patients with unilateral medial compartment knee OA were retrospectively analyzed. The FB group comprised 20 patients (using Chunli XG prosthesis), and the MB group comprised 21 patients (using Chunli XK prosthesis). Knee range of motion (ROM), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) pain score, and Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) knee score were compared between the two groups preoperatively, postoperatively, and at the final follow-up. Femorotibial angle (FTA), tibial component valgus angle (TCVA), and tibial component posterior slope angle (TCPSA) were measured and compared. Perioperative indicators and complications were recorded. Results Postoperative ROM, VAS, and HSS scores significantly improved compared with preoperative values in both groups (all P < 0.0001). At the final follow-up, the VAS score in the FB group was significantly lower than that in the MB group (P < 0.05), while no significant differences were observed in ROM or HSS scores between the two groups (all P > 0.05). Postoperative FTA, TCVA, and TCPSA values returned to the ideal range in both groups, with no significant intergroup differences (all P > 0.05). The FB group had a significantly shorter operative time (P < 0.05). No severe complications occurred in either group, and the prosthesis survival rate was 100% in both groups. Conclusion Both FB-UKA and MB-UKA significantly improve pain, range of motion, and function in patients with medial compartment knee OA, with comparable efficacy in restoring lower limb alignment. The FB prosthesis offers advantages in pain control and surgical convenience. Clinical selection may be individualized based on patient characteristics and surgeon experience. Keywords Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty; Mobile-bearing prosthesis; Fixed-bearing prosthesis; Osteoarthritis; Complications

闭合复位弹性髓内钉固定术对小儿股骨骨折康复进程及关节功能的影响研究

Study on the effect of closed reduction and elastic intramedullary nail fixation on the rehabilitation process and joint function of pediatric femoral fractures

:-
 
目的:探讨闭合复位弹性髓内钉固定术(CR-ESIN)对股骨骨折患儿康复进程及关节功能的影响。方法:回顾性选取2024年4月~2025年6月至我院行内固定术治疗的102例股骨骨折患儿为研究对象,依据手术方案不同,将行CR-ESIN治疗的51例患儿列为CR-ESIN组,将剩余51例行传统切开复位接骨板内固定术(ORIF)治疗的患儿列为ORIF组,比较两组患儿的治疗情况、康复进程,手术并发症发生情况,关节功能恢复情况及内固定物取出阶段负担。结果:在不同手术方案下,CR-ESIN组的手术耗时、术中出血量、术后住院时间、支具使用时间、完全负重时间分别为(60.29±5.44)min、(50.52±5.49)mL、(6.22±1.34)d、(4.15±1.33)周、(6.81±1.34)周,均低于ORIF组[(76.33±8.29)min、(190.48±20.51)mL、(8.17±1.65)d、(6.32±1.48)周、(7.82±2.17)周](t=11.552,47.076,6.552,8.322,2.828;P<0.05)。CR-ESIN组的手术并发症发生率5.88%(3/51)低于ORIF组19.61%(10/51)(x2=4.320;P<0.05)。CR-ESIN组的髋关节前屈活动度、后伸活动度、儿童下肢功能量表(PODCI)评分分别为(132.44±22.52)°、(20.39±4.47)°、(75.14±6.29)分,均高于ORIF组[(120.28±20.37)°、(17.55±3.12)°、(70.31±5.36)分],术后双侧股骨长度差(1.52±0.39)cm低于ORIF组(3.08±0.44)cm(t=2.860,3.721,4.174,18.948;P<0.05)。CR-ESIN组的取出手术切口长度、取出手术耗时、取出手术出血量、再骨折率均低于ORIF组(t/x2=31.706,8.298,38.448,4.883;P<0.05)。结论:CR-ESIN能提高股骨骨折患儿手术效率并降低出血风险,与传统ORIF相比,此术式有利于加快患儿康复进程、降低术后并发症发生率、促进关节功能恢复并减轻内固定物取出阶段负担。
Objective:To explore the effects of closed reduction elastic intramedullary nail fixation (CR-ESIN) on the rehabilitation process and joint function of children with femoral fractures.Methods:A retrospective study was conducted on 102 children with femoral fractures who underwent internal fixation surgery in our hospital from April 2024 to June 2025. Based on different surgical plans, 51 children who underwent CR-ESIN treatment were included in the CR-ESIN group, and the remaining 51 children who underwent traditional open reduction plate internal fixation (ORIF) treatment were included in the ORIF group. The treatment status, rehabilitation process, incidence of surgical complications, joint function recovery, and burden during the removal of internal fixation materials were compared between the two groups of children.Results:Under different surgical plans, the surgical time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative hospitalization time, brace use time, and complete weight-bearing time of the CR-ESIN group were (60.29 ± 5.44) min, (50.52 ± 5.49) mL, (6.22 ± 1.34) d, (4.15 ± 1.33) weeks, and (6.81 ± 1.34) weeks, lower than the ORIF group [(76.33 ± 8.29) min, (190.48 ± 20.51) mL, (8.17 ± 1.65) d, (6.32 ± 1.48) weeks, and (7.82 ± 2.17) weeks] (t=11.552,47.076,6.552,8.322,2.828; P<0.05). The incidence of surgical complications in the CR-ESIN group was 5.88% (3/51) lower than the ORIF group 19.61% (10/51) (x2=4.320; P<0.05). The hip flexion range of motion, extension range of motion, and PODCI scores of the CR-ESIN group were (132.44 ± 22.52) °, (20.39 ± 4.47) °, and (75.14 ± 6.29) points, higher than the ORIF group [(120.28 ± 20.37) °, (17.55 ± 3.12) °, and (70.31 ± 5.36) points]. The length difference between the bilateral femurs was (1.52 ± 0.39) cm, which was lower than the ORIF group (3.08 ± 0.44) cm (t=2.860,3.721,4.174,18.948; P<0.05). The length of the surgical incision, the duration of the extraction surgery, the amount of bleeding during the extraction surgery, and the rate of re fracture in the CR-ESIN group were all lower than the ORIF group (t/x2=31.706,8.298,38.448,4.883; P<0.05).Conclusion:CR-ESIN can improve the surgical efficiency and reduce the risk of bleeding in children with femoral fractures. Compared with traditional ORIF, this procedure is beneficial for accelerating the recovery process of children, reducing the incidence of postoperative complications, promoting joint function recovery, and reducing the burden of internal fixation removal stage.
论著

改良颈肩体热塑膜固定下颈胸段食管癌放射治疗中的摆位误差分析

Analysis of set-up errors in radiotherapy of cervical thoracic esophageal cancer under modified neck shoulder body thermoplastic film fixation

:52-57
 
目的 应用锥形束CT比较改良颈肩体热塑膜和传统颈肩体热塑膜体位固定装置在颈胸段食管癌患者放射治疗中的摆位差异,分析两种固定方式对锁骨上下区摆位误差的影响。方法 分析2021年6月—2022年10月在南京医科大学第一附属医院行放射治疗的29例食管癌患者的临床资料。将患者分为改良颈肩体热塑膜组(改良组)和光板颈肩体热塑膜组(对照组),对比分析2组病例不同配准区域的摆位误差。结果 改良组在X(左右)方向的平移误差及Rz(冠状面)方向的旋转误差小于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。改良组锁骨上下区在X(左右)方向的平移误差以及Rx(矢状面)方向的旋转误差小于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。改良组的整体靶区外放范围在X、Y方向上均小于颈肩体组,改良组在锁骨上下区的X方向靶区外放范围也更小。结论 对于颈胸段食管癌需行锁骨上下区放疗的患者,应用改良颈肩体热塑膜可减少平移误差,控制旋转角度,减少靶区外放范围。
Objective To compare the set-up errors between the modified neck-shoulder body thermoplastic film and the traditional neck-shoulder body thermoplastic film fixation device in the radiotherapy of patients with cervical and thoracic esophageal cancer by cone beam CT,and to analyze the influence of the two fixation methods on the positioning error of the upper and lower clavicular region.Methods The clinical data of 29 patients with esophageal cancer who underwent radiotherapy in the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University from June 2021 to October 2022 were analyzed.The patients were divided into two groups:the modified neck-shoulder body thermoplastic film group(the modified group)and the smooth neck-shoulder body thermoplastic film group(the control group),the positioning errors in different regions of the two groups were compared and analyzed.Results The translation error in the X(left and right)direction and the rotation error in the Rz(coronal plane)direction of the modified group were smaller than those of the control group,and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).The translation error in the X(left and right)direction and the rotation error in the Rx(sagittal plane)direction of the superior and inferior clavicular region in the modified group were smaller than those in the control group,and the differencs were statistically significant(P<0.05).The overall target area of the modified group was smaller in X and Y directions than that of the neck-shoulder body group,and the target area of the improved group in X direction was also smaller in the upper and lower clavicle area.Conclusions For patients with cervical and thoracic esophageal cancer who need radiotherapy in the upper and lower clavicular region,the application of modified neck shoulder body thermoplastic film can reduce the translation error,control the rotation angle and reduce the external radiation range of the target region.
论著

股骨颈系统与空心加压螺钉固定60岁以下患者股骨颈骨折的临床效果对比

Clinical results of femoral neck system and hollow compression screw fixation of femoral neck fracture in middle age patients

:60-64
 
目的 探究空心加压螺钉(CCS)和股骨颈系统(FNS)两种不同的内固定方法治疗60岁以下患者股骨颈骨折的疗效。方法 回顾性研究2018年1月—2019年9月期间在我院接受内固定手术治疗的100例股骨颈骨折患者,根据内固定方式不同,分为FNS组(观察组)和CCS组(对照组),比较2组患者的术后并发症、围手术期特征;并在手术前和手术后1年使用Harris髋关节评分(HHS)评估关节功能。结果 2组患者中,观察组的手术时间和围手术期出血量均大于对照组(P<0.05);术后观察组的骨愈合时间低于对照组,且观察组股骨颈短缩程度也低于对照组(P<0.05);观察组螺钉切除发生率以及术后并发症总发生率均低于对照组(P<0.05)。结论 年龄小于60岁的股骨颈骨折患者通过CCS或FNS治疗可以获得满意的临床效果。 FNS 具有优异的生物力学性能,并显示出更高的整体结构稳定性。
Objective To explore the curative effect of two different internal fixation methods, cannulated compression screw (CCS) and femoral neck system (FNS), in the treatment of femoral neck fractures in patients under 60 years old. Methods Retrospectively studied 100 patients with femoral neck fractures who underwent internal fixation surgery in our hospital from January 2018 to September 2019. According to different internal fixation methods, they were divided into FNS group (observation group) and CCS group (control group). The postoperative complications and perioperative characteristics of the two groups of patients were compared, and the Harris Hip Score (HHS) was used to assess joint function before and 1 year after the operation. Results In the two groups of patients, the operation time and perioperative blood loss of the observation group were more than those of the control group (P<0.05); the bone healing time of the observation group was shorter than that of the control group, and the degree of femoral neck shortening in the observation group was also lower than the control group (P<0.05); the incidence of screw resection and the total incidence of postoperative complications in the observation group were lower than those in the control group (P<0.05). Conclusions Patients with femoral neck fractures under 60 years old could obtain satisfactory clinical results through CCS or FNS treatment. FNS had excellent biomechanical properties and showed significantly higher overall structural stability.
论著

踝关节骨折合并下胫腓联合韧带损伤患者行手术固定治疗的效果分析

Analysis of the treatment effect of surgical fixation in ankle fracture with lower tibiofibular syndesmosis injury

:75-78
 
目的 探究合并下胫腓联合韧带损伤的踝关节骨折患者实施手术固定治疗的临床价值。方法 遴选2018年1月—2020年12月70例合并下胫腓作者联合韧带损伤的踝关节骨折患者,根据随机数字表法分2组,开展石膏外固定治疗35例(记对照组),开展手术内固定治疗35例(记观察组),评估2组治疗优良率、治疗康复情况、踝关节功能(Kofoed评分)以及日常生活能力(ADL评分)、术后并发症率。结果 观察组治疗优良率94.29%相较对照组77.14%更高(P<0.05);观察组康复速率更快,二次手术率更低(P<0.05);术前2组Kofoed评分、ADL评分比较,均无统计学差异(P>0.05),术后观察组Kofoed评分、ADL评分较对照组更高(P<0.05);观察组术后并发症率低于对照组(P<0.05)。结论 对合并下胫腓联合韧带损伤的踝关节骨折患者开展实施手术内固定治疗,对骨折早期愈合及修复韧带损伤具有显著价值,降低二次手术率及控制术后并发风险,促进关节功能早日恢复,实现理想的临床疗效。
Objective To explore the clinical value of surgical fixation in patients with ankle fracture with lower tibiofibular syndesmosis injury.Methods A total of 70 patients with ankle fracture and lower tibiofibular syndesmosis injury from January 2018 to December 2020 were selected and divided into two groups according to the random number table method.Thirty-five cases were treated with external plaster fixation (control group) and 35 cases were treated with internal surgical fixation (observation group).The treatment and rehabilitation outcomes,ankle function (Kofoed score) and ability of daily living (ADL score),postoperative complication incidence rate of the two groups were evaluated.Results The effective rates of treatment were 94.29% and 77.14% in observation group and control group (P<0.05).The observation group has a faster recovery rate and a lower rate of secondary operations (P<0.05).There were no significant difference in Kofoed score and ADL score between the two groups before operation (P>0.05).After operation,the Kofoed score and ADL score in the observation group were significantly higher than those in the control group (P<0.05). The postoperative complication incidence in the observation group was significantly lower than that in the control group (P<0.05).Conclusions The implementation of internal surgical fixation in patients with ankle fracture and lower tibiofibular syndesmosis injury had significant value for early fracture healing and ligament injury repair,reduced the secondary operation rate and controlling the postoperative complication risk,promoted the early recovery of joint function and achieved ideal clinical effect.
论著

负压封闭引流联合胸骨固定系统在心脏术后发生纵膈感染临床治疗

Clinical treatment of mediastinal infection with negative pressure sealing drainage combined with sternum fixation system after cardiac surgery

:30-34
 
目的 总结一种新的技术在心脏术后纵隔感染的应用经验。方法 回顾性分析2017年2月—2019年6月15日心脏术后发生纵膈感染成人患者,共有5例(1.2%),其中男性4例,女性1例,平均年龄(49±19)岁,平均体质量(70±15)kg,2例为急性A型主动脉夹层,2例为冠心病,1例为感染性心内膜炎合并白塞氏病,患者确诊后出现创面感染重、分泌物多,行VSD(负压封闭引流)进行过渡治疗,待创面清洁、肉芽新鲜后入手术室行清创术,术中4例采用SternaLock胸骨固定系统进行固定,1例因未累及至胸骨后,仅在胸骨前方行清创缝合。结果 4例完全治愈并顺利出院,1例因出现多器官功能衰竭死亡,但伤口愈合良好。结论 通过VSD引流增加了胸骨血流,加速肉芽组织形成,防止感染进一步加重,稳定胸骨,为进一步清创创造了良好的基础,同时运用SternaLock®胸骨固定系统(8孔型钛板及2.4 mm自钻锁螺钉)进行固定,明显增加了胸骨的稳定性,进一步改善患者预后。
Objective To summarize the application experience of a new technique in mediastinal infection after cardiac operation. Methods A retrospective analysis of adult patients with mediastinal infection after cardiac surgery from February 2017 to June 15, 2019 were taken including a total of 5 cases (1.2%), of which 4 were male and 1 was female, with an average age (49±19) years old, average weight (70±15) kg;2 cases had acute type A aortic dissection, 2 cases had coronary heart disease, 1 case had infective endocarditis with Behcet's disease. After diagnosed, the patients developed severe wound infection and excessive secretion. VSD (vacuum sealing drainage) was performed for transitional treatment. After the wounds were cleaned and the granulation were still fresh, the wounds were for debridement in the operating room. During the operation, 4 cases were fixed with the SternaLock® plating system, and 1 case was only treated with debridement and suture in front of the sternum because it did not involve the sternum. Results Four cases were cured and discharged smoothly, and 1 case died due to multiple organ failure, but the wound healed well. Conclusion The VSD increased sternum blood flow, which accelerated the granulation tissue formation, further to prevent infection and stable sternum, create a good foundation for further debridement, meanwhile the SternaLock ® plating system(consists of eight pass since the titanium plate and 2.4 mm drill lock screw) was used for fixation, which significantly increased the stability of the sternum, further improved the prognosis of patients.
论著

河源地区机采血小板固定献血者血小板抗原系统基因多态性分析

The polymorphism of human platelet antigens in fixed apheresis platelet donors in Heyuan area

:64-67
 
目的 探讨河源地区机采血小板固定献血者血小板抗原系统的基因多态性特征,为建立本地区机采血小板供血者库奠定基础。方法 采用PCR-SSP方法对100例机采血小板固定献血者进行血小板抗原HPA1~17系统基因分型。结果 HPA1~17基因中成多态性分布的等位基因是HPA2a、HPA3a、HPA5a、HPA15a,其频率分别为0.96、0.49、0.99、0.515。HPA-2、HPA-3、HPA-5、HPA-15系统存在aa、ab、bb 三种表型。HPA1a、HPA4a、HPA6a-14a、HPA16a-17a基因频率为1,呈单线性分布,未发现b基因。结论 河源地区血小板HPA-3系统不配合率最高(0.420),HPA-15系统次之。建立本地区机采血小板供血者库,为患者提供HPA相合的血小板,对减少临床血小板输注无效的发生具有重要意义。
Objective To study the polymorphism of human platelet antigens in fixed apheresis platelet donors in Heyuan area and to lay a foundation for the establishment of platelets donor bank. Methods PCR-SSP method was used to analyze HPA 1~17 genotype in 100 fixed platelet donors. Results The highest numbers of heterozygotes were HPA2a,HPA3a,HPA5a and HPA15a,with frequencies of 0.96,0.49,0.99 and 0.515,respectively. The frequencies of HPA1a,HPA4a,HPA6a-14a and HPA16a-17a genes were 1,which showed a single linear distribution. Conclusion HPA-3 system were the highest mismatch rate (0.420),followed by HPA-15 system. It is great significance to establish a local platelet donor bank and provide HPA compatible platelets for patients.
临床护理

早期康复训练对高龄股骨骨折内固定患者术后康复的影响

:118-120
 
目的 探讨早期康复训练对高龄股骨骨折内固定患者术后康复的影响研究。方法 抽选我院2015年3月—2017年7月收治的98例高龄股骨骨折患者,均以防旋股骨近端髓内钉(PFMA)内固定治疗,根据患者自愿及实际自身状态原则分为对照组(n=45例,仅开展常规术后康复护理)和观察组(n=53例,在内固定治疗期给予早期康复训练),比较术前及术后3、6个月髋关节运动功能(Harisr评分)及日常生活活动能力(Barthel指数),观察6个月内并发症发生情况。结果 观察组干预3、6个月后Harisr髋关节活动评分、Barthel指数均高于对照组(P<0.05)。观察组锻炼6月后,髋关节运动功能恢复优良率高于对照组(P<0.05)。观察组发生骨延迟愈合、压疮、切口感染、肺炎、泌尿系感染等并发症的概率低于对照组(P<0.05)。结论 高龄股骨骨折患者PFMA内固定术后开展早期康复训练,可促进患者骨关节功能恢复,改善运动功能,降低并发症发生率,值得临床推广。
临床诊疗

经皮微创椎弓根钉内固定和传统开放式手术治疗脊椎骨折的优劣差异

Merit and demerit of treament compared minimally invasive percutaneou pedicle screw fixtion and traditional open operation

:99-101
 
目的 分析比较经皮微创椎弓根钉内固定和传统开放式手术治疗脊椎骨折的优劣差异。方法 本研究选择我院2015年2月—2016年6月收治的脊椎骨折患者72例,按照治疗方法的不同将全部患者分成对照组(36例)和实验组(36例),两组患者分别给予传统开放式手术治疗和经皮微创椎弓根钉内固定治疗,对两组患者的临床疗效进行观察分析。结果 在手术时间、手术出血量、切口长度以及住院时间方面,实验组患者均优于对照组(P<0.05);实验组患者术后的血清肌酸激酶活性低于对照组患者(P<0.05);治疗后两组患者椎体前缘高度、Cobb's角均优于治疗前(P<0.05),但是组间比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。术后两组患者均没有发生椎间隙感染、神经损伤、切口感染等并发症。结论 在对脊椎骨折患者进行治疗时,经皮微创椎弓根钉内固定治疗和传统开放式手术治疗的临床疗效比较类似,但是和传统开放式手术相比较,经皮微创椎弓根钉内固定治疗对患者的损伤更加轻微,术后恢复时间更短。
出版者信息








《广州医药》公众号