广州医药 ›› 2017, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (5): 19-23.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8535.2017.05.005

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

镜像视觉反馈联合改良强制性运动治疗对脑卒中偏瘫患者上肢功能的疗效观察

刘文权, 曾德良, 梁宇健, 胡庆中   

  1. 暨南大学医学院附属广州市红十字会医院 (广州 510220)
  • 收稿日期:2017-04-17 发布日期:2021-12-01
  • 通讯作者: 刘文权, E-mail: hhyylwq@163.com

Clinical investigation of mirror visual feedback combined with modified constraint-induced movement therapy on upper extremity function in patients with post-stroke hemiplegia

LIU Wenquan, ZENG Deliang, LIANG Yujian, HU Qingzhong   

  1. Guangzhou Red Cross Hospital affiliated Medical College of Jinan University, Guangzhou 510220, China
  • Received:2017-04-17 Published:2021-12-01

摘要: 目的 观察镜像视觉反馈和改良强制性运动治疗对脑卒中偏瘫患者上肢功能的影响。方法 前瞻性纳入2013年12月—2016年10月在我院收治的、临床资料完整的脑卒中偏瘫患者117例,随机将患者分4组:A组30例,B组29例,C组28例和D组30例,所有患者均接受常规综合康复治疗,连续治疗4周。在常规综合康复治疗的基础上,B组和C组分别增加镜像视觉反馈训练和改良强制性运动治疗,D组则同时另加镜像视觉反馈和改良强制性运动治疗。主要观察指标包括治疗前、后的Fugl-Meyer量表(FMA)、上肢功能测试(upper extremity function test, UEFT)和改良Barthel指数(MBI)的评分。结果 4组患者治疗后的FMA、UEFT和MBI评分分别为:A组(26.37±3.44)、(43.30±3.46)、(56.27±4.76),B组(29.17±2.82)、(45.41±3.40)、(58.72±4.48),C组(29.46±3.16)、(45.71±2.37)、(58.82±3.89),D组(31.93±2.74)、(48.83±3.57)、(62.17±4.51),与治疗前组内相比,配对t检验显示差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);单因素方差分析发现,D组明显优于A、B、C 3组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);B、C 2组均优于A组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);B、C 2组间比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 在常规综合康复训练基础上,单独联合镜像视觉反馈或改良强制性运动治疗均能改善脑卒中偏瘫患者上肢运动功能和日常生活自理能力,但同时联合应用两种疗法,疗效更佳。

关键词: 镜像视觉反馈, 改良强制性运动, 脑卒中, 偏瘫, 上肢运动功能

Abstract: Objective To investigate the effects of mirror visual feedback (MVF) and modified constraint-induced movement therapy (mCIMT) on upper extremity function in post-stroke hemiplegics. Methods 117 patients with hemiplegia post-stroke were collected prospectively from December 2013 to October 2016, and randomly divided into the following four groups: group A (n=30), group B (n=29), group C (n=28) and group D (n=30). All patients were trained with conventional comprehensive rehabilitation therapy for four weeks, while the group B and group C were respectively trained with MVF and mCIMT based on conventional comprehensive rehabilitation therapy. Finally, the group D was simultaneously trained with MVF and mCIMT. The investigation duration was set as four weeks for all groups. The Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) score, Upper Extremity Function Test (UEFT) score, and Modified Barthel Index (MBI) score were used as main index of clinical effects. Results After treatment, the scores of FMA, UEFT and MBI were respectively (26.37±3.44),(43.30±3.46),(56.27±4.76) in group A, (29.17±2.82), (45.41±3.40), (58.72±4.48) in group B, (29.46±3.16), (45.71±2.37), (58.82±3.89) in group C, (31.93±2.74), (48.83±3.57), (62.17±4.51) in group D.Comparing with the scores before treatment, the paired-sample t test showed that there were significant differences (P<0.05). The single factor variance test showed that the scores of the group D were significant better than those scores in group A, group B and group C (P<0.05); furthermore the scores of the group B and group C were significant better than the group A (P<0.05). However, there were no difference at those scores between the group B and group C (P>0.05). Conclusion Based on conventional comprehensive rehabilitation, single combined with MVF or mCIMT may significantly improve the function of upper limb and activities of daily living (ADL) in post-stroke patients with hemiplegia. However, simultaneous combined with MVF and mCIMT will be more effective than the single one.

Key words: Mirror visual feedback, Modified constraint-induced movement therapy, Stroke, Hemiplegia, Upper limb function