手动杠杆式胸外按压心肺复苏装置对模拟院内心肺复苏按压质量和按压者疲劳影响的研究

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-8535.2017.05.006

广州医药 ›› 2017, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (5): 24-27.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8535.2017.05.006

手动杠杆式胸外按压心肺复苏装置对模拟院内心肺复苏按压质量和按压者疲劳影响的研究

吴海东, 王鹏, 吴满辉, 黄子通

中山大学孙逸仙纪念医院急诊科,中山大学心肺脑复苏研究所 (广州 510120)

收稿日期:2017-05-24 发布日期:2021-12-01
基金资助:
广东省省级科技计划项目(2014A020212624)

The study of manual leverage external chest compress device on rescuer's fatigue and compression quality on simulated in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation

WU Haidong, WANG Peng, WU Manhui, HUANG Zitong

Department of Emergency Medicine, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University;Institute of Cardiopulmonary Ce-rebral Resuscitation, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510120, China

Received:2017-05-24 Published:2021-12-01

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的探讨手动杠杆式胸外按压心肺复苏(CPR)装置对院内心肺复苏按压质量和复苏疲劳的影响。方法将12名医学生志愿者分为手动杠杆式胸外按压CPR装置组(LDCPR)(n=6)和徒手标准CPR组(STCPR)(n=6)模拟院内心肺复苏场景进行CPR试验。LDCPR组采用手动杠杆式胸外按压CPR装置对模拟人进行连续6min连续胸外按压,STCPR组徒手对模拟人进行6min连续胸外按压。监测复苏期间按压的深度、频率以及按压者的心率和疲劳程度等变化。结果随着连续胸外按压的进行,按压者的心率和疲劳程度都在不断增加,有效按压深度超过5 cm次数逐渐减少,但是在连续胸外按压的第4～6min,LDCPR组按压者的心率较STCPR组慢(P<0.05),疲劳程度较轻(P<0.05),有效按压的比例更高(P<0.05)。按压频率两组比较无明显差异。结论在本模拟人试验中,手动杠杆式胸外按压CPR装置可减轻按压者疲劳,有助于提高院内CPR时长时间胸外按压的质量。

关键词: 院内心肺复苏, 疲劳, 机械按压

Abstract: Objective We aimed to investigate simulated in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) quality and rescuer fatigue of external chest compression-only CPR by a manual leverage device(LDCPR). Methods All 12 volunteers (medical staffs: male 6 and female 6) were randomized to standard CPR by hand(STCPR)group (n=6)or LDCPR group(n=6). At STCPR group, continuous external chest compression-only was performed for 6 minutes to simulate in hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation on a manikin; at LDCPR group, compression-only was performed for 6 minutes by a leverage device on a manikin. We measured blood pressure of the volunteers before and after performing each CPR technique, volunteers self-report fatigue scale and continuously monitored heart rate (HR) of the volunteers during each CPR technique by smart ring. CPR quality measures included chest compression rate and depth. Results During continuous external chest compression-only CPR, compressor's heart rate and fatigue scale were rising continuously, and percent of compress depth >5 cm were declining, too.Compressor's heart rate and fatigue scale were higher in the STCPR group than in the LDCPR group (P<0.05) during the fourth to sixth minutes CPR (P<0.05). Percent of compress depth > 5 cm was higher in the LDCPR group than in the STCPR group (P<0.05) during the fourth to sixth minutes of CPR (P<0.05).Compress rate had not differed between the 2 groups during CPR. Conclusion In the manikin study, manual leverage external chest compress device may reduce fatigue scale and improve long term compression quality during in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Key words: In-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation, Fatigue, Mechanical compression

吴海东, 王鹏, 吴满辉, 黄子通. 手动杠杆式胸外按压心肺复苏装置对模拟院内心肺复苏按压质量和按压者疲劳影响的研究[J]. 广州医药, 2017, 48(5): 24-27.

WU Haidong, WANG Peng, WU Manhui, HUANG Zitong. The study of manual leverage external chest compress device on rescuer's fatigue and compression quality on simulated in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation[J]. Guangzhou Medical Journal, 2017, 48(5): 24-27.

参考文献

[1] WU H, WANG P, LI Y, et al. Diazoxide attenuates postresuscitation brain injury in a rat model of asphyxial cardiac arrest by opening mitochondrial atp-sensitive potassium channels[J]. Biomed Res Int, 2016,2016:1253842.
[2] TRAVERS A H, PERKINS G D, BERG R A, et al. Part 3: Adult basic life support and automated external defibrillation: 2015 international consensus on cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care science with treatment recommendations[J]. Circulation,2015,132(16 Suppl 1):S51-S83.
[3] MCDONALD C H, HEGGIE J, JONES C M, et al. Rescuer fatigue under the 2010 ERC guidelines, and its effect on cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) performance[J]. Emerg Med J,2013,30(8):623-627.
[4] SHAO F, LI C S, LIANG L R, et al. Incidence and outcome of adult in-hospital cardiac arrest in Beijing, China[J]. Resuscitation,2016,102:51-56.
[5] NOLAN J P, SOAR J, SMITH G B, et al. Incidence and outcome of in-hospital cardiac arrest in the United Kingdom National Cardiac Arrest Audit[J]. Resuscitation,2014,85(8):987-992.
[6] TRPKOVIC S, PAVLOVIC A, BUMBASIREVIC V, et al. Outcome among patients suffering from in-hospital cardiac arrest][J]. Srp Arh Celok Lek,2014,142(3-4):170-177.
[7] BONNES J L, BROUWER M A, NAVARESE E P, et al. Manual Cardiopulmonary resuscitation versus cpr including a mechanical chest compression device in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a comprehensive meta-analysis from randomized and observational studies[J]. Ann Emerg Med,2016,67(3):349-360.
[8] BROOKS S C, ANDERSON M L, BRUDER E, et al. Part 6: Alternative techniques and ancillary devices for cardiopulmonary resuscitation: 2015 american heart association guidelines update for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care[J]. Circulation,2015,132(18 Suppl 2):S436-S443.

手动杠杆式胸外按压心肺复苏装置对模拟院内心肺复苏按压质量和按压者疲劳影响的研究

The study of manual leverage external chest compress device on rescuer's fatigue and compression quality on simulated in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 2

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	刘全保, 陈海松, 武哲明, 陈韵. 融合功能训练在大龄人群斜视矫正术后疗效的评价[J]. 广州医药, 2020, 51(5): 58-61.
[2]	丁小珍, 刘洁珍, 刘欣, 郭惠兰. 体感音乐疗法对青少年视疲劳患者的影响[J]. 广州医药, 2015, 46(2): 44-45.