思维导图教育模式对肠造口患者生活质量与心理情绪的影响

来源期刊：广州医药 | 52-57 发布时间：2023-08-15 收稿时间：2025/11/13 18:32:38 阅读量：40

作者：: 汤婷婷,

何青青,

梁明,

何婉青,

肖晓梅,

刘爱丽,

关键词：: 思维导图教育结直肠癌肠造口生活质量心理情绪; mind map education colorectal cancer enterostomy quality of life psychological emotion

DOI：: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8535.2023.07.009

收稿时间：: 2022-12-30
修订日期：
接收日期：
引用总数：: 2

目的探讨与观察思维导图教育模式对肠造口患者生活质量与心理情绪的影响。方法选择2021年5月—2022年4月本院胃肠外科收治的低位直肠癌术后患者80例为研究对象,按入院顺序随机编号,对应随机数字为偶数的分到思维导图组（n=40）,奇数的分到传统组（n=40）。传统组给予常规健康教育干预,思维导图组在传统组护理的基础上给予思维导图教育模式干预,思维导图组与传统组护理观察时间为3个月。结果思维导图组护理期间的造口感染、坏死、水肿、出血、旁疝等并发症发生率与传统组相比都降低（P<0.05）。思维导图组与传统组护理后的焦虑与抑郁评分与护理前相比降低（P<0.05）,护理后思维导图组评分与传统组相比降低（P<0.05）。思维导图组的术后住院时间、术后排气时间、术后下床活动时间与传统组相比均减少（P<0.05）。思维导图组护理后的副作用、共性症状、尿路症状、特异躯体症状、特异心理、性功能、尿袋问题等生活质量评分与传统组相比都减少（P<0.05）。结论思维导图教育模式在肠造口患者的应用能促进缓解心理负面情绪,促进患者康复,提高患者的生活质量,减少术后造口并发症的发生。

Objective To explore and observe the effects of mind map education mode on the quality of life and psychological emotions of patients with enterostomy．Methods From May 2021 to April 2022, 80 cases of patients with postoperative low rectal cancer who were admitted to the Gastrointestinal Surgery Department of our hospital were selected as the research subjects, and all the cases were numbered according to the random admission sequence, and those with even random numbers were assigned to the mind map group（n=40）, and odd numbers were assigned to the traditional group（n=40）．The traditional group was given routine health education intervention, the mind map group was given mind map education mode intervention additionally, and the nursing observation time of both groups was 3 months．Results The incidences of complications such as stoma bleeding, parastomal hernia, stoma necrosis, stoma edema and stoma infection during nursing in the mind map group were lower than that in the traditional group（P<0.05）．The anxiety and depression scores in both groups after nursing were significantly lower than those before nursing（P<0.05）, and the scores in the mind map group after nursing were also significantly lower than those in the traditional group（P<0.05）．The postoperative hospital stay, postoperative exhaust time, and postoperative ambulation time of the mind map group were significantly shorter than those of the traditional group（P<0.05）．The quality of life scores of common symptoms, side effects, urinary tract symptoms, specific somatic symptoms, specific psychology, urine bag problems and sexual function in the mind map group after nursing were significantly lower than those in the traditional group（P<0.05）．Conclusions The application of mind map education model in patients with enterostomy can promote the relief of psychological negative emotions, promote the recovery of patients, reduce the occurrence of postoperative complications, and improve the quality of life of patients．

1、 WILSON R B.Morpheus and the underworld-interventions to reduce the risks of opioid use after surgery:ORADEs,dependence,cancer progression,and anastomotic leakage[J].J Gastrointest Surg,2019,23(6):1240-1249.

2、辛楚璇,王伟,黄赛艳,等.结肠癌造口患者自我管理能力的现状及影响因素分析[J].临床与病理杂志,2020,40(2):403-410.

3、杜荣欣,张晓红.肠造口患者延续性护理需求与生活质量的纵向研究[J].护理学杂志,2020,35(6):84-87.

4、杨晓莉,蔡海燕,李瑜敏.基于同质医疗理念的创新型护理实践联合积极心理干预对结直肠癌造口患者的影响[J].广东医学,2020,41(3):287-292.

5、 MALEK A E,RAAD II.Preventing catheter-related infections in cancer patients:a review of current strategies[J].Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther,2020,18(6):531-538.

6、 LINDER L A,GERDY C,ABOUZELOF R,et al.Using practice-based evidence to improve supportive care practices to reduce central line-associated bloodstream infections in a pediatric oncology unit[Formula:see text][J].J Pediatr Oncol Nurs,2017,34(3):185-195.

7、张楠,韩月姣,王亚菲,等.基于预防性理论的全程护理干预对肠造口患儿及其照顾者的影响[J].齐鲁护理杂志,2020,26(10):32-35.

8、 KUMAR A,PATEL V R,PANAIYADIYAN S,et al.Nerve-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy:Current perspectives[J].Breast Cancer Res Treat,2021,8(1):2-13.

9、 GIVEN C W.Family caregiving for cancer patients:the state of the literature and a direction for research to link the informal and formal care systems to improve quality and outcomes[J].Semin Oncol Nurs,2019,35(4):389-394.

10、 BOLSHINSKY V,LI M H,ISMAIL H,et al.Multimodal prehabilitation programs as a bundle of care in gastrointestinal cancer surgery:A systematic review[J].Dis Colon Rectum,2018,61(1):124-138.

11、李小林,张德雪,赵海燕,等.认知行为疗法对结直肠癌永久性肠造口患者创伤后成长的影响[J].安徽医学,2020,41(2):204-207.

12、章晓霞. 延伸护理服务在直肠癌永久性造口术后患者中的应用[J].护理实践与研究,2020,17(5):81-82.

13、 WATANABE M,OKAMURA A,TOIHATA T,et al.Recent progress in perioperative management of patients undergoing esophagectomy for esophageal cancer[J].Esophagus,2018,15(3):160-164.

14、 SEKANDARZAD M W,DOORNEBAL C,HOLLMANN M W.Opiophobia in cancer biology- justified?- The role of perioperative use of opioids in cancer recurrence[J].Curr Pharm Des,2019,25(28):3020-3027.

15、王凤仪,韩绮嘉,梁瑞冰.思维导图在CT小肠造影患者健康教育中的应用[J].齐鲁护理杂志,2020,26(14):86-88.

16、李岩,段莎莎,张兰兰.思维导图在提高永久性结肠造口患者自护能力中的应用[J].护理实践与研究,2020,17(22):69-72.

17、徐丽芬,杨荆艳,颜巧元,等.永久性尿路造口患者应用视频版思维导图健康教育的效果观察[J].护理学报,2020,27(11):75-78.

18、汪蕾,李阿文,卢姗,等.思维导图在回肠膀胱造口患者围手术期健康教育中的应用效果[J].中华全科医学,2021,19(9):1535-1538,1614.

19、殷月,邓雨芳,张红梅,等.思维导图式健康教育在肠造口患者出院准备度中的应用[J].齐鲁护理杂志,2021,27(12):4-6.

20、程金歌,丁瑞娟,冯蓓莉,等.思维导图健康教育模式对肠造口患儿家属疾病认知水平、心理健康及家庭造口照护能力的影响[J].中国健康心理学杂志,2021,29(12):1804-1809.

1、刘瑜,王城,周柯均,等.多样化教学在小儿外科临床见习中的应用[J].广州医药,2024,55(06):683-688.

2、黄丹丹.一点二源理论下适应性干预联合思维导图教育在心律失常出院患者中的应用观察[J].心血管病防治知识,2024,14(13):122-125.