子宫瘢痕的超声弹性成像结合厚度分析对剖宫产后再妊娠产妇子宫破裂的预测应用

来源期刊：广州医药 | 40-45 发布时间：2023-10-12 收稿时间：2025/11/13 18:30:52 阅读量：26

作者：: 赵明智,

曾福强,

纪宗萍,

关键词：: 子宫瘢痕超声弹性成像厚度剖宫产再妊娠子宫破裂; uterine scar ultrasonic elastic imaging thickness pregnant after cesarean section uterine rupture

DOI：: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8535.2023.09.007

收稿时间：: 2023-01-03
修订日期：
接收日期：
引用总数：: 3

目的探讨子宫瘢痕的超声弹性成像结合厚度分析对剖宫产后再妊娠产妇子宫破裂的预测应用。方法选择2020年1月—2021年12月在中山市中医院分娩的剖宫产术后再次妊娠经阴道分娩（VBAC）产妇作为研究对象。根据纳入和排除标准,共纳入子宫破裂的VBAC产妇32例、非子宫破裂的VBAC产妇90例。通过住院病历信息系统查询研究对象的基本信息及其在妊娠晚期（≥37周）用B超对研究对象行子宫瘢痕厚度和弹性的测量结果,采用受试者工作特征曲线（ROC）曲线分析子宫瘢痕厚度和弹性SI值对子宫破裂的预测作用。结果子宫破裂组中年龄>35岁、妊娠>2次、与上次剖宫产间隔<2年、新生儿体质量≥3 kg、单层缝合者的比例高于非子宫破裂组（P<0.05）。122例产妇子宫瘢痕厚度的均值为（3.42±0.49）mm,SI的均值为（2.57±0.45）。ROC曲线分析结果显示：子宫瘢痕厚度单独预测子宫破裂的曲线下面积（AUC）为0.805（95%CI：0.730~0.880,P<0.05）,cut off值为3.05 mm,灵敏度为0.726,特异度为0.910,约登指数为0.636;子宫瘢痕SI单独预测子宫破裂的AUC为0.730（95%CI：0.635~0.824,P<0.05）,cut off值为2.11,灵敏度为0.767,特异度为0.781,约登指数为0.548;子宫瘢痕厚度联合预测子宫破裂的AUC为0.874（95%CI：0.812~0.937,P<0.01）,灵敏度为0.875,特异度为0.811,约登指数为0.686。子宫瘢痕厚度结合子宫瘢痕SI值预测子宫破裂的AUC高于单独使用子宫瘢痕厚度（Z=7.611,P=0.041）和子宫瘢痕SI值（Z=25.864,P=0.025）。结论子宫瘢痕的超声弹性成像SI值联合子宫厚度可有效提高超声对于VBAC产妇子宫破裂的预测效能,具有一定的应用意义。

Objective To study the application of ultrasound elasticity imaging combined thickness analysis of uterine scar in predicting uterine rupture in women pregnant after cesarean section．Methods Pregnant women with vaginal birth after cesarean（VBAC）from January 2020 to December 2021 in Zhongshan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine were selected as the research subjects．A total of 32 VBAC parturients with uterine rupture and 90 VBAC parturients without uterine rupture were included according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria．The basic information of the subjects was queried through the medical record information system of the hospital．In the third trimester（≥37 weeks）,the thickness and elasticity of uterine scar were measured by ultrasound,and the predictive effect of uterine scar thickness and elastic SI value on uterine rupture was analyzed by ROC curve．Results Chi-square test showed that the incidence of uterine rupture was higher in patients with age>35 years,pregnancy>2 times,interval from last cesarean section<2 years,newborn weight≥3kg,and the proportion of uterine rupture in single suture was higher than that in double suture（P<0.05）．The mean uterine scar thickness of 122 subjects was（3.42±0.49）mm,and the mean SI was（2.57±0.45）．The area under curve（AUC）of uterine scar thickness alone for predicting uterine rupture was 0.805（95%CI：0.730-0.880,P<0.05）,the cut off value was 3.05 mm,the sensitivity was 0.726,the specificity was 0.910,and the Youden coefficient was 0.636 by ROC curve analysis．The AUC of uterine scar SI alone for predicting uterine rupture was 0.730（95%CI：0.635-0.824,P<0.05）,the cut off value was 2.11,the sensitivity was 0.767,the specificity was 0.781,and the Youden coefficient was 0.548 by ROC curve analysis．The AUC of uterine scar thickness combination for predicting uterine rupture was 0.874（95%CI：0.812-0.937,P<0.01）,the sensitivity was 0.875,the specificity was 0.811,and the Youden coefficient was 0.686 by ROC curve analysis．The AUC predicted by uterine scar thickness combined with uterine scar SI value was higher than that predicted by uterine scar thickness alone（Z=7.611,P=0.041）and uterine scar SI value（Z=25.864,P=0.025）．Conclusions Elastic SI value of ultrasound imaging of uterine scar combined with uterine thickness can effectively improve the prediction efficiency of ultrasound for VBAC maternal uterine rupture,which has certain application significance,but further demonstration is still needed．

1、[17] FUKUDA M,FUKUDA K,SHIMIZU T,et al.Ultrasound assessment of lower uterine segment thickness during pregnancy,labour,and the postpartum period[J].J Obstet Gynaecol Can,2016,38(2):134-140.

2、[16] SELIGER G,CHAOUI K,LAUTENSCHLAGER C,et al.Technique of sonographic assessment of lower uterine segment in women with previous cesarean delivery:a prospective,pre/intraoperative comparative ultrasound study[J].Arch Gynecol Obstet,2018,298(2):297-306.

3、[15] 王雪松. 剖宫产术后不同时期子宫瘢痕愈合的临床观察及其与Ⅰ、Ⅲ型胶原表达关系的研究[D].大连:大连医科大学,2014.

4、[14] SHARMA C,SURYA M,SONI A,et al.Sonographic prediction of scar dehiscence in women with previous cesarean section[J].J Obstet Gynaecol India,2015,65(2):97-103.

5、[13] KOK N,WIERSMA I C,OPMEER B C,et al.Sonographic measurement of lower uterine segment thickness to predict uterine rupture during a trial of labor in women with previous Cesarean section:a meta-analysis[J].Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol,2013,42(2):132-139.

6、[12] 仲莞,陈震宇.超声在剖宫产术后再次妊娠子宫下段厚度测量中的应用[J].中国计划生育和妇产科,2019,11(12):32-35,45.

7、[11] JASTROW N,VIKHAREVA O,GAUTHIER R J,et al.Can third-trimester assessment of uterine scar in women with prior cesarean section predict uterine rupture?[J].Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol,2016,47(4):410-414.

8、[10] 苏秀梅,陈新,罗新,等.首次剖宫产单层缝合法与双层缝合法有效性与安全性的Meta分析[J].实用妇产科杂志,2017,33(12):939-944.

9、[9] 吴萍. 瘢痕子宫再次剖宫产妊娠结局及产后出血危险因素分析[D].上海:上海交通大学,2020.

10、[8] 屈在卿,周训琼,马润玫.剖宫产后再次妊娠阴道试产子宫完全破裂6例临床分析[J].实用妇产科杂志,2016,32(5):369-371.

11、[7] 钟璐男,周飞宇,胡菊梅.超声弹性成像技术评估先前剖宫产妇女的子宫瘢痕弹性程度[J].中国优生与遗传杂志,2021,29(10):1480-1483.

12、[6] 陈洁,屠丽丽.妊娠早期子宫瘢痕厚度与子宫破裂发生的相关性研究[J].中国妇幼保健,2021,36(11):2509-2512.

13、[5] 陈惠春,涂海斌,林健玲.超声弹性成像联合血清学检查预测肝细胞癌微血管侵犯研究[J].中华肝胆外科杂志,2021,27(10):744-747.

14、[4] 孙荣荣,金雅芳,顾颖,等.瘢痕子宫再次妊娠分娩发生子宫破裂的危险因素分析[J].中国妇幼健康研究,2021,32(11):1553-1557.

15、[3] 赵贞. 瘢痕子宫再次妊娠不同分娩方式母婴结局的meta分析[D].吉林:吉林大学,2021.

16、[2] PARVEEN S,RENGARAJ S,CHATURVEDULA L.Factors associated with the outcome of TOLAC after one previous caesarean section:a retrospective cohort study[J].J Obstet Gynaecol,2022,42(3):430-436.

17、Uterine scar dehiscence:A rare cause of life-threatening delayed secondary postpartum hemorrhage-A case report and literature review[J].J Obstet Gynaecol India,2021,71(6):629-632.

18、 THAKUR G,KARMAKAR P,GUPTA P,et al.

1、窦娟.剪切波弹性成像预测疤痕子宫再次妊娠分娩方式的可行性分析[J].影像研究与医学应用,2024,8(15):46-48.

2、李雪梅.子宫破裂的影响因素及临床诊治分析[J].中外医学研究,2024,22(23):160-163.DOI:10.14033/j.cnki.cfmr.2024.23.039.

3、林华兰,蓝柳冰.瘢痕子宫阴道试产的影响因素[J].中外医学研究,2025,23(01):171-173.DOI:10.14033/j.cnki.cfmr.2025.01.047.