目的 评估医院-社区-家庭一体化康复护理模式对慢性创面患者生活质量及创面愈合的潜在影响。方法 选择2023年1月—2024年6月在广州市第一人民医院接受治疗的慢性创面患者80例作为研究对象,所有患者在住院期间均接受基于溃疡面积、深度及是否合并感染等因素的综合治疗,包括彻底清创、创缘处理、负压治疗、感染控制等治疗,并接受常规护理。出院前,通过随机数字表法将患者分为两组,每组40例。两组患者在住院期间均接受常规护理,出院后,对照组接受延续护理并定期复查。干预组40例患者在出院后接受医院-社区-家庭一体化康复护理模式。入组时及护理3个月后,使用生活质量调查表（SF-36）对患者生活质量和创面愈合率进行评估。结果 干预组创面愈合率为（32.61±4.26）%,高于对照组（11.48±1.04）%,差异具有统计学意义（t=19.473,P<0.05）。两组患者在护理3个月后的数字评定量表评分和创面疼痛频率评分均较入组时降低（P<0.05）。其中干预组护理3个月后的创面VAS评分为（1.82±0.17）分,创面疼痛频率评分为（1.28±0.25）分;而对照组分别为（3.91±0.22）分和（2.63±0.37）分,干预组低于对照组（P<0.05）。此外,干预组在护理后3个月的总体健康、生理功能、生理职能、精神健康、情感功能、社会功能评分均高于对照组（P<0.05）。在居家3个月期间,干预组的感染发生率为5.00%,而对照组为17.50%,干预组感染发生率低于对照组（χ²=3.781,P<0.05）。结论 本研究表明,医院-社区-家庭一体化康复护理模式干预能够促进慢性创面患者的创面愈合,降低居家期间感染的风险,并提升患者的生活质量。

Objective To assess the potential impact of the integrated hospital-community-home rehabilitation nursing model on the quality of life and wound healing in patients with chronic wounds．Methods A total of 80 patients with chronic wounds treated at the Guangzhou First People’s Hospital from January 2023 to June 2024 were selected as the study subjects．All patients received comprehensive treatment during their hospital stay,including thorough debridement,edge treatment,vacuum therapy,infection control and routine nursing care．Prior to discharge,the patients were randomly divided into two groups using a random number table,with 40 patients in each group．Both groups received routine nursing care during their hospital stay,and the control group received continuing nursing care and regular follow-up after discharge．Forty patients in the intervention group received the integrated hospital-community-home rehabilitation nursing model after discharge．Quality of life（QoL）and wound healing rates were assessed using the Short Form 36（SF-36）questionnaire at the time of enrollment and 3 months after nursing．Results The wound healing rate in the intervention group was significantly higher than that in the control group （[32.61±4.26]% vs [11.48±1.04]%）,with a statistical difference（t=19.473,P<0.05）．The numerical rating scale（NRS）scores and frequency of wound pain scores decreased in both groups 3 months after nursing compared to the enrollment period（P<0.05）．Specifically,the VAS score for wound pain in the intervention group 3 months after nursing was（1.82±0.17）,and the frequency of wound pain was（1.28±0.25）,in the control group,these scores were（3.91±0.22）and（2.63±0.37）,respectively,with the intervention group scoring significantly lower than the control group（P<0.05）．Furthermore,the scores for overall health,physical function,role physical,mental health,emotional function,and social function in the intervention group were higher than those in the control group 3 months after nursing（P<0.05）．During the 3-month home recovery period,the incidence of infection in the intervention group was 5.00%,whereas it was 17.50% in the control group,with the intervention group showing a lower incidence of infection（χ²=3.781,P<0.05）．Conclusions This study demonstrates that the hospital-community-home integrated rehabilitation care model intervention can promote wound healing in chronic wound patients,reduce the risk of infection during home care,and significantly improve patients’ quality of life．

目的 探究血清外泌体对小鼠烫伤伤口愈合的促进作用及机制。方法 选取我院60只NIH小鼠作为研究对象,对其血清中的外泌体进行提取和分离,建立起皮肤烫伤模型。采用血清外泌体进行治疗,评估治疗的效果,观察皮肤组织的病理变化,检测小鼠成纤维细胞增殖和表皮HaCat细胞迁移使用血清外泌体受到的影响。结果 空白对照组和血清外泌体小鼠烫伤创口愈合时间比较,差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05);血清外泌体作用24 h后,不同剂量OD值差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05);10 μL Exo组和PBS组内部不同时间点OD值差异均有统计学意义(P＜0.05);外泌体组和PBS组24 h的HaCat细胞迁移率相比较,差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05)。结论 血清外泌体可以促进小鼠烫伤伤口的愈合,对成纤维细胞的增殖和表皮HaCat细胞的迁移作用也比较显著,可能成为临床治疗烫伤的新手段。

       目的   评估医院-社区-家庭一体化康复护理模式对慢性创面患者生活质量及创面愈合的潜在影响。方法   选择2023年1月—2024年6月在广州市第一人民医院接受治疗的慢性创面患者80例作为研究对象，所有患者在住院期间均接受基于溃疡面积、深度及是否合并感染等因素的综合治疗，包括彻底清创、创缘处理、负压治疗、感染控制等治疗，并接受常规护理。出院前，通过随机数字表法将患者分为两组，每组40例。两组患者在住院期间均接受常规护理，出院后，对照组接受延续护理并定期复查。干预组40例患者在出院后接受医院-社区-家庭一体化康复护理模式。入组时及护理3个月后，使用生活质量调查表（SF-36）对患者生活质量和创面愈合率进行评估。结果   干预组创面愈合率为（32.61±4.26）%，高于对照组（11.48±1.04）%，差异具有统计学意义（t=19.473，P＜0.05）。两组患者在护理3个月后的数字评定量表评分和创面疼痛频率评分均较入组时降低（P＜0.05）。其中干预组护理3个月后的创面VAS评分为（1.82±0.17）分，创面疼痛频率评分为（1.28±0.25）分；而对照组分别为（3.91±0.22）分和（2.63±0.37）分，干预组低于对照组（P＜0.05）。此外，干预组在护理后3个月的总体健康、生理功能、生理职能、精神健康、情感功能、社会功能评分均高于对照组（P＜0.05）。在居家3个月期间，干预组的感染发生率为5.00%，而对照组为17.50%，干预组感染发生率低于对照组（χ ² =3.781，P＜0.05）。结论   本研究表明，医院-社区-家庭一体化康复护理模式干预能够促进慢性创面患者的创面愈合，降低居家期间感染的风险，并提升患者的生活质量。

       Objective  To assess the potential impact of the integrated hospital-community-home  rehabilitation nursing model on the quality of life and wound healing in patients with chronic wounds．Methods  A total of 80 patients with chronic wounds treated at the Guangzhou First People’s Hospital from January 2023 to June 2024 were selected as the study subjects．All patients received comprehensive treatment during their hospital stay，including thorough debridement，edge treatment，vacuum therapy，infection control and routine nursing care．Prior to discharge，the patients were  randomly divided into two groups using a random number table，with 40 patients in each group．Both groups received routine nursing care during their hospital stay，and the control group received continuing nursing care and regular follow-up after discharge．Forty patients in the intervention group received the integrated hospital-community-home rehabilitation nursing model after discharge．Quality of life（QoL）and wound healing rates were assessed using the Short Form 36（SF-36）questionnaire at the time of enrollment and 3 months after nursing．Results  The wound healing rate in the intervention group was significantly higher than that in the control group （［32.61±4.26］% vs ［11.48±1.04］%），with a statistical difference（t=19.473，P＜0.05）．The numerical rating scale（NRS）scores and frequency of wound pain scores decreased in both groups 3 months after nursing compared to the enrollment period（P＜0.05）．Specifically，the VAS score for wound pain in the intervention group 3 months after nursing was（1.82±0.17），and the frequency of wound pain was（1.28±0.25），in the control group，these scores were（3.91±0.22）and（2.63±0.37），respectively，with the intervention group scoring significantly lower than the control group（P＜0.05）．Furthermore，the scores for overall health，physical function，role physical，mental health，emotional function，and social function in the intervention group were higher than those in the control group 3 months after nursing（P＜0.05）．During the 3-month home recovery period，the incidence of infection in the intervention group was 5.00%，whereas it was 17.50% in the control group，with the intervention group  showing a lower incidence of infection（χ ² =3.781，P＜0.05）．Conclusions  This study demonstrates that the hospital-community-home integrated rehabilitation care model intervention can promote wound healing in chronic wound patients，reduce the risk of infection during home care，and significantly improve patients’ quality of life．