目的 比较腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术(laparoscopic radical prostatectomy,LRP)后发生尿失禁(postprostatectomy incontinence,PPI)与没有发生PPI的患者在尿动力学上的差异,为临床诊疗提供尿动力学依据。方法 对87例LRP术后的患者按术后是否并发PPI分成两组,行尿动力学检查后进行比较分析。结果 PPI组患者术中保留一侧或双侧神经血管束的比例少于非PPI组,且最大尿道闭合压(maximum urethral closure pressure,MUCP)、最大膀胱容量(maximum cystometric capacity,MCC)、排尿时膀胱开口压力和最大逼尿肌压均较非PPI组低。而腹压漏尿点压试验阳性与临床上是否漏尿并不完全相符。多变量回归分析表明,术中保留神经血管束、MUCP和MCC是PPI的相关因素。结论 PPI与LRP术中保留神经血管束、MUCP和MCC独立相关。尿动力学检查能为更精准有效指导临床治疗提供依据。

Objective To compare the urodynamic parameters in men with and without postprostatectomy incontinence(PPI) after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy(LRP). Methods 87 patients of prostatic carcinoma after LRP were divided into two groups according to have PPI or not. After urodynamic study, the data were collected to find the difference. Results Overall, the proportion of preservation of unilateral or bilateral neurovascular bundles(NVBs) during LRP was lower in PPI group than that in non-PPI group. Besides, the patients in PPI group had lower maximum urethral closure pressure (P=0.04), maximum cystometric capacity (P=0.04), detrusor pressure during opening (P=0.02)and maximum detrusor pressure (P<0.001), as compared with those in non-PPI group. In the multivariate logistic regression, the preservation of unilateral or bilateral NVBs, MUCP and MCC were identified as the related factor with PPI. Conclusion PPI is significantly associated with the preservation of unilateral or bilateral NVBs, MUCP and MCC. Urodynamic test can be used to make the treatment for PPI. It will be more accurate and effective in clinical practice.

       目的   探讨阴道分娩后尿失禁患者疾病应对方式的影响因素。方法   选取2022年1月—2023年1月医院收治的阴道分娩后尿失禁患者78例，评估所有患者的应对方式，根据结果分为积极应对组与消极应对组，设计基线资料调查表，详细统计两组患者的基线资料并比较，重点分析阴道分娩后尿失禁患者疾病应对方式的影响因素。结果   经评估，78例阴道分娩后尿失禁患者疾病消极应对有40例，占比51.28%；积极应对组与消极应对组患者的产次（χ ² =4.110，P=0.043）、文化水平（Z=2.094，P=0.036）、家庭关怀度（Z=2.069，P=0.040）与自我效能（Z=2.249，P=0.025）比较差异有统计学意义，组间年龄（t=0.096，P=0.924）、孕次（t=1.257，P=0.212）、体质指数（BMI）（t=0.125，P=0.901）、工作（χ ² =0.778，P=0.378）、家庭月人均收入（χ ² =0.044，P=0.834）、漏尿（χ ² =0.040，P=0.842）比较差异无统计学意义；经回归分析发现，家庭关怀度低（OR=1.799，P=0.041）、自我效能低（OR=1.942，P=0.026）、经产妇（OR=2.554，P=0.045）及文化水平低（OR=1.837，P=0.038）均是阴道分娩后尿失禁患者疾病应对方式的影响因素。结论   阴道分娩后尿失禁患者疾病消极应对风险高，可能与产次、文化水平、家庭关怀度及自我效能有关。

       Objective To explore the influencing factors of disease coping strategies in patients with urinary incontinence after vaginal delivery．Methods A total of 78 patients with urinary incontinence after vaginal delivery admitted to the hospital from January 2022 to January 2023 were selected．The coping strategies of all patients were evaluated，and they were divided into a positive coping group and a negative coping group based on the results．A baseline data questionnaire was designed，and the baseline data of the two groups of patients were compared in detail．The focus was on analyzing the factors influencing the disease coping strategies of patients with urinary incontinence after vaginal delivery．Results After evaluation，40 out of 78 patients with urinary incontinence after vaginal delivery had negative coping strategies，accounting for 51.28%．The parity of patients in the positive and negative coping groups（χ ² =4.110，P=0.043），educational level（Z=2.094，P=0.036），family care（Z=2.069，P=0.040），and self-efficacy（Z=2.249，P=0.025）among the groups were different．Age between groups（t=0.096，P=0.924），gestational age（t=1.257，P=0.212），body mass index（t=0.125，P=0.901），and work experience（χ ² =0.778，P=0.378），monthly per capita income of households（χ ² =0.044，P=0.834），urinary leakage（χ 2 =0.040，P=0.842）had no statistically significant difference in comparison．Through regression analysis，it was found that low family care（OR=1.799，P=0.041），low self-efficacy（OR=1.942，P=0.026），postpartum women（OR=2.554，P=0.045），and low educational level（OR=1.837，P=0.038）were all influencing factors on the disease coping strategies of patients with urinary incontinence after vaginal delivery．Conclusions  Patients with urinary incontinence after vaginal delivery have a higher risk of negative coping with the disease，which may be related to parity，educational level，family care and self-efficacy．