目的 研究基于儿童早期预警评分（PEWS）的分级干预模式促进重症肺炎患儿康复进程及对呼吸功能的影响。方法 回顾性分析2021年4月—2023年4月我院收治的100例重症肺炎患儿临床资料。将其按照干预方式的差异分为研究组（n=50）及对照组（n=50）。对照组选用常规干预,研究组则于对照组基础上增加基于PEWS的分级干预。对比两组康复进程（相关指标涵盖症状持续时长及住院天数）、呼吸功能（涵盖通气流速、每分钟最大通气量、肺活量、用力肺活量及深吸气量）、并发症发生情况（涵盖呼吸机相关性肺炎、肺大疱及胸膜炎）、患儿家属满意度。结果 研究组各项症状持续时长及住院天数均短于对照组（均P<0.05）。研究组各项呼吸功能指标水平均高于对照组（均P<0.05）。两组各项并发症发生率对比差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。研究组患儿家属满意度高于对照组（96.00% vs 82.00%,P<0.05）。结论 基于PEWS的分级干预模式促进重症肺炎患儿康复进程的效果较佳,且能改善呼吸功能,提高患儿家属满意度。

Objective To study the effect of graded intervention mode based on Pediatric Early Warning Score（PEWS）on the recovery process and respiratory function of children with severe pneumonia．Methods The clinical data of 100 children with severe pneumonia treated in our hospital from April 2021 to April 2023 were retrospectively analyzed．Those children were divided into study group（n=50）and control group（n=50）according to the difference of intervention methods．Conventional intervention was used in the two groups,and PEWS-based graded intervention was added to the study group．The two groups were compared with each other in terms of recovery process（including duration of symptoms and length of stay）,respiratory function（including ventilation velocity,maximum volume per minute,vital capacity,forced vital capacity and deep inspiratory capacity）,complications（including ventilators associated pneumonia,bullosa and pleurisy）,and family member satisfaction．Results The duration of symptoms and hospitalization days in the study group were shorter than those in the control group（all P<0.05）．The levels of respiratory function indexes in study group were higher than those in control group（all P<0.05）．There was no significant difference in the incidence of complications between the two groups（P>0.05）．The satisfaction of family member in the study group was higher than that in the control group（96.00% vs 82.00%）（P<0.05）．Conclusions The PEWS based graded intervention model has a good effect on promoting the rehabilitation process of children with severe pneumonia,and can improve respiratory function,and increase the satisfaction of family member of children with severe pneumonia．

目的 比较压力控制通气(PCV)中不同吸气流速对单肺通气(OLV)患者呼吸功能及炎症因子的影响。方法 本研究为2018—2019年对75例单肺通气患者的前瞻性研究。患者在麻醉和单肺通气(OLV)后随机分为吸气流量30 L/min(A组)、50 L/min(B组)或70 L/min(C组)。比较OLV前(T₀)、OLV后30 min(T₁)、60 min(T₂)和120 min(T₃)的呼吸力学、呼吸功能、血流动力学和血气分析,中心静脉血检测分析IL- 6、IL-8、TNF-α和sICAM-1,观察术后3天肺部并发症和ARDS的发生情况。结果 三组一般情况、血流动力学指标差异均无统计学意义(P＞0.05);B组、C组PaCO₂较A组降低(P<0.05);与T₀时比较,T₁-T₃时三组PaO_2、SVO₂均降低(P<0.05);三组PH、SO₂和HB差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。与A组比较,B组、C组ΔVT增大(P<0.05);三组Ppeak差异无统计学意义;与A组比较,B组、C组PEEP均增大(P<0.05);与A组比较,T₁-T₃时B组、C组V_D/V_T减少(P>0.05);与T₀比较,T₁-T₃时三组Qs/Qt增加(P<0.05);与A组比较,T₁-T₃时B组、C组Cdyn增大(P<0.05);与T₀相比,T₁-T₃时三组PaO₂/FiO₂降低(P<0.05);与T₀相比,T₁-T₃时三组IL-6、IL-8、TNF-α和sICAM-1的浓度增多(P<0.05),但A组、B组低于C组(P<0.05)。三组患者发生术后肺部并发症和ARDS差异均无统计学意义。结论 在PCV模式下通过增加吸气流速能增加VT,减少死腔率,促进 CO₂的交换,并且改善肺动态顺应性,但并不能很好的改善氧合及肺内分流。吸气流速50 mL/L在较小炎症反应的情况下达到上述改善呼吸功能和呼吸力学,可推荐应用于进行OLV患者。

Objective The effects of different inspiratory velocity PCV on respiratory function and inflammatory factors in patients with one-lung ventilation OLV were compared. Methods This was a prospective study of 75 patients with one-lung ventilation in 2018-2019. The subjects were randomized to the inspiratory velocity 30(group A),50(group B)or 70(group C)L/min after anesthesia and one-lung ventilation OLV. Respiratory mechanics,respiratory function,hemodynamics and blood gas parameters were compared between the three groups pre-OLV(T₀)and after 30 (T₁), 60 (T₂), and 120 (T₃)minutes of OLV.Center venous blood was collected to measure interleukin (IL)-6, IL-8,tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α,andsoluble intercellular adhesion molecule-1 levels.Observation of pulmonary complications and occurrence of ARDS 3 days after operation were made. Results Hemodynamic and general patient status were similar between the three groups (all P>0.05). PaCO₂was lower in the group B and group C compared with the group A (P<0.05). Compared with T₀, PaO₂ and SVO₂were lower at T₁-T₃of the three groups(P<0.05). PH, SO2 and HB were similar between the three groups (all P>0.05).ΔVT was higher in the group B and group C compared with the group A (P<0.05);Ppeak were similar between the three groups (all P>0.05). PEEP was higher in the group B and group C compared with the group A (P<0.05); V_D/V_T decreased in the group B and group C compared with the group A (P<0.05).Compared with T₀,Qs/Qt increased at T₁-T₃ of the three groups (all P<0.05). Cdyn increased at T₁-T₃ of the group B and group C(all P<0.05). PaO₂/FiO₂ decreased at T₁-T₃ of the three groups(all P<0.05).Compared with T₀, the concentrations of Il-6, Il-8, TNF-α and sICAM-1 increased at T₁-T₃of three groups (P<0.05), and in group A and group B were lower than those in group C (P<0.05).The number of patients who had postoperative pulmonary complications PPCS or acute respiratory distress syndrome(ARDS)were similar between the three groups (all P>0.05). Conclusion In PCV mode, it can increase VT by increasing the inspiratory velocity, reduce the V_D/V_T, promote the exchange of CO₂, and increase the Cdyn, but it cannot improve the oxygenation and Qs/Qt.Inspiratory velocity of 50 mL/L to achieve the above improvement in respiratory function and respiratory mechanics in the case of a smaller inflammatory response. It may be recommended for use in patients undergoing OLV.