PCV中吸气流速对OLV患者呼吸功能及炎症因子的影响

来源期刊：广州医药 | 38-45 发布时间：2021-11-28 收稿时间：2025/11/13 17:39:31 阅读量：30

作者：: 秦新磊,

殷姜文,

樊世文,

张成超,

张钰,

代志刚,

关键词：: 吸气流速炎症因子压力控制通气单肺通气; Inspiratory flow rate Inflammatory factors Pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV)One-lung ventilation (OLV)

DOI：: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8535.2020.06.008

收稿时间：: 2020-01-22
修订日期：
接收日期：
引用总数：: 0

目的比较压力控制通气(PCV)中不同吸气流速对单肺通气(OLV)患者呼吸功能及炎症因子的影响。方法本研究为2018—2019年对75例单肺通气患者的前瞻性研究。患者在麻醉和单肺通气(OLV)后随机分为吸气流量30 L/min(A组)、50 L/min(B组)或70 L/min(C组)。比较OLV前(T₀)、OLV后30 min(T₁)、60 min(T₂)和120 min(T₃)的呼吸力学、呼吸功能、血流动力学和血气分析,中心静脉血检测分析IL- 6、IL-8、TNF-α和sICAM-1,观察术后3天肺部并发症和ARDS的发生情况。结果三组一般情况、血流动力学指标差异均无统计学意义(P＞0.05);B组、C组PaCO₂较A组降低(P<0.05);与T₀时比较,T₁-T₃时三组PaO_2、SVO₂均降低(P<0.05);三组PH、SO₂和HB差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。与A组比较,B组、C组ΔVT增大(P<0.05);三组Ppeak差异无统计学意义;与A组比较,B组、C组PEEP均增大(P<0.05);与A组比较,T₁-T₃时B组、C组V_D/V_T减少(P>0.05);与T₀比较,T₁-T₃时三组Qs/Qt增加(P<0.05);与A组比较,T₁-T₃时B组、C组Cdyn增大(P<0.05);与T₀相比,T₁-T₃时三组PaO₂/FiO₂降低(P<0.05);与T₀相比,T₁-T₃时三组IL-6、IL-8、TNF-α和sICAM-1的浓度增多(P<0.05),但A组、B组低于C组(P<0.05)。三组患者发生术后肺部并发症和ARDS差异均无统计学意义。结论在PCV模式下通过增加吸气流速能增加VT,减少死腔率,促进 CO₂的交换,并且改善肺动态顺应性,但并不能很好的改善氧合及肺内分流。吸气流速50 mL/L在较小炎症反应的情况下达到上述改善呼吸功能和呼吸力学,可推荐应用于进行OLV患者。

Objective The effects of different inspiratory velocity PCV on respiratory function and inflammatory factors in patients with one-lung ventilation OLV were compared. Methods This was a prospective study of 75 patients with one-lung ventilation in 2018-2019. The subjects were randomized to the inspiratory velocity 30(group A),50(group B)or 70(group C)L/min after anesthesia and one-lung ventilation OLV. Respiratory mechanics,respiratory function,hemodynamics and blood gas parameters were compared between the three groups pre-OLV(T₀)and after 30 (T₁), 60 (T₂), and 120 (T₃)minutes of OLV.Center venous blood was collected to measure interleukin (IL)-6, IL-8,tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α,andsoluble intercellular adhesion molecule-1 levels.Observation of pulmonary complications and occurrence of ARDS 3 days after operation were made. Results Hemodynamic and general patient status were similar between the three groups (all P>0.05). PaCO₂was lower in the group B and group C compared with the group A (P<0.05). Compared with T₀, PaO₂ and SVO₂were lower at T₁-T₃of the three groups(P<0.05). PH, SO2 and HB were similar between the three groups (all P>0.05).ΔVTwas higher in the group B and group C compared with the group A (P<0.05);Ppeak were similar between the three groups (all P>0.05). PEEPwas higher in the group B and group C compared with the group A (P<0.05); V_D/V_T decreased in the group B and group C compared with the group A (P<0.05).Compared with T₀,Qs/Qt increased at T₁-T₃ of the three groups (all P<0.05). Cdyn increased at T₁-T₃ of the group B and group C(all P<0.05). PaO₂/FiO₂ decreased at T₁-T₃ of the three groups(all P<0.05).Compared with T₀, the concentrations of Il-6, Il-8, TNF-α and sICAM-1 increased at T₁-T₃of three groups (P<0.05), and in group A and group B were lower than those in group C (P<0.05).The number of patients who had postoperative pulmonary complications PPCS or acute respiratory distress syndrome(ARDS)were similar between the three groups (all P>0.05). Conclusion In PCV mode, it can increase VT by increasing the inspiratory velocity, reduce the V_D/V_T, promote the exchange of CO₂, and increase the Cdyn, but it cannot improve the oxygenation and Qs/Qt.Inspiratory velocity of 50 mL/L to achieve the above improvement in respiratory function and respiratory mechanics in the case of a smaller inflammatory response. It may be recommended for use in patients undergoing OLV.

1、 BLANK R S, COLQUHOUN D A, DURIEUX M E, et al. Management of one-lung ventilation: impact of tidal volume on complications after thoracic surgery[J]. Anesthesiol, 2016,124(6):1286.

2、 INOMATA S, NISHIKAWA T, SAITO S, et al. “Best” PEEP during one-lung ventilation[J]. Br J Anaesth, 1997, 78(6):754-756.

3、 AGOSTINI P, CIESLIK H, RATHINAM S, et al. Postoperative pulmonary complications following thoracic surgery: are there any modifiable risk factors?[J]. Thorax,2010, 65(9):815-818.

4、 NETO ARY S,HEMMES SABRINE N T,BARBAS CARMEN S V, et al. Association between driving pressure and development of postoperative pulmonary complications in patients undergoing mechanical ventilation for general anaesthesia: a meta-analysis of individual patient data[J]. Lancet Respir Med, 2016(4): 272-280.

5、 MENDEZ M P, MORRIS S B, WILCOXEN S, et al. Shedding of soluble ICAM-1 into the alveolar space in murine models of acute lung injury[J]. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, 2006,290(5):L962-970.

6、 CHIEH WU, LIN L, YANG J, et al. Attenuation of lipopolysaccharide-induced acute lung injury by treatment with IL-10[J]. Respirol, 2010,14(4):511-521.

7、 BREUNIG A, GAMBAZZI F, BECK-SCHIMMER B, et al. Cytokine & chemokine response in the lungs, pleural fluid and serum in thoracic surgery using one-lung ventilation[J]. J Inflamm, 2011, 8(1):32.

8、 MUKHOPADHYAY S, HOIDAL J R, MUKHERJEE T K. Role of TNFα in pulmonary pathophysiology[J]. Respir Res, 2006, 7(1):125.

9、 ABE T,OKA M,TANGOKU A, et al. Interleukin-6 production in lung tissue after transthoracic esophagectomy[J]. J Am Coll Surg, 2001(192): 322-329.

10、 NAKAZAWA K, NARUMI Y, ISHIKAWA S, et al. Effect of prostaglandin E1 on inflammatory responses and gas exchange in patients undergoing surgery for oesophageal cancer[J]. Br J Anaesth, 2004,93(2):199-203.

11、 KIM S H, JUNG K T, AN T H. Effects of tidal volume and PEEP on arterial blood gases and pulmonary mechanics during one-lung ventilation[J]. J Anesth, 2012, 26(4):568-573.

12、 WRIGGE H, UHLIG U, ZINSERLING J, et al. The effects of different ventilatory settings on pulmonary and systemic inflammatory responses during major surgery[J]. Anesth Analg, 2004,98(3):775-781.

13、 PAN L, HUANG B, LIANG R, et al. Pressure-controlled versus volume-controlled ventilation during one-lung ventilation in elderly patients with poor pulmonary function[J]. Ann Thorac Med, 2014, 9(4):203.

14、 MAEDA Y, FUJINO Y, UCHIYAMA A, et al. Effects of peak inspiratory flow on development of ventilator-induced lung injury in rabbits[J]. Anesthesiol, 2004,101(3):722-728.

15、 ZHU Y Q, FANG F, LING X M, et al. Pressure-controlled versus volume-controlled ventilation during one-lung ventilation for video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy[J]. J Thorac Dis, 2017,9(5):1303-1309.

16、 KIM K N, KIM D W, JEONG M A, et al. Comparison of pressure-controlled ventilation with volume-controlled ventilation during one-lung ventilation: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. BMC Anesthesiol, 2016,16(1):72.

17、 LOHSER J. Evidence-based management of one-lung ventilation[J]. Anesthesiol Clin, 2008,26(2):241-272.

18、 LICKER M J, WIDIKKER I, ROBERT J, et al. Operative mortality and respiratory complications after lung resection for cancer: impact of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and time trends[J]. Ann Thorac Surg, 2006,81(5):1830-1837.

19、 LOHSER J, SLINGER P. Lung injury after one-lung ventilation: a review of the pathophysiologic mechanisms affecting the ventilated and the collapsed lung[J]. Anesth Analg, 2015,121(2):302-318.