目的 观察托烷司琼预处理配合丙泊酚全身麻醉对预防术后恶心呕吐（PONV）的应用价值。方法 采用前瞻性研究,纳入融通集团信阳154医院在2021年6月—2022年12月期间收治的接受腹腔镜手术治疗的122例患者,所有患者均实施含丙泊酚的全身麻醉辅助手术,采用随机数字表法对入组患者进行分组,分别列为预处理组（61例）和常规组（61例）,常规组术后予以常规止吐,预处理组采用托烷司琼预处理,比较两组患者术后6 h、术后12 h、术后24 h及术后48 h等不同时间点的PONV发生率、呕吐症状改善情况,麻醉苏醒后的疼痛、镇静情况,以及术后48 h内的麻醉相关不良反应发生情况。结果 预处理组术后6 h的PONV发生率为3.28%（2/61）,术后12 h的PONV发生率为4.92%（3/61）,术后24 h的PONV发生率为3.28%（2/61）,术后48 h的PONV发生率为0.00%（0/61）,均低于常规组[16.39%（10/61）、18.03%（11/61）、16.39%（10/61）、13.11%（8/61）],差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。预处理组术后6 h的恶心呕吐干呕症状评估量表（INVR）评分为（20.15±5.41）分,术后12 h的INVR评分为（17.66±4.42）分,术后24 h的INVR评分为（13.29±4.17）分,术后48 h的INVR评分为（10.22±3.35）分,均低于常规组[（23.32±5.13）分、（20.12±4.35）分、（16.33±4.24）分、（12.75±3.06）分],差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。预处理组苏醒后的视觉模拟疼痛量表（VAS）评分为（4.04±1.06）分,Ramsay镇静评分为（3.11±0.25）分,与常规组[（3.87±0.25）分、（3.06±0.35）分]比较差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。术后48 h内,预处理组的麻醉相关不良反应发生率为9.84%（6/61）,与常规组8.20%（5/61）比较差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。结论 托烷司琼预处理辅助含丙泊酚腔镜全身麻醉腹手术可有效降低PONV发生风险并改善患者PONV相关症状,联合应用此药未对麻醉镇静、镇痛效果产生明显影响,且未明显增加术后麻醉相关不良反应发生风险,安全性较高。

Objective To observe the application value of tropisetron preconditioning combined with propofol general anesthesia in the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting（PONV）．Methods This is a prospective cohort study．The patients were included from June 2021 to December 2022．The subjects of the study were 122 patients who received laparoscopy．All patients received general anesthesia assisted surgery containing propofol．The enrolled patients were divided into preconditioning group（61 cases）and conventional group（61 cases）by random number table．The conventional group was given routine antiemesis after surgery,and the preconditioning group was given tropisetron preconditioning．The incidence of PONV,improvement of vomiting symptoms,pain and sedation after anesthesia awakening,and occurrence of anesthesia related adverse reactions within 48 hours after surgery were compared between two groups of patients at different time points,including 6 hours,12 hours,24 hours,and 48 hours after surgery．Results Under different treatment regimens,the PONV incidence rates in the preconditioning group were 3.28%（2/61）after 6 hours,4.92%（3/61）after 12 hours,3.28%（2/61）after 24 hours,and 0.00%（0/61）after 48 hours．Compared with the conventional group [16.39%（10/61）,18.03%（11/61）,16.39%（10/61）,and 13.11%（8/61）],the incidence rates were lower（P<0.05）．The preconditioning group had an Index of Nausea and Vomiting and Retching（INVR）score of（20.15±5.41）points after 6 hours,（17.66±4.42）points after 12 hours,（13.29±4.17）points after 24 hours,and（10.22±3.35）points after 48 hours．Compared with（23.32±5.13）points,（20.12±4.35）points,（16.33±4.24）points,and（12.75±3.06）points）of the preconditioning group ,the INVR score at each time point was lower（P<0.05）．Under different treatment regimens,the VAS score of the preconditioning group after awakening was（4.04±1.06）points,and the Ramsay score was（3.11±0.25）points,which was similar to the conventional group [（3.87±0.25）points,（3.06±0.35）points]（P>0.05）．Within 48 hours after surgery,the incidence of anesthesia related adverse reactions in the preconditioning group was 9.84%（6/61）,which was similar to 8.20%（5/61）in the conventional group（P>0.05）．Conclusions Tropisetron preconditioning assisted laparoscopy under general anesthesia with propofol can effectively reduce the risk of PONV and improve the PONV related symptoms of patients．The combined use of this drug has no significant impact on the sedation and analgesia effects of anesthesia,and does not significantly increase the risk of postoperative anesthesia related adverse reactions,with high safety．

目的 探讨右美托咪定（Dex）分别联合丙泊酚或依托咪酯在颅内动脉瘤介入术中的镇静效果及对患者血流动力学的影响。方法 将60例颅内动脉瘤介入术患者按照随机数表法分为A组（Dex+丙泊酚,n=30）、B组（Dex+依托咪酯,n=30）。记录两组不同时间点的平均动脉压（MAP）、心率（HR）,比较苏醒期的镇静效果、呛咳程度、拔管时间、苏醒时间、清醒时间及术后不良反应。结果 A组患者T₁MAP、HR为（84.56±5.13）mmHg、（65.87±5.14）次/分和T₂（83.29±5.47）mmHg、（65.87±5.14）次/分均低于B组T₁（87.89±3.88）mmHg、（70.22±5.67）次/分和T₂（86.71±3.75）mmHg、（69.97±5.87）次/分（t分别为2.836、2.825、3.113、3.391,均P<0.001）。两组苏醒期各项指标和躁动（10.00% vs 0%,P=0.757）、呼吸抑制发生率（3.33% vs 0%,P=0.313）比较差异均无统计学意义（均P>0.05）,A组恶心、呕吐发生率（3.33%）较B组（20.00%）更低（χ²=4.043,P=0.044）。结论 Dex联合丙泊酚、依托咪酯麻醉在颅内动脉瘤介入术中均可发挥良好安全的麻醉作用,降低患者术后躁动和呼吸抑制的发生率,使用Dex联合依托咪酯在患者围插管期的血流动力学的稳定性效果更好,但在降低患者术后恶心呕吐的风险方面效果较差。

Objective To evaluate the sedative effect of dexmedetomidine（Dex）combined with propofol or etomidate during cerebral aneurysm intervention and its effect on patient hemodynamics．Methods A total of 60 cerebral aneurysm patients were randomly divided into two groups：Group A（Dex + propofol,n=30）and Group B（Dex + etomidate,n=30）．Mean arterial pressure（MAP）and heart rate（HR）were recorded at different time points in the two groups,and the sedation effect,choking degree,extubation time,waking up time,waking time and postoperative side effects were compared．Results T₁ MAP,HR of（84.56±5.13）mmHg,（65.87±5.14）times / min and T₂（83.29±5.47）mmHg,（65.87±5.14）times / min in group A were lower than those in group B T₁（87.89±3.88）mmHg,（70.22±5.67）times / min and T₂（86.71±3.75）mmHg,（69.97±5.87）times / min（t=2.836,2.825,3.113,3.391,all P<0.001）．There was no significant difference in the incidence of emergence agitation（10.00 % vs 0.00 %,P=0.757）and respiratory depression（3.33 % vs 0.00 %,P=0.313）between the two groups（P>0.05）．The incidence of nausea and vomiting in group A（3.33 %）was lower than that in group B（20.00 %）（χ²=4.043,P=0.044）．Conclusions Dex combined with propofol and etomidate anesthesia can have a good and safe anesthesia effect in intracranial aneurysm intervention,and reduce the incidence of postoperative agitation and respiratory depression in patients．Hemodynamic stabilization during the tube phase is more effective,but less effective in reducing the risk of postoperative nausea and vomiting in patients．

目的 对比纳布啡联合环泊酚、纳布啡联合丙泊酚应用于老年患者无痛胃镜中的效果。方法 选取厦门市中医院2021年10月至2022年10月收治的180例老年患者（均行无痛胃肠镜检查）为研究对象,按照随机数表法分组,其中A组90例患者给予纳布啡联合环泊酚,B组90例患者给予纳布啡联合丙泊酚,对比两组患者麻醉相关指标、血流动力学、围术期不良反应。结果 两组患者诱导量、诱导时间、追加次数、总追加量、苏醒时间、恢复室停留时间对比差异均无统计学意义（t=1.486、0.830、1.157、0.941、0.906、1.403,均P>0.05）;重复测量方差分析结果显示,分组因素间收缩压（SBP）（F=30.019,P<0.001）、心率（HR）（F=282.057,P<0.001）、SpO₂（F=64.518,P<0.001）、;时间因素SBP（F=21.780,P<0.001）、HR（F=345.118,P<0.001）、SpO₂（F=41.762,P<0.001）;分组与时间交互时间因素SBP（F=12.941,P<0.001）、HR（F=193.295,P<0.001）、SpO₂（F=13.546,P<0.001）,差异均有统计学意义。折线图直观显示,A组患者SBP、HR、SpO₂、较B组低。;A组患者围术期不良反应发生率（20.00%）低于B组患者（56.67%）（χ²=25.593,P<0.001）。结论 两种麻醉方案应用于老年无痛胃肠镜,麻醉效果相近,环泊酚复合纳布啡血流动力学更稳定,且围术期不良反应的发生率较低。

Objective To compare the effects of nalbuphine combined with ciprofol and nalbuphine combined with propofol on painless gastroscopy in elderly patients. Methods A total of 180 elderly patients（all underwent painless gastroscopy）admitted to Xiamen Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital from October 2021 to October 2022 were selected as the study subjects．They were randomly divided into groups using a random number table method．Among them,90 patients in Group A were given a combination of nalbuphine and ciprofol,while 90 patients in Group B were given a combination of nalbuphine and propofol．Anesthesia related indicators,hemodynamics,and perioperative adverse reactions were compared between the two groups．There was no statistically significant difference in the induction amount,induction time,number of additional times,total additional amount,awakening time,and recovery room stay time between the two groups of patients（t=1.486,0.830,1.157,0.941,0.906,1.403,all P>0.05）．The results of repeated measures analysis of variance showed that there were statistically significant differences among the grouping factors,including SBP（F=30.019,P<0.001）,HR（F=282.057,P<0.001）,SpO₂（F=64.518,P<0.001）,time factors SBP（F=21.780,P<0.001）,HR（F=345．118,P<0.001）,SpO₂（F=41.762,P<0.001）,and interaction factors SBP（F=12.941,P<0.001）,HR（F=193.295,P<0.001）,and SpO₂（F=13.546,P<0.001）．The line chart visually shows that the SBP,HR,SpO₂ of Group A patients were lower than those of Group B．The incidence of perioperative adverse reactions in Group A patients（20.00%）was lower than that in Group B patients（56.67%）（χ²=25.593,P<0.001）. Conclusions The two anesthesia regimens used for elderly painless gastroscopy have similar anesthesia effects,with more stable hemodynamics of ciprofol combined with nalbuphine,and a lower incidence of perioperative adverse reactions．

目的 比较甲苯磺酸瑞马唑仑和丙泊酚在超声胃镜检查中的有效性和安全性。方法 采用随机对照的研究方法,选择接受超声胃镜病人60例,分为观察组(29例)和对照组(31例)。观察组采用甲苯磺酸瑞马唑仑麻醉,对照组采用丙泊酚。观察麻醉过程中不同时点的血流动力学指标、改良警觉/镇静(MOAA/S)评分各时刻的变化、苏醒及离室时间、围术期不良事件。结果 观察组的血流动力学影响更小;观察组可进入足够的镇静深度,而对照组的镇静程度更深;2组起效时间相似,且迅速苏醒而离室,但在苏醒及离室时间方面观察组稍短;不良事件对照组高于观察组。结论 甲苯磺酸瑞马唑仑应用于无痛超声胃镜检查,其对血流动力学影响小,能产生足够的镇静深度,能使患者迅速苏醒,且不良事件发生率低,总体有效性和安全性优于丙泊酚。

Objective To compare the efficacy and safety of remimazolam tosilate and propofol in painless ultrasonic gastroscopy. Methods In a randomized, single-blind controlled study, 60 patients undergoing ultrasonic gastroscopy were selected and divided into observation group (31 cases) and control group (29 cases). Observation group was anesthetized with remimazolam tosilate, while control group was anesthetized with propofol. Two groups' hemodynamic index, perioperative adverse events, changes of MOAA/S score, awakening and departure time were observed at different time points during anesthesia. Results The observation group had less changes on hemodynamics. The observation group had enough depth of sedation, while the control group had a deeper degree of sedation. The onset time of the two groups was similar and both awoke quickly and left, but the awakening time and leaving time in the observation group were slightly shorter. Adverse events in the control group were more than those in the observation group. Conclusions Remimazolam tosilate for painless ultrasonic gastroscopy had little effect on hemodynamics, which can generate enough depth of sedation, and make patients wake up quickly. In addition, the incidence of its adverse events was low, and the overall effectiveness and safety were superior to those of propofol.

目的 分析总结异丙酚静脉麻醉复合利多卡因乳腺后间隙局部浸润麻醉在乳腺多发性肿块真空辅助微创旋切术的临床应用体会。方法 通过对我院2012年3月—2015年3月380例乳腺多发性肿物在异丙酚静脉麻醉复合利多卡因乳腺后间隙局部浸润麻醉下行真空辅助微创旋切术的病例,进行回顾性综合分析。结果 手术前、中和手术后血氧饱和度无明显变化;手术中平均动脉压、心率与术前比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);麻醉效果好,术后并发症少。结论 乳腺多发性肿物真空辅助微创旋切术采用异丙酚静脉麻醉复合利多卡因乳腺后间隙局部浸润麻醉,安全可行,患者依从性好、满意度和耐受度较高,临床效果满意。

Objective To investigate the applicative value of Propofol intravenous anesthesia combining with local infiltration anesthesia in vacuum assisted biopsy minimal invasive system for multiple breast lumps excision. Methods Encor minimally invasive surgery was performed under Propofol intravenous anesthesia together with local infiltration anesthesia in 380 cases with multiple breast lumps admitted to our department from March 2012 to March 2015. Anesthesia effect, SpO₂, MAP and HR were analyzed retrospectively. Results All 380 patients achieved good anesthetic effect for completing multiple breast lumps excision. The postoperative complications were less. There was no obvious change of oxyhemoglobin saturation (SpO₂) before, during and after the surgery period (P>0.05). The mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR) had statistical significance compared the surgery period with the pre-operative time (P<0.05). Conclusion Vacuum assisted biopsy minimal invasive system under Propofol intravenous anesthesia combining with local infiltration anesthesia is a safety and feasible method for multiple breast lumps excision. It has more advantages including perfect anesthetic effect, good patient compliance, higher satisfaction and higher tolerance level.

目的 研究地佐辛复合丙泊酚对腹式子宫切除术牵拉反应的预防作用。方法 选择择期行腹式子宫切除术患者60例(ASA I ~Ⅱ级),随机分成三组。所有患者给予腰麻,麻醉平面调节并固定于T₆后,给予A组患者0.1 mg/kg地佐辛,静脉注射;B组静脉注射0.1 mg/kg地佐辛后丙泊酚持续泵注2~4 mg/(kg·h);C组单次静注丙泊酚1.5 mg/kg后持续泵注2~4mg/(kg·h)。记录麻醉前(T₀)、腰麻平面固定后(T₁)、静注药物后5min(T₂)、切皮(T₃)、牵拉子宫时(T₄)、术毕(T₅)患者的HR、MAP及Ramesay镇静评分;评价肌松效果、牵拉反应、患者舒适度及满意度。结果 三组患者一般情况无差异(P＞0.05);与T₀相比,Ⅲ组T₂及T₅时刻MAP与T₀相比差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05),T₂、 T₃ 、T₄及T₅时刻HR与T₀相比差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05);与T₀相比,Ⅱ组及Ⅲ组Ramesay镇静评分在T₂、 T₃及T₄时刻均升高,差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05);Ⅱ组及Ⅲ组Ramesay镇静评分在T₂、T₃及T₄时刻高于I组,差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05)。牵拉反应评价I组评为优的患者个数明显少于II组及III组,评为良及差的患者个数多于II组及III组,此差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05);II组及III组舒适度及满意度评定为优的患者个数明显多余I组,差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05)。结论 0.1 mg/kg地佐辛复合丙泊酚可以很好预防腹式子宫切除手术中的牵拉反应,提高患者舒适度和满意度。

Objective To observe whether dezocine combined with propofol can prevent intra operative dragging reaction during hysterectomy or not. Methods Sixty patients(ASAⅠ~Ⅱ)which through hysterectomy surgery were randomly arranged to 3 groups. All the patients were under spinal anesthesia, adjusted the anesthesia plane to T6. Group l: dezocine 0.1 mg/kg were intravenous injected, Group ll: dezocine 0.1 mg/kg were intravenous injected and then propofol 2~4 mg/kg/h were intravenous pumped, Group lll: propofol 1.5 mg/kg were intravenous injected and then propofol 2~4 mg/kg/h intravenous were pumped. HR、MAP and Ramesay scale were recorded at the time points of pre-anesthesia(T₀)、pre-injection(T₁)、5 min after injection(T₂)、skin incision(T₃)、dragging uterus(T₄)、after surgery(T₅),the effect of muscle relaxation and the reaction of patients were recorded in the mean time, comfort degree and satisfaction degree of patients were evaluated after surgery. Results There was no significant difference of general condition between the three groups (P>0.05). At the time point of T₂ and T₅, MAP of Group lll patients were significant lower than the base value(P<0.05). At the time point of T₂、T₃、T₄ and T₅, HR of Group lll patients were significant lower then base value(P<0.05). Dragging reaction during the surgery were significant reduced in Group ll and Group lll but not in Group l(P<0.05). Group ll and Group lll patients felt more comfortable and more satisfied than Group l patients(P<0.05). Conclusion 0.1 mg/kg dezocine combined with propofol can prevent intra operative dragging reaction and make patient feel more comfortable during hysterectomy.

目的 观察对应手术时点小剂量丙泊酚抑制无痛人工流产手术孕者应激反应的有效性。方法 选择门诊自愿在全麻下行无痛人工流产手术的早孕妇女80例,ASAⅠ或Ⅱ级,随机分为前臂头静脉组(A组)、下肢踝前大隐静脉组(B组)。两组早孕者分别在抬臀铺入无菌臀巾时(T₁)、置入窥器即刻(T₂)、钳夹宫颈即刻(T₃)时点,推注不同剂量丙泊酚,观察记录麻醉效果相关指标。结果 A组追加丙泊酚次数与B组相比少(P<0.01),A组丙泊酚用量与B组相比减少(P<0.01),A组术毕到唤醒睁眼的时间与B组相比缩短,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论 对应手术操作时点经上肢头静脉小剂量推注丙泊酚能较好的抑制无痛人工流产手术孕者应激反应,且苏醒快,并发症少。