目的 分析CT+MRI在原发性肝癌诊断与介入治疗预后评估中的临床意义。方法 选定本院2019年1月—2021年1月住院治疗的150例原发性肝癌患者,入院后均接受介入治疗,分别予以CT、MRI检查,将手术病理检查结果作为本次研究的金标准,比较CT、MRI、CT+MRI诊断效能,Kappa检验CT、MRI、CT+MRI与金标准的一致性,比较CT、MRI、CT+MRI介入术后病灶检出率。结果 CT+MRI诊断准确率(98.67%)、特异度(75.00%)、灵敏度(99.32%)均高于CT(86.00%、25.00%、87.67%)、MRI(90.67%、91.78%、50.00%),P＜0.05(差异均有统计学意义),CT+MRI与金标准的一致性较好(Kappa值为0.779),CT、MRI与金标准的一致性一般(Kappa值为0.527、0.596)。CT+MRI介入术后病灶总检出率(12.00%)高于CT(2.00%)、MRI(4.00%),P＜0.05(差异有统计学意义)。结论 CT+MRI可提高原发性肝癌患者介入术后病灶检出率,弥补了单一CT、MRI检查的不足。

Objective To evaluate the clinical significance of CT + MRI scans in diagnosis of primary liver cancer and prognosis evaluation after interventional therapy. Methods A total of 150 cases of patients with primary liver cancer admitted to our hospital from January 2019 to January 2021 were selected. They all received interventional treatment, and were examined by CT and MRI. The results of pathological examination were taken as the gold standard in this study to compare the diagnostic efficacy of CT, MRI and CT+MRI.Kappa value was used to compare the consistency of CT, MRI, CT+MRI scans with gold standard, and compared the detection rate of lesions after CT, MRI and CT+MRI interventional surgery. Results The diagnostic accuracy (98.67%), specificity (75.00%) and sensitivity (99.32%) of CT + MRI scans were higher than those of CT (86.00%, 25.00%, 87.67%) and MRI scans (90.67%, 91.78%, 50.00%),P<0.05 (which differences were statistically significant). The consistency of CT + MRI scans with gold standard was good (kappa value was 0.779), but the consistency of CT/MRI scans with gold standard were not satisfying (kappa value were 0.527, 0.596). The total detection rate of lesions after CT + MRI interventional surgery (12.00%) was higher than that of CT (2.00%) and MRI (4.00%, which P<0.05). Conclusion CT + MRI scans can improve the detection rate of lesions in patients with primary liver cancer after interventional therapy, and make up for the deficiency of only CT or MRI scans.

目的 探讨血管介入治疗糖尿病足的疗效以及术后血管再狭窄的影响因素。方法 选取2013年2月—2015年3月在我院接受治疗的糖尿病足患者96例,采用随机数表法将患者分为观察组和对照组两个各48例,观察组患者给予血管微创手术介入治疗,对照组患者给予常规治疗,比较两组患者治疗后的临床疗效、住院费用、住院天数、Wagner分级以及患者观察组患者术后血管再狭窄的影响因素。结果 治疗后,观察组患者的总有效率为93.75%高于对照组72.91%,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);将观察组患者术后发生发生血管再狭窄的22例患者作为A组,未出现血管再狭窄的26例患者作为B组。A、B两组患者病程、TG、LDL-C、MDA含量、HbA以及BMI比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);术后,A组患者的TC明显高于B组,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),由此可见,TC是导致患者术后出现血管再狭窄的危险因素;观察组患者的住院费用以及住院天数低于对照组,两组比较差异显著(P<0.05)。结论 采用血管介入治疗糖尿病足患者疗效显著,高TC是患者术后血管再次发生狭窄的影响因素。