目的 了解社区医护人员的心理健康状况,评估心理干预措施效果,找到提高社区医护人员心理健康状况的有效措施。方法 采用《症状自评量表 SCL-90》对社区医护人员的心理健康状况进行基线调查,在干预3、6、9个月时分别进行SCL-90复测,以评估心理干预措施效果;根据《医护人员工作压力测试量表》的调查结果制定有针对性的心理干预措施并适时调整。结果 社区医护人员SCL-90测评总分和躯体化、强迫、人际敏感、焦虑、敌对、恐怖、偏执7个因子得分均高于全国常模水平(P<0.05);经过综合干预,随访期间SCL-90测评总分呈逐步下降趋势,干预6个月时,除人际敏感因子外,SCL-90测评总分及各因子分已趋于正常水平,与全国常模比较差异没有统计学意义(P<0.05)。至9个月时,人际敏感因子得分也恢复至正常水平。结论 社区医护人员心理健康状况低于全国常模水平,进行针对性的综合干预可提高其心理健康水平,实验显示干预时长应不低于6个月。

Objective To understand the mental health status of community health care workers, assess the effect of psychological intervention measures, and find effective measures to improve the mental health status of community health care workers.Methods With the help of Symptom Checklist SCL-90, we firstly carried out baseline survey on community medical staff mental health; then retested that at 3, 6 and 9 months later. Thus, we could assess the effect of psychological intervention. According to the results of the medical staff working pressure test questionnaire, we could develop targeted psychological intervention measures and adopt prompt adjustment.Results Community health care personnel SCL-90 evaluation score and 7 factors scores(physical,forced,interpersonal sensitivity,anxiety,hostility,terror,and paranoia) were higher than the national norm(P<0.05);after comprehensive intervention in the 9 months follow-up,the SCL-90 evaluation score was decreasing gradually.After intervention for 6 months,except for the interpersonal sensitivity factor,SCL-90 total scores and the other factor scores tend to normal levels, to compare the national norm, there was no statistical significance in differences (P<0.05). 9 months later, the scores of interpersonal sensitivity also return to normal levels.Conclusion The mental health status of community health care workers was lower than the national norm,the comprehensive intervention may improve their mental health level, and the experiment showed that the intervention should be no less than 6 months.

目的 探讨焦虑障碍与冠心病经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)患者术后发生对比剂肾病(CIN)的相关性及机制,为早期发现CIN高危人群及其预防提供理论依据。方法 入选2014年6月—2016年12月于天津市第四中心医院心内科住院确诊冠心病并接受PCI患者,进行综合医院焦虑/抑郁情绪测定表(HAD)及汉密尔顿焦虑量表(HAMA)评价,依据量表的评分标准,最终纳入研究共120例,其中焦虑障碍组60例,非焦虑障碍组60例。观察2组患者PCI术前及术后72 h肌酐(SCr)、肌酐清除率(Ccr)、肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α)、可溶性细胞间黏附分子-1(sICAM-1)、C反应蛋白(CRP)、白细胞介素-18(IL-18)的变化情况,并记录CIN的发生率。结果 2组患者PCI术前Scr、Ccr水平差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);2组患者PCI术后Scr水平均较术前升高,Ccr水平较术前降低(P<0.01)。PCI术后,焦虑障碍组Scr水平高于非焦虑障碍组,Ccr水平低于非焦虑障碍组(P<0.05)。2组患者PCI术前sICAM-1、CRP、IL-18、TNF-α差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);2组患者PCI术后sICAM-1、CRP、IL-18、TNF-α水平较术前均升高(P<0.01);PCI术后焦虑障碍组sICAM-1、CRP、IL-18、TNF-α水平高于非焦虑障碍组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。PCI术前,焦虑障碍组HAD、HAMA评分高于非焦虑障碍组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01);非焦虑障碍组患者PCI术后较术前HAD、HAMA评分差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);焦虑障碍组PCI术后HAD、HAMA评分高于术前,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01);PCI术后,焦虑障碍组HAD、HAMA评分高于非焦虑障碍组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论 焦虑障碍可能是冠心病患者PCI术后发生对比剂肾病的危险因素之一。

目的 观察ST段抬高型急性心肌梗死(STEMI)患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)中应用不同转运模式的应用疗效。方法 选取我院80例行急诊PCI的STEMI患者,有31例患者的12导联心电图由救护车上的急救人员通过手机微信传输到指定的东莞市大朗医院胸痛中心微信群(远程早期干预组),有49例患者自行来院就诊(传统就诊组),比较两组患者的临床疗效。结果 远程早期干预组患者的D-to-B时间低于传统就诊组(P<0.01),D-to-B达标率高于传统就诊组(P<0.01);远程早期干预组患者住院费用、平均住院天数、住院期间病死率及心力衰竭发生率均低于传统就诊组(P<0.05)。结论 相比较传统就诊模式,远程转运模式能显著提高STEMI患者PCI术的治疗效果,并有效改善其预后情况,临床效益较好,值得实践推广。

目的 研究护理干预对慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者抑郁焦虑情绪的效果。方法 选取2015年2月—2017年3月我院收治的慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者84例为观察对象。2015年2月—2016年2月入院患者42例为对照组,遵医嘱给予治疗,同时均予以常规慢性阻塞性肺疾病知识宣教。2016年3月—2017年3月入院患者42例为观察组在对照组基础上予以优质护理干预。分别比较干预前后两组患者抑郁、焦虑及干预前后肺功能变化、患者满意度、生活质量。结果 干预后观察组抑郁自评量表(SDS)、焦虑自评量表(SAS)评分分别为(20.05±5.24)分、(21.57±6.03)分,均低于对照组(28.57±5.29)分、(31.72±6.14)分,差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05)。干预后观察组FEV1水平(2.00±0.33)L,高于对照组的(1.68±0.25)L、观察组FEV1/FVC水平分别为(69.50±7.95)%,高于对照组的(65.18±8.43)%,差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05)。观察组患者满意度为95.24%(40/42),高于对照组的73.81%(31/42),差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05)。观察组患者各项SF-36评分均高于对照组,均P＜0.05差异有统计学意义。结论 优质护理干预可缓解患者负性情绪,改善肺功能,提高满意度及生活质量。

Objective To study effects of nursing intervention in paitents with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Methods 84 patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease admitted to our hospital from February 2015 to March 2017 were selected as the observation objects. From February 2015 to February 2016, 42 patients admitted to the control group were treated with conventional therapy. From March 2016 to March 2017, 42 patients admitted to the hospital as the observation group were given quality nursing intervention on the basis of the control group. The depression, anxiety, lung function changes, patient satisfaction and quality of life before and after intervention were compared between the two groups before and after intervention. Results After the intervention, the SDS and SAS scores of the observation group were (20.05±5.24), (21.57±6.03), which were lowered than that of the control group (28.57±5.29), (31.72±6.14), the difference was statistical significance (P<0.05). After intervention, the level of FEV1 in the observation group (2+0.33) L was higher than that in the control group (1.68+0.25) L, and the FEV1/FVC level in the observation group was (69.50+7.95)%, which was higher than that in the control group (65.18+8.43)%,the difference was statistical significance (P<0.05). Satisfaction of patients in the observation group was 95.24% (40/42), higher than the control group 73.81% (31/42),the difference was statistical significance (P<0.05). The SF-36 scores of the observation group were higher than those of the control group, P<0.05, the difference was statistical significance. Conclusion High quality nursing intervention may effectively alleviate depression, anxiety and other negative emotions, improve lung function, satisfaction and quality of life.

目的 急性Stanford A型主动脉夹层(AAAD)患者往往需急诊手术,以挽救其生命。手术通常存在高风险。术后常见并发症包括:神经系统、呼吸系统、胃肠道、肝、肾脏等多器官系统的功能障碍,以及全身感染,其使得术后过程更加复杂。 因此, 围术期护理极为重要。方法 2016年2月—2018年2月, 共完成了24 例 AAAD患者的手术。术前所有病人收治科室ICU。手术方式为Bentall+Sun'氏术。 围术期,对患者随机分组进行密切观察和护理。A组:常规组(routine nursing):对患者给予常规护理;B组:整体组(integrated nursing):除了常规的基本护理外,加强了围术期镇静、镇痛和术后并发症的专业化的整合护理。结果 两组共24例成功完成了手术。两组术前资料比较,无显著差异。整体护理组ICU停留时间和住院时间短于常规组(P<0.05);护理满意度、生活质量比较,整体组患者优于常规组(P<0.05)。结论 护士提供的围术期专业化技术的整体护理,可改善患者围术期的治疗效果,促进康复。

目的 对临床护士实施预防住院患者误吸教育干预,评价干预措施对护士预防误吸知识及护理行为的影响。方法 选取我院神经系统相关科室的110名护士为研究对象,通过一系列教育干预,对比干预前后护士在预防误吸知识及护理行为等方面的改变,评估干预措施的效果。结果 110名护士均对培训满意;培训前护士预防误吸知识的平均得分为(65.6±9.6)分,培训后平均得分为(92.5±6.5)分,培训前后得分的差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。培训后89份(89%)跟踪调查卷明确表示护士在工作中运用了培训所学的知识。结论 对护士进行有组织、有计划的教育干预能提高护士预防与处理患者误吸的知识水平,并能对护士预防和处理患者误吸的行为产生积极影响。

Objective To evaluate the effect of educating nurses on how to prevent and reduce aspiration rate of patients. Methods 110 nurses were recruited from neurological department in our hospital and were trained systematically about the prevention and nursing of aspiration. We compared the scores they had before and after training. Results 110 nurses were all satisfied with the training. The pre-education test score about the aspiration knowledge was 65.6±9.6 while the post-education test score was 92.5±6.5. The difference of the score before and after training was statistically significant difference (P<0.05). The follow-up study indicated that 89% nurses are applying the knowledge gained from the training to their clinical work. Conclusion It's suggested that well-organized educational training may improve nurses' performance of preventing patients from aspiration and treating patients when they had aspiration, which left a positive effect on nurses' behavior.

早期干预是预防和减少早产儿神经系统损伤的有效措施,可以促进早产儿的正常发育并减轻神经系统伤残的发生,对提高儿童综合素质和家庭幸福都至关重要。在早产儿早期干预过程中存在与医学伦理原则不相适应的方面,如医疗设施不足、医疗措施不当、专业人员不足,早产儿干预预后的不确定性,治疗时机与家长经济及遵医行为之间的冲突,家长知情选择和知情同意不足等,本文结合医学伦理学的观点对0~3岁早产儿在早期干预中存在的问题进行分析并提出相应的建议。

Early intervention is an effective measure to prevent and reduce the nervous system injury in preterm infants,It can promote the normal development of preterm infants and reduce the occurrence of the nervous system disability.It is vital to improve the comprehensive quality of children and family quality of life. In the stage of premature infant intervention,there are some aspects that are incompatible with the medical ethics principle,i.e. inadequate medical facilities,improper medical measures,lack of professionals,premature infants intervention prognosis uncertainty,the conflict between the timing of treatment and the parents' economic and compliance behaviors,parents' informed choice and informed consent. etc. This paper analyzes the problems in early intervention of 0~3 year old preterm infants and puts forward corresponding suggestions according to the viewpoint of medical ethics.

目的 对信息协作平台的社区结直肠癌三级防治及干预体系进行探索与实践。方法 对纳入本次研究的2 492名社区人群进行问卷调查,包括健康人群1 118人,1 374例肿瘤患者。分析健康人群和肿瘤患者关于肿瘤防治知识及途径的认知情况,比较健康人群和肿瘤患者就诊首选医院,了解肿瘤患者就诊流向和行为以及发现患癌的途径。结果 在肿瘤患者中知道癌前病变、早期肿瘤症状、高危人群的比例显著高于健康人群[26.93%(370/1 374)、39.96%(549/1 374)、46.00%(632/1 374)比14.49%(162/1 118)、21.91%(245/1 118)、26.92%(301/1 118)]。健康人群认为肿瘤三级防治网络可行、会参加三级防治网、有必要开展癌症筛查、会参加筛查的比率显著高于肿瘤患者[98.83%(1 105/1 118)、91.95%(1 028/1 118)、98.12%(1 097/1 118)、98.03%(1 096/1 118)比81.95%(1 126/1 374)、79.98%(1 099/1 374)、80.93%(1 112/1 374)、85.95%(1 181/1 374)],差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。健康人群把三甲医院视为就诊首选医院的比率显著低于肿瘤患者[32.56%(364/1 118)比86.97%(1 195/1 374)](P<0.05)。肿瘤患者中发现肿瘤及确诊医院、肿瘤复诊、康复医院的选取主要以三甲综合医院为主。在肿瘤患者中因身体不适到医院就诊发现患癌的比率显著高于单位员工体检、自检发现、社区卫生服务中心体检发现的比率。结论 我国目前肿瘤发病率和死亡率正处在快速上升的阶段,利用网络优势,加大肿瘤防治知识的宣传力度,建立社区、区域二级医院、三级医院优势互补的三级肿瘤防控体系,是当前我国肿瘤防治的迫切需求。

Objective To explore and practice the community tertiary prevention and intervention system for colorectal cancer based on information collaboration platform. Methods A questionnaire survey was conducted among 2 492 community residents which were included in this study, including the healthy crowd of 1 118 people, 1 374 cases of tumor patients. The study was to analyze the knowledge of cancer prevention and treatment in healthy people and cancer patients, to contrast the preferred hospital by healthy people and cancer patients, to acquaint the flow direction in seeking medical service, behavior and way to diagnosis cancer of tumor patients. Results In patients with cancer, the understanding proportion of patients with precancerous lesions, early tumor symptoms, and high risk groups was significantly higher than that in healthy people [26.93% (370/1 374), 39.96% (549/1 374), 46.00% (632/1 374) vs 14.49% (162/1 118), 21.91% (245/1 118), 26.92% (301/1 118)]. In healthy people, the proportion of identification of tumor three-grade prevention and control network, willing to participate in the tertiary prevention and control network, necessity to carry out cancer screening, willing to participate in screening was significantly higher than that in patients with cancer [98.83% (1 105/1 118), 91.95% (1 028/1 118), 98.12% (1 097/1 118), 98.03% (1 096/1 118) vs 81.95% (1 126/1 374), 79.98% (1 099/1 374) and 80.93% (1 112/1 374), 85.95% (1 181/1 374)]. There were significantly differences (P<0.05). Healthy people preferred to choose common hospital instead of 3A hospital as the first choice [32.56% (364/1 118) vs 86.97% (1 195/1 374)] (P<0.05). Discovery and diagnosis of cancer, further consultation, and rehabilitation were mainly carried out in 3A hospital. In patients with cancer, the cancer discovery ratio because of physical discomfort for medical attention was significantly higher than that in unit staff physical examination, self-inspection found, and physical examination in community health service center. Conclusion At present, the incidence and mortality of cancer in our country is in a stage of rapid rising. It's an urgent need for cancer prevention and control in China that making use of the advantage of network to improve the propaganda of the knowledge of cancer prevention and control, and establishing complementary advantages of the tertiary cancer prevention and control system by community, regional hospitals, and 3A hospitals.

目的 分析于剖宫产产妇围手术期实施针对性护理对其切口感染率及不良情绪的影响。方法 选取2015年6月—2016年4月于我院择期行剖宫产术的102例产妇,通过随机数表法分为观察组与对照组,各51例。给予对照组常规护理,在此基础上观察组给予针对性护理干预。对比两组术后恢复情况、护理前后疼痛评分(VAS)、抑郁评分(SDS)及焦虑评分(SAS)变化情况,并统计两组并发症发生率、护理满意度。结果 观察组肛门排气时间、切口愈合时间、24 h睡眠时间、住院时间、下床活动时间均少于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05);护理前两组SAS评分、SDS评分、VAS评分间无明显差异(P＞0.05),经护理干预,观察组SAS评分、SDS评分、VAS评分低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05);两组切口感染率、并发症发生率(1.96%、7.84%)低于对照组(15.69%、31.37%),差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05);两组护理满意度对比,观察组(98.04%)高于对照组(82.35%),差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05)。结论 给予剖宫产围术期产妇针对性护理疗效确切,可缓解不良情绪,减轻疼痛感,促使机体功能及早康复,减少切口感染与并发症发生。

目的 探讨血管介入治疗糖尿病足的疗效以及术后血管再狭窄的影响因素。方法 选取2013年2月—2015年3月在我院接受治疗的糖尿病足患者96例,采用随机数表法将患者分为观察组和对照组两个各48例,观察组患者给予血管微创手术介入治疗,对照组患者给予常规治疗,比较两组患者治疗后的临床疗效、住院费用、住院天数、Wagner分级以及患者观察组患者术后血管再狭窄的影响因素。结果 治疗后,观察组患者的总有效率为93.75%高于对照组72.91%,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);将观察组患者术后发生发生血管再狭窄的22例患者作为A组,未出现血管再狭窄的26例患者作为B组。A、B两组患者病程、TG、LDL-C、MDA含量、HbA以及BMI比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);术后,A组患者的TC明显高于B组,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),由此可见,TC是导致患者术后出现血管再狭窄的危险因素;观察组患者的住院费用以及住院天数低于对照组,两组比较差异显著(P<0.05)。结论 采用血管介入治疗糖尿病足患者疗效显著,高TC是患者术后血管再次发生狭窄的影响因素。