目的 分析上消化道早癌与癌前病变内镜下治疗的效果。方法 将2017年10月—2020年10月接诊且行传统外科手术治疗的75例上消化道早癌与癌前病变患者作为对照组,将同期接诊且行内镜黏膜下剥离术(ESD)治疗的75例上消化道早癌与癌前病变患者作为观察组,对组间围手术期指标、生活质量、疼痛评分、病灶切除情况、治疗效果、并发症发生率展开分析。结果 (1)观察组术中出血量(17.66±2.25)mL、手术用时(96.79±9.25)min、住院时间(10.95±1.88)d、治疗费用(1.74±0.41)万元均少于对照组(87.73±5.63)mL、(190.52±10.68)min、(22.75±2.69)d、(4.96±0.37)万元(P<0.05);(2)组间生活质量、疼痛评分在术前无差异(P>0.05);观察组生活质量、疼痛评分在术后优于对照组(P<0.05);(3)观察组治愈性切除率(98.67%)、整块完整切除率(100.00%)与对照组(96.00%、98.67%)无差异(P>0.05);(4)观察组总有效率(96.00%)与对照组(97.33%)无明显差异(P>0.05);(5)观察组发生2例并发症(2.67%),对照组发生11例并发症(14.67%,P<0.05)。结论 对上消化道早癌与癌前病变患者行ESD治疗,疗效显著,可以减少并发症,减轻疼痛感与经济压力,改善生活质量,值得推广。

Objective To analyze the effect of endoscopic treatment of early upper gastrointestinal cancer and precancerous lesions. Methods From October 2017 to October 2020, 75 patients with early cancer and precancerous lesions of upper digestive tract who were treated by traditional surgery were selected as the control group, and 75 patients with early cancer and precancerous lesions of upper digestive tract who were treated by endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) were selected as the observation group. The therapeutic effect and the incidence of complications were analyzed. Results (1) The intraoperative blood loss was (17.66±2.25) mL, operation time was (96.79±9.25) min, hospitalization time was (10.95±1.88) d, treatment cost was(17.4±4.1)thousand yuan in the observation group, which were less than those in the control group [(87.73±5.63) mL, (190.52±10.68) min, (22.75±2.69) d, (49.6±3.7) thousand yuan, (P＜0.05)]. (2) There were no significant differences in quality of life and pain score between groups before operation. The quality of life and pain score of the observation group were better than those of the control group after operation (P<0.05). (3) The curative resection rate (98.67%) and complete resection rate (100.00%) of the observation group were not significantly different from those of the control group (96.00% and 98.67%,P＞0.05); (4) The total effective rate (96.00%) of the observation group was not significantly different from that of the control group (97.33%,P＞0.05); (5) The total effective rate of the observation group was significantly higher than that of the control group (97.33%). There were 2 cases of complications in the observation group (2.67%), and 11 cases in the control group (14.67%, P<0.05). Conclusion ESD treatment for patients with early upper gastrointestinal cancer and precancerous lesions has significant effect, can reduce complications, relieve pain and economic stress, and improve the quality of life, which is worthy of promotion.

       目的   分析早期结直肠癌内镜下治疗前行窄带成像结合放大内镜 （ME-NBI）和超声内镜技术的评估价值。方法   采用回顾性分析方法，以2021年1月— 2023 年 12月中山市第五人民医院收治的102例早期结直肠癌患者为观察对象，所有患者均接受内镜下黏膜切除术（EMR）或内镜黏膜下剥离术（ESD）治疗，根据内镜下治疗前是否进行ME-NBI和超声内镜检查分为研究组与对照组各51例。比较两组年龄、性别、肿瘤大小、直乙结肠占比及组织病理特征；比较两组治疗时间、ESD治疗后非治愈性切除发生率、治愈性切除率、并发症发生情况及再次ESD或外科手术治疗率。结果   两组年龄、性别、肿瘤大小、直乙结肠占比及组织病理比较差异均无统计学意义（P＞0.05）。研究组中37例行ESD治疗，治疗时间为（120.6±140.3）min，12例行EMR治疗，治疗时间为（11.6±9.3）min，有2例不符合内镜下治疗指征，转外科手术治疗。对照组有38例行ESD治疗，治疗时间为（128.8±144.5）min，13例行EMR治疗，治疗时间为（12.5±9.5）min，两者治疗时间比较差异均无统计学意义（P＞0.05）。研究组非治愈性切除率为7.84，低于对照组27.45；治愈性切除率为88.24，高于对照组72.55；研究组ESD手术并发症为8.11%，低于对照组31.58；ESD或外科手术率为6.12，低于对照组25.49（P＜0.05），结论  ME-NBI和超声内镜对早期结直肠癌患者行内镜下治疗指征评估更准确，可提高治愈性切除率。

       Objective  To  study the application value of magnifying endoscopy combined with  narrow  band imaging （ME-NBI）and ultrasonic endoscopy system before endoscopic treatment in patients with early colorectal cancer．Methods  A retrospective analysis was carried out on  102  patients with early-stage colorectal cancer who were admitted to Zhongshan Fifth People’s Hospital from January 2021 to December 2023．All patients were treated with endoscopic mucosal resection（EMR）or endoscopic submucosal dissection（ESO）．The patients were divided into study group（51 cases）and control group（51 cases）according to whether ME-NBI and ultrasonic endoscopy was performed before endoscopic treatment or not．The patient age，sex，volume of tumor，location of tumor and pathological result of the tumor were compared between two groups．Time for treatment，curative resection rate，non-curative resection rate and the complication incidence of ESD，incidences of second ESD or surgery were compared between the two groups．Results  There were no statistical differences in age，sex，volume of tumor，location of tumor and pathological result of the tumor（P＞0.05）．In the study group，37 patients received ESD treatment，operation time was（120.6±140.3）minutes，and 12 patients received EMR treatment，operation time was（11.6±9.3）minutes，two cases were transferred to surgery due to endoscopic ultrasonography combined with magnifying endoscopy showed that they did not meet the indications for ESD treatment．In the control group，38 patients received ESD treatment，operation time was（128.8±144.5）minutes，13 patients received EMR treatment，operation time was（12.5±9.5）minutes．There was no significant difference in treatment duration between the two groups．The non-curative resection rate of the study group was 7.84%，which was significantly lower than that in the control group（27.45%），and the curative resection rate（88.24%）was significantly higher than that in the control group（72.55%）．The complications of ESD surgery in the study group were 8.11%，lower than 31.58% in the control group．The rate of second ESD or surgery was 6.12%，lower than 25.49% in the control group（P＜0.05）．Conclusions  ME-NBI and endoscopic ultrasound are more accurate in the evaluation of endoscopic indications for early colorectal cancer patients，and can improve the curative resection rate．