目的 探究血清多配体蛋白聚糖-1（SCD-1）与可溶性血管内皮生长因子受体-2（sVEGFR-2）表达水平在老年慢性心力衰竭患者预后评估的判定价值。方法 选取2023年1月—2024年3月珠海市第五人民医院检验科收治的110例老年慢性心力衰竭患者,检测其血清SCD-1和sVEGFR-2水平,对患者进行随访调查,了解其再次由于心力衰竭住院、心源性死亡的情况。运用多因素Logistic回归分析,探究老年慢性心力衰竭患者预后影响因素。结果 Logistic回归分析显示,心功能分级（OR=3.433,95%CI：0.934~6.431）、B型脑钠肽升高（OR=2.462,95%CI：0.861~4.765）、血清SCD-1升高（OR=3.795,95%CI：0.972~6.894）、血清sVEGFR-2升高（OR=3.842,95%CI：0.942~6.912）为影响老年慢性心力衰竭患者预后不良的重要因素（P<0.05）;联合血清SCD-1和sVEGFR-2曲线下面积0.962与B型脑肽钠曲线下面积0.844,相较于单一SCD-1曲线下面积0.658、sVEGFR-2曲线下面积0.712明显偏高（P<0.05）。结论 经研究证实,老年慢性心力衰竭患者预后效果不理想,其血清SCD-1和sVEGFR-2监测水平异常升高,和老年慢性心力衰竭预后不佳存在关联性,可视为老年慢性心力衰竭患者判定预后效果的主要标志物。

Objective To investigate the prognostic value of serum syndecan-1（SCD-1）and soluble vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2（sVEGFR-2）expression levels in elderly patients with chronic heart failure. Methods A total of 110 elderly patients with chronic heart failure admitted to our hospital were selected,with a time interval of January 2023 to March 2024．Serum SCD-1 and sVEGFR-2 levels were detected and follow-up investigations were conducted to understand their re hospitalization and cardiogenic death due to heart failure．Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to explore the prognostic factors affecting elderly patients with chronic heart failure. Results According to logistic retrospective analysis,heart function grading（OR=3.433,95%CI：0.934-6.431）,elevated B-type brain natriuretic peptide（OR=2.462,95%CI：0.861-4.765）,elevated serum SCD-1（OR=3.795,95%CI：0.972-6.894）,and elevated serum sVEGFR-2（OR=3.842,95%CI：0.942-6.912）were important factors affecting the poor prognosis of elderly patients with chronic heart failure,with differences P<0.05．The area under the curve of combined serum SCD-1 and sVEGFR-2 was 0.962,and the area under the curve of B-type brain peptide sodium was 0.844,which was significantly higher than that of a single SCD-1 curve of 0.658 and sVEGFR-2 curve of 0.712,with a difference of P<0.05. Conclusions Research has confirmed that the prognosis of elderly patients with chronic heart failure is not satisfied,and their serum SCD-1 and sVEGFR-2 monitoring levels are abnormally elevated,which is related to the poor prognosis of elderly patients with chronic heart failure．It can be regarded as the main biomarker for defining the prognosis of elderly patients with chronic heart failure．

目的 探讨表皮生长因子受体酪氨酸酶抑制剂（EGFR-TKIs）一线治疗耐药后,二线化学治疗（化疗）联合程序性死亡蛋白1及其配体（PD-1/L1）免疫检查点抑制剂方案对晚期非小细胞肺癌（NSCLC）的疗效。方法 选取2018年 6月—2022年10月期间就诊于南通大学附属肿瘤医院院的80例有完整临床资料、应用EGFR-TKIs耐药后晚期NSCLC患者进行回顾性分析,依照不同治疗方式将患者分为观察组与对照组,均为40例。对照组一线EGFR-TKIs治疗耐药后进行二线化疗,观察组一线EGFR-TKIs治疗耐药后进行二线化疗联合PD-1/L1免疫检查点抑制剂治疗。对比两组临床疗效及无进展生存期（PFS）,化疗前后血清中人细胞角蛋白21-1片段（Cyfra21-1）、糖类抗原125（CA125）、碱性成纤维细胞生长因子（bFGF）、血管内皮生长因子（VEGF）水平变化,不良反应发生率及生存质量。结果 观察组客观缓解率与疾病控制率高于对照组（P<0.05）,对照组PFS为10（2.38,24.13）个月,观察组PFS为14（5.27~,5.27）个月,观察组高于对照组（χ²=4.536,P=0.041）;化疗后两组bFGF、VEGF,CA125、Cyfra21-1肿瘤标志物水平均比化疗前降低,且观察组[（17.85±3.32）ng/L、（310.51±88.37）ng/L、（51.62±13.66）U/mL、（10.26±3.37）ng/mL]低于对照组[（19.62±3.24）ng/L、（366.26±49.42）ng/L、（59.26±9.35）U/mL、（12.62±2.73）ng/mL],对比差异有统计学意义（t₁=2.413,P₁=0.018;t₂=3.482,P₂<0.001;t₃=2.919,P₃=0.005;t₄=3.442,P₄<0.001）;两组不良反应发生率对比差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）;化疗后两组世界卫生组织生存质量量表简表评分均升高,观察组[（98.62±8.24）、（101.53±12.62）、（95.28±11.15）、（97.79±10.47）分]高于对照组[（84.25±7.32）、（93.58±15.75）、（82.24±9.34）、（83.47±8.38）]分,对比差异有统计学意义（t₁=8.246,P₁<0.001;t₂=2.491,P₂=0.015;t₃=5.670,P₃<0.001;t₄=6.753,P₄<0.001）。结论 对EGFR-TKIs耐药后晚期非小细胞肺癌患者采取二线化疗联合PD-1/L1免疫检查点抑制剂可提升其临床疗效及生存期,改善血清相关肿瘤标志物表达水平,提升患者生存质量。

Objective To explore the therapeutic effect of second-line chemotherapy combined with PD-1/L1 immune checkpoint inhibitor regimen on advanced non-small cell lung cancer（NSCLC） after epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors（EGFR-TKIs）resistance in first-line chemotherapy．Methods Retrospectively selected 80 patients with advanced NSCLC EGFR TKIs resistance,who were admitted to the Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Nantong University from June 2018 to October 2022．Patients were divided into an observation group and a control group according to different treatment methods,with 40 cases in each group．The control group received second-line chemotherapy after first-line EGFR-TKIs therapy resistance,while the observation group received second-line chemotherapy and PD-1/L1 inhibitor after first-line EGFR-TKIs therapy reactions and quality of live．Clinical efficacy and PFS,changes in serum levels of human Cyfra21-1,CA125,bFGF,VEGF,incidence of adverse chemotherapy of two groups were compared．Results The ORR and DCR of the observation group were significantly higher than those of the control group（P<0.05）．The mean PFS of the control group was 10（2.38-24.13）months,while the mean PFS of the observation group was 14（5.27-35.27）months．The observation group was higher than the control group（χ²=4.536,P=0.041）．After chemotherapy,levels of bFGF,VEGF,CA125 and Cyfra21-1 tumor markers decreased in both groups,and the observation group [（17.85±3.32）ng/L,（310.51±88.37）ng/L,（51.62±13.66）U/mL,（10.26±3.37）ng/mL] was lower than the control group [（19.62±3.24）ng/L,（366.26±49.42）ng/L,（59.26±9.35）U/mL,（12.62±2.73）ng/mL],which showed statistically significant difference in the comparison（t₁=2.413,P₁=0.018;t₂=3.482,P₂<0.001;t₃=2.919,P₃=0.005;t₄=3.442,P₄<0.001）．There was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse reactions between the two groups（P>0.05）．After treatment,the WHO QOL-BREF scores increased in both patient groups and the observation group scores[（98.62±8.24）,（101.53±12.62）,（95.28±11.15）,（97.79±10.47）] were higher than the control group scores[（84.25±7.32）,（93.58±15.75）,（82.24±9.34）,（83.47±8.38）],which showed statistically significant difference．（t₁=8.246,P₁<0.001;t₂=2.491,P₂=0.015;t₃=5.670,P₃<0.001;t₄=6.753,P₄<0.001）．Conclusions The combination of second-line chemotherapy with PD-1/L1 immune checkpoint inhibitors can improve the clinical efficacy and survival of advanced NSCLC patients who are resistant to EGFR-TKIs,improve the expression levels of serum related tumor markers,and enhance the quality of life of patients．

目的 研究EGFR基因突变与系列肿瘤标志物在160例原发性肺癌患者及51例肺部良性占位病变患者中的表达状况,为肺部占位病变的诊断、鉴别诊断和治疗提供参考依据。方法 160例肺癌患者取新鲜病理组织标本,采用扩增阻滞突变系统荧光PCR(ARMS-PCR)技术检测EGER基因突变;160例肺癌患者和51例良性占位病变患者取外周静脉血用化学发光法检测系列肿瘤标志物,用χ²检验统计分析数据。结果 160例肺癌病例中,EGFR基因野生型比率为47.56%(78/164),EGFR基因突变型比率为52.44%(86/164),突变型中21L858R点突变占23.17%(38/164),19Del缺失突变占22.56%(37/164)。肺癌组中系列肿瘤标志物较良性占位组具显著高表达,P＜0.01。差异有统计学意义。结论 肺癌致病与EGFR基因突变、肿瘤标志物高表达有显著正相关,通过肿瘤标志物和EGFR基因突变检测,结合影像学检查,将有助于肺部占位病变诊断和鉴别诊断,并为治疗手段选择提供参考依据。

Objective To research EGFR gene mutation and series of tumor markers expression in 160 patients with primary lung cancer and 51 patients with lung benign placeholder lesions, provide some references for the diagnosis, differential diagnosis and treatment in lung placeholder lesions. Methods We took fresh pathological tissue specimens from 160 cases of patients with lung cancer, Then used ARMS PCR technique to detect EGER gene mutations. We took the peripheral venous blood in 160 patients with lung cancer and 51 patients with lung benign placeholder lesions, with chemiluminescence method to detect series of tumor markers,and used thechi-square test to statistic and analysis data. Results In 160 cases of lung cancer patients,The EGFR gene wild type rate was 47.56%(78/164).The EGFR gene mutation type rate was 52.44%(86/164).In EGFR gene mutation type,The proportion of 21L858R mutation was 23.17%(38/164),19del mutation was 22.56%(37/164). Series of tumor markers had significantly higher expression in lung cancer group than in benign placeholder lesions group. P＜0.01.The difference was statistically significant. Conclusion Lung cancer pathogenesis and EGFR gene mutations, tumor markers high expression was significantly positive correlation. Through a series of tumor markers and EGFR mutation testing, combined with imaging examination, it will contribute to the diagnosis and differential diagnosis in lung placeholder lesions, and provide the basis for treatment.

       目的   探究血清多配体蛋白聚糖-1（SCD-1）与可溶性血管内皮生长因子受体-2（sVEGFR-2）表达水平在老年慢性心力衰竭患者预后评估的判定价值。方法   选取2023年1月—2024年3月珠海市第五人民医院检验科收治的110例老年慢性心力衰竭患者，检测其血清SCD-1和sVEGFR-2水平，对患者进行随访调查，了解其再次由于心力衰竭住院、心源性死亡的情况。运用多因素Logistic回归分析，探究老年慢性心力衰竭患者预后影响因素。结果  Logistic回归分析显示，心功能分级（OR=3.433，95%CI：0.934~6.431）、B型脑钠肽升高（OR=2.462，95%CI：0.861~4.765）、血清SCD-1升高（OR=3.795，95%CI：0.972~6.894）、血清sVEGFR-2升高（OR=3.842，95%CI：0.942~6.912）为影响老年慢性心力衰竭患者预后不良的重要因素（P＜0.05）；联合血清SCD-1和sVEGFR-2曲线下面积0.962与B型脑肽钠曲线下面积0.844，相较于单一SCD-1曲线下面积0.658、sVEGFR-2曲线下面积0.712明显偏高（P＜0.05）。结论   经研究证实，老年慢性心力衰竭患者预后效果不理想，其血清SCD-1和sVEGFR-2监测水平异常升高，和老年慢性心力衰竭预后不佳存在关联性，可视为老年慢性心力衰竭患者判定预后效果的主要标志物。

      Objective  To investigate the prognostic value of serum syndecan-1（SCD-1）and soluble vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2（sVEGFR-2）expression levels in elderly patients with chronic heart failure．Methods  A total of 110 elderly patients with chronic heart failure admitted to our hospital were selected，with a time interval of January 2023 to March 2024．Serum SCD-1 and sVEGFR-2 levels were detected and follow-up investigations were conducted to understand their re hospitalization and cardiogenic death due to heart failure．Multiple logistic  regression analysis was used to explore the prognostic factors affecting elderly patients with chronic heart failure．Results  According to logistic retrospective analysis，heart function grading（OR=3.433，95%CI：0.934-6.431），elevated B-type brain natriuretic peptide（OR=2.462，95%CI：0.861-4.765），elevated serum SCD-1（OR=3.795，95%CI：0.972-6.894），and elevated serum sVEGFR-2（OR=3.842，95%CI：0.942-6.912）were important factors affecting the poor prognosis of elderly patients with chronic heart failure，with differences P＜0.05．The area under the curve of combined serum SCD-1 and sVEGFR-2 was 0.962，and the area under the curve of B-type brain peptide sodium was 0.844，which was significantly higher than that of a single SCD-1 curve of 0.658 and sVEGFR-2 curve of 0.712，with a difference of P＜0.05．Conclusions  Research has confirmed that the prognosis of elderly patients with chronic heart failure is not satisfied，and their serum SCD-1 and sVEGFR-2 monitoring levels are abnormally elevated，which is related to the poor prognosis of elderly patients with chronic heart failure．It can be regarded as the main biomarker for defining the prognosis of elderly patients with chronic heart failure．