目的 观察辅助性T17细胞（Th17）与调节性T细胞（Treg）比值与2型糖尿病（T2DM）患者胰岛素抵抗及胰岛β细胞功能的关系。方法 纳入2022年4月—2023年4月在贵州医科大学第二附属医院内分泌科住院及健康体检人群各100例, 分为糖耐量正常组（NGT组, n=100）和T2DM组（n=100）, 分别测定糖化血红蛋白（HbA1c）、空腹血糖（FPG）、甘油三酯（TG）等生化指标, 电化学发光法测定空腹胰岛素（FINS）, 稳态模型计算胰岛β细胞功能指数（HOMA-β）、胰岛素抵抗指数（HOMA-IR）及胰岛素敏感指数（HOMA-ISI）。流式细胞术检测Th17、Treg水平。HOMA-IR、HOMA-β和HOMA-ISI的影响因素采用多元线性回归分析。结果 与NGT组相比, T2DM组BMI、FPG、HbA1c、LDL-C 、TG、TC、FINS、HOMA-IR、Th17及Th17/Treg水平均升高（P<0.01）, HDL-C、HOMA-β、HOMA-ISI、Treg水平均降低, 且差异有统计学意义（P<0.01）。Th17与BMI（r=0.251, P<0.001）及HOMA-IR（r=0.305, P<0.001）呈正相关; 与HOMA-β（r=-0.204, P<0.001）及HOMA-ISI（r=-0.359, P<0.001）呈负相关。Treg与HOMA-ISI之间呈正相关（r=0.170, P=0.008）, 而与HOMA-IR呈负相关（r=-0.153, P=0.017）; Th17/Treg与BMI（r=0.332, P<0.001）及HOMA-IR（r=0.374, P<0.001）;与HOMA-β（r=-0.249, P<0.001）及HOMA-ISI（r=-0.427, P<0.001）呈负相关。多元线性回归分析显示, Th17/Treg是HOMA-IR（β=5.915）升高及HOMA-ISI（β=-2.557）下降的影响因素（P<0.01）。结论 Th17/Treg可能通过影响胰岛素抵抗、降低胰岛素敏感性参与T2DM的发生。

Objective To explore the relationship among the proportion of helper T17 cells（Th17）to regulatory T cells（Treg）, insulin resistance, and the function of islet beta cells．Methods One hundred cases of hospitalized patients and 100 cases of health check-ups people in the Department of Endocrinology of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University from April 2022 to April 2023 were included．Patients were divided into normal glucose tolerance group（NGT group, n=100）and type 2 diabetes mellitus group（T2DM group, n=100）．The biochemical indexes of HbA1c, fasting blood glucose（FPG）, triglyceride（TG）and fasting insulin（FINS）were determined by electrochemiluminescence．Islet beta cell function index（HOMA-β）, insulin resistance index（HOMA-IR）and insulin sensitivity index（HOMA-ISI）were calculated in homeostasis model．The levels of Th17 and Treg were detected by flow cytometry．Spearman was used to analyze the correlation between indicators, and multiple linear regression analysis was used to analyze the influencing factors of HOMA-IR, HOMA-β and HOMA-ISI．Results In contrast to the NGT group, the T2DM group exhibited elevated levels of BMI, FPG, HbA1c, LDL-C, TG, TC, FINS, HOMA-IR, Th17 and Th17/Treg, with these variances being signifincantly different（P<0.01）．There was a notable reduction in the levels of HDL-C,HOMA-β,HOMA-ISI,Treg,with those changes being significantly different（P<0.01）．Th17 was positively correlated with BMI（r=0.251, P<0.001）and HOMA-IR（r=0.305, P<0.001）, it was negatively correlated with HOMA-β（r=-0.204, P<0.001）and HOMA-ISI（r=-0.359, P<0.001）．Treg was positively correlated with HOMA-ISI（r=0.170, P=0.008）, while it was negatively correlated with HOMA-IR（r=-0.153, P=0.017）．The ratio of Th17/Treg was positively correlated with BMI（r=0.332, P<0.001）and HOMA-IR（r=0.374, P<0.001）, it was negatively correlated with HOMA-β（r=-0.249, P<0.001）and HOMA-ISI（r=-0.427, P<0.001）．Multiple linear regression analysis showed that Th17/Treg was an influential factor in the increase of HOMA-IR（β=5.915）and the decrease of HOMA-ISI（β=-2.557）（P<0.01）．Conclusions Th17/Treg may be involved in the development of T2DM by affecting insulin resistance and reducing insulin sensitivity．

目的 探讨以家庭为中心的患教模式对糖尿病患者代谢控制水平的影响。方法 选取168例2016年9月—2017年8月在我院治疗的糖尿病患者,根据不同的健康教育模式干预将其分为观察组和对照组,每组各84例。对照组患者采用传统的综合患教模式,观察组患者在对照组的基础上采用以家庭为中心的患教模式,比较两组患者的自我管理水平及血糖、血脂控制效果。结果 干预后,观察组自我管理总得分、饮食控制、运动锻炼、血糖监测、足部护理、高低血糖处理均优于对照组(P＜0.05);观察组的FBG、PBG、HbA1C、TC、TG、LDL-C水平均低于对照组(P＜0.05)。结论 以家庭为中心的患教模式可辅助患者规范自己的行为,加强自我管理,改善血糖控制水平。

Objective To study the effects of two health education models on the level of metabolic control in diabetic patients. Methods 168 patients with diabetes admitted to our hospital from September 2016 to August 2017 were selected as subjects. According to different health education model interventions, they were divided into observation group and control group, with 84 cases in each group. The patients in the control group adopted a comprehensive health education model, and the patients in the observation group adopted a family-centered health education model based on the control group. The self-management level and blood glucose and blood lipid control effects of the two groups were compared. Results After intervention, the observation group self-management total score, diet control, exercise, blood glucose monitoring, foot care, high and low blood glucose treatment were better than that of control group (P<0.05); observation group FBG, PBG, HbA1C, TC, TG, LDL-C level were lower than that of the control group (P<0.05). Conclusion A family-centered health education model may help patients regulate their behavior, strengthen self-management, and improve their blood sugar control levels.

目的 探究基于微信平台的健康管理对糖尿病老年患者焦虑、抑郁、主观幸福感、血糖水平和生存质量的影响。方法 采取便利抽样方法选取我院老年病科2型糖尿病患者106例,随机分为干预组和对照组各53例。干预组进行基于微信平台的健康管理,主要包括心理干预和健康宣教,对照组实施传统心理干预和健康宣教,比较2组患者的焦虑、抑郁、主观幸福感、空腹血糖、餐后2 h血糖、HbA1C和生存质量。结果 干预后,干预组焦虑发生率低于对照组(P＜0.05),而抑郁发生率与对照组比较,差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05);干预组患者SAS评分、GDS评分、主观幸福感总分空腹血糖、餐后2 h血糖水平、HbA1C、PCS和MCS评分降低或升高效果优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(t=2.823,3.231,-18.956,5.152,7.401,7.528,-3.165,-3.232;P＜0.05)。结论 基于微信平台的健康管理能有效控制糖尿病老年患者的血糖水平,降低焦虑抑郁症状水平,提升主观幸福感和生存质量。

Objective To explore the effect of health management based on WeChat platform on depressive symptoms and quality of life of elderly patients with diabetes. Methods 106 elderly patients with type 2 diabetes hospitalized in geriatrics department in our hospital were selected by convenient sampling method and divided into two groups randomly, with 53 cases in each group. The intervention group was given psychological nursing and health education based on WeChat platform, while the control group received traditional psychological nursing and health education. Finally, the levels of anxiety and depressive symptoms, subjective well-being, fasting blood-glucose, 2h postprandial blood glucose, HbA1C and quality of life, were compared in both groups. Results After the intervention, the incidence of anxiety in the intervention group was lower than that in the control group (P＜0.05), while the incidence of depression did not have statistical difference compared with that in the control group (P＞0.05). The decrease or evaluation of SAS, GDS, subjective well-being, fasting blood-glucose, 2h postprandial blood glucose, HbA1C, PCS and MCS of the intervention group were greater than those in the control group, (t=2.823,3.231,-18.956,5.152,7.401,7.528,-3.165,-3.232;;P＜0.05). Conclusion Psychological intervention and health education by WeChat may control the blood glucose level of elderly patients with diabetes, reduce the level of anxiety and depression symptoms and improve subjective well-being and quality of life effectively.

目的 探索使用血浆中溶血磷脂酸 LPA作为老年糖尿病患者发生缺血性心脑血管病早期预警指标。方法 在公共卫生项目开展的基础上,将老年糖尿病患者随机分为观察组和对照组。对照组实施糖尿病规范管理,观察组在对照组的基础上进行血浆LPA 的水平定期检测,对LPA 明显升高者,予降脂、抗纤溶、抗血小板凝集等干预措施,比较两组间缺血性心脑血管病发生率和病情严重程度。结果 观察组缺血性脑血管发病率高于对照组,差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。中、重型缺血性脑血管病患者的血浆LPA高于轻型组（P<0.05）,且重型组高于中型组（P<0.05）结论 血浆LPA值可作为老年糖尿病患者发生缺血性心脑血管病的预警因子,值得在基层老年糖尿病患者规范化管理中常规应用。

Objective To explore the early warning index of ischemic cardiocerebrovascular disease in elderly diabetic patients with plasma LPA. Methods On the basis of public health project,elderly diabetic patients were randomly divided into observation group and control group. Control group adopted diabetes management implementation,while observation group adopted periodic testing of the levels of plasma LPA on the basis of the control group,implementing fall fat,resisting fibrinolytic,antiplatelet aggregation and other interventions if LPA significantly increased. We compared the ischemic cardio-cerebrovascular disease incidence and disease severity between the two groups. Results The incidence of cerebral ischemia in the observation group was higher than that in the control group,and the difference was statistically significant （P<0.05）. Medium and heavy plasma LPA is higher than the light of ischemic cerebrovascular disease group （P < 0.05）,and heavy above medium group （P < 0.05） Conclusion The plasma LPA values can be used as early warning factor in elderly patients with diabetes occuring ischemic cardio-cerebrovascular disease and promote its application.

目的 探讨利拉鲁肽与二甲双胍对新诊断2型糖尿病患者骨代谢的影响。方法 选取2016年1月—2017年6月在我院就诊并确诊为新诊断2型糖尿病患者50例,按照随机数字表法将研究对象随机分为利拉鲁肽组及二甲双胍组,每组各25人。两组患者均单药治疗24周后比较两组患者骨密度、骨代谢指标变化情况。结果 两组患者骨密度、血清ALP以及BGP、PINP水平治疗前后相比,无改变(P>0.05);而利拉鲁肽组患者的β-CTx水平较治疗前降低(P<0.05);两组患者治疗后FPG、2hFPG、HOMA-IR、HbA1c均较治疗前下降(P<0.05),而空腹胰岛素较治疗前上升(P<0.05);利拉鲁肽组患者治疗24周后BMI值低于治疗前(P<0.05)。结论 利拉鲁肽与二甲双胍对新诊断2型糖尿病患者骨密度的影响均不明显,两种药物可有效降低血糖,改善胰岛素抵抗,利拉鲁肽在使用过程中可明显降低患者血清β-CTx水平,但其是否存在骨质保护作用仍需进一步研究。

Objective To explore the effect of liraglutide and metformin on bone metabolism in newly diagnosed type 2 diabetic patients. Methods From January 2016 to June 2017, 50 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus admitted to our hospital were selected. According to the random number table method, the subjects were randomly divided into liraglutide group and metformin group, 25 in each group. Changes in bone mineral density and bone metabolism were compared between the two groups after 24 weeks of monotherapy. Results That there was no significant change in bone mineral density, serum ALP, TPINP,and BGP levels before and after treatment (P>0.05). The β-CTx levels in patients in the liraglutide group were lower than that before treatment (P<0.05); FPG, 2hFPG, HOMA-IR, and HbA1c levels in the two groups were lower than that before treatment (P<0.05). Fasting insulin was higher than that before treatment (P<0.05); BMI was lower in the liraglutide group after 24 weeks of treatment than that before treatment (P<0.05). Conclusion The effects of liraglutide and metformin on the bone mineral density of patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes are not obvious. Liraglutide may reduce serum β-CTx levels during use. We need to have further study whether it has a bone protection.

目的 探讨一种适合社区糖尿病患者健康素养的干预方法,并进一步探讨提高糖尿病患者健康素养对社区卫生服务利用的影响。方法 选择2014年—2015年在我社区卫生服务中心建档的210例糖尿病居民为调查研究对象,对糖尿病患者进行健康素养干预后,比较其健康素养、基本医疗服务利用、社区卫生服务利用情况。结果 对社区糖尿病人进行健康素养干预后,患者的健康理念、传染病预防、健康行为、基本医疗知识、安全素养得分均比干预前高,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。首次就诊医疗机构首选社区率及区县级医疗机构就诊的比例干预后比干预前高(P<0.05),最近两周内在社区医疗机构就诊率、签约全科医生率均比健康素养干预前高,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。而糖尿病患者过去1年住院例数干预前后无差别,差异没有统计学意义(P>0.05)。患者参与社区健康教育活动的次数干预后比干预前多(P<0.05),参加免费体检及接受社区医生健康生活方式的指导的比例比干预前高(P<0.05)。结论 利用健康促进模式可提高糖尿病患者的健康素养,健康素养的提高可使其对卫生服务的利用有所增加,使其自身的健康状况得以改善。

目的 探讨社区护理干预指导在糖尿病中的临床护理效果。方法 采取回顾分析法对我市3个街道的居民资料,选取其中有分析价值的100例糖尿病患者资料进行临床分析,根据不同护理方法将患者分为对照组和观察组,对照组实施常规护理,观察组进行社区护理干预指导,比较两组护理效果。结果 实验组体重指数为(22.9±2.48)kg/m²、FBG指标为(7.24±1.68)mmol/L、2hBG指标为(9.72±2.14)mmol/L、HbALc指标为(7.26±1.08)%,低于对照组(P<0.05);实验组96%合理饮食、98%生活具有规律性,92%患者能够定期运动,94%患者能够自我监测病情,高于对照组(P<0.05)。结论 对社区糖尿病患者进行护理指导时,常识性问题、危险性因素、并发症预防问题认识不足是护理督促的要点。因此应提升社区糖尿病患者的自我管理能力,对糖尿病患者进行心理护理、饮食治疗、运动养生、定期服药等方面的进行护理干预,提高社区居民的预防意识和督促指导。

Objective To investigate the guidance of community nursing intervention in diabetes clinical care effect. Methods A retrospective analysis of the city's three neighborhood offices resident data to be analyzed, select one of the analytical value of 100 patients with diabetes clinical data analysis, according to the different methods of care patients were divided into a control group and observation group.Control implementation of routine care group, observation group of community nursing intervention guidance, care and effect between the two groups. Results Body mass index in the experimental group (22.9±2.48) kg/m², FBG indicators (7.24±1.68) mmol/L, 2hBG indicators (9.72±2.14) mmol/L, HbALc indicators (7.26±1.08)%, significantly were lower than the control group (P<0.05); the experimental group, 96% of a reasonable diet, 98% had a regular life, 92% of patients can do exercise regularly, 94% of patients were able to self-monitoring disease.It was significantly higher (P<0.05). Conclusion Diabetic patients in community care and guidance, common sense, risk factors, lack of awareness of the issue of prevention of complications is the point of care supervise, and also one of the main problems exist. It should enhance self-management of diabetes, psychological care, diet therapy, exercise regimen, regular medication and other aspects of nursing intervention guidance. It should be increasing community awareness of prevention, improve supervision and guidance role.

       目的   探讨自行设计教育路径在非内分泌科糖尿病患者同质化管理中的应用效果。方法    采用时间分段法将200例非内分泌科住院糖尿病患者分为对照组和研究组各100例，对照组所在非内分泌科各科室责任护士在糖尿病联络护士指导下进行糖尿病常规健康教育，研究组自行设计非内分泌科糖尿病健康教育路径并实施同质化管理，观察比较两组患者糖尿病知识知晓程度、血糖水平、自我管理能力、护理满意度。结果   出院时研究组患者密西歇根糖尿病知识测试问卷（DKT）评分（18.37±3.06）分，对照组为（16.01±3.59）分，研究组高于对照组（t=5.004，P＜0.05）；管理6个月空腹血糖（FBG）、餐后2h血糖（2hPBG）、糖化血红蛋白（HbA_lc）分别为［7.00（7.00，8.00）］mmol/L、［8.00（6.00，9.00）］mmol/L、［7.50（6.00，8.00）］%，对照组分别为［8.00（7.00，10.00）］mmol/L、［9.00（8.00，11.00）］mmol/L、［8.00（7.00，9.00）］%，研究组均低于对照组（Z=6.398、5.248、3.034，均P＜0.05）；研究组糖尿病自我管理能力行为量表（SDSCA-6）评分、纽卡斯尔护理满意度量表（NNSS）评分分别为（35.36±4.75）分、（83.42±6.92）分，对照组分别为（30.90±7.56）分、（72.31±9.26）分，研究组均高于对照组（t=4.998、9.614，均P＜0.05）。结论   糖尿病教育路径结合同质化管理能提高非内分泌科住院糖尿病患者糖尿病知识的掌握程度，有效控制血糖水平，提高患者自我管理能力和对护理工作满意度。

      Objective   To explore the application effect of self-designed education path in homogenization management of non-endocrinology diabetic patients．Methods   A total of 200 inpatients with diabetes in non-endocrinology departments were divided into control group and research group with 100 cases in each group．The  responsible  nurses in the  non-endocrinology departments of the control group conducted routine diabetes health education under the guidance of diabetes liaison nurses．The research group designed its own non-endocrinology diabetes health education path and implemented homogenized management．The knowledge level of diabetes mellitus，blood sugar level，self-management ability and nursing satisfaction of the two groups were observed and compared．Results   At discharge，the DKT score of the study group was（18.37±3.06） and that of the control group was（16.01±3.59），which was higher than that of the control group（t=5.004，P＜0.05）．After 6 months management，FBG，2 HPBG and HbA_lc of study group were［7.00（7.00，8.00）］ mmol/L，［8.00（6.00，9.00）］ mmol/L，［7.50（6.00，8.00）］%，respectively，while those in the control group was［8.00（7.00，10.00）］mmol/L，［9.00（8.00，11.00）］mmol/L and［8.00（7.00，9.00）］%，respectively．The study group was lower than the control group（Z=6.398，5.248，3.034，all P＜0.05）．SDSCA-6 scores and NNSS scores in the study group were（35.36±4.75）scores and（83.42±6.92）scores，respectively，while those in the control group were（30.90±7.56）scores and（72.31±9.26）scores，which were higher in the study group than in the control group（t=4.998，9.614，all P＜0.05）．Conclusions   The combination of diabetes education pathway and homogenized management can improve the mastery of diabetes knowledge，effectively control blood sugar level，improve patients’ self-management ability and satisfaction with nursing work．