目的 评估医院-社区-家庭一体化康复护理模式对慢性创面患者生活质量及创面愈合的潜在影响。方法 选择2023年1月—2024年6月在广州市第一人民医院接受治疗的慢性创面患者80例作为研究对象,所有患者在住院期间均接受基于溃疡面积、深度及是否合并感染等因素的综合治疗,包括彻底清创、创缘处理、负压治疗、感染控制等治疗,并接受常规护理。出院前,通过随机数字表法将患者分为两组,每组40例。两组患者在住院期间均接受常规护理,出院后,对照组接受延续护理并定期复查。干预组40例患者在出院后接受医院-社区-家庭一体化康复护理模式。入组时及护理3个月后,使用生活质量调查表（SF-36）对患者生活质量和创面愈合率进行评估。结果 干预组创面愈合率为（32.61±4.26）%,高于对照组（11.48±1.04）%,差异具有统计学意义（t=19.473,P<0.05）。两组患者在护理3个月后的数字评定量表评分和创面疼痛频率评分均较入组时降低（P<0.05）。其中干预组护理3个月后的创面VAS评分为（1.82±0.17）分,创面疼痛频率评分为（1.28±0.25）分;而对照组分别为（3.91±0.22）分和（2.63±0.37）分,干预组低于对照组（P<0.05）。此外,干预组在护理后3个月的总体健康、生理功能、生理职能、精神健康、情感功能、社会功能评分均高于对照组（P<0.05）。在居家3个月期间,干预组的感染发生率为5.00%,而对照组为17.50%,干预组感染发生率低于对照组（χ²=3.781,P<0.05）。结论 本研究表明,医院-社区-家庭一体化康复护理模式干预能够促进慢性创面患者的创面愈合,降低居家期间感染的风险,并提升患者的生活质量。

Objective To assess the potential impact of the integrated hospital-community-home rehabilitation nursing model on the quality of life and wound healing in patients with chronic wounds．Methods A total of 80 patients with chronic wounds treated at the Guangzhou First People’s Hospital from January 2023 to June 2024 were selected as the study subjects．All patients received comprehensive treatment during their hospital stay,including thorough debridement,edge treatment,vacuum therapy,infection control and routine nursing care．Prior to discharge,the patients were randomly divided into two groups using a random number table,with 40 patients in each group．Both groups received routine nursing care during their hospital stay,and the control group received continuing nursing care and regular follow-up after discharge．Forty patients in the intervention group received the integrated hospital-community-home rehabilitation nursing model after discharge．Quality of life（QoL）and wound healing rates were assessed using the Short Form 36（SF-36）questionnaire at the time of enrollment and 3 months after nursing．Results The wound healing rate in the intervention group was significantly higher than that in the control group （[32.61±4.26]% vs [11.48±1.04]%）,with a statistical difference（t=19.473,P<0.05）．The numerical rating scale（NRS）scores and frequency of wound pain scores decreased in both groups 3 months after nursing compared to the enrollment period（P<0.05）．Specifically,the VAS score for wound pain in the intervention group 3 months after nursing was（1.82±0.17）,and the frequency of wound pain was（1.28±0.25）,in the control group,these scores were（3.91±0.22）and（2.63±0.37）,respectively,with the intervention group scoring significantly lower than the control group（P<0.05）．Furthermore,the scores for overall health,physical function,role physical,mental health,emotional function,and social function in the intervention group were higher than those in the control group 3 months after nursing（P<0.05）．During the 3-month home recovery period,the incidence of infection in the intervention group was 5.00%,whereas it was 17.50% in the control group,with the intervention group showing a lower incidence of infection（χ²=3.781,P<0.05）．Conclusions This study demonstrates that the hospital-community-home integrated rehabilitation care model intervention can promote wound healing in chronic wound patients,reduce the risk of infection during home care,and significantly improve patients’ quality of life．

目的 应用不同冲洗液对慢性创面上应用的封闭负压吸引装置进行冲洗,对比两种冲洗方法的优劣,为临床应用提供参考。方法 对比两组冲洗液冲洗后创面肉芽组织生长情况,疼痛度,堵管率,住院天数,细菌培养及药敏试验结果等情况。结果 呋喃西林组对比于生理盐水组能更好的促进肉芽组织生长[(9.41±1.12) vs (7.76±0.67)],能缩短患者平均住院日[(29.44±1.88) vs (32.79±1.74)]d,但是对于减轻疼痛度、降低堵管率方面两者效果相当(P＞0.01)。同时细菌培养显示创面感染以革兰阴性菌为主,呋喃西林组细菌检出率低于生理盐水组(62.5% vs 82.5%);呋喃西林组部分细菌对呋喃西林产生耐药性,而生理盐水组这种情况较之少见(68% vs 36.36%)。结论 ①呋喃西林冲洗在促进肉芽组织生长,缩短平均住院日方面优于生理盐水组。②两种方法均能有效防止引流管的堵塞情况。③呋喃西林冲洗可降低细菌检出率,但能使部分细菌产生对呋喃西林的耐药性。

Objective: To compare the effects of two different liquid in negative pressure wound therapy for chronic wounds, provide the reference for clinical application. Methods: The growth of granulation tissue, pain degree, plugging rate, average hospitalization days, bacterial culture and drug sensitivity test results were compared after the two liquid was used. Results: Nitrofural group compared with the saline group can promote the growth of granulation tissue[(9.41±1.12) vs (7.76±0.67)], shorten the average days of hospitalization[(29.44±1.88) vs (32.79±1.74)]; but for the relief of pain degree and the plugging rate, the effects was similar(P＞0.01, the difference was not significant). At the same time, bacterial test showed that there were almost gram-negative bacteria, bacteria detection rate (62.5%) in Nitrofural group was less than that in the saline group (82.5%); Nitrofural group has more nitrofurazone resistant bacteria(68%), and the saline group performs not the same(36.36%). Conclusion: ① Furacilin irrigation could promote the growth of granulation tissue, shorten the average hospitalization days. ②The two methods can effectively prevent the blockage of the drainage tube. ② Furacilin irrigation can reduce the detection rate of bacteria, but cannot prevent the resistance of nitrofurazone.

       目的   评估医院-社区-家庭一体化康复护理模式对慢性创面患者生活质量及创面愈合的潜在影响。方法   选择2023年1月—2024年6月在广州市第一人民医院接受治疗的慢性创面患者80例作为研究对象，所有患者在住院期间均接受基于溃疡面积、深度及是否合并感染等因素的综合治疗，包括彻底清创、创缘处理、负压治疗、感染控制等治疗，并接受常规护理。出院前，通过随机数字表法将患者分为两组，每组40例。两组患者在住院期间均接受常规护理，出院后，对照组接受延续护理并定期复查。干预组40例患者在出院后接受医院-社区-家庭一体化康复护理模式。入组时及护理3个月后，使用生活质量调查表（SF-36）对患者生活质量和创面愈合率进行评估。结果   干预组创面愈合率为（32.61±4.26）%，高于对照组（11.48±1.04）%，差异具有统计学意义（t=19.473，P＜0.05）。两组患者在护理3个月后的数字评定量表评分和创面疼痛频率评分均较入组时降低（P＜0.05）。其中干预组护理3个月后的创面VAS评分为（1.82±0.17）分，创面疼痛频率评分为（1.28±0.25）分；而对照组分别为（3.91±0.22）分和（2.63±0.37）分，干预组低于对照组（P＜0.05）。此外，干预组在护理后3个月的总体健康、生理功能、生理职能、精神健康、情感功能、社会功能评分均高于对照组（P＜0.05）。在居家3个月期间，干预组的感染发生率为5.00%，而对照组为17.50%，干预组感染发生率低于对照组（χ ² =3.781，P＜0.05）。结论   本研究表明，医院-社区-家庭一体化康复护理模式干预能够促进慢性创面患者的创面愈合，降低居家期间感染的风险，并提升患者的生活质量。

       Objective  To assess the potential impact of the integrated hospital-community-home  rehabilitation nursing model on the quality of life and wound healing in patients with chronic wounds．Methods  A total of 80 patients with chronic wounds treated at the Guangzhou First People’s Hospital from January 2023 to June 2024 were selected as the study subjects．All patients received comprehensive treatment during their hospital stay，including thorough debridement，edge treatment，vacuum therapy，infection control and routine nursing care．Prior to discharge，the patients were  randomly divided into two groups using a random number table，with 40 patients in each group．Both groups received routine nursing care during their hospital stay，and the control group received continuing nursing care and regular follow-up after discharge．Forty patients in the intervention group received the integrated hospital-community-home rehabilitation nursing model after discharge．Quality of life（QoL）and wound healing rates were assessed using the Short Form 36（SF-36）questionnaire at the time of enrollment and 3 months after nursing．Results  The wound healing rate in the intervention group was significantly higher than that in the control group （［32.61±4.26］% vs ［11.48±1.04］%），with a statistical difference（t=19.473，P＜0.05）．The numerical rating scale（NRS）scores and frequency of wound pain scores decreased in both groups 3 months after nursing compared to the enrollment period（P＜0.05）．Specifically，the VAS score for wound pain in the intervention group 3 months after nursing was（1.82±0.17），and the frequency of wound pain was（1.28±0.25），in the control group，these scores were（3.91±0.22）and（2.63±0.37），respectively，with the intervention group scoring significantly lower than the control group（P＜0.05）．Furthermore，the scores for overall health，physical function，role physical，mental health，emotional function，and social function in the intervention group were higher than those in the control group 3 months after nursing（P＜0.05）．During the 3-month home recovery period，the incidence of infection in the intervention group was 5.00%，whereas it was 17.50% in the control group，with the intervention group  showing a lower incidence of infection（χ ² =3.781，P＜0.05）．Conclusions  This study demonstrates that the hospital-community-home integrated rehabilitation care model intervention can promote wound healing in chronic wound patients，reduce the risk of infection during home care，and significantly improve patients’ quality of life．