【摘要】目的：探讨器械护士术中分区精细化器械管理对心脏瓣膜置换术（HVR）手术效率及安全性的影响。方法：研究对象包括2024年6月~2026年5月至我院行HVR治疗的110例心脏瓣膜病（VHD）患者，以及同期参与手术的22名器械护士，采用随机数字表法将入组患者及护士分别列为常规组（55例患者、11名护士）、试验组（55例患者、11名护士），常规组内护士术中实施常规器械管理，试验组内护士术中实施分区精细化器械管理。比较两组患者的手术效率、围手术期安全事件，以及两组护士所参与手术的工作效率、术中器械管理情况。结果：在不同器械管理模式下，试验组内患者的主动脉阻断时间、体外循环时间、术中非必要等待时间、手术总耗时均低于常规组（t=8.817，5.730，20.609，9.632；P＜0.05）。试验组内患者的围手术期安全事件发生率9.09%（5/55）低于常规组25.45%（14/55）（x2=5.153；P＜0.05）。试验组内护士的器械摆台时间、器械传递反应时间、手术中断次数、器械整理时间、器械移交时间均低于常规组（t=3.347，6.505，5.971，3.795，5.838；P＜0.05）。试验组内护士的器械管理差错率低于常规组（x2=5.238；P＜0.05）。结论：器械护士术中分区精细化器械管理能提高HVR患者的手术效率并降低围手术期安全事件发生风险，对提高器械护士的器械管理质量、预防器械管理差错有积极影响

[Abstract]Objective:To explore the impact of refined intraoperative instrument management by operating room nurses on the efficiency and safety of HVR surgery.Methods:The study subjects included 110 patients with VHD who underwent HVR treatment at our hospital from June 2024 to May 2026, along with 22 instrument nurses who participated in the surgeries synchronously. Using the random number table method, the enrolled patients and nurses were divided into a control group (55 patients, 11 nurses) and an experimental group (55 patients, 11 nurses). Nurses in the conventional group implemented routine instrument management during surgery, while nurses in the experimental group implemented zoned and refined instrument management during surgery. The surgical efficiency, perioperative safety events of the two groups of patients, as well as the work efficiency and intraoperative instrument management of the surgeries participated by the nurses in the two groups were compared.Results:Under different instrument management modes, the aortic occlusion time, extracorporeal circulation time, intraoperative non-essential waiting time, and total surgical time of patients in the experimental group were all lower than the control group (t=8.817，5.730，20.609，9.632; P<0.05). The incidence of perioperative safety events in the experimental group was 9.09% (5/55) lower than that in the control group 25.45% (14/55) (x2=5.153; P<0.05). The instrument placement time, instrument delivery response time, number of surgical interruptions, instrument sorting time, and instrument handover time of nurses in the experimental group were lower than those in the control group (t=3.347，6.505，5.971，3.795，5.838; P<0.05). The error rate of nurses in the experimental group was lower than the control group (x2=5.238; P < 0.05).Conclusion:Refined intraoperative zone-specific instrument management by instrument nurses enhances surgical efficiency for HVR patients and reduces the risk of perioperative safety incidents, thereby positively impacting the quality of instrument care provided by nurses and preventing instrument-related adverse events.

摘要目的 探讨基于E-Coach健康管理模式的营养管理联合主动循环呼吸训练（ACBT）在非小细胞肺癌（NSCLC）化疗患者中的应用效果。方法 选取2023年6月至2025年8月我院收治的98例NSCLC化疗患者，采用随机数字表法将所有研究对象分为联合组和常规组，每组49例。常规组给予常规干预，联合组在常规组基础上予以E-Coach健康管理模式的营养管理联合ACBT干预。比较两组干预前后营养状况、肺功能、运动耐力、生活质量以及营养不良发生率。结果 干预12周后，两组BMI、ALB、PA、Hb均较干预前上升且联合组高于常规组（P<0.05）；联合组FVC、FEV1、MVV及6MWT均显著高于常规组（P＜0.05）；干预前两组6MWT组间对比差异无统计学意义（P>0.05），干预4周、6周、8周、12周后，两组6MWT均较干预前增加，且联合组远于常规组（P<0.05）；干预12周后，两组身体功能、社会或家庭功能、情感功能、功能性状况得分均较干预前上升，且联合组高于常规组（P<0.05）。结论基于E-Coach健康管理模式的营养管理联合ACBT能够有效改善NSCLC化疗患者的营养状况和肺功能，提高生活质量和运动耐力。

Abstract Objective To investigate the application effect of nutrition management based on the E-Coach health management model combined with active cycle of breathing technique (ACBT) in patients undergoing chemotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods A total of 98 NSCLC patients receiving chemotherapy in our hospital from June 2023 to August 2025 were selected and randomly divided into a combination group and a conventional group using a random number table method, with 49 cases in each group. The conventional group received routine intervention, while the combination group received nutrition management based on the E-Coach health management model combined with ACBT in addition to the routine intervention. The nutritional status, lung function, exercise endurance, quality of life, and incidence of malnutrition were compared between the two groups before and after the intervention. Results After 12 weeks of intervention, BMI, ALB, PA, and Hb in both groups increased compared with baseline, and the levels in the combination group were higher than those in the conventional group (P<0.05). The FVC, FEV1, MVV, and 6MWT in the combination group were significantly higher than those in the conventional group (P<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in 6MWT between the two groups before intervention (P>0.05); after 4, 6, 8, and 12 weeks of intervention, the 6MWT in both groups increased compared with baseline, and the walking distance in the combination group was significantly longer than that in the conventional group (P<0.05). After 12 weeks of intervention, the scores of physical function, social/family function, emotional function, and functional well-being in both groups increased compared with baseline, and the scores in the combination group were higher than those in the conventional group (P<0.05). Conclusion Nutrition management based on the E-Coach health management model combined with ACBT can effectively improve the nutritional status and lung function of NSCLC patients undergoing chemotherapy, and enhance their quality of life and exercise endurance.

探讨将 Root Cause Analysis（RCA）质量管理模式与心理资本理论相结合应用于手术核查团队，对改善沟通中断、提升沟通执行质量与团队协作能力的效果。方法 选取 2025年 1 月至 2025 年12 月某三级医院手术室手术团队成员 80 名，按手术间编号分为对照组与实验组，各 40 名。对照组实施常规手术核查流程；实验组在此基础上实施基于 RCA 的流程诊断与基于心理资本理论的综合沟通能力提升干预。干预结束后，比较两组沟通中断发生率、核查流程执行质量、沟通效率，以及心理资本量表（PCQ-24）和团队协作量表（T-TPQ）得分。结果 实验组沟通中断发生率显著低于对照组（P＜0.05），核查流程执行质量和沟通效率均显著优于对照组（P＜0.001）。实验组 PCQ-24 各维度及总分、T-TPQ 各维度及总分均显著高于对照组（均 P＜0.001）。结论 将 RCA 流程分析与心理资本理论干预相结合，可通过流程规范化与心理动力增强双路径同步改善手术团队沟通质量与协作水平，具有良好的临床应用价值与推广潜力。

To evaluate the effectiveness of an intervention combining Root Cause Analysis (RCA)–based quality management and Psychological Capital (PsyCap) theory in reducing communication interruptions and improving communication quality and teamwork in surgical safety check teams. Methods: Eighty surgical team members from a tertiary hospital (January 2025 - December 2025.) were assigned to a control group or an intervention group according to operating room allocation (40 per group). The control group followed routine surgical safety check procedures, whereas the intervention group additionally received an RCA-guided workflow analysis and a PsyCap-based communication enhancement program. Post-intervention outcomes included communication interruption rate, execution quality and efficiency of safety checks, Psychological Capital Questionnaire (PCQ-24) scores, and TeamSTEPPS Teamwork Perceptions Questionnaire (T-TPQ) scores. Results: The intervention group demonstrated a significantly lower communication interruption rate compared with the control group (P＜0.05). Execution quality and communication efficiency were significantly improved in the intervention group (P＜0.001). PCQ-24 total and subscale scores were significantly higher in the intervention group than in the control group (P＜0.001), as were T-TPQ total and subscale scores (P＜0.001). Conclusion: Integrating RCA-based workflow optimization with PsyCap-oriented psychological and behavioral training can effectively enhance communication quality, reduce interruptions, and strengthen teamwork in surgical safety check teams. The combined model has strong applicability and potential for wider clinical promotion.

探讨将 Root Cause Analysis（RCA）质量管理模式与心理资本理论相结合应用于手术核查团队，对改善沟通中断、提升沟通执行质量与团队协作能力的效果。方法 选取 2025年 1 月至 2025 年12 月某三级医院手术室手术团队成员 80 名，按手术间编号分为对照组与实验组，各 40 名。对照组实施常规手术核查流程；实验组在此基础上实施基于 RCA 的流程诊断与基于心理资本理论的综合沟通能力提升干预。干预结束后，比较两组沟通中断发生率、核查流程执行质量、沟通效率，以及心理资本量表（PCQ-24）和团队协作量表（T-TPQ）得分。结果 实验组沟通中断发生率显著低于对照组（P＜0.05），核查流程执行质量和沟通效率均显著优于对照组（P＜0.001）。实验组 PCQ-24 各维度及总分、T-TPQ 各维度及总分均显著高于对照组（均 P＜0.001）。结论 将 RCA 流程分析与心理资本理论干预相结合，可通过流程规范化与心理动力增强双路径同步改善手术团队沟通质量与协作水平，具有良好的临床应用价值与推广潜力。

To evaluate the effectiveness of an intervention combining Root Cause Analysis (RCA)–based quality management and Psychological Capital (PsyCap) theory in reducing communication interruptions and improving communication quality and teamwork in surgical safety check teams. Methods: Eighty surgical team members from a tertiary hospital (January 2025 - December 2025.) were assigned to a control group or an intervention group according to operating room allocation (40 per group). The control group followed routine surgical safety check procedures, whereas the intervention group additionally received an RCA-guided workflow analysis and a PsyCap-based communication enhancement program. Post-intervention outcomes included communication interruption rate, execution quality and efficiency of safety checks, Psychological Capital Questionnaire (PCQ-24) scores, and TeamSTEPPS Teamwork Perceptions Questionnaire (T-TPQ) scores. Results: The intervention group demonstrated a significantly lower communication interruption rate compared with the control group (P＜0.05). Execution quality and communication efficiency were significantly improved in the intervention group (P＜0.001). PCQ-24 total and subscale scores were significantly higher in the intervention group than in the control group (P＜0.001), as were T-TPQ total and subscale scores (P＜0.001). Conclusion: Integrating RCA-based workflow optimization with PsyCap-oriented psychological and behavioral training can effectively enhance communication quality, reduce interruptions, and strengthen teamwork in surgical safety check teams. The combined model has strong applicability and potential for wider clinical promotion.

目的 探讨将 Root Cause Analysis（RCA）质量管理模式与心理资本理论相结合应用于手术核查团队，对改善沟通中断、提升沟通执行质量与团队协作能力的效果。方法 选取 2025年 1 月至 2025 年12 月某三级医院手术室手术团队成员 80 名，按手术间编号分为对照组与实验组，各 40 名。对照组实施常规手术核查流程；实验组在此基础上实施基于 RCA 的流程诊断与基于心理资本理论的综合沟通能力提升干预。干预结束后，比较两组沟通中断发生率、核查流程执行质量、沟通效率，以及心理资本量表（PCQ-24）和团队协作量表（T-TPQ）得分。结果 实验组沟通中断发生率显著低于对照组（P＜0.05），核查流程执行质量和沟通效率均显著优于对照组（P＜0.001）。实验组 PCQ-24 各维度及总分、T-TPQ 各维度及总分均显著高于对照组（均 P＜0.001）。结论 将 RCA 流程分析与心理资本理论干预相结合，可通过流程规范化与心理动力增强双路径同步改善手术团队沟通质量与协作水平，具有良好的临床应用价值与推广潜力。

To evaluate the effectiveness of an intervention combining Root Cause Analysis (RCA)–based quality management and Psychological Capital (PsyCap) theory in reducing communication interruptions and improving communication quality and teamwork in surgical safety check teams. Methods: Eighty surgical team members from a tertiary hospital (January 2025 - December 2025.) were assigned to a control group or an intervention group according to operating room allocation (40 per group). The control group followed routine surgical safety check procedures, whereas the intervention group additionally received an RCA-guided workflow analysis and a PsyCap-based communication enhancement program. Post-intervention outcomes included communication interruption rate, execution quality and efficiency of safety checks, Psychological Capital Questionnaire (PCQ-24) scores, and TeamSTEPPS Teamwork Perceptions Questionnaire (T-TPQ) scores. Results: The intervention group demonstrated a significantly lower communication interruption rate compared with the control group (P＜0.05). Execution quality and communication efficiency were significantly improved in the intervention group (P＜0.001). PCQ-24 total and subscale scores were significantly higher in the intervention group than in the control group (P＜0.001), as were T-TPQ total and subscale scores (P＜0.001). Conclusion: Integrating RCA-based workflow optimization with PsyCap-oriented psychological and behavioral training can effectively enhance communication quality, reduce interruptions, and strengthen teamwork in surgical safety check teams. The combined model has strong applicability and potential for wider clinical promotion.

探讨将 Root Cause Analysis（RCA）质量管理模式与心理资本理论相结合应用于手术核查团队，对改善沟通中断、提升沟通执行质量与团队协作能力的效果。方法 选取 2025年 1 月至 2025 年12 月某三级医院手术室手术团队成员 80 名，按手术间编号分为对照组与实验组，各 40 名。对照组实施常规手术核查流程；实验组在此基础上实施基于 RCA 的流程诊断与基于心理资本理论的综合沟通能力提升干预。干预结束后，比较两组沟通中断发生率、核查流程执行质量、沟通效率，以及心理资本量表（PCQ-24）和团队协作量表（T-TPQ）得分。结果 实验组沟通中断发生率显著低于对照组（P＜0.05），核查流程执行质量和沟通效率均显著优于对照组（P＜0.001）。实验组 PCQ-24 各维度及总分、T-TPQ 各维度及总分均显著高于对照组（均 P＜0.001）。结论 将 RCA 流程分析与心理资本理论干预相结合，可通过流程规范化与心理动力增强双路径同步改善手术团队沟通质量与协作水平，具有良好的临床应用价值与推广潜力。

To evaluate the effectiveness of an intervention combining Root Cause Analysis (RCA)–based quality management and Psychological Capital (PsyCap) theory in reducing communication interruptions and improving communication quality and teamwork in surgical safety check teams. Methods: Eighty surgical team members from a tertiary hospital (January 2025 - December 2025.) were assigned to a control group or an intervention group according to operating room allocation (40 per group). The control group followed routine surgical safety check procedures, whereas the intervention group additionally received an RCA-guided workflow analysis and a PsyCap-based communication enhancement program. Post-intervention outcomes included communication interruption rate, execution quality and efficiency of safety checks, Psychological Capital Questionnaire (PCQ-24) scores, and TeamSTEPPS Teamwork Perceptions Questionnaire (T-TPQ) scores. Results: The intervention group demonstrated a significantly lower communication interruption rate compared with the control group (P＜0.05). Execution quality and communication efficiency were significantly improved in the intervention group (P＜0.001). PCQ-24 total and subscale scores were significantly higher in the intervention group than in the control group (P＜0.001), as were T-TPQ total and subscale scores (P＜0.001). Conclusion: Integrating RCA-based workflow optimization with PsyCap-oriented psychological and behavioral training can effectively enhance communication quality, reduce interruptions, and strengthen teamwork in surgical safety check teams. The combined model has strong applicability and potential for wider clinical promotion.

探讨将 Root Cause Analysis（RCA）质量管理模式与心理资本理论相结合应用于手术核查团队，对改善沟通中断、提升沟通执行质量与团队协作能力的效果。方法 选取 2025年 1 月至 2025 年12 月某三级医院手术室手术团队成员 80 名，按手术间编号分为对照组与实验组，各 40 名。对照组实施常规手术核查流程；实验组在此基础上实施基于 RCA 的流程诊断与基于心理资本理论的综合沟通能力提升干预。干预结束后，比较两组沟通中断发生率、核查流程执行质量、沟通效率，以及心理资本量表（PCQ-24）和团队协作量表（T-TPQ）得分。结果 实验组沟通中断发生率显著低于对照组（P＜0.05），核查流程执行质量和沟通效率均显著优于对照组（P＜0.001）。实验组 PCQ-24 各维度及总分、T-TPQ 各维度及总分均显著高于对照组（均 P＜0.001）。结论 将 RCA 流程分析与心理资本理论干预相结合，可通过流程规范化与心理动力增强双路径同步改善手术团队沟通质量与协作水平，具有良好的临床应用价值与推广潜力。

To evaluate the effectiveness of an intervention combining Root Cause Analysis (RCA)–based quality management and Psychological Capital (PsyCap) theory in reducing communication interruptions and improving communication quality and teamwork in surgical safety check teams. Methods: Eighty surgical team members from a tertiary hospital (January 2025 - December 2025.) were assigned to a control group or an intervention group according to operating room allocation (40 per group). The control group followed routine surgical safety check procedures, whereas the intervention group additionally received an RCA-guided workflow analysis and a PsyCap-based communication enhancement program. Post-intervention outcomes included communication interruption rate, execution quality and efficiency of safety checks, Psychological Capital Questionnaire (PCQ-24) scores, and TeamSTEPPS Teamwork Perceptions Questionnaire (T-TPQ) scores. Results: The intervention group demonstrated a significantly lower communication interruption rate compared with the control group (P＜0.05). Execution quality and communication efficiency were significantly improved in the intervention group (P＜0.001). PCQ-24 total and subscale scores were significantly higher in the intervention group than in the control group (P＜0.001), as were T-TPQ total and subscale scores (P＜0.001). Conclusion: Integrating RCA-based workflow optimization with PsyCap-oriented psychological and behavioral training can effectively enhance communication quality, reduce interruptions, and strengthen teamwork in surgical safety check teams. The combined model has strong applicability and potential for wider clinical promotion.

探讨将 Root Cause Analysis（RCA）质量管理模式与心理资本理论相结合应用于手术核查团队，对改善沟通中断、提升沟通执行质量与团队协作能力的效果。方法 选取 2025年 1 月至 2025 年12 月某三级医院手术室手术团队成员 80 名，按手术间编号分为对照组与实验组，各 40 名。对照组实施常规手术核查流程；实验组在此基础上实施基于 RCA 的流程诊断与基于心理资本理论的综合沟通能力提升干预。干预结束后，比较两组沟通中断发生率、核查流程执行质量、沟通效率，以及心理资本量表（PCQ-24）和团队协作量表（T-TPQ）得分。结果 实验组沟通中断发生率显著低于对照组（P＜0.05），核查流程执行质量和沟通效率均显著优于对照组（P＜0.001）。实验组 PCQ-24 各维度及总分、T-TPQ 各维度及总分均显著高于对照组（均 P＜0.001）。结论 将 RCA 流程分析与心理资本理论干预相结合，可通过流程规范化与心理动力增强双路径同步改善手术团队沟通质量与协作水平，具有良好的临床应用价值与推广潜力。

To evaluate the effectiveness of an intervention combining Root Cause Analysis (RCA)–based quality management and Psychological Capital (PsyCap) theory in reducing communication interruptions and improving communication quality and teamwork in surgical safety check teams. Methods: Eighty surgical team members from a tertiary hospital (January 2025 - December 2025.) were assigned to a control group or an intervention group according to operating room allocation (40 per group). The control group followed routine surgical safety check procedures, whereas the intervention group additionally received an RCA-guided workflow analysis and a PsyCap-based communication enhancement program. Post-intervention outcomes included communication interruption rate, execution quality and efficiency of safety checks, Psychological Capital Questionnaire (PCQ-24) scores, and TeamSTEPPS Teamwork Perceptions Questionnaire (T-TPQ) scores. Results: The intervention group demonstrated a significantly lower communication interruption rate compared with the control group (P＜0.05). Execution quality and communication efficiency were significantly improved in the intervention group (P＜0.001). PCQ-24 total and subscale scores were significantly higher in the intervention group than in the control group (P＜0.001), as were T-TPQ total and subscale scores (P＜0.001). Conclusion: Integrating RCA-based workflow optimization with PsyCap-oriented psychological and behavioral training can effectively enhance communication quality, reduce interruptions, and strengthen teamwork in surgical safety check teams. The combined model has strong applicability and potential for wider clinical promotion.

探讨将 Root Cause Analysis（RCA）质量管理模式与心理资本理论相结合应用于手术核查团队，对改善沟通中断、提升沟通执行质量与团队协作能力的效果。方法 选取 2025年 1 月至 2025 年12 月某三级医院手术室手术团队成员 80 名，按手术间编号分为对照组与实验组，各 40 名。对照组实施常规手术核查流程；实验组在此基础上实施基于 RCA 的流程诊断与基于心理资本理论的综合沟通能力提升干预。干预结束后，比较两组沟通中断发生率、核查流程执行质量、沟通效率，以及心理资本量表（PCQ-24）和团队协作量表（T-TPQ）得分。结果 实验组沟通中断发生率显著低于对照组（P＜0.05），核查流程执行质量和沟通效率均显著优于对照组（P＜0.001）。实验组 PCQ-24 各维度及总分、T-TPQ 各维度及总分均显著高于对照组（均 P＜0.001）。结论 将 RCA 流程分析与心理资本理论干预相结合，可通过流程规范化与心理动力增强双路径同步改善手术团队沟通质量与协作水平，具有良好的临床应用价值与推广潜力。

To evaluate the effectiveness of an intervention combining Root Cause Analysis (RCA)–based quality management and Psychological Capital (PsyCap) theory in reducing communication interruptions and improving communication quality and teamwork in surgical safety check teams. Methods: Eighty surgical team members from a tertiary hospital (January 2025 - December 2025.) were assigned to a control group or an intervention group according to operating room allocation (40 per group). The control group followed routine surgical safety check procedures, whereas the intervention group additionally received an RCA-guided workflow analysis and a PsyCap-based communication enhancement program. Post-intervention outcomes included communication interruption rate, execution quality and efficiency of safety checks, Psychological Capital Questionnaire (PCQ-24) scores, and TeamSTEPPS Teamwork Perceptions Questionnaire (T-TPQ) scores. Results: The intervention group demonstrated a significantly lower communication interruption rate compared with the control group (P＜0.05). Execution quality and communication efficiency were significantly improved in the intervention group (P＜0.001). PCQ-24 total and subscale scores were significantly higher in the intervention group than in the control group (P＜0.001), as were T-TPQ total and subscale scores (P＜0.001). Conclusion: Integrating RCA-based workflow optimization with PsyCap-oriented psychological and behavioral training can effectively enhance communication quality, reduce interruptions, and strengthen teamwork in surgical safety check teams. The combined model has strong applicability and potential for wider clinical promotion.

目的 探讨将 Root Cause Analysis（RCA）质量管理模式与心理资本理论相结合应用于手术核查团队，对改善沟通中断、提升沟通执行质量与团队协作能力的效果。方法 选取 2025年 1 月至 2025 年12 月某三级医院手术室手术团队成员 80 名，按手术间编号分为对照组与实验组，各 40 名。对照组实施常规手术核查流程；实验组在此基础上实施基于 RCA 的流程诊断与基于心理资本理论的综合沟通能力提升干预。干预结束后，比较两组沟通中断发生率、核查流程执行质量、沟通效率，以及心理资本量表（PCQ-24）和团队协作量表（T-TPQ）得分。结果 实验组沟通中断发生率显著低于对照组（P＜0.05），核查流程执行质量和沟通效率均显著优于对照组（P＜0.001）。实验组 PCQ-24 各维度及总分、T-TPQ 各维度及总分均显著高于对照组（均 P＜0.001）。结论 将 RCA 流程分析与心理资本理论干预相结合，可通过流程规范化与心理动力增强双路径同步改善手术团队沟通质量与协作水平，具有良好的临床应用价值与推广潜力。

Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of an intervention combining Root Cause Analysis (RCA)–based quality management and Psychological Capital (PsyCap) theory in reducing communication interruptions and improving communication quality and teamwork in surgical safety check teams. Methods: Eighty surgical team members from a tertiary hospital (January 2025 - December 2025.) were assigned to a control group or an intervention group according to operating room allocation (40 per group). The control group followed routine surgical safety check procedures, whereas the intervention group additionally received an RCA-guided workflow analysis and a PsyCap-based communication enhancement program. Post-intervention outcomes included communication interruption rate, execution quality and efficiency of safety checks, Psychological Capital Questionnaire (PCQ-24) scores, and TeamSTEPPS Teamwork Perceptions Questionnaire (T-TPQ) scores. Results: The intervention group demonstrated a significantly lower communication interruption rate compared with the control group (P＜0.05). Execution quality and communication efficiency were significantly improved in the intervention group (P＜0.001). PCQ-24 total and subscale scores were significantly higher in the intervention group than in the control group (P＜0.001), as were T-TPQ total and subscale scores (P＜0.001). Conclusion: Integrating RCA-based workflow optimization with PsyCap-oriented psychological and behavioral training can effectively enhance communication quality, reduce interruptions, and strengthen teamwork in surgical safety check teams. The combined model has strong applicability and potential for wider clinical promotion.