目的：探讨免气腹、免全身麻醉腹腔镜辅助下腹股沟疝无张力修补术对患者术中生命体征稳定性及术后恢复的影响。方法：选取广州市从化区中医医院及花都区人民医院于2023年7月至2025年6月收治的腹股沟疝患者，按照手术方式的不同分为研究组与对照组。对照组行传统气腹全身麻醉腹腔镜下腹股沟疝无张力修补术（TEP 或 TAPP 术式），研究组行免气腹、免全身麻醉腹腔镜辅助下腹股沟疝无张力修补术。比较两组患者术中呼吸、循环功能变化，术后并发症发生情况，以及术后肛门排气时间、住院时间和住院费用。结果：两组患者一般资料比较，差异无统计学意义。研究组术中血压波动幅度小于对照组（P＜0.05），心率及血氧饱和度变化与对照组比较差异无统计学意义。亚组分析显示，研究组中采用 TAPP 术式的患者呼吸波动大于对照组中采用 TAPP 术式的患者（P＜0.05），而两组中采用 TEP 术式的患者呼吸波动差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）。研究组手术时间短于对照组，术中出血量高于对照组（P＜0.05）。两组住院时间比较差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05），但研究组术后肛门排气时间更短、总住院费用更低（P＜0.05）。结论：免气腹、免全身麻醉腹腔镜辅助下腹股沟疝无张力修补术有助于缩短手术时间，促进术后胃肠功能恢复，并降低住院费用，具有一定的临床应用价值。

目的 探讨快速康复理念联合腹腔镜手术治疗对小儿腹股沟疝疗效观察。方法 选取焦作市妇幼保健院2021年1月—2023年1月收治的86例腹股沟疝患儿进行分析与研究,应用随机数字表法将其分为观察组与对照组,各组均为43例。所有患儿均采取腹腔镜手术治疗,对照组采取常规护理,观察组采取快速康复理念护理。对比两组围术期恢复情况,术后4、12、24、48 h疼痛程度,并发症及护理满意度情况。结果 观察组首次下床时间、首次肛门排气时间、进食时间、住院时间短于对照组（P<0.05）;两组患儿术后4、12、24、48 h视觉模拟量表（VAS）评分逐渐降低,观察组低于对照组（P<0.05）;两组恶心呕吐、尿潴留、腹胀腹痛、感染并发症发生率对比差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）;观察组患儿及家长健康教育、住院环境、专科护理、检查指导、病情观察相关护理满意度评分高于对照组（P<0.05）。结论 快速康复理念联合腹腔镜手术治疗小儿腹股沟疝效果显著,可进一步促进患儿早日康复,缩短住院时间,术后疼痛水平低,同时可提升患儿及家长护理满意度。

Objective To explore the therapeutic effect of rapid rehabilitation concept combined with laparoscopic surgery on pediatric inguinal hernia．Methods A total of 86 children with inguinal hernia admitted to Jiaozuo Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital from January 2021 to January 2023 were selected for analysis and study,and divided into observation group and control group by random number table method,with 43 cases in each group．All patients were treated with laparoscopic surgery,while the control group received routine care,while the observation group received rapid recovery concept care．The perioperative recovery,pain level,complications,and nursing satisfaction at 4,12,24,and 48 hours after surgery were compared．Results The first discharge time,first anal exhaust time,feeding time,and hospitalization time were shorter than the control group（P<0.05）．The VAS scores decreased after 4 h,12 h,24 h and 48 h,and the observation group was lower than the control group（P<0.05）．The incidences of nausea and vomiting,urinary retention,abdominal distension,abdominal pain and infectious complications between the two groups were significantly insignificant（P>0.05）．The health education,inpatient environment,specialized care,nursing examination guidance and condition observation were significantly higher than that of the observation group（P<0.05）．Conclusions The combination of rapid recovery concept and laparoscopic surgery for the treatment of inguinal hernia in children has a significant effect,which can further promote early recovery,shorten hospital stay,lower postoperative pain levels．At the same time,it can improve the nursing satisfaction of children and parents．

目的 探讨成人全身麻醉（全麻）腹腔镜下腹股沟疝修补日间手术的可行性及安全性。方法 回顾性分析2021年1月—2023年12月广州市第一人民医院收治的进行全麻腹腔镜下疝修补手术治疗的成人患者病历资料,根据患者住院手术模式分为日间手术组、传统手术组。日间手术组采用日间手术模式下全麻腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术,传统手术组采用传统入院模式下择期全麻腹腔镜下腹股沟疝修补术,对比分析两组可行性（住院时间、住院费用、患者满意度）、安全性（手术时间、手术的出血量、手术并发症的发生率）等。结果 最终纳入199例病例,日间手术组52例（26.1%）,传统手术组147例（73.9%）。与传统手术组相比较,日间手术组住院时间、术前住院时间、术后住院时间缩短,满意度评分升高,差异具有统计学意义（P<0.05）。在手术费用、住院总费用、术后24 h疼痛评分、手术时间、手术的出血量、手术并发症的发生率方面,组间比较差异均无统计学意义（P>0.05）。结论 成人全麻腹腔镜下腹股沟疝修补日间手术,能够缩短患者的住院时间,提高患者的住院满意程度,不增加手术风险和并发症发生率,是安全、有效的。

Objective To explore and analyze the feasibility and safety of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair surgery under general anesthesia in adults．Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on the medical records of patients admitted to a hospital from January 2021 to December 2023 who underwent laparoscopic hernia repair surgery under general anesthesia．The patients were divided into day surgery group and traditional surgery group based on their hospitalization surgery mode．The daytime surgery group underwent laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair under general anesthesia in the daytime surgery mode,while the traditional surgery group underwent elective laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair under general anesthesia in the traditional admission mode．The feasibility（hospitalization duration,hospitalization cost,patient satisfaction）and safety（surgery duration,surgical bleeding volume,incidence of surgical complications）of the two groups were compared and analyzed．Results A total of 199 cases were enrolled,with 52 cases（26.1%）in the day surgery group and 147 cases（73.9%）in the traditional surgery group．Compared with the traditional surgery group,the daytime surgery group showed a decrease in length of hospital stay,preoperative hospital stay,and postoperative hospital stay,while the satisfaction score increased,and the difference was statistically significant（P<0.05）．There was no difference（P>0.05）between the two groups in terms of surgical costs,total hospitalization costs,postoperative 24-hour pain scores,surgical time,surgical bleeding volume,and incidence of surgical complications．Conclusion sLaparoscopic inguinal hernia repair under general anesthesia during the day for adults is safe and effective．

目的 对比腹腔镜疝囊高位结扎术及无张力疝修补术治疗小儿腹股沟疝的临床疗效。方法 选取2012年1月—2014年1月在本院住院手术治疗纳入研究的52例腹股沟疝患儿为研究对象,研究对象随机分为两组,A组为(腹腔镜疝囊高位结扎术),B组为(无张力疝修补术),各组均为26例,对比两组术中出血量、术后康复相关指标及术后1天与3天的VRS疼痛评分。结果 A组术中出血量明显少于B组,且术后康复相关指标优于B组,疼痛评分较B组低。结论 腹腔镜疝囊高位结扎术较无张力疝修补术治疗小儿腹股沟疝临床效果更优,值得推广。

Objective To compare the clinical effect of laparoscopic high ligation of hernial sac and non-tension herniorrhaphy in the children with inguinal hernia. Methods 56 children with inguinal hernia in our hospital from January 2012 to January 2014 were analyzed, they were randomly divided into 2 groups, 26 cases in group A were treated with laparoscopic high ligation of hernial sac, 26 cases in group B were treated with traditional non-tension herniorrhaph, and to compare the peri-operative bleeding,hospital stays, postoperative complications and postoperative VRS score between two groups. Results The peri-operative bleeding amount, hospital stays, postoperative complications and postoperative VRS score in group A were remarkable less than those of group B(P<0.01). Conclusion The advantages of laparoscopic high ligation of hernial sac is more obvious than that traditional open non-tension herniorrhaphy, and worth of being generalized.

目的 通过构建结构方程模型,分析某三级甲等综合医院腹股沟疝患者住院费用的影响因素,旨在为合理控制腹股沟疝单病种费用提供依据。方法 收集4 328份高州市人民医院2016—2022年主要诊断疾病名称为腹股沟疝且行腹股沟疝手术的患者的病历资料,预分析单个影响因素,采用AMOS28.0拟合构建模型。结果 结构方程模型拟合达到标准。性别、年龄、费别、住院次数、入院途径、伴随病、单双侧疝对总费用所产生的总效应数值分别为0.008、-0.044、0.062、0.014、-0.119、0.106、0.236;性别、年龄、费别、住院次数、入院途径、伴随病、单双侧疝通过住院时间间接对住院费用产生影响。结论 对住院费用产生的影响因素有性别、年龄、费别、住院次数、入院途径、伴随病、单双侧疝、住院时间,建议推行患者预住院模式及日间手术,在正式住院前完成相关检查,优化医疗服务流程,从而合理有效控制单病种住院费用。

Objective By utilizing a structural equation model, to analyze determinants that affect the hospitalization costs for individuals with inguinal hernia at a tertiary-level comprehensive medical center, offering insights for the potential management of costs associated with this specific ailment. Methods This study entailed the compilation of 4 328 patient files from individuals who received surgical treatment for inguinal hernia at a third-level general hospital over the period spanning 2016 to 2022. Preliminary analysis was conducted on isolated variables, followed by the development of a model using AMOS 28. 0 for fit assessment. Results The fitting of structural equation model reached the standard. The total effect values of gender, age, cost, number of hospitalizations, admission route, concomitant disease, unilateral and bilateral hernia on the total cost were 0. 008, -0. 044, 0. 062, 0. 014, -0. 119, 0. 106, 0. 236, respectively. Gender, age, cost, number of hospitalizations, admission route, concomitant disease, unilateral and bilateral hernia indirectly affected hospitalization expenses through hospitalization days. Conclusions Gender, age, cost, number of hospitalizations, of admission, concomitant diseases, unilateral and bilateral hernia, and length of hospital stay have an impact on hospitalization costs. It is suggested to implement the pre-hospitalization mode and day surgery, complete relevant examinations before formal hospitalization, and optimize the medical service process, so as to reasonably and effectively control the hospitalization cost of single disease.