目的 观察康复路径在髋关节置换术后的临床应用效果,探讨其临床应用价值 。方法 将广州市第一人民医院2014年10月—2015年10月收治行髋关节置换术患者100例为研究对象,随机分为对照组与观察组各50例。对照组采取常规围手术期护理,观察组按照康复路径护理,比较两组患者术后并发症、住院时间、费用、患肢功能以及日常生活自理能力。结果 观察组住院时间和住院费用均少于对照组(P<0.01);两组术后并发症发生率、患肢功能评分及日常生活自理能力比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.01 )。结论 康复计划护理用于髋关节置换术后效果显著,可明显降低患者术后并发症,缩短住院时间,降低住院费用,有利于促进患者术后功能以及自理能力的恢复。

Objective To observe the effect of clinical application of rehabilitation in the path of a hip replacement, and to explore its clinical application value. Methods October 2014 to October 2015 in Guangzhou First People's Hospitalhip arthroplasty cases werecollected of 100 patients as the research object, randomly divided into control group and observation group with 50 cases in each group. The control group adopted conventional perioperation period nursing care, observation group in accordance with the recovery paths. We compared two groups of patients complications, hospitalization time, expense, limb function and activities of daily living. Results In the observation group, the hospitalization time and cost of hospitalization were significantly less than that of the control group (P<0.01); The incidence of limb function score, ability of daily living and postoperative complications were compared between the two groups, the differences were statistically significant (P<0.01). Conclusion Rehabilitation nursing care plans for after hip replacement effect is significant. It can significantly reduce the postoperative complications, shorten the time of hospitalization, reduce hospitalization expenses, and is beneficial to the recovery of the function of promoting postoperative and self-care ability.

       目的   对比分析双极半髋关节置换术（BHA）与全髋关节置换术（THR）治疗股骨颈骨折（FNF）的效果。方法   回顾性收集北京中医药大学东直门医院洛阳医院2019年6月—2023年4月90例FNF患者临床资料，依照手术治疗方案差异分为两组，BHA组（45例）行BHA治疗，THR组（45例）行THR治疗，比较两组围术期指标、术前及术后3 d炎症因子水平、术后6个月髋关节活动度、术前及术后6个月生活质量［欧洲生活质量评分（EQ-5D评分）］。结果  THR组手术时间（108.76±15.33）min、下床活动时间（40.37±10.24）h、住院时间（19.02±5.11）d均较BHA组［（53.49±10.12）min、（25.92±7.15）h、（15.16±4.87）d］长（t分别为20.184、7.761、3.668，均P＜0.05），术中失血量（318.69±35.14）mL、术后引流量（129.74±21.03）mL均较BHA组［（224.07±29.35）mL、（90.35±17.48）mL］多（t分别为13.863、9.663，均P＜0.001）；组间并发症发生率比较差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）；术后3 d，BHA组血清白细胞介素-1为（17.35±3.06）pg/L、白细胞介素-6为（24.82±4.31）pg/L、C-反应蛋白为（26.17±4.59）pg/L，低于THR组的（20.16±3.48）pg/L、（27.04±5.06）pg/L、（28.90±5.12）pg/L（t分别为4.068、2.241、2.663，均P＜0.05）；两组术后6个月髋关节内旋、屈曲、外旋、外展、内收活动度及EQ-5D评分对比差异均无统计学意义（均P＞0.05）。结论   与THR相比，BHA能减少FNF患者围术期失血量，降低术后炎症因子表达水平，缩短手术及下床活动时间，促进恢复。

      Objective  To compare and analyze the effects of bipolar hemihip replacement（BHA）and total  hip replacement（THR）in the treatment of femoral neck fracture（FNF）．Methods  The clinical data of 90 patients with FNF in the Luoyang Hospital，Dongzhimen Hospital，Beijing University of Chinese Medicine，from June 2019 to April 2023 were retrospectively collected．The patients were divided into two groups according to the difference in surgical treatment plan．The BHA group（45 cases）received BHA treatment，and the THR group（45 cases）received THR treatment．The perioperative indicators，preoperative and postoperative inflammatory factor levels，postoperative hip joint mobility at six months，preoperative and postoperative quality of life ［European Quality of Life Scale（EQ-5D score）］were compared between the two groups．Results  The operation time（108.76±15.33）min，ambulation time（40.37±10.24）h，and hospitalization time（19.02±5.11）d in the  THR  group were longer than those in the BHA group ［（53.49±10.12）min，（25.92±7.15）h，（15.16±4.87）d］（t=20.184，8.630，3.668，respectively，all P＜0.05）．The intraoperative blood loss（318.69±35.14）mL and  postoperative  drainage volume（129.74±21.03）mL were both higher than those in the BHA group ［（224.07±29.35）mL，（90.35±17.48）mL］（t=13.863，9.663，respectively，all P＜0.001）．There was no significant difference in the incidence of complications between the groups（P＞0.05）．Three days after surgery，the serum levels of interleukin-1，interleukin-6，and C-reactive protein in the BHA group were（17.35±3.06）pg/L，（24.82±4.31）pg/L，and（26.17±4.59）pg/L，respectively，which were lower than those in the THR group（20.16±3.48）pg/L，（27.04±5.06）pg/L，and（28.90±5.12）pg/L（t=4.068，2.241，2.663，respectively，all P＜0.05）．There was no significant difference in the range of motion of internal rotation，flexion，external rotation，abduction，and adduction of the hip joint and EQ-5D scores between the two groups at six months after surgery（all P＞0.05）．Conclusions  Compared with THR，BHA can reduce perioperative blood loss in FNF patients，reduce postoperative inflammatory factor expression level，shorten operation and ambulation time，and promote recovery．