论著

纤维支气管镜下给药治疗耐多药空洞型肺结核疗效研究

Study on the therapeutic effect of multi drug resistant cavitary pulmonary tuberculosis treated by fiberoptic bronchoscopy

:65-67
 
目的 研究纤维支气管镜下给药治疗耐多药空洞型肺结核的临床治疗效果。方法 抽取我院2017年1月—2019年12月期间收治的空洞型肺结核耐多药(同时耐INH、RFP,其他药敏试验抗痨药物均敏感)患者74例作为研究对象,其中38例设作治疗组,在应用传统抗痨药物帕司烟肼、EMB、PZA、TH1321治疗基础上,应用纤维支气管镜下给药治疗,药物选择AMK和左氧氟沙星;36例设作对照组,单纯应用传统抗结核药物帕司烟肼、EMB、PZA、TH1321治疗,比较两组临床治疗效果。结果 治疗组临床治疗总有效率94.7%,高于对照组66.7%,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);治疗后,两组QOL评分均高于治疗前,治疗组评分高于对照组,比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);治疗组患者痰菌转阴时间、病灶减少时间、空洞缩小时间等指标均优于对照组,比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组不良反应比较无差异(P>0.05)。结论 纤维支气管镜下给药应用AMK和左氧氟沙星,可以有效治疗耐多药空洞型肺结核,取得理想的临床治疗效果,能有效改善患者临床症状,缩短痰菌转阴、病灶减少和空洞缩小的时间,有效改善患者的生活质量,而且治疗安全性较高,可以应用于临床推广。
Objective To study the clinical effect of drug administration under fiberoptic bronchoscope in the treatment of multi drug resistant (mdr) cavitary pulmonary tuberculosis. Methods 74 patients with cavitary pulmonary tuberculosis(who were resistant to INH and RFP at the same time and sensitive to other drugs in other drug sensitivity tests) were selected as the study subjects. 38 of them were set up as the treatment group. On the basis of the treatment with traditional antituberculosis drugs such as pasiazide, EMB, PZA and TH1321, they were treated with fiberoptic bronchoscopy and drug selection AMK and levofloxacin, 36 cases as control group, were treated with traditional antituberculotic drugs, such as pasiazide, EMB, PZA and TH1321. Results The total effective rate of clinical treatment in the treatment group was 94.7%, higher than 66.7% in the control group, and the difference between the two groups was statistically significant(P<0.05);there was no difference in adverse reactions between the two groups(P>0.05). Conclusion Administration of AMK and levofloxacin under fiberbronchoscope may effectively treat mdr-cavitary tuberculosis, achieve ideal clinical treatment effect, effectively improve the clinical symptoms of patients, shorten the time of sputum bacteria turning negative, focus reduction and cavitary reduction, effectively improve the quality of life of patients. The treatment safety is high, which may be applied in clinical promotion.
论著

大咯血对支气管镜诊疗操作相关出血的影响

The effect of short-term massive hemoptysis on the procedure-related bleeding of bronchoscopy

:98-101
 
目的 探讨近期大咯血对支气管镜诊疗操作相关出血的影响。方法 回顾性分析2015年12月—2019年12月我院支气管镜操作导致出血超过30 mL患者的临床资料,根据近1周是否发生大咯血,分为观察组(大咯血组)和对照组(无大咯血组),比较2组间的出血量以及大出血、血凝块、窒息的发生率。结果 观察组的出血量以及大出血的发生率高于对照组,2组间差异有统计学意义,血凝块、窒息的发生率两组间差异无统计学意义。结论 近期大咯血的患者支气管镜操作发生大出血的风险高。
Objective To explore the effect of short-term massive hemoptysis on the procedure-related bleeding of bronchoscopy. Methods The clinical data of patients with more than 30 mL bleeding caused by bronchoscopy operation in Guangzhou Chest Hospital from December 2015 to December 2019 were analyzed retrospectively. According to whether massive hemoptysis occurred in the past week, the patients were divided into observation group (massive hemoptysis group) and control group (no massive hemoptysis group). The bleeding volume, the incidence of massive hemorrhage, blood clot and asphyxia were compared between the two groups. Results The amount of bleeding and the incidence of massive hemorrhage in the observation group were higher than those in the control group, that there was a statistical significance between the two groups. There was no statistical significance between the two groups in the incidence of blood clots and asphyxia. Conclusion Patients with recent massive hemoptysis have a higher risk of massive haemorrhage due to bronchoscopy.
论著

支纤镜吸痰及镜下注药治疗COPD的临床研究

Clinical study of applying bronchoscopy combined with endoscopic injection therapy in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

:33-34
 
目的 探讨纤维支气管镜吸痰联合镜下注药治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)的应用价值。方法 选择50例确诊慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者,随机分为A、B两组(每组25例),两组患者均予常规治疗,B组在常规治疗的基础上加予每周二次经纤维支气管镜吸痰和镜下注药治疗。通过观察比较2组治疗前后的症状、肺通气功能、动脉血气分析的变化及不良反应来评价疗效。结果 治疗两周后,B组患者的症状、肺通气功能、血气分析以及氧合指数较A组有明显改善,无明显不良反应。结论 纤维支气管镜吸痰联合镜下注药治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病安全、有效,值得临床推广。
Objective To investigatethe utility of applying bronchoscopy combined with endoscopic injection in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Methods 50 patients diagnosed with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, were randomly divided into A, B groups (n=25,respectively). All the patients received internal routine treatment. Patients in group B received bronchoscopy and endoscopic injection therapy twice a week additionally. The efficacy was evaluated by comparing improvement of symptoms, pulmonary ventilation function and arterial blood gas analysis before and after treatment. The assessment of adverse reactions was also included. Results After two weeks of treatment, the patients in group B had been improved more significantly than the patients in group A, no significant adverse reactions were found. Conclusion It's safe and effective using bronchoscopy combined with endoscopic injection therapy for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
论著

支气管镜联合雾化吸入药物对肺炎支原体肺炎患儿症状持续时间及肺部影像学好转情况分析

Analysis of the duration of symptoms and pulmonary imaging conversion in children with Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia treated with bronchoscopy combined with nebulized inhalation of medication

:377-381
 
        目的   探究支气管镜联合雾化吸入药物对肺炎支原体肺炎患儿症状持续时间及肺部影像学好转情况。方法   选取94例肺炎支原体肺炎患儿为研究对象,以随机数字表法分为A组、B组,各47例,分别实施布地奈德雾化吸入治疗、支气管镜肺泡灌洗联合布地奈德雾化吸入治疗,比较两组症状持续时间、治疗后肺部影像改善情况、炎症指标水平及不良反应发生率。结果  B组体温恢复时间(2.73±0.51)d、咳嗽消失时间(5.98±1.24)d、住院时间(10.96±3.36)d,A组分别为(3.14±0.83)(7.06±2.33)(13.27±3.18)d,B组较A组短(t=2.885、2.809、3.423,均P<0.05);治疗后B组40.43%阴影完全消失、34.04%阴影显著缩小、23.40%阴影有所缩小、2.13%阴影改善不明显,A组分别为21.28%、36.17%、25.53%、17.02%,B组肺部阴影改善情况优于A组(Z=8.311,P<0.05);治疗前B组白细胞计数(WBC)、超敏C-反应蛋白(hs-CRP)、降钙素原(PCT)水平与A组相近(P>0.05);治疗后B组WBC(7.71±1.94)×109 /L、hs-CRP(4.96±1.44)mg/L、PCT(84.32±21.40)pg/mL,A组分别为(9.05±2.48)×109 /L、(6.17±1.85)mg/L、(105.46±34.02)pg/mL,B组水平较A组低(t=2.918、3.538、3.606,均P<0.05);B组不良反应发生率为8.52%,A组为4.26%,B与A组相近(χ 2 =0.178,P>0.05)。结论   对肺炎支原体肺炎患儿实施支气管镜联合雾化吸入药物治疗,可缩短康复时间,促进肺部阴影消退,降低其炎症指标水平,且未增加不良反应发生率。
     Objective  To investigate the effect of bronchoscopy combined with nebulized inhalation of medication on the duration of symptoms and pulmonary imaging conversion in children with Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia(MPP).Methods  A total of 94 children with MPP were selected as the research subjects and randomly divided into Group A and Group B using a random number table,with 47 cases in each group.They were treated with budesonide nebulization inhalation therapy and bronchoalveolar lavage combined with budesonide nebulization inhalation therapy,respectively.The duration of symptoms,improvement of lung imaging before and after treatment,levels of inflammatory indicators,and incidence of adverse  reactions were compared between the two groups.The results showed that the temperature recovery time was(2.73±0.51)days,cough disappearance time was(5.98±1.24)days,and hospitalization time was(10.96±3.36)days in Group B,(3.14±0.83)days,(7.06±2.33)days,and(13.27±3.18)days in Group A,respectively.Durpation in Group B was shorter than Group A(t=2.885,2.809,3.423,all P<0.05). After treatment,40.43% of the shadows in Group B completely disappeared,34.04% of the shadows significantly reduced,23.40% of the shadows reduced,and 2.13% of the shadows showed no significant improvement,better than 21.28%,36.17%,25.53%,and 17.02% in Group A(Z=8.311,P<0.05). Before treatment,the white blood cell count(WBC),high-sensitivity C-reactive protein(hs CRP),and procalcitonin(PCT)levels in group B were similar to those in Group A(P>0.05).After treatment,the WBC(7.71±1.94)×109 /L,hs CRP(4.96±1.44)mg/L,and PCT(84.32±21.40)pg/mL in Group B were lower than those in Group A(9.05±2.48)×109 /L,(6.17±1.85)mg/L,and(105.46±34.02)pg/mL,respectivelyt=2.918,3.538,3.606,all P<0.05).The incidence of adverse reactions in Group B was 8.52%,while in Group A it was 4.26%.The incidence of adverse reactions in group B was similar to that in group A(χ 2 =0.178,P>0.05).Conclusions  Bronchoscopy combined with nebulized inhalation therapy for children with MPP can shorten the recovery time,promote the disappearance of lung shadows,reduce their inflammatory index levels,and without increasing the incidence of adverse reactions.
出版者信息








《广州医药》公众号