目的 观察慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重期（AECOPD）患者应用基于Caprini量表评估的干预模式联合充气加压泵（IPC）预防静脉血栓（VTE）的效果。方法 选取河南省人民医院在2023年11月—2024年11月收入的82例AECOPD患者作为研究对象，经随机数表法分为对照组41例予以VTE常规干预，观察组41例在对照组的基础上接受基于Caprini量表评估的干预模式联合IPC预防。比较两组AECOPD患者肢体情况及深静脉血栓（VTE）发生情况、凝血指标及股静脉血流速度。结果 观察组肢体肿胀率、肢体疼痛率及VTE发生率均低于对照组（P＜0.05）。干预前，两组AECOPD患者凝血酶时间（TT）、凝血酶原时间（PT）、活化部分凝血活酶时间（APTT）、D-二聚体水平比较差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）；干预后，两组患者TT、PT、APTT、D-二聚体水平均降低，观察组较低（P＜0.05）。干预前，两组AECOPD患者平均流速、血流峰速及阻力指数比较差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）；干预后，两组患者平均流速、血流峰速均升高，观察组高于对照组（P＜0.05）；阻力指数均降低，观察组低于对照组（P＜0.05）。结论 AECOPD患者应用基于Caprini量表评估的干预模式联合IPC能有效降低肢体肿胀率、肢体疼痛率及VTE发生率，改善凝血指标与股静脉血流速。

   Objective To observe the effect of a Caprini score?based intervention model combined with intermittent pneumatic compression（IPC）in preventing venous thromboembolism（VTE）in patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease（AECOPD）．Methods A total of 82 AECOPD patients admitted to Henan Provincial People’s Hospital from November 2023 to November 2024 were selected as subjects and randomly divided into a control group（41 cases）and an observation group（41 cases）using a random number table．The control group received routine VTE prevention，while the observation group received the Caprini score?based intervention combined with IPC in addition to the routine care．The extremity conditions，occurrence of VTE，coagulation parameters，and femoral venous blood flow velocity were compared between the two groups．Results The rates of extremity swelling，extremity pain，and VTE incidence in the observation group were lower than those in the control group（P＜0.05）．Before the intervention，there were no statistically significant differences in thrombin time（TT），prothrombin time（PT），activated partial thromboplastin time（APTT），or D?dimer levels between the two groups（P＞0.05）．After the intervention，TT，PT，APTT，and D?dimer levels decreased in both groups，with lower values in the observation group（P＜0.05）．Before the intervention，there were no statistically significant differences in mean flow velocity，peak flow velocity，or resistance index between the two groups（P＞0.05）．After the intervention，mean flow velocity and peak flow velocity increased in both groups，with higher values in the observation group（P＜0.05），while the resistance index decreased，with a lower value in the observation group（P＜0.05）．Conclusions The application of a Caprini score?based intervention model combined with IPC in AECOPD patients can effectively reduce the rates of extremity swelling，extremity pain，and VTE incidence，and improve  coagulation parameters and femoral venous blood flow velocity．

目的 探讨慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重期（AECOPD）合并呼吸衰竭机械通气患者发生撤机相关性肺水肿（WIPE）的影响因素，以指导临床早期制定个体化干预方案。方法 前瞻性选取2022年5月～2025年5月于本院接受机械通气治疗的AECOPD合并呼吸衰竭患者209例为研究对象，依据自主呼吸试验（SBT）开始后1 h内是否发生WIPE将其分为发生组73例、未发生组136例。统计两组临床资料，通过单因素、多因素Logistic回归分析确定WIPE发生的影响因素，基于回归分析构建预测模型，并验证模型的预测效能。结果 发生组年龄、入院时急性生理与慢性健康评分系统Ⅱ（APACHEⅡ）评分、浅快呼吸指数、入院时肺部超声评分、糖尿病占比、机械通气治疗24 h后动脉血二氧化碳分压（PaCO2）≥80 mmHg占比、机械通气时间≥7 d占比、吸烟史占比、合并多器官功能障碍综合征（MODS）占比、合并左心室舒张功能障碍占比高于未发生组，撤机前6 h血清高迁移率蛋白B1（HMGB1）、C反应蛋白（CRP）、乳酸（Lac）/白蛋白（Alb）高于未发生组（P＜0.05）；入院时APACHEⅡ评分、糖尿病、机械通气治疗24 h后PaCO2、机械通气时间、吸烟史、合并MODS、入院时肺部超声评分及HMGB1、Lac/Alb、CRP为WIPE发生的独立危险因素（P＜0.05）；预测模型预测WIPE发生风险的AUC值为0.880，敏感度、特异度分别为86.30%、72.79%，Hosmer-Lemeshow检验显示该模型与观测值拟合度良好，DCA曲线显示风险阈值在0.05～0.91时该模型具有良好的临床净获益。结论 入院时APACHEⅡ评分、糖尿病、机械通气治疗24 h后PaCO2、机械通气时间、吸烟史、合并MODS、入院时肺部超声评分及HMGB1、Lac/Alb、CRP为AECOPD合并呼吸衰竭机械通气患者发生WIPE的独立危险因素，基于以上危险因素构建的预测模型预测效能良好，临床应制定针对性干预方案，以降低WIPE发生风险。

目的 分析布地格福吸入、无创正压通气（NIPPV）联合治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重（AECOPD）合并呼吸衰竭的效果。方法 本研究采用回顾性对照研究。选取2024-06—2025-05我院96例AECOPD合并呼吸衰竭者，根据治疗方案不同分组，每组48例。对照组接受NIPPV治疗，研究组接布地格福吸入、NIPPV联合治疗，持续治疗1周。观察并对比两组疗效、病情程度、血气指标[动脉血二氧化碳分压（PaCO2）、动脉血氧分压（PaO2）]、肺功能[最大呼气压（MEP）、一秒率（FEV1/FVC）]、炎性因子指标[C反应蛋白（CRP）、白介素-6（IL-6）、肿瘤坏死因子-α（TNF-α）]、氧化应激指标[超氧化物歧化酶（SOD）、谷胱甘肽过氧化物酶（GSH-Px）、过氧化脂质（LPO）]及不良反应。结果 研究组治疗有效率为91.67%（44/48），高于对照组75.00%（36/48）（P＜0.05）；治疗1周后与对照组相比，研究组mMRC分值、CAT分值均较低（P＜0.05）；治疗1周后，与对照组相比，研究组MEP、FEV1/FVC、PaO2较高，PaCO2较低（P＜0.05）；治疗1周后与对照组相比，研究组CRP、TNF-α、IL-6较低（P＜0.05）；治疗1周后与对照组相比，研究组SOD、GSH-Px较高，LPO较低（P＜0.05）；两组不良反应无明显差异（P＞0.05）。结论 布地格福吸入、NIPPV联合治疗AECOPD合并呼吸衰竭，可明显减轻症状，改善血气指标与肺功能，抑制炎症反应，调节氧化应激，且保障安全性。

目的 探讨福莫特罗联合格隆溴铵对慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重期（AECOPD）患者的疗效。方法 选择2021年1月—2023年6月廉江市人民医院收治的97例AECOPD患者进行研究,在双方知情基础上,通过单双号抽签方式分组,抽取单号纳入对照组（n=48,予以福莫特罗治疗）,抽取双号纳入观察组（n=48,予以福莫特罗联合格隆溴铵治疗）,对比两组肺功能指标、血气指标、症状改善情况及出现的不良反应。结果 治疗后两组的肺功能指标均高于治疗前,而观察组各指标高于对照组（P<0.05）;治疗后两组PaO₂高于治疗前,PaCO₂低于治疗前,且观察组上述血气指标与对照组比较差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）;治疗后两组的CAT及SGRQ评分均低于治疗前,其中观察组评分低于对照组（P<0.05）;观察组（8.33%）与对照组（12.24%）不良反应率比较,差异不显著（P>0.05）。结论 采用福莫特罗联合格隆溴铵治疗AECOPD患者,有助于改善患者肺功能,使其血气指标得到改善,还可有效缓解其呼吸道症状,且安全性得到保障。

Objective To explore the curative effect of formoterol combined with glycopyrronium bromide on patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease（AECOPD）. Methods The research cut-off period was from January 2021 to June 2023．A total of 97 patients with AECOPD were selected from Lianjiang People's Hospital for research．On the basis of mutual knowledge,they were divided into groups by odd and even numbers．The odd numbers were drawn into the control group（n=48,treated with formoterol）and the odd numbers were drawn into the observation group（n=48,treated with formoterol+glycopyrronium bromide）,the pulmonary function index,blood gas index,symptom improvement and adverse reactions were compared between the two groups. Results After treatment,the lung function indexes of the two groups were higher than those before treatment,while the indexes of the observation group were higher than those of the control group（P<0.05）．PaO₂ was higher and PaCO₂ was lower in the two groups after treatment,and the blood gas indexes in the observation group were different from those in the control group（P<0.05）．The scores of COPD assessment test and St. George's Respiratory Questionaire in the two groups after treatment were lower than those before treatment,while the scores in the observation group were lower than those in the control group（P<0.05）;There was no significant difference between the observation group（8.33%）and the control group（12.24%）（P>0.05）. Conclusions The choice of formoterol and qualified ammonium bromide for AECOPD is helpful to improve the lung function,blood gas index and respiratory symptoms,And the security is guaranteed．

目的 观察经鼻高流量氧疗治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重期（AECOPD）伴Ⅱ型呼吸衰竭对患者肺功能、血气分析指标的影响。方法 收集2020年3月—2022年3月我院收治的AECOPD伴Ⅱ型呼吸衰竭患者92例,随机分为常规通气组（46例,无创正压通气）、经鼻氧疗组（46例,经鼻高流量氧疗）,测量记录治疗前及治疗后2组患者心率及呼吸频率、血气分析指标、肺功能指标,评估患者舒适度及呼吸困难情况,记录治疗期间并发症。结果 治疗后经鼻氧疗组心率、呼吸频率低于常规通气组（P<0.05）;治疗后经鼻氧疗组二氧化碳分压（PaCO₂）低于常规通气组,动脉血氧分压（PaO₂）高于常规通气组（P<0.05）;治疗后经鼻氧疗组第1秒用力呼出气容积（FEV₁）、用力呼气容积（FVC）高于常规通气组（P<0.05）;治疗后经鼻氧疗组Borg评分低于常规通气组,舒适率高于常规通气组（P<0.05）;经鼻氧疗组并发症发生率低于常规通气组（P<0.05）。结论 给予AECOPD伴Ⅱ型呼吸衰竭患者经鼻高流量氧疗可改善患者肺功能、血气分析指标,促进呼吸困难症状缓解,且可提高患者舒适度,降低并发症发生率。

Objective To observe the effect of nasal high-flow oxygen therapy on pulmonary function and blood gas analysis indexes in patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease（AECOPD）with type Ⅱ respiratory failure．Methods From March 2020 to March 2022,92 patients with AECOPD complicated with type Ⅱ respiratory failure who were treated in our hospital were enrolled and randomly divided into conventional ventilation group（46 cases,non-invasive positive pressure ventilation）and nasal oxygen therapy group（46 cases,nasal high-flow oxygen therapy）．The heart rate and respiratory rate,blood gas analysis indexes,pulmonary function indexes of the two groups of patients before and after treatment were measured and recorded,the comfort level and dyspnea situation of the patients were evaluated,and the complications during the treatment were recorded．Results After treatment,the heart rate and respiratory rate in the nasal oxygen therapy group were significantly lower than those in the conventional ventilation group（P<0.05）．The partial pressure of carbon dioxide（PaCO₂）in the nasal oxygen therapy group was significantly lower than that in the conventional ventilation group,partial pressure of oxygen（PaO₂）was significantly higher than the conventional ventilation group（P<0.05）．The nasal oxygen therapy group forced expiratory volume in one second,（FEV₁）,forced vital capacity（FVC）were significantly higher than the conventional ventilation group（P<0.05）．The Borg score of nasal oxygen therapy group was significantly lower than the conventional ventilation group,the comfort level was significantly higher than the conventional ventilation group（P<0.05）．The incidence of complications in the nasal oxygen therapy group was significantly lower than that in the conventional ventilation group（P<0.05）．Conclusions Nasal high-flow oxygen therapy for AECOPD patients with type Ⅱ respiratory failure can significantly improve the pulmonary function and blood gas analysis indicators,promote the relief of dyspnea symptoms,improve the comfort level of patients,and reduce the incidence of complications．

目的 探讨集束化护理模式在AECOPD并呼吸衰竭患者初次无创通气中的作用。方法 选我院2016年10月—2018年12月收治AECOPD并呼吸衰竭需初次无创通气的患者为研究对象,随机分为对照组和观察组,对照组予传统护理,观察组予集束化护理,各30例;分别记录两组患者每日无创通气时间、总住院时间、循环呼吸指标(HR、RR)、指尖血氧饱和度、血气分析、并发症、患者满意度和护理质量。结果 观察组患者的每日无创通气时间,指尖血氧饱和度、pH值、氧分压和二氧化碳分压改善均优于对照组,并发症发生率和住院时间低于对照组,满意度和护理质量较高(P<0.01)。结论 集束化护理可以提高AECOPD并呼吸衰竭患者无创通气的疗效,减少并发症、缩短住院天数,改善预后。

      目的 探讨老年营养风险指数（GNRI）与慢性阻塞性肺疾病者急性加重期患者预后的相关性。方法 选择贵州省六盘水水旷医院2019年1月—2022年1月收治的COPD急性加重期患者，根据GNRI值，分为正常营养组（GNRI＞98）和营养不良组（GNRI≤98），应用生存曲线和Cox比例风险回归评估营养状况与死亡率之间的关联。结果 共纳入198例COPD急性加重期患者，正常营养组90例，营养不良组108例，营养不良发生率为54.5%；Kaplan-Meier曲线表明，营养不良组的全因累积死亡率更高（58.3% vs 35.0%，P＜0.001）。Cox比例风险回归分析显示在未校正模型中，HR为2.31（1.25~4.28），P＜0.001。在完全校正模型中，HR为2.48（1.37~4.51），P=0.005，提示与正常营养状况相比，营养不良与全因死亡风险升高相关。结论  GNRI低是COPD患者急性加重期全因死亡的独立危险因素。

      Objective  To investigate the correlation between elderly nutritional risk index（GNRI）and prognosis of patients with AECOPD．Methods  Patients with AECOPD admitted to our hospital from January 2019 to January 2022 were selected and divided into normal nutrition group（GNRI＞98）and malnutrition group（GNRI≤98）according to GNRI value．Survival curve and Cox regression were used to evaluate the association between nutritional status and mortality．Results  A total of 198 patients with AECOPD were included in this study．According to GNRI scores，90 patients were in the normal nutrition group and 108 were in the malnutrition group，with malnutrition incidence of 54.5%．The Kaplan-Meier curve showed that the cumulative all-cause mortality was higher in the malnutrition group（58.3% vs 35%，P＜0.001）．Cox proportional hazard  regression analysis showed that HR in the uncorrected model was 2.31（1.25-4.28），P＜0.001．In the fully corrected model，HR was 2.4（1.37-4.51）and P=0.005，suggesting that malnutrition was associated with a significantly higher risk of all-cause mortalitycompared with normal nutritional status．Conclusions  Low GNRI is an independent risk factor for all-cause death in AECOPD patients．