医疗质量管理是医院的核心任务，医疗质量管理在医院内具体落实到各个专科的管理，口腔门诊（不含住院部）作为一个特殊的专科，广泛存在于一、二级医疗机构，也存在于部分三级医疗机构，普通住院科室或门诊专科的医疗质量管理模式均不适用于口腔门诊，需要专属的医疗质量管理方式。医疗质量管理常以质控检查与指标监测为抓手，本文综合目前关于口腔门诊质控的研究，系统梳理口腔门诊的质控检查项目与指标，为口腔门诊医疗质量管理模式提供科学依据。

      Medical quality management is the fundamental task of hospitals，and it is specifically implemented in the management of various specialties within hospitals．As a special specialty，dental outpatient clinics（excluding inpatient departments） exist in most primary and secondary medical institutions，as well as some tertiary medical institutions．The medical quality management methods of general inpatient departments or outpatient specialties are not applicable to dental outpatient clinics，which require a dedicated medical quality management approach．Quality control inspections and monitoring of quality control indicators are focuses of medical quality management．This article synthesizes current research on quality control in dental outpatient clinics，systematically sorts out quality control inspection items and quality control indicators for dental outpatient clinics，and provides a scientific basis for medical quality management model in dental outpatient clinics．

目的 评估SCORTEN评分与我国SJS/TEN患者疾病严重程度的一致性,比较单用糖皮质激素(TCS)和糖皮质激素—丙种球蛋白冲击(TCS-IVIG)联合治疗SJS/TEN的临床效果。方法 收集我院2005年6月—2015年5月住院的SJS/TEN患者,计算每例患者的SCORTEN评分,采用Hosmer-Lemeshow检验评估SCORTEN模型的预期死亡率和实际死亡率的拟合度;比较单用TCS和TCS-IVIG联合治疗的患者在疾病严重程度、住院天数、疾病控制时间和死亡率方面的差异。结果 SCORTEN模型的预期死亡率和实际死亡率之间的拟合度良好(各组P值均大于0.5);二组患者在住院天数、疾病控制时间和死亡率方面的差异没有统计学意义(P分别为0.105,0.910,0.701),但TCS-IVIG组患者的疾病严重程度显著高于TCS组(P=0.017)。结论 SCORTEN评分可以用于评估国内SJS/TEN患者的病情严重程度,并预测患者预后;与单用TCS相比,联合IVIG有助于提高重症SJS/TEN患者的救治效果。

Objectivs To evaluate the performance of SCORTEN in severity of SJS/TEN in China, and to compare the efficacy of corticosteroid therapy (TCS) and intravenous immunoglobulin combined therapy (TCS-IVIG). Methods Collected retrospectively the data of the SJS/TEN patients from June 2005 to May 2015 in our hospital. Hosmer-Lemeshow statistic were used to assess SCORTEN model calibration. And the differences between TCS group and TCS-IVIG group were compared in severity-of-illness, length of hospitalization, disease control time and mortality. Results A good calibration were found in all groups (all P＞0.5). Although the severity-of-illness in the TCS-IVIG group was significantly higher than that in the TCS group (P=0.017), there was no statistical significance between the two groups in length of hospitalization, disease control time and mortality (P=0.105, 0.910, 0.701, respectively). Conclusion SCORTEN can be used to assess the severity-of-illness in Chinese patients with SJS/TEN and to predict the prognosis. Compared with single TCS, It could improve the clinical outcomes of patients with severe SJS/TEN combined with IVIG.