目的 探讨气道径向超声(RP-EBUS)引导多维度联合检查对周围型肺癌的诊断价值。方法 选取2019年9月—2021年12月于佛山市第二人民医院确诊的74例周围型肺癌患者,分析RP-EBUS引导肺活检、支气管黏膜刷检、支气管肺泡灌洗细胞学及DNA甲基化检测等多维度联合检查对周围型肺癌的诊断阳性率及影响因素。结果 RP-EBUS引导肺活检、支气管黏膜刷检、支气管肺泡灌洗液细胞学、DNA甲基化检测对周围型肺癌的诊断阳性率分别为52.7%、47.3%、45.9%和51.4%,RP-EBUS引导多维度联合检查阳性率为71.6%,高于单一方法检查(P<0.05);RP-EBUS引导多维度联合检查病灶直径≥30 mm诊断阳性率高于病灶直径＜30 mm (82.9% vs 57.6%),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);RP-EBUS引导多维度联合检查在肺上叶、中叶/舌叶、下叶病灶的阳性率分别为69.7%、66.7%和76.9%,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);联合检查中超声探及病灶的诊断阳性率高于超声未探及病灶(76.9% vs 33.3%),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);病灶超声图像表现为中心均实型的联合检查诊断阳性率高于非中心均实型(86.0% vs 59.1%),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 RP-EBUS引导多维度联合检查对周围型肺癌有更高的诊断阳性率,诊断阳性率与病灶大小、超声是否探及病灶及病灶超声图像特征有关,与病灶部位无关。

Objective To investigate the value of radial probe endobronchial ultrasound (RP-EBUS)guided multi-dimensional combined examination in the diagnosis of peripheral lung cancer. Methods A retrospective analysis of 74 patients with peripheral lung cancer which were diagnosed in Foshan Second People's Hospital from September 2019 to December 2021 was carried out. RP-EBUS guided biopsy, brushing biopsy, bronchus alveolar lavage cytology and DNA methylation detection results were analyzed to obtain the positive diagnosis rate and influencing factors. Results The positive rates of RP-EBUS guided biopsy, brushing biopsy, bronchus alveolar lavage cytology and methylation for peripheral lung cancer were 52.7%, 47.3%, 45.9% and 51.4%, respectively. The positive rate of RP-EBUS guided multi-dimensional combined detection was 71.6%, which was significantly higher than single detection (P<0.05). The positive rate of RP-EBUS multi-dimensional combined examination in lesions diameter ≥30 mm was higher than that of lesion diameter ＜30 mm (82.9% vs 57.6%, P<0.05). The positive rate of RP-EBUS guided multi-dimensional combined group in the upper lobe, middle lobe/lingual lobe, and lower lobe of the lung were 69.7%, 66.7% and 76.9%, respectively, with no significant difference (P>0.05). The positive rate of ultrasound detected lesion in combined group was higher than that of undetected lesions (76.9% vs 33.3%, P<0.05). The ultrasound images of solid center lesions had higher positive rates than that of non solid center lesions (86.0% vs 59.1%, P<0.05). Conclusions RP-EBUS guided multi-dimensional combined examination has a higher positive rate for diagnosis of peripheral lung cancer. The positive rate of diagnosis are related to the size of the lesion, whether the lesion is detected by ultrasound and the characteristics of the ultrasound image of the lesion, but not related to the location of the lesion.

目的 观察社区综合防治健康管理模式对社区高血压患者血压控制疗效及药物经济学的影响。方法 收集2012年7月—2013年7月广州参与研究的三级医院及社区卫生服务中心收治的原发性高血压病患者2 383例,病例入组后随机分为综合管理组和常规治疗组。记录及随访两组高血压患者基线血压值、降压药物使用方案、是否更换药物、血压控制疗效及药物经济学相关费用情况。结果 与常规治疗组相比,综合管理组患者血压治疗效果较好,显效率及总有效率提高[(60.71% vs 46.01%); (90.20% vs 71.06%), P＜0.001];高血压治疗及管理的药物费用虽有升高(t=16.186,P＜0.001),但相关的门诊费用、住院费用、护理费用及总费用降低(t=25.647, t=35.785, t=22.274,t=73.710,P＜0.001);在降压方案方面,从减少抗高血压药物使用,减少费用考虑,单独用药方式适合单纯性轻度高血压患者,从费用效果分析上,成本效果比以单药组最低,联用药组逐渐增大;增量成本-效果比:二药联用降压方案优于其他降压联合方案,因而两药联用降压为兼顾疗效和成本的降压较佳组合。结论 应用社区综合防治模式对高血压患者进行干预,效果满意,能够有效降低成本-效果比,值得临床推广应用。

Objective To investigate the effects of comprehensive prevention and control measures on the therapeutic efficient and pharmacoeconomics in community hypertension patients. Methods 2383 cases of hypertension were collected from July 2012 to July 2013 in the tertiary and community hospitals in Guangzhou, which were randomly divided into general therapy group, in which the patients were treated by general administration of drugs, and comprehensive management group that the patients were visited regularly. The sources of drugs, drugs use and changes in drugs were investigated. Results Compared with the general therapy group, better treatment effects were achieved in the comprehensive group. The apparent efficiency and total efficiency were both increased in the comprehensive group[(60.71% vs 46.01%); (90.20% vs 71.06%), P＜0.001]. Although the therapy and pharmacy fees were slightly increased in the comprehensive group as compared to the control group (t=16.186, P＜0.001), the outpatient expenses,hospitalization expenses, nursing expenses and the total expenses were decreased(t=25.647; t=35.785; t=22.274;t=73.710;P＜0.001). Considering reducing the use of drugs and decreasing the cost, the method of using single drug is beneficial to the patients of low-risk mild hypertension. The method of using calcium antagonist is the most economical and reasonable way. Conclusion Standardizing management of hypertension in community is effective in improving hypertension treatment and decreasing the cost, which is thus worth popularizing.