本文概述了传统日间腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者术后早期康复质量存在的问题，IMB模型通过向患者提供科学的疾病知识，改变其疾病认知与态度，最终促使其采纳并维持健康行为。本文还介绍了IMB模型在日间腹腔镜胆囊切除术后患者早期康复质量中应用涉及的相关概念、研究背景和国内外的研究现状以及未来发展趋势与挑战。研究结果显示，IMB模型可显著降低患者术后疼痛发生率，并提高患者参与治疗决策的程度，为后期关于IMB模型在日间腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者术后早期康复质量的相关研究提供借鉴与参考，以便后期实施相关个性化干预措施，并提供相关理论依据。

       This paper summarizes the problems existing in the early postoperative rehabilitation quality of patients undergoing traditional ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy．The IMB model changes patients’ disease cognition and attitude by providing them with scientific disease knowledge，and ultimately promotes their adoption and maintenance of healthy behaviors．It also introduces the relevant concepts involved in the application of the IMB model in the early postoperative rehabilitation quality of patients undergoing ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy，the research background of this study，the current research status at home and abroad，as well as the future development trends and challenges．The research results show that the IMB model can significantly reduce the incidence of postoperative severe pain in patients and the degree of patient participation in treatment decision-making．This provides reference and guidance for subsequent studies on the early rehabilitation quality of patients undergoing ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy using the IMB model，so as to implement relevant personalized intervention measures in the future and provide relevant theoretical basis．

目的 分析丹珍头痛胶囊联合疏肝调神针法治疗肝阳上亢型偏头痛患者的效果。方法 回顾性收集我院2023年8月～2025年4月148例肝阳上亢型偏头痛患者临床资料，依照治疗方案不同分为两组，各74例。对照组接受疏肝调神针法治疗，观察组接受丹珍头痛胶囊联合疏肝调神针法治疗，比较两组疗效、治疗前后临床症状[中医证候积分、发作情况（发作次数、持续时间、疼痛程度）]、睡眠质量[匹兹堡睡眠质量量表（PSQI）评分]、炎性相关因子[肿瘤坏死因子-α（TNF-α）、白细胞介素-6（IL-6）、细胞间黏附分子-1（ICAM-1）、白细胞介素-10（IL-10）]水平、安全性（不良事件、不良反应）。结果 观察组总有效率较对照组高（P＜0.05）；治疗后，两组临床症状均减轻，且观察组中医证候积分较对照组低，发作次数较对照组少，持续时间较对照组短，疼痛程度较对照组低（P＜0.05）；治疗后，两组睡眠质量均提升，且观察组PSQI评分较对照组低（P＜0.05）；与治疗前相比，两组治疗后血清TNF-α、IL-6、ICAM-1均降低，IL-10均升高，且观察组优于对照组（P＜0.05）；两组治疗期间均未发生断针等不良事件及恶心呕吐等不良反应。结论 丹珍头痛胶囊联合疏肝调神针法治疗肝阳上亢型偏头痛患者，能有效改善临床症状，提高睡眠质量，调节炎性相关因子水平。

目的：探究对老年腹腔镜结直肠癌根治术中患者实施环泊酚联合瑞芬太尼后对其的苏醒质量、认知功能影响。方法：选取2025年1月-10月在我院接受腹腔镜结直肠癌根治术的50例老年患者作为研究对象，并采用随机数字表法将其分为两组。对照组25例患者，实施丙泊酚联合瑞芬太尼麻醉；观察组25例患者，采用环泊酚联合瑞芬太尼进行麻醉。对两组患者的苏醒质量（睁眼时间、拔管时间、定向力恢复、Steward评分）、术后认知功能（MMSE、MOCA.POCD发生率、MOAA/S评分）、炎症反应（IL-6, TNF-a, CRP, S100B, NSE）、疼痛控制（VAS评分、镇痛药用量）、不良反应（呼吸抑制、PONV、低血压、寒战等）与术中血流动力学（血压、心率、Sp0z、PaCO2、氧合指数）进行比较分析。结果：观察组的睁眼时间（10.55±2.11 min）、拔管时间（16.44±1.55 min）、定向力恢复时间（34.55±5.33 min）短于对照组，Steward苏醒评分（5.44±0.33 min）高于对照组（P＜0.05）。观察组术后的MMSE评分（27.44±1.22 分）、MoCA评分（28.44±1.66 分）、MOAA/S评分（3.22±0.44 分）均高于对照组，POCD发生率（16.00%）低于对照组（P＜0.05）。观察组术后IL-6（100.22±10.22 pg/mL）、TNF-α（30.22±4.44 pg/mL）、CRP（80.44±5.22 mg/L）、S100B（0.15±0.02 μg/L）、NSE水平（13.66±3.22 μg/L）均低于对照组（P＜0.05）。两组的术后VAS评分比较，统计学无差异，P＞0.05；观察组24h镇痛药物用量（80.23±20.44 mg）少于对照组（P＜0.05）。观察组术中血压、心率、Sp0z、PaCO2、氧合指数比对照组更稳定（P＜0.05）。观察组呼吸抑制、PONV、低血压、寒战的不良反应发生率（16.00%）低于对照组（44.00%）（P＜0.05）。结论：环泊酚联合瑞芬太尼麻醉方案可提高老年腹腔镜结直肠癌根治术患者的苏醒质量方面，利于患者的术后认知功能恢复，减轻其神经炎症反应，维持患者血流动力学稳定，并降低镇痛药物用量与不良反应发生率。

目的：探讨利多卡因复合艾司氯胺酮对肺部手术患者苏醒质量及认知功能的影响。方法：选取2023年7月至2025年6月本院收治的100例拟行肺部手术患者，按随机数字表法分为观察组和对照组，各50例。对照组采用常规麻醉方案维持麻醉，观察组在常规麻醉基础上复合利多卡因及艾司氯胺酮辅助麻醉。比较两组患者苏醒质量[拔管后30min Riker镇静躁动评分（SAS）、苏醒时间、拔管时间]、认知功能[术前及术后1d、3d简易精神状态检查表评分（MMSE）]、围术期血流动力学指标[麻醉药物输注前（T0）、气管插管时（T1）、拔管后5min（T2）平均动脉压（MAP）、心率（HR）]及术后72h不良反应发生率。结果：观察组拔管后30min SAS评分、术后1d、3d的MMSE评分高于对照组，苏醒时间、拔管时间低于对照组；观察组T0、T1、T2各时间点MAP、HR无显著差异（P>0.05）；对照组T1、T2时MAP、HR高于T0（P<0.05）；两组不良反应发生率无显著差异（P>0.05）。结论：利多卡因复合艾司氯胺酮应用于肺部手术，可提升患者苏醒质量、保护术后认知功能，维持围术期血流动力学稳定，且安全性良好。

Objective : To investigate the effect of lidocaine combined with esketamine on recovery quality and cognitive function in patients undergoing lung surgery. Methods : A total of 100 patients receiving pulmonary resection at our hospital between July 2023 and December 2025 were enrolled and randomized via a random number table into two equal arms (n=50 per group): observation and control. The control group was treated with routine anesthesia to maintain anesthesia, and the observation group was treated with lidocaine and esketamine on the basis of routine anesthesia. The recovery quality [ Riker sedation agitation score ( SAS ) at 30 min after extubation, recovery time, extubation time ], cognitive function [ simple mental state examination score ( MMSE ) before operation and 1 d, 3 d after operation ], perioperative hemodynamic indexes [ mean arterial pressure ( MAP ), heart rate ( HR ) before anesthesia drug infusion ( T0 ), tracheal intubation ( T1 ), 5 min after extubation ( T2 ) ] and the incidence of adverse reactions at 72 h after operation were compared between the two groups. Results : In the observation group, the SAS score measured 30 minutes post-extubation and the MMSE scores at 1 day and 3 days post-operation were significantly higher than those in the control group. Conversely, both recovery and extubation times were shorter in the observation group compared to the control group. No significant differences in MAP and HR were observed at T0, T1, and T2 within the observation group (P > 0.05). In contrast, within the control group, MAP and HR at T1 and T2 were notably elevated compared to T0, with the differences being statistically significant (P < 0.05). Conclusion : The application of lidocaine combined with esketamine in lung surgery can improve the quality of recovery, protect postoperative cognitive function, maintain perioperative hemodynamic stability, and has good safety.

探讨将 Root Cause Analysis（RCA）质量管理模式与心理资本理论相结合应用于手术核查团队，对改善沟通中断、提升沟通执行质量与团队协作能力的效果。方法 选取 2025年 1 月至 2025 年12 月某三级医院手术室手术团队成员 80 名，按手术间编号分为对照组与实验组，各 40 名。对照组实施常规手术核查流程；实验组在此基础上实施基于 RCA 的流程诊断与基于心理资本理论的综合沟通能力提升干预。干预结束后，比较两组沟通中断发生率、核查流程执行质量、沟通效率，以及心理资本量表（PCQ-24）和团队协作量表（T-TPQ）得分。结果 实验组沟通中断发生率显著低于对照组（P＜0.05），核查流程执行质量和沟通效率均显著优于对照组（P＜0.001）。实验组 PCQ-24 各维度及总分、T-TPQ 各维度及总分均显著高于对照组（均 P＜0.001）。结论 将 RCA 流程分析与心理资本理论干预相结合，可通过流程规范化与心理动力增强双路径同步改善手术团队沟通质量与协作水平，具有良好的临床应用价值与推广潜力。

To evaluate the effectiveness of an intervention combining Root Cause Analysis (RCA)–based quality management and Psychological Capital (PsyCap) theory in reducing communication interruptions and improving communication quality and teamwork in surgical safety check teams. Methods: Eighty surgical team members from a tertiary hospital (January 2025 - December 2025.) were assigned to a control group or an intervention group according to operating room allocation (40 per group). The control group followed routine surgical safety check procedures, whereas the intervention group additionally received an RCA-guided workflow analysis and a PsyCap-based communication enhancement program. Post-intervention outcomes included communication interruption rate, execution quality and efficiency of safety checks, Psychological Capital Questionnaire (PCQ-24) scores, and TeamSTEPPS Teamwork Perceptions Questionnaire (T-TPQ) scores. Results: The intervention group demonstrated a significantly lower communication interruption rate compared with the control group (P＜0.05). Execution quality and communication efficiency were significantly improved in the intervention group (P＜0.001). PCQ-24 total and subscale scores were significantly higher in the intervention group than in the control group (P＜0.001), as were T-TPQ total and subscale scores (P＜0.001). Conclusion: Integrating RCA-based workflow optimization with PsyCap-oriented psychological and behavioral training can effectively enhance communication quality, reduce interruptions, and strengthen teamwork in surgical safety check teams. The combined model has strong applicability and potential for wider clinical promotion.

目的 探讨超声引导双侧眶下神经阻滞对鼻中隔偏曲矫正术患者术后镇痛效果、麻醉苏醒质量的影响。方法 回顾性选取2021年8月至2025年8月我院收治的行鼻中隔偏曲矫正术治疗的患者120例，按麻醉方案不同，分为全麻组和眶下神经阻滞组，各60例。全麻组进行气管插管全身麻醉和术后镇痛泵镇痛，眶下神经阻滞组在全麻基础上进行超声引导双侧眶下神经阻滞+术后镇痛泵镇痛。比较两组麻醉前、拔管即刻、拔管后5 min血流动力学（心率、平均动脉压）水平、术后麻醉苏醒质量（苏醒时间、苏醒期躁动发生情况）、术后24 h按压镇痛泵次数、术后3 h、6 h、12 h、24 h镇痛效果[数字分级评分（NRS）]及麻醉前、拔管后5 min时血清应激指标水平及不良反应发生情况。结果 拔管即刻、拔管后5 min，眶下神经阻滞组平均动脉压、心率均低于全麻组（P＜0.05）；眶下神经阻滞组躁动发生率、术后24 h按压镇痛泵次数低于全麻组（P＜0.05）；术后3 h、6 h、12 h，眶下神经阻滞组NRS评分均低于全麻组（P＜0.05）；拔管后5 min，眶下神经阻滞组血清皮质醇（Cor）、去甲肾上腺素（NE）水平低于全麻组（P＜0.05）；两组麻醉相关不良反应总发生率比较，差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）。结论 超声引导双侧眶下神经阻滞可有效减轻患者鼻中隔矫正术后循环波动、术后疼痛及应激反应，减少麻醉药物用量，降低躁动发生率。

探讨将 Root Cause Analysis（RCA）质量管理模式与心理资本理论相结合应用于手术核查团队，对改善沟通中断、提升沟通执行质量与团队协作能力的效果。方法 选取 2025年 1 月至 2025 年12 月某三级医院手术室手术团队成员 80 名，按手术间编号分为对照组与实验组，各 40 名。对照组实施常规手术核查流程；实验组在此基础上实施基于 RCA 的流程诊断与基于心理资本理论的综合沟通能力提升干预。干预结束后，比较两组沟通中断发生率、核查流程执行质量、沟通效率，以及心理资本量表（PCQ-24）和团队协作量表（T-TPQ）得分。结果 实验组沟通中断发生率显著低于对照组（P＜0.05），核查流程执行质量和沟通效率均显著优于对照组（P＜0.001）。实验组 PCQ-24 各维度及总分、T-TPQ 各维度及总分均显著高于对照组（均 P＜0.001）。结论 将 RCA 流程分析与心理资本理论干预相结合，可通过流程规范化与心理动力增强双路径同步改善手术团队沟通质量与协作水平，具有良好的临床应用价值与推广潜力。

To evaluate the effectiveness of an intervention combining Root Cause Analysis (RCA)–based quality management and Psychological Capital (PsyCap) theory in reducing communication interruptions and improving communication quality and teamwork in surgical safety check teams. Methods: Eighty surgical team members from a tertiary hospital (January 2025 - December 2025.) were assigned to a control group or an intervention group according to operating room allocation (40 per group). The control group followed routine surgical safety check procedures, whereas the intervention group additionally received an RCA-guided workflow analysis and a PsyCap-based communication enhancement program. Post-intervention outcomes included communication interruption rate, execution quality and efficiency of safety checks, Psychological Capital Questionnaire (PCQ-24) scores, and TeamSTEPPS Teamwork Perceptions Questionnaire (T-TPQ) scores. Results: The intervention group demonstrated a significantly lower communication interruption rate compared with the control group (P＜0.05). Execution quality and communication efficiency were significantly improved in the intervention group (P＜0.001). PCQ-24 total and subscale scores were significantly higher in the intervention group than in the control group (P＜0.001), as were T-TPQ total and subscale scores (P＜0.001). Conclusion: Integrating RCA-based workflow optimization with PsyCap-oriented psychological and behavioral training can effectively enhance communication quality, reduce interruptions, and strengthen teamwork in surgical safety check teams. The combined model has strong applicability and potential for wider clinical promotion.

目的 探讨将 Root Cause Analysis（RCA）质量管理模式与心理资本理论相结合应用于手术核查团队，对改善沟通中断、提升沟通执行质量与团队协作能力的效果。方法 选取 2025年 1 月至 2025 年12 月某三级医院手术室手术团队成员 80 名，按手术间编号分为对照组与实验组，各 40 名。对照组实施常规手术核查流程；实验组在此基础上实施基于 RCA 的流程诊断与基于心理资本理论的综合沟通能力提升干预。干预结束后，比较两组沟通中断发生率、核查流程执行质量、沟通效率，以及心理资本量表（PCQ-24）和团队协作量表（T-TPQ）得分。结果 实验组沟通中断发生率显著低于对照组（P＜0.05），核查流程执行质量和沟通效率均显著优于对照组（P＜0.001）。实验组 PCQ-24 各维度及总分、T-TPQ 各维度及总分均显著高于对照组（均 P＜0.001）。结论 将 RCA 流程分析与心理资本理论干预相结合，可通过流程规范化与心理动力增强双路径同步改善手术团队沟通质量与协作水平，具有良好的临床应用价值与推广潜力。

To evaluate the effectiveness of an intervention combining Root Cause Analysis (RCA)–based quality management and Psychological Capital (PsyCap) theory in reducing communication interruptions and improving communication quality and teamwork in surgical safety check teams. Methods: Eighty surgical team members from a tertiary hospital (January 2025 - December 2025.) were assigned to a control group or an intervention group according to operating room allocation (40 per group). The control group followed routine surgical safety check procedures, whereas the intervention group additionally received an RCA-guided workflow analysis and a PsyCap-based communication enhancement program. Post-intervention outcomes included communication interruption rate, execution quality and efficiency of safety checks, Psychological Capital Questionnaire (PCQ-24) scores, and TeamSTEPPS Teamwork Perceptions Questionnaire (T-TPQ) scores. Results: The intervention group demonstrated a significantly lower communication interruption rate compared with the control group (P＜0.05). Execution quality and communication efficiency were significantly improved in the intervention group (P＜0.001). PCQ-24 total and subscale scores were significantly higher in the intervention group than in the control group (P＜0.001), as were T-TPQ total and subscale scores (P＜0.001). Conclusion: Integrating RCA-based workflow optimization with PsyCap-oriented psychological and behavioral training can effectively enhance communication quality, reduce interruptions, and strengthen teamwork in surgical safety check teams. The combined model has strong applicability and potential for wider clinical promotion.

探讨将 Root Cause Analysis（RCA）质量管理模式与心理资本理论相结合应用于手术核查团队，对改善沟通中断、提升沟通执行质量与团队协作能力的效果。方法 选取 2025年 1 月至 2025 年12 月某三级医院手术室手术团队成员 80 名，按手术间编号分为对照组与实验组，各 40 名。对照组实施常规手术核查流程；实验组在此基础上实施基于 RCA 的流程诊断与基于心理资本理论的综合沟通能力提升干预。干预结束后，比较两组沟通中断发生率、核查流程执行质量、沟通效率，以及心理资本量表（PCQ-24）和团队协作量表（T-TPQ）得分。结果 实验组沟通中断发生率显著低于对照组（P＜0.05），核查流程执行质量和沟通效率均显著优于对照组（P＜0.001）。实验组 PCQ-24 各维度及总分、T-TPQ 各维度及总分均显著高于对照组（均 P＜0.001）。结论 将 RCA 流程分析与心理资本理论干预相结合，可通过流程规范化与心理动力增强双路径同步改善手术团队沟通质量与协作水平，具有良好的临床应用价值与推广潜力。

To evaluate the effectiveness of an intervention combining Root Cause Analysis (RCA)–based quality management and Psychological Capital (PsyCap) theory in reducing communication interruptions and improving communication quality and teamwork in surgical safety check teams. Methods: Eighty surgical team members from a tertiary hospital (January 2025 - December 2025.) were assigned to a control group or an intervention group according to operating room allocation (40 per group). The control group followed routine surgical safety check procedures, whereas the intervention group additionally received an RCA-guided workflow analysis and a PsyCap-based communication enhancement program. Post-intervention outcomes included communication interruption rate, execution quality and efficiency of safety checks, Psychological Capital Questionnaire (PCQ-24) scores, and TeamSTEPPS Teamwork Perceptions Questionnaire (T-TPQ) scores. Results: The intervention group demonstrated a significantly lower communication interruption rate compared with the control group (P＜0.05). Execution quality and communication efficiency were significantly improved in the intervention group (P＜0.001). PCQ-24 total and subscale scores were significantly higher in the intervention group than in the control group (P＜0.001), as were T-TPQ total and subscale scores (P＜0.001). Conclusion: Integrating RCA-based workflow optimization with PsyCap-oriented psychological and behavioral training can effectively enhance communication quality, reduce interruptions, and strengthen teamwork in surgical safety check teams. The combined model has strong applicability and potential for wider clinical promotion.

探讨将 Root Cause Analysis（RCA）质量管理模式与心理资本理论相结合应用于手术核查团队，对改善沟通中断、提升沟通执行质量与团队协作能力的效果。方法 选取 2025年 1 月至 2025 年12 月某三级医院手术室手术团队成员 80 名，按手术间编号分为对照组与实验组，各 40 名。对照组实施常规手术核查流程；实验组在此基础上实施基于 RCA 的流程诊断与基于心理资本理论的综合沟通能力提升干预。干预结束后，比较两组沟通中断发生率、核查流程执行质量、沟通效率，以及心理资本量表（PCQ-24）和团队协作量表（T-TPQ）得分。结果 实验组沟通中断发生率显著低于对照组（P＜0.05），核查流程执行质量和沟通效率均显著优于对照组（P＜0.001）。实验组 PCQ-24 各维度及总分、T-TPQ 各维度及总分均显著高于对照组（均 P＜0.001）。结论 将 RCA 流程分析与心理资本理论干预相结合，可通过流程规范化与心理动力增强双路径同步改善手术团队沟通质量与协作水平，具有良好的临床应用价值与推广潜力。

To evaluate the effectiveness of an intervention combining Root Cause Analysis (RCA)–based quality management and Psychological Capital (PsyCap) theory in reducing communication interruptions and improving communication quality and teamwork in surgical safety check teams. Methods: Eighty surgical team members from a tertiary hospital (January 2025 - December 2025.) were assigned to a control group or an intervention group according to operating room allocation (40 per group). The control group followed routine surgical safety check procedures, whereas the intervention group additionally received an RCA-guided workflow analysis and a PsyCap-based communication enhancement program. Post-intervention outcomes included communication interruption rate, execution quality and efficiency of safety checks, Psychological Capital Questionnaire (PCQ-24) scores, and TeamSTEPPS Teamwork Perceptions Questionnaire (T-TPQ) scores. Results: The intervention group demonstrated a significantly lower communication interruption rate compared with the control group (P＜0.05). Execution quality and communication efficiency were significantly improved in the intervention group (P＜0.001). PCQ-24 total and subscale scores were significantly higher in the intervention group than in the control group (P＜0.001), as were T-TPQ total and subscale scores (P＜0.001). Conclusion: Integrating RCA-based workflow optimization with PsyCap-oriented psychological and behavioral training can effectively enhance communication quality, reduce interruptions, and strengthen teamwork in surgical safety check teams. The combined model has strong applicability and potential for wider clinical promotion.