医联体是分级诊疗制度建设的重要抓手,对“健康中国”战略目标的实现具有重要作用。在当前医疗改革背景下,探究医联体建设模式具有重要意义。文章介绍了广州市属A医院和区属B医院探索的非托管紧密型医联体实践举措、成效、创新与不足,总结了该模式对我国医联体建设的启示：一是政府层面要做好顶层设计,给与政策支持;二是网顶医院要下沉优质资源,因地制宜帮扶;三是成员单位要主动参与建设,抓住发展机遇。

The establishment of medical unions is a crucial step in the development of a hierarchical diagnosis and treatment system and plays a significant role in achieving the strategic goal of “Healthy China．”Given the current context of healthcare reform,it is highly important to explore effective models for constructing medical unions．This paper introduces the practical measures taken by Guangzhou Hospital A and Hospital B to establish a non-trustee-close medical commonwealth．It discusses the effects achieved as well as innovations made through this approach while also highlighting its limitations．Furthermore,this study summarizes key insights that can be drawn from this model for building medical commonwealths in China：firstly,governments should focus on top-level design and provide policy support;secondly,leading hospitals should allocate high-quality resources based on local conditions;thirdly,member units should actively participate in construction efforts and seize development opportunities．

目的 对医疗损害责任纠纷案的法庭审理进行分析,探究医疗损害责任纠纷案件的处理现状,对此过程中医疗机构应当关注的问题进行分析总结,以期为医院应对医疗损害鉴定工作和法官审理医疗损害责任纠纷案提供参考。方法 对广州市三所综合医院2015—2021年共93例医疗损害责任纠纷案的判决书进行描述性分析。结果 93例案例中79例进行了医疗损害鉴定。79例进行医疗损害鉴定的案例中,71例鉴定结论被法院采信,采信率达90%。有29例案件鉴定人出庭（占比36.7%）,其中有25例鉴定意见被法院采信,采信率为86.2%,仅有7例案例当事人申请了专家辅助证人出庭。医方大多数最终承担次要及以下责任,占比为73.4%。鉴定结论为责任范围的,法院最后判决偏向于取最高值和中间值（43例出具责任范围的案例中,14例为最高值,13例为中间值）。结论 医疗机构要充分加强对医疗事故技术鉴定和医疗损害鉴定的认识,高度重视医疗损害鉴定工作,尤其加强尸体解剖告知及病历书写管理,充分利用好鉴定人和专家辅助证人出庭两种手段。

Objective To analyze the court trial of medical damage liability disputes,to explore the current situation of medical damage liability disputes,to analyze and summarize the problems encountered in dealing with medical damage disputes,so as to provide some references for hospitals to deal with medical damage disputes．Methods Descriptive statistical analysis performed on the written judgment of 93 cases of medical damage liability disputes in three large comprehensive hospitals in Yuexiu District,Guangzhou from 2015 to 2021．Results In 93 cases,79 cases had expertise of medical malpractice．In 79 expertise,71 of them were adopted,and the acceptance rate was 90%．Among the 29 cases in which the appraisers appeared in court,25 expert opinions were accepted by the court,the acceptance rate was 86.2%．In only 7 cases,the parties applied for expert witnesses to appear in court．In most cases,hospitals ultimately took secondary and lower responsibilities,accounting for 73.4%．If the appraisal conclusion falls within the scope of responsibility,the court's final judgment tends to take the highest and middle values．Conclusions Medical institutions should fully strengthen their understanding of technical identification of medical accidents and medical malpractice identification．Attach great importance to the identification of medical malpractice,especially strengthen the management of autopsy notification and medical record writing,make full use of two methods：appraisers and experts witnesses appearing in court．

目的 探索老龄化形势下广州市白云区西部卒中防治工作的新模式。方法 通过完善组织结构、管理架构、建立稳定高效运行的(1+1+N)紧密型医联体模式,创建优质高效的卒中救治区域联盟,实现高质量的基层首诊,双向转诊,快速响应的卒中绿道急救和全程管理。结果 初步完成构建广州市白云区西部区域性卒中救治中心,区域内卒中患者及时救治,溶栓效率,血管再通等均有显著提升,整体提升白云区西部医疗机构的卒中救治水平。结论 区域性的协同救治是提高卒中救治水平的重要举措。(1+1+N)紧密型医联体模式能提高卒中患者救治率,具有可行性和必要性。

Objective To explore the effectiveness of a new stroke prevention and treatment pattern in the western part of Baiyun District, Guangzhou city, under an aging situation. Method We aim to build a high-quality and efficient stroke treatment regional alliance based on a (1+1+N) compact medical consortium, expecting to improve the overall abilities of stroke treatment in the western part of Baiyun District through high-quality primary care, two-way referrals, rapid response to stroke greenway emergency and full-process management. Results We have initially established a regional stroke treatment center in the western part of Baiyun District, Guangzhou. Stroke patients in that region can be treated in time, and the efficiency of thrombolysis and vascular recanalization have been significantly improved. Conclusion Regional coordinated treatment is an effective measure to reduce the disability and fatality rate of stroke. The (1+1+N) compact medical consortium model can improve the treatment effect in stroke patients, which is feasible and necessary.

       目的   对医疗损害责任纠纷案的法庭审理进行分析，探究医疗损害责任纠纷案件的处理现状，对此过程中医疗机构应当关注的问题进行分析总结，以期为医院应对医疗损害鉴定工作和法官审理医疗损害责任纠纷案提供参考。方法   对广州市三所综合医院2015—2021年共93例医疗损害责任纠纷案的判决书进行描述性分析。结果  93例案例中79例进行了医疗损害鉴定。79例进行医疗损害鉴定的案例中，71例鉴定结论被法院采信，采信率达90%。有29例案件鉴定人出庭（占比36.7%），其中有25例鉴定意见被法院采信，采信率为86.2%，仅有7例案例当事人申请了专家辅助证人出庭。医方大多数最终承担次要及以下责任占比为73.4%。鉴定结论为责任范围的，法院最后判决偏向于取最高值和中间值（43例出具责任范围的案例中，14例为最高值，13例为中间值）。结论   医疗机构要充分加强对医疗事故技术鉴定和医疗损害鉴定的认识，高度重视医疗损害鉴定工作，尤其加强尸体解剖告知及病历书写管理，充分利用好鉴定人和专家辅助证人出庭两种手段。

      Objective  To analyze the court trial of medical damage liability disputes，to explore the current situation of medical damage liability disputes，to analyze and summarize the problems encountered in dealing with medical damage disputes，so as to provide some references for hospitals to deal with medical damage disputes．Methods  Descriptive statistical analysis performed on the written judgment of 93 cases of medical damage liability disputes in three large comprehensive hospitals in Yuexiu District，Guangzhou from 2015 to 2021．Results  In 93 cases，79 cases had expertise of medical malpractice．In 79 expertise，71 of them were adopted，and the acceptance rate was 90%．Among the 29 cases in which the appraisers appeared in court，25 expert opinions were accepted by the court，the acceptance rate was 86.2%．In only 7 cases，the parties applied for expert witnesses to appear in court．In most cases，hospitals ultimately took secondary and lower responsibilities，accounting for 73.4%．If the appraisal conclusion falls within the scope of responsibility，the court’s final judgment tends to take the highest and middle values．Conclusions  Medical institutions should fully strengthen their understanding of technical identification of medical accidents and medical malpractice identification．Attach great importance to the identification of medical malpractice，especially strengthen the management of autopsy notification and medical record writing，make full use of two methods：appraisers and experts witnesses appearing in court．