目的 探讨具有不同载脂蛋白E4等位基因(Apolipoprotein E4 alleles,APOE4)阿尔茨海默病患者的神经心理学量表差异。方法 纳入2014年1月—2017年12月广州市第一人民医院收治阿尔茨海默病患者28人,分别予简易精神状态检查量表、阿尔茨海默病评定量表-认知部分、临床医师通过面谈对变化的印象、日常生活活动能力量表、神经精神问卷,并检测量表间相关关系。之后随访18个月,观察量表评测的各功能变化及互相间相关性。检测不同载脂蛋白E4等位基因等阿尔茨海默病相关基因分布及与量表间相关关系。结果 认知评定量表间、认知评定量表与整体评价量表间、以及认知评定量表与日常活动能力评定量表间具有相关性。精神与行为症状量表分数与其他评定量表无明显相关性。随访中各量表分数变化间均无相关性。各基因组间功能变化无显著性差异,载脂蛋白E4等位基因变异主要影响患者的认知功能。等位基因分布与患病年龄,日常活动能力及精神与行为症状无相关性。结论 阿尔茨海默病量表评测的各认知领域间相关性不同,功能变化间无相关关系。载脂蛋白E4等位基因变异主要影响患者的认知功能。

Objective The present study aimed to elucidate the performance of multiple psychological tests among different Apolipoprotein E4 alleles (APOE4) in people with Alzheimer's disease (AD). Methods 28 patients were enrolled from January 2014 to December 2017 in Guangzhou First People'S Hospital. All patients were tested by using Mini-mental State Examination (MMSE), Alzheimer's disease Assessment Scale (ADAS-cog), Clinician's Interview-Based Impression of Change (CIBIC-Plus), Activities of Daily Living (ADL) and the NeuroPsychiatric Inventory (NPI). After 18 months follow-up visit, the change of the tests points were recorded. AD pathogenic genes, including Apolipoprotein E4 allele's variations, were detected in all patients. Then the correlations of APOE4 alleles and multiple psychological tests were analyzed. Results The correlations were confirmed between MMSE and ADAS-cog, MMSE and CIBIC-plus, MMSE and ADL, ADAS-cog and CIBIC-plus, ADAS-cog and ADL. NPI showed no correlation with the others. No correlation was found between changes of multiple psychological tests after 18 months follow-up. APOE4 alleles' variation affected cognitive function mainly. The effects of APOE4 on ADL and NPI showed no statistical significance in AD patients. No correlation was found among patients groups with different APOE4 alleles in all psychological tests and age of onset. Conclusion The correlations were existed among multiple cognitive domains while levels were different. The changes between psychological tests showed no correlations. APOE4 alleles' variation affected cognitive function mainly.

目的 对首发短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA)及缺血性轻型卒中的患者进行认知功能分析,评估其认知损害程度及常见的认知损害领域,以便制定早期的认知功能康复计划,减少痴呆的发生。方法 纳入起病10天内的首发TIA及缺血性轻型卒中患者,完善MMSE和MoCA评分,把MMSE评分正常者划分为MoCA正常组和MoCA异常者,比较两组的认知功能损害程度及损害领域。结果 纳入142例患者,MMSE正常者113例,其中MoCA正常组83例,MoCA异常组30例。两组的认知功能比较,在视空间/执行功能、命名、注意力、计算、延迟记忆、定向力等方面的差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05),在言语流畅、抽象思维方面的差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05)。结论 TIA/轻型卒中患者存在多方面不同程度的认知功能损害,临床上需重视对该类患者的认知筛查,及时了解患者认知功能的变化,以便给予及时的诊断和治疗。

Objective To analyze the cognitive impairment among the paitents with TIA and minor ischemic stroke for the first attack. Making a recovery plan in early time by eveluating the degree and domains of the cognitive impairment, so as to reduce the prevelance of dimentia. Methods Patients with TIA and minor ischemic stroke for the first attack in 10 days were included. MMSE and MoCA were completed, we sorted out the normal MMSE patients and divided them into MoCA normal group and MoCA abnormal group, compared the cognitive function between the two groups. Results 142 patients were included. Among them 113 patients' MMSE were normal, in which MoCA normal group were with 83 patients and MoCA abnormal group with 30 patients. There were significant differences between them in visuospatial and executive function, naming, attention, caculation, delay memory and orientation(P＜0.05), while no significant difference in language fluency and abstraction(P＞0.05). Conclusion Cognitive impairment of TIA/minor ischemic stroke patients was in different degree, so we should pay more attention to their cognitive function and give them an in-time diagnosis and treatment.