因气候与生活习惯影响，广东地区老年性肩周炎临床特点及康复需求具有独特性，亟待制定规范、具有当地特色的康复方案。为制订适合地区差异化的康复方案，广东省中西医结合学会康复专业委员会联合广东省康复医学发展研究会疼痛康复发展研究分会牵头发起，省内多家机构专家学者共同制订《老年性肩周炎中医全周期康复广东专家共识（2026年版）》。该共识以ICF框架为基础，立足肩周炎康复循证医学证据，结合多学科专家产教研实践经验，对肩周炎 ICF评定、中医适宜技术及康复治疗技术运用、阶梯式干预性措施制定和中西医全周期康复协同等方面形成共识性意见。本共识的发布，将为老年性肩周炎中医全周期康复提供规范化、本土化的“广东方案”。

   Due to climatic and lifestyle influences，the clinical characteristics and rehabilitation needs of senile periarthritis of the shoulder in Guangdong region exhibit unique features，necessitating the development of standardized and locally tailored rehabilitation protocols．To formulate regionally differentiated rehabilitation plans，the Rehabilitation Professional Committee of Guangdong Association of Integrative Medicine and the Pain Rehabilitation Development Research Branch of Guangdong Rehabilitation Medicine Development Research Association jointly initiated the development of the “Guangdong Expert Consensus on TCM Full-Cycle Rehabilitation for Senile Periarthritis of the Shoulder（2026 Edition）” through collaboration with multiple provincial institutions and experts．Based on the International Classification of Functioning，Disability and Health（ICF）framework and evidence-based rehabilitation medicine for periarthritis of the shoulder，this consensus integrates multidisciplinary expertise from industry，academia，and research to establish unified guidelines on ICF assessment，application of appropriate TCM techniques and rehabilitation therapies，implementation of stepwise intervention measures，and integrated TCM-Western medicine full-cycle rehabilitation approaches．The publication of this consensus will provide a standardized and localized “Guangdong Solution” for TCM-based full-cycle rehabilitation of senile periarthritis of the shoulder．

目的 对比热敏灸联合“合谷刺法”与温灸针“合谷刺法”治疗肩周炎的疗效。方法 2015年7月—2017年1月,筛选康复科收治的慢性肩周炎患者120例,按照随机数字表达法分组,对照1组、对照组2组、观察组各入选40例。对照1组采取温针灸“合谷刺法”,对照2组采取传统取穴针刺疗法,观察组热敏灸联合“合谷刺法”。对比3组疗效,治疗前后肩关节功能ASES量表(American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons shoulder index)、VAS肩关节疼痛评分、肩关节活动度。结果 3组均未见退出例。观察组愈显率82.5%高于对照1组50.0%、对照组2组55.0%,差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05),观察组整体疗效与对照2组差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05)。治疗后,观察组、对照1组、对照2组VAS肩关节疼痛评分低于治疗前,观察组治疗后差值高于对照1组、对照2组,ASES评分高于治疗前,观察组治疗前后差值高于对照1组、对照2组,差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05)。治疗后,观察组、对照1组、对照2组前屈上举角度、外展上举与后伸角度、水平内收外展角度高于治疗前,观察组高于对照1组、对照2组,差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05)。结论 热敏灸联合“合谷刺法”与温灸针“合谷刺法”在治疗肩周炎疗效肯定,但前者减轻疼痛、改善功能方面有明显的优势。