【摘要】目的：探讨多元化健康宣教在幽门螺旋杆菌（Hp）感染碳13（13C）呼气试验筛查中的应用效果。方法：将2024年5月~2026年4月至我院体检科进行无痛胃肠镜检查后，结果提示Hp阳性的300例患者作为研究对象，开展前瞻性临床试验。经数字表法将入组患者随机列为常规组和试验组，每组150例。两组患者均行13C呼气试验，常规组检查前实施常规健康宣教，试验组检查前实施多元化健康宣教，比较两组患者的心理状态，准备情况，检查情况及整体满意度。结果：试验组的疾病不确定感（MUIS）评分、广泛性焦虑量表-7（GAD-7）评分均低于常规组（t=7.644，10.923；P＜0.05）。试验组的药物停用依从率、饮食依从率、空腹依从率分别92.00%（138/150）、93.33%（140/150）、96.67%（145/150），均高于常规组[80.00%（120/150）、81.33%（122/150）、85.33%（128/150）]（x2=8.970，9.763，11.762；P＜0.05）。试验组的吹气一次成功率、肺泡气样本质量达标率、检查完成率、检查结果准确率分别为94.67%（142/150）、94.00%（141/150）、96.67%（145/150）、96.00%（144/150），均高于常规组[82.67%（124/150）、83.33%（125/150）、84.67%（127/150）、84.00%（126/150），]（x2=10.748，8.492，12.763，12.000；P＜0.05）。试验组的心理舒适、信息获取、检查流畅、结果可靠满意度评分均高于常规组（t=5.279，4.625，4.592，5.729；P＜0.05）。结论：多元化健康宣教可改善Hp感染患者的心理状态，并优化13C呼气试验的准备情况、检查情况，对提升检查结果准确性及患者满意度均有积极影响

[Abstract]Objective:Exploring the application effect of diversified health education in screening for Hp infection with 13C breath test.Methods:A prospective clinical trial will be conducted on 300 patients who were found to be Hp positive after undergoing painless gastroscopy in our hospital from May 2024 to April 2026. The enrolled patients were randomly divided into a control group and an experimental group using a numerical table method, with 150 cases in each group. Both groups of patients underwent 13C breath tests. The routine group received routine health education before the examination, while the experimental group received diversified health education before the examination. The psychological status, preparation, examination results, and overall satisfaction of the two groups of patients were compared.Results:Compare to the control group,the experimental group had lower MUIS scores and GAD-7 scores (t=7.644，10.923; P<0.05). The medication discontinuation compliance rate, dietary compliance rate, and fasting compliance rate of the experimental group were 92.00% (138/150), 93.33% (140/150), and 96.67% (145/150), respectively, all higher than those of the conventional group [80.00% (120/150), 81.33% (122/150), 85.33% (128/150)] (x2=8.970，9.763，11.762; P<0.05). The success rate of one-time blowing, the quality compliance rate of alveolar gas samples, the completion rate of examination, and the accuracy of examination results in the experimental group were 94.67% (142/150), 94.00% (141/150), 96.67% (145/150), and 96.00% (144/150), respectively, which were higher than those in the conventional group [82.67% (124/150), 83.33% (125/150), 84.67% (127/150), 84.00% (126/150)] (x2=10.748，8.492，12.763，12.000; P<0.05). Compare to the control group,the experimental group had higher satisfaction scores of psychological comfort, information acquisition, smooth examination, and reliable results (t=5.279，4.625，4.592，5.729; P<0.05).Conclusion:Diversified health education can improve the psychological state of Hp infected patients, optimize the preparation and examination of 13C breath tests, and have a positive impact on improving the accuracy of examination results and patient satisfaction.

目的 探讨唐氏综合征血清学筛查风险值异常孕妇选择接受无创产前基因检测（NIPT）的影响因素,为临床制定对应策略提供参考依据。方法 选取2022年1月—2022年12月唐氏综合征血清学筛查风险值异常孕妇229例,根据是否接受NIPT分为接受组（195例）与不接受组（34例）。收集两组临床资料,采用Lasso-Logistic回归分析唐氏综合征血清学筛查风险值异常孕妇接受NIPT的影响因素。结果 单因素分析显示,年龄、文化水平、居住地、家庭平均月收入、孕前优生优育检查、孕前合并生殖相关疾病、受孕方式、不良孕产史、家族史、补充叶酸、配偶意愿、NIPT认知水平、血清学风险等级是血清学筛查异常孕妇接受NIPT的影响因素（P<0.05）;Lasso回归分析筛选出7个变量,分别为年龄、文化水平、家庭平均月收入、不良孕产史、家族史、NIPT认知水平、血清学风险等级;Logistic回归分析,年龄（OR=6.269,95%CI：2.413~16.285）、文化水平（OR=4.119,95%CI：1.627~10.430）、家庭平均月收入（OR=5.102,95%CI：2.067~12.594）、不良孕产史（OR=5.247,95%CI：1.833~15.021）、家族史（OR=7.416,95%CI：2.952~18.629）、NIPT认知水平（OR=5.751,95%CI：2.338~14.146）、血清学风险等级（OR=7.866,95%CI：3.057~20.238）是血清学筛查异常孕妇接受NIPT的影响因素（P<0.05）。结论 唐氏综合征血清学筛查风险值异常孕妇选择接受NIPT的影响因素较多,包括年龄、文化水平、家庭平均月收入、不良孕产史、家族史、NIPT认知水平、血清学风险等级,能为临床提高NIPT接受度提供指导信息。

Objective To explore the influencing factors of noninvasive prenatal testing（NIPT）for pregnant women with abnormal risk value of serological screening for Down syndrome,and to provide reference for clinical development of corresponding strategies．Methods A total of 229 pregnant women with abnormal serological screening risk values for Down syndrome from January 2022 to December 2022 were selected and divided into acceptance group（195 cases）and non-acceptance group（34 cases）according to whether they received NIPT．The clinical data of the two groups were collected and Lasso-Logistic regression was used to analyze the factors influencing the acceptance of NIPT in pregnant women with abnormal serological screening risk value for Down syndrome．Results In single factor analysis,age,education level,place of residence,average monthly family income,pre-pregnancy and childbearing examination,pre-pregnancy combined with reproductive diseases,conception method,adverse pregnancy history,family history,folic acid supplementation,spouse intention,NIPT cognition level and serological risk grade were the influencing factors for the acceptance of NIPT in pregnant women with abnormal serological screening（P<0.05）．Seven variables were selected by Lasso regression analysis,which were age,education level,average monthly family income,adverse pregnancy history,family history,NIPT cognition level and serological risk level．Logistic regression analysis showed that age（OR=6.269,95%CI：2.413-16.285）,education level（OR=4.119,95%CI：1.627-10.430）,average monthly family income（OR=5.102,95%CI：2.067-12.594）,adverse pregnancy history（OR=5.247,95%CI：1.833-15.021）,family history（OR=7.416,95%CI：2.952-18.629）,NIPT cognitive level（OR=5.751,95%CI：2.338-14.146）and serological risk level（OR=7.866,95%CI：3.057-20.238）were independent influencing factors for NIPT acceptance in pregnant women with abnormal serological screening（P<0.05）．Conclusions There are many influencing factors for pregnant women with abnormal serological screening risk value to accept NIPT,including age,education level,average monthly family income,adverse pregnancy history,family history,NIPT cognition level,serological risk grade,etc．,which can provide guidance information for clinical improvement of NIPT acceptance．

目的 初步探讨无创产前基因检测（NIPT）筛查胎儿患猫叫综合征临床性能。方法 收集2018年4月—2019年3月行NIPT提示胎儿患猫叫综合征高风险的孕妇,并收集其羊水细胞培养染色体核型分析或微阵列芯片检测结果,分析NIPT与羊水产前诊断结果的符合率。结果 NIPT提示猫叫综合征病例11例,孕妇均接受了羊水穿刺,染色体核型分析或微阵列芯片检测出胎儿染色体异常6例,符合率为54.5%。结论 NIPT对胎儿猫叫综合征的筛查具有临床价值,当提示高风险时必须行有创性产前诊断。

Objective To investigate the value of non-invasive prenatal testing（NIPT）for the screening of fetal Cri du Chat Syndrome（CdCS）. Methods Pregnant women who accepted NIPT with the results with high risk of fetal CdCS were selected in the study from April 2018 to March 2019．They were also accepted prenatal genetic counseling and the chromosome karyotype analysis or CMA detection of amniotic fluid cell culture．The coincidence rate of NIPT with chromosome karyotype and microarray analysis results were conducted. Results There were 11 cases with high risk of fetal CdCS in NIPT．All of them had received amniocentesis chromosome karyotype or microarray analysis,6（54.5%）cases were confirmed. Conclusions NIPT has some clinical value in screening fetal CdCS from maternal blood．Therefore,it was suggested to perform the invasive chromosomal karyotyping and CMA for high risk of fetal CdCS．

目的 探讨胎儿颈部软组织(NT)超声检查联合血清甲胎蛋白(AFP)水平检测对产前胎儿神经管畸形诊断中的应用价值。方法 选取684例我院2018年4月—2021年4月接受产前检查的孕妇,所有孕妇分别采用NT超声检查、血清AFP水平检查,以引产结果为“金标准”,比较NT超声、血清AFP水平及联合检查诊断结果、诊断效能及对不同类型神经管畸形诊断符合率的影响。结果 经引产结果显示共48例神经管畸形胎儿;经NT超声检查共36例神经管畸形胎儿;经血清AFP水平检查共34例神经管畸形胎儿;经联合检查共47例神经管畸形胎儿;与NT超声、血清AFP水平单独检查相比,联合检查灵敏度89.58%、准确率98.68%、阴性预测值99.22%较高,漏诊率10.42%较低(P＜0.05);与NT超声、血清AFP水平单独检查相比,联合检查对于脑膨出、隐形脊柱裂胎儿检出率较高(P＜0.05)。结论 NT超声检查、血清AFP联合诊断准确率显著高于单独检查,可有效提高诊断效能,为临床筛查胎儿神经管畸形提供有效手段。

目的 探讨鳞状上皮细胞抗原（SCCA）、人乳头瘤病毒（HPV）-DNA联合阴道镜检查在宫颈鳞状细胞癌（SCC）筛查中的应用价值。方法 选择2019年1月1日—2021年12月31日在中山市博爱医院就诊并确诊为SCC的妇女作为研究对象,共纳入100例SCC患者（SCC组）,同时选择200例经活检确诊为宫颈慢性炎症的患者（宫颈慢性炎症组）作为阴性对照。采用阴道镜观察研究对象的宫颈情况,并采集研究对象的宫颈组织标本进行HPV-DNA检测。采集研究对象的静脉血,采用化学发光免疫法测定研究对象SCCA的水平。以病理检查结果为金标准,分别对HPV-DNA检测、外周血SCCA两者联用以及阴道镜、HPV-DNA检测、外周血SCCA三者联用进行筛查效果的评价。结果 SCC组研究对象的年龄≥40岁者、出血者、性生活开始年龄≤20岁者比例均高于宫颈慢性炎症患者组;而宫颈慢性炎症患者组疼痛的比例高于SCC患者组,差异均有统计学意义（P<0.01）。χ²检验结果显示,SCC组研究对象的SCCA阳性率高于宫颈慢性炎症组（P<0.001）。阴道镜结合SCCA、HPV-DNA检测筛查SCC的灵敏度和特异度均高于单独使用SCCA和HPV-DNA,并取得较好的约登系数（75%）和Kappa值（0.730）。结论 采用阴道镜结合HPV-DNA、SCCA可有效提高SCC疾病的约登系数与Kappa值,其联合诊断的效能高于单独使用阴道镜、HPV-DNA或SCCA诊断SCC。

Objective To study the application value of squamus cell carcinoma antigen（SCCA）and human papillomavirus（HPV）-DNA combined with colposcope in cervical squamous cell carcinoma（SCC）screening．Methods Women diagnosed with SCC who visited Boai Hospital of Zhongshan city from January 1,2019 to December 31,2021 were selected as research subjects,including 100 patients with SCC（SCC group）and 200 patients with chronic cervical inflammation confirmed by biopsy（chronic cervical inflammation group）．The cervix of the subjects was observed by colposcope,and cervical tissue samples were collected for HPV-DNA testing．Venous blood of subjects was collected and SCCA levels were determined by chemiluminescence immunoassay．Using pathological examination results as the gold standard,the screening effect of combination HPV-DNA test and peripheral blood SCCA test,combination colposcope,HPV-DNA test and peripheral blood SCCA were evaluated respectively．Results In SCC group,the proportion of age≥40 years old,bleeding,sexual life age ≤20 years old were higher than those in chronic cervical inflammation group,but chronic cervical inflammation group had higher rate of pain than those in SCC group（P<0.01）by Chi-square test．SCCA positive rate in SCC group was higher than that in chronic cervical inflammation group（P<0.001）by Chi-square test．The sensitivity and specificity of colposcope combined with SCCA and HPV-DNA were higher than those of SCCA and HPV-DNA alone,and better Youden’s coefficient（75%）and Kappa value（0.730）were obtained．Conclusions Colposcope combined with HPV-DNA and SCCA can effectively improve the Youden’s coefficient and Kappa value of SCC disease,and its combined diagnosis efficiency was higher than that of colposcope,HPV-DNA and SCCA alone in the diagnosis of SCC,which has high clinical promotion significance．

目的 研究抗体筛查阳性输血患者的抗体与Rh抗原分布情况。方法 收集2019年10月1日—2022年12月31日中山大学孙逸仙纪念医院34 796例患者的不规则抗体筛查结果,以及抗体筛查阳性患者的抗体鉴定与Rh抗原分型结果,记录34 796例患者的年龄、性别、妊娠史、输血史等基本资料,分析各血型系统不规则抗体产生的阳性率及相关影响因素。结果 34 796例患者中,不规则抗体筛查阳性的患者237例,抗体筛查阳性率为0.68%。共检出不规则抗体260例,其中MNS系统83例（占31.93%）,Rh血型系统抗体70例（占26.93%）,Lewis血型系统14例（占比5.39%）。同种非特异性抗体79例,阳性率30.38%。同种特异性抗体中抗-E的占比最高,为20.77%;其次是抗-Mia,为20.39%。对237例抗体筛查阳性患者进行Rh抗原分型,CCDee抗原表型占比最高,为52.74%,其次是CcDEe占比29.16%。抗体筛查阳性率与性别、输血史、妊娠史有关,女性、有输血史、有妊娠史者的抗体筛查阳性率较高（P>0.05）。不同科室间抗体筛查阳性率比较差异有统计学意义（P>0.05）,其中风湿免疫科与血液科患者阳性率最高。结论 抗-E、抗-Mia为主要的红细胞不规则抗体,不规则抗体的产生与性别、输血史、妊娠史有关,输血前进行不规则抗体筛查、鉴定及Rh抗原分型,有利于提高输血安全。

Objective To explore the distribution of antibodies and Rh antigens in transfusion patients with positive antibodies screened in our hospital．Methods From October 1,2019 to December 31,2022,there were 34,796 patients undergoing irregular antibody screening in Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University,antibody identification and Rh blood typing results of positive patients were collected．Meanwhile,the age,sex,pregnancy history,blood transfusion history and other basic data of 34 796 patients were collected,and the positive rate of irregular antibody production and related influencing factors of blood group system were analyzed．Results Among the 34,796 patients,237 patients were screened positive for irregular antibodies,and the antibody screening positivity rate was 0.68%．A total of 260 cases of irregular antibodies were detected,83 cases of MNS system,accounting for 31.93%;70 cases of Rh blood group system,accounting for 26.93%;14 cases of Lewis blood group system,accounting for 5.39%．There were 79 cases of homozygous non-specific antibodies,with a detection rate of 30.38%．The highest percentage of homo-specific antibodies was anti-E,accounting for 20.77%,followed by anti-Mia,accounting for 20.39%．Rh antigen typing was performed in 237 antibody-screening positive patients,and the highest percentage of CCDee antigen phenotype was 52.74%,followed by CcDEe with 29.16%．Antibody screening positive rate was correlated with gender,blood transfusion history and pregnancy history,and the positive rate was higher in female,patients with blood transfusion history and pregnancy history,and the difference was statistically significant（P>0.05）．There were differences in the positive detection rate of antibody-screening in different departments,and the differences were statistically significant（P>0.05）,and the highest positive rates were in Department of Rheumatology and Immunology and Hematology．Conclusions Anti-E,anti-Mia are the main erythrocyte irregular antibodies,and the production of irregular antibodies is related to gender,transfusion history and pregnancy history,and irregular antibody screening,identification and Rh antigen typing before transfusion are beneficial to improve transfusion safety．

目的 本文旨在对全流程的生物安全管理问题进行梳理,为未来出现的大规模核酸筛查提供参考。方法 我们参考技术规范及其他医疗机构的实践总结,结合自身实际经验,梳理了核酸采集场所、个人防护、标本采集转运检测流程共3个方面的生物安全管理需注意的问题及解决措施。严格要求采样队伍按标准要求执行,以达到保质保量完成筛查任务的目的。结果 新冠核酸筛查期间我院共外派采集标本361 841人次。标本零污染零丢失,未发生一例生物安全事件,圆满完成采样任务。结论 大规模新冠核酸筛查是查清疫情源头、抑制疫情蔓延的重要手段。为了保证全流程的生物安全,应做好充足准备,严格落实各项生物安全措施。

Objective This article aims to sort out the problems in the whole process of biosafety management and provide reference for large-scale nucleic acid screening in the future. Methods We refer to the technical guidelines and the practice of other medical institutions, combined with our practical experience, summarized the problems and solutions needing attention in biosafety management in three aspects: nucleic acid sampling place, personal protection and the process from sample collection to detection. The sampling team was strictly required to implement the standard requirements, so as to complete the screening task with quality and quantity. Results A total of 361 841 samples were collected during SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid screening. No samples were contaminated or lost, and no biosafety accident occurred. The sampling task were successfully completed. Conclusion Large-scale SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid screening is an important method to find out the source of the epidemic and curb the spread of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. In order to ensure the biosafety of the whole process, sufficient preparations should be made and biosafety measures should be strictly implemented.

目的 探讨广州地区儿童2019新型冠状病毒(2019 novel coronavirus, 2019-nCoV)感染筛查/疑似病例的流行病学特点、发病特点、可能的原因及防控建议。方法 回顾性分析2020年1月20日—2020年2月29日广州市唯一一家儿童2019-nCoV感染隔离定点医疗单位隔离病房收治住院的符合儿童2019-nCoV感染筛查/疑似病例129例,对其流行病学、发病特点、临床特征、实验室检查及转归、随访等进行总结分析。 结果 男 79例,女 50例,最小1个月,最大13岁,中位数2岁,51例(39.5%)有武汉疫区旅游或居住史,20例(15.5%)有与来自疫区有呼吸道症状人员接触史,17例(13.1%)周边或社区有确诊病例,3例(2.3%)有确诊病人接触史(其中2例为家庭确诊病例密切接触史),38例(29.5%)为临床符合或聚集性发病;临床症状:发热121例(93.8%),咳嗽92例(71.3%),流涕50例(38.8%),32例伴有腹泻、呕吐/腹痛(24.8%),102例(79.0%)白细胞降低或正常,C反应蛋白(C-reactive protein,CRP)＜20 mg/L有103例(79.8%),57例(44.2%)胸片或CT示肺部斑片状影或实变;病原学检查:2019-nCoV实时荧光定量反转录PCR检测结果:所有患儿及陪同家属都有行咽拭子检查,只有21例患儿(16.3%)有行肛拭子检查,仅有1例(0.78%)家庭确诊病例密切接触者肛拭子阳性,但连续多次咽拭子结果阴性,余患者肛拭子和咽拭子及陪同家属咽拭子结果均阴性。其他病原学检查结果61例(47.3%),包括14例RSV阳性,9例流感病毒A,8例人偏肺病毒,6例肠道病毒,6例流感病毒B,6例肺炎支原体,4例副流感病毒1型,1例副流感病毒3型,2例人博卡病毒,3例腺病毒,1例肺炎克雷伯菌,1例人型葡萄球菌,其中1例合并副流感病毒1型及人博卡病毒。跟踪唯一1例确诊患者咽拭子多次检查均阴性,肛拭子持续19天后才转阴,一直无任何症状。其余患者好转出院后第3天、7天及14天进行随访,无异常发现。结论 儿童2019-nCoV感染筛查/疑似病例临床多表现为呼吸道或消化道症状,确诊主要依靠核酸检测,新冠病毒感染确诊率极低,而其将近50%病例能找到除新冠病毒外的其它相关病原体;高危患者为密切接触者,但存在漏诊的可能,肛拭子阳性率或高于咽拭子。

Objective To explore the epidemiological characteristics, onset characteristics, pathogenic mechanism of 2019-nCoV infection in children, and its control and prevention in Guangzhou. Methods From January 20, 2020 to February 29, 2020, a retrospective analysis was carried out on 129 suspected cases of 2019-nCoV infection admitted to the isolation ward of the only medical unit designated for children in Guangzhou. The epidemiology, disease characteristics, clinical characteristics, laboratory examination, outcome and follow-up were summarized and analyzed. Results There were 79 males and 50 females, with a minimum age of 1 month and a maximum age of 13 years. Anong them, 51 cases (39.5%) had a history of tourism or residence in the epidemic area of Wuhan, 20 cases (15.5%) had a history of contact with people with respiratory symptoms from the epidemic area, 17 cases (13.1%) with a confirmed case in the surrounding area or community, 3 cases (2.3%) had a history of contact with a confirmed patient (2 of them were family clustering cases), 38 cases (29.5%) were clinically suspected cases. Clinical symptoms: 121 cases with fever (93.8%), 92 cases with coughing (71.3%), 50 cases with runny nose (38.8%), 32 cases with diarrhea, vomiting or abdominal pain (24.8%). In 102 cases (79.0%), white blood cells were decreased or normal, 103 cases (79.8%) with CRP＜20 mg/L, and 57 cases (44.2%) showed focal infection on chest X-ray or CT scan. Etiological examination: only one case (0.78%) of the family confirmed cases had positive anal swab result, but the throat swab results were negative all the time. The anal swab and throat swab results of other patients and the throat swab results of their accompanying family members were negative. Other pathogens were detected in 61 cases (47.3%), including 14 RSV positive cases, 9 influenza A positive cases, 8 human metapneumovirus positive cases, 6 enterovirus positive cases, 6 influenza B positive cases, 6 Mycoplasma pneumoniae positive cases, 4 parainfluenza virus type 1 positive cases, 1 parainfluenza virus type 3 positive cases, 2 human bocavirus positive cases, 3 adenovirus positive cases, 1 Klebsiella pneumoniae positive cases, 1 Human Staphylococcus positive case, and 1 case with parainfluenza virus type 1 and human bocavirus. The only confirmed patient was followed up while multiple pharyngeal swab results were negative, and the positive anal swab results lasted for 19 days before turning negative and remained asymptomatic. Other patients were followed up on the 3rd, 7th and 14th day after discharge, and no abnormal findings were found. Conclusion Screening/suspected cases of 2019-nCoV infection in children were mostly clinically manifested as respiratory or gastrointestinal symptoms. The diagnosis rate of nucleic acids was extremely low, and there was a possibility of missed diagnosis. Nearly 50% of cases could find other relevant pathogens excluding the 2019-nCoV. The positive rate of anal swab results was higher than that of pharyngeal swab.

目的 本文通过对越秀区2016—2020年学生肺结核流行特征和筛查情况分析,为学校制定针对性防控措施提供参考依据,最大限度地做好学校结核病防控工作。方法 在“国家结核病管理信息系统”专网中,导出2016—2020年常住在越秀区的学生肺结核患者的病案信息到EXCLE表,进行逻辑核对和补漏;将患者每次所做的密切接触者筛查资料统一并录入到一个EXCLE汇总表,将信息表转换成FoxPro 6.0数据库进行统计,分析本地居住学生肺结核登记发病率、新发与复发构成比,人群分布特征、发现方式、就诊和确诊延误、耐药情况、密切接触者筛查情况。结果 共登记学生肺结核191例,登记发病率为3.25/10万,不同年份登记发病率未见统计学差异(χ²=7.84. P=0.097 3),但学生患者占比从2016年的2.52%上升到2020年的7.74%,上升了3.07倍。学生患者均为新发,男女性别比为1.27:1,以15～24岁年龄段的高中生和大学生构成为主,分别占45.55%和39.79%,两者合计85.34%。发现方式主要以转诊、追踪到位和因症到结防机构直接就诊为主,分别为44.50%、25.13%、23.56%,其中转诊比例最高,占了44.50％;各年的发现方式构成比差异未见统计学意义(χ²=12.057,P=0.441 1)。共登记涂阳患者45例,就诊延误10例,延误率22.22%,确诊延误2例,延误率4.44%;共登记涂阴患者146例,就诊延误29例,延误率19.86%,确诊延误3例,延误率2.05%。共登记培养阳性(涂阳培阳45例,涂阴培阳6例),对一线抗结核药物(HRZES)全敏感42例,全敏感率82.35%;单耐药9例,耐药率17.65%,其中单耐药率最高的为异烟肼和链霉素,不同年份的全敏感率未见统计学差异(χ²=3.81 P=0.432)。需开展筛查的学生肺结核患者178例,已开展筛查的患者169例,筛查率94.94%。需筛查的密切接触者7954例,实际接受筛查(开展了PPD或胸片筛查1项或以上)者7 898例,筛查率99.30%,发现活动性肺结核13例,检出率0.16%。密切接触者筛查方式:胸片筛查6 317人,发现胸片异常42人,异常率0.66%;PPD筛查7 897人,强阳性493人,强阳性率6.24%;症状筛查7 897人,自诉有症状64人,症状阳性率0.81%。结论 2016—2020年,广州市越秀区学生肺结核疫情较轻,患者以高中和大学生首次发病为主,男女差别不大,但就诊延误和确诊延误仍较普遍。其次,对学生患者及其密切接触者的筛查工作做得较好,及时发现了较多现症患者及近期感染者。因此,继续加强高中以上学校的结核病防治知识宣传工作和做好应筛必筛工作,是今后学校疫情控制的侧重点。

目的 分析酶联免疫法(ELISA)联合核酸检测技术(NAT)在献血者血液筛查和输血残余风险分析中的应用价值。方法 选取2019年1月—8月惠州市中心血站2 514例无偿献血者为研究对象,采集血液标本,分别应用两种不同ELISA试剂盒检测乙肝病毒表面抗原(HBsAg)、丙肝抗体(抗-HCV)、艾滋病抗体(抗-HIV),并以核酸扩增技术(NAT)进行HBV DNA、HCV RNA、HIV RNA检测,对ELISA检测阴性,而NAT检测阳性的标本进行进一步追踪分析。结果 ELISA检测结果显示27例阳性,阳性率1.07%,其中2例同时HBsAg阳性、丙肝抗体(抗-HCV)阳性。NAT技术检测结果显示12例阳性,阳性率0.48%,其中1例同时HBV DNA阳性、HCV RNA阳性。27例ELISA检测阳性中,10例经NAT技术检测证实为阳性,17例为阴性;2 487例ELISA检测阴性中,2例NAT技术检测HBV DNA阳性,2 485例为阴性。对2例ELISA检测阴性、NAT技术检测阳性者进行随访追踪证实HbsAg阳性。结论 2次ELISA筛查献血者血液仍然存在漏检误检风险,存在输血残余风险,联合应用NAT技术能够降低输血残余风险。