专题论著: 新型冠状病毒肺炎

天津市三级综合医院疫情期间医护人员代谢综合征与高同型半胱氨酸血症的关系及靶器官损害的研究

Study on the relationship of metabolic syndrome and hyperhomocysteinemia and target organ damage among medical staff in a Tianjin third-class general hospital during the pandemic period

:11-16
 
目的 了解疫情期间医护人员代谢综合征(MS)、高同型半胱氨酸血症(HHcy)的患病率、二者关系及靶器官损害。方法 选取2020年1月—2021年11月在天津市某三级综合医院的1 544名医护人员作为研究对象。测量人体指标,测定血液生化、免疫等指标。分析MS及其组分的患病率、HHcy的患病率及靶器官损害。采用χ2检验,比较MS组、HHcy组与对照组靶器官损害的差异。采用Logistic回归模型分析MS与HHcy的关系。结果 三级综合医院医护人员疫情期间MS患病率为23.7%,MS组分:中心性肥胖、高血压/高血压病、高甘油三酯、低高密度脂蛋白和高空腹葡萄糖/糖尿病的患病率分别为49.4%、19.3%、24.3%、0.5%和37%。HHcy的患病率为29.7%。MS组、HHcy组与对照组靶器官损害程度差异有统计学意义(P<0.001)。HHcy与MS无直接相关性。结论 疫情期间医护人员MS和HHcy患病率较高,与对照组相比有明显的靶器官损害,HHcy不是MS的独立危险因素。
Objective To explore the prevalence of metabolic syndrome (MS) and hyperhomocysteinemia (HHcy), their relationship and target organ damage among medical staff during the pandemic. Methods A total of 1 544 medical staff in a third-class general hospital in Tianjin from January 2020 to November 2021 were selected as the object of study. The indexes of human body were measured, and the indexes of blood biochemistry and immunity were detected. The prevalence of MS and its components, the prevalence of HHcy and target organ damage were analyzed. χ2 test was used to analyze the difference of target organ damage among MS group, HHcy group and control group. The relationship between HHcy and MS was analyzed by Logistic regression model. Results The prevalence of MS among medical staff in the third-class general hospital during the pandemic was 23.7%. The prevalence of central obesity, hypertension / hypertension disease, high triglyceride, low high density lipoprotein cholesterol and high fasting plasma glucose/diabetes were 49.4%, 19.3%, 24.3%, 0.5% and 37%, respectively. The prevalence of HHcy was 29.7%. There was significant difference in target organ damage among MS group, HHcy group and control group (P<0.001). There was no direct correlation between HHcy and MS. Conclusions During the pandemic period, the prevalence of MS and HHcy in medical staff were high, and there was obvious target organ damage in those staff compared with the control staff. HHcy is not an independent risk factor of MS.
临床诊疗

焦虑障碍与冠状动脉介入治疗患者对比剂肾病的相关性分析

The analysis about contrast induced nephropathy after undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with anxiety disorder

:80-84
 
目的 探讨焦虑障碍与冠心病经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)患者术后发生对比剂肾病(CIN)的相关性及机制,为早期发现CIN高危人群及其预防提供理论依据。方法 入选2014年6月—2016年12月于天津市第四中心医院心内科住院确诊冠心病并接受PCI患者,进行综合医院焦虑/抑郁情绪测定表(HAD)及汉密尔顿焦虑量表(HAMA)评价,依据量表的评分标准,最终纳入研究共120例,其中焦虑障碍组60例,非焦虑障碍组60例。观察2组患者PCI术前及术后72 h肌酐(SCr)、肌酐清除率(Ccr)、肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α)、可溶性细胞间黏附分子-1(sICAM-1)、C反应蛋白(CRP)、白细胞介素-18(IL-18)的变化情况,并记录CIN的发生率。结果 2组患者PCI术前Scr、Ccr水平差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);2组患者PCI术后Scr水平均较术前升高,Ccr水平较术前降低(P<0.01)。PCI术后,焦虑障碍组Scr水平高于非焦虑障碍组,Ccr水平低于非焦虑障碍组(P<0.05)。2组患者PCI术前sICAM-1、CRP、IL-18、TNF-α差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);2组患者PCI术后sICAM-1、CRP、IL-18、TNF-α水平较术前均升高(P<0.01);PCI术后焦虑障碍组sICAM-1、CRP、IL-18、TNF-α水平高于非焦虑障碍组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。PCI术前,焦虑障碍组HAD、HAMA评分高于非焦虑障碍组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01);非焦虑障碍组患者PCI术后较术前HAD、HAMA评分差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);焦虑障碍组PCI术后HAD、HAMA评分高于术前,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01);PCI术后,焦虑障碍组HAD、HAMA评分高于非焦虑障碍组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论 焦虑障碍可能是冠心病患者PCI术后发生对比剂肾病的危险因素之一。
出版者信息








《广州医药》公众号