目的 分析比较经皮微创椎弓根钉内固定和传统开放式手术治疗脊椎骨折的优劣差异。方法 本研究选择我院2015年2月—2016年6月收治的脊椎骨折患者72例,按照治疗方法的不同将全部患者分成对照组(36例)和实验组(36例),两组患者分别给予传统开放式手术治疗和经皮微创椎弓根钉内固定治疗,对两组患者的临床疗效进行观察分析。结果 在手术时间、手术出血量、切口长度以及住院时间方面,实验组患者均优于对照组(P＜0.05);实验组患者术后的血清肌酸激酶活性低于对照组患者(P＜0.05);治疗后两组患者椎体前缘高度、Cobb's角均优于治疗前(P＜0.05),但是组间比较差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05)。术后两组患者均没有发生椎间隙感染、神经损伤、切口感染等并发症。结论 在对脊椎骨折患者进行治疗时,经皮微创椎弓根钉内固定治疗和传统开放式手术治疗的临床疗效比较类似,但是和传统开放式手术相比较,经皮微创椎弓根钉内固定治疗对患者的损伤更加轻微,术后恢复时间更短。

目的 研究新辅助化疗联合保肢手术治疗骨肉瘤的临床效果。方法 根据既往治疗骨肉瘤方法的不同,将56例患者分为对传统保肢组（A组）和现代保肢组（B组）,各28例。A组用采用传统保肢方案,即保肢手术+术后化疗方案进行;B组采用现代保肢方案,即新辅助化疗+保肢手术+术后化疗方案进行。化疗方案均采用CTX + VCR +MTX+ ADM方案,比较两组转移/复发率、术后1 年、2年及 3 年生存率、肢体功能、临床疗效情况。结果 比较两组的转移/复发率及3年后的死亡率,B组低于A组(P<0.05);肢体功能优良率及临床疗效,B组高于A组(P<0.05)。结论 新辅助化疗联合保肢手术能够降低骨肉瘤患者转移/复发率、死亡率,改善肢体功能,提高临床疗效。

Objective To study the clinical effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with limb salvage surgery for osteosarcoma. Methods Based on the previous methods of treating osteosarcoma, 56 patients were divided into the traditional limb salvage group (A group) and the modern limb salvage group (B group), 28 cases for each. The traditional limb salvage surgery + postoperative chemotherapy regimen were used in group A, and modern limb salvage regimen was performed in group B, ie neoadjuvant chemotherapy + limb salvage surgery + postoperative chemotherapy. The CTX + VCR +MTX+ ADM protocol was used in the chemotherapy regimens. The metastasis/recurrence rate, the 1-year, 2-year and 3-year survival rates, limb function, and clinical efficacy were compared between the two groups. Results The metastasis/recurrence rate and the mortality rate after 3 years in the two groups were compared. The B group was lower than that of the group A (P<0.05). The excellent rate of limb function and clinical efficacy were higher in the B group than that of in the group A (P<0.05). Conclusion Neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with limb salvage surgery may reduce the metastasis/recurrence rate and mortality of osteosarcoma patients, improve limb function and increase clinical efficacy.

目的 比较分析神经内镜和常规开颅手术在治疗高血压脑出血时的优劣。方法 回顾性分析我院神经外科2015年12月1日—2017年12月31日收治的60例高血压脑出血患者,根据治疗术式的不同,分为对照组和观察组,各30例。对照组行常规开颅手术,观察组给予神经内镜治疗,通过对比两组患者的手术时长、术中出血量、血肿清除率、住院时间、术后并发症及术后6个月随访效果,分析两组优劣。结果 观察组手术时长短于对照组,差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）;观察组术中出血量少于对照组,差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）;观察组血肿清除率高于对照组,差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）;观察组术后并发症（颅内感染、肺部感染）发生率低于对照组,差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）,而两组再次出血及死亡率差异均有统计学意义（P>0.05）;观察组患者术后预后效果优于对照组,差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。结论 神经内镜在治疗高血压脑出血时对比常规开颅手术具有显著缩短手术时长及住院时间,提高血肿清除率,减少术中出血,降低颅内及肺部感染率等优势,值得临床推广应用。

Objective To compare and analyze the advantages and disadvantages of neuroendoscopy and conventional craniotomy in the treatment of hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage. Methods 60 patients with hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage admitted to our hospital from December 1,2015 to December 31,2017 were divided into the control group and the observation group,each with 30 cases. The control group underwent conventional craniotomy,and the observation group underwent neuroendoscopic treatment. The length of operation,intraoperative blood loss,hematoma clearance,length of hospital stay,postoperative complications,and follow-up after 6 months were compared between the two groups, to analysis the advantages and disadvantages of both groups. Results The duration of operation in the observation group was shorter than that in the control group （P<0.05）. The intraoperative blood loss in the observation group was less than that in the control group （P<0.05）;The hematoma clearance rate in the observation group was higher than that in the control group （P<0.05）;The incidence of postoperative complications （intracranial infection,lung infection） in the observation group was lower than that of the control group （P<0.05）. There was no statistically significant in rebleeding and mortality between the two groups （P>0.05）. The prognosis of the observation group was better than that of the control group. In the control group,the difference was statistically significant （P<0.05）. Conclusion Neuroendoscope in the treatment of hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage compared with conventional craniotomy may shorten the length of operation and hospital stay,improve hematoma clearance rate,reduce intraoperative bleeding,reduce intracranial and pulmonary infection and other advantages. It is worthy of clinical promotion and application.

目的 探讨闭角型青光眼合并白内障采取三联手术治疗的效果。方法 随机抽取我院2013年2月—2015年12月接诊的三联手术治疗的闭角型青光眼合并白内障患者40例(41眼)与同期小梁术后再行超声乳化白内障摘除+人工晶体植入术的闭角型青光眼合并白内障患者40例(41眼)进行回顾性分析,其中前者作为研究组,后者为对照组,均随访半年以上,观察记录两组患者术前与术后最佳矫正视力、术后1周与3个月眼压、术前与术后前房变化、术后滤过泡及并发症情况,并对比分析。结果 两组术前最佳矫正视力比较无明显差异(P>0.05),术后两组均有明显升高(P<0.05),且研究组稍高于对照组(P>0.05);两组术后1周眼压比较无明显差异(P>0.05),术后3个月研究组明显下降(P<0.05),且低于对照组(P<0.05);两组术前前房深度比较无明显差异(P>0.05),术后研究组明显高于对照组(P<0.05);研究组术后功能性滤过泡率稍高于对照组(P>0.05);组间并发症发生率比较无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 三联手术治疗闭角型青光眼合并白内障安全性高,可更好地改善视力与眼压,是临床上治疗青光眼合并白内障可靠方法。

目的 研究鳞癌抗原(SCC-Ag)的表达对宫颈癌手术治疗后临床转归的预测价值。方法 选取我院2014年4月—2015年9月实施宫颈癌手术的患者52例,分别于手术前后分析所有患者的鳞癌抗原表达,对患者进行1年的随访,以发生癌细胞转移、复发或死亡为研究终点,比较预后良好的患者与预后差的患者鳞癌抗原的表达的不同。结果 Ia、Ib1、Ib2、IIa、IIb期宫颈癌患者术后SCC-Ag水平较手术前均显著降低(P＜0.05);纳入本次研究的患者宫颈癌术后复发或转移发生率为15.38%,转归良好的患者为84.62%,预后良好的患者术后SCC-Ag水平(0.91±0.27)ng/mL较发生复发或转移的患者(1.37±0.57)ng/ml显著较较低(P＜0.05)。结论 宫颈癌患者术后血清SCC-Ag水平与肿瘤的应答之间具有关联性,术后SCC-Ag水平高的患者复发与转移发生率显著高于SCC-Ag水平低的患者,鳞癌抗原的表达对宫颈癌手术后患者的转归情况具有预测价值,临床应予以重视。

目的 探讨双侧声带麻痹治疗方式的选择与疗效。方法 回顾分析本院自2000年1月—2007年12月收治的双侧声带麻痹患者16例手术治疗资料与术后随访情况。结果 16例双侧声带麻痹的患者总共接受了29次手术治疗。4例鼻咽癌放疗后患者接受1次气管切开术,其他12例患者总共接受了25次手术治疗,平均每人2.1次。术式包括:气管切开术、神经肌蒂移植术、喉声带外移术、支撑喉镜CO₂激光声带手术及喉裂开单侧声带切除。结论 目前针对双侧声带麻痹的手术治疗有多种术式可供选择,临床医生应结合患者具体情况为患者提供个性化的治疗方案。

Objective To investigate the choice of surgical treatments for patients with bilateral vocal cord paralysis. Methods A retrospective analysis the operation and postoperative treatments in patients with bilateral vocal cord paralysis,from Jannuary 2000 to December 2007 in our hospital. Results A total of 29 operations were applied in 16 cases patients with bilateral vocal cord paralysis.Four cases of patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma were received one time tracheotomy after radiotherapy.The others were received operation therapy for a total of 25 times.The average operation times in these groups was 2.1.Among them:Two patients were received one time operation,accounted for 16.7%(2/12);Five patients were received two times operation,accounted for 41.7%(5/12);Three patients were received three times operation,accounted for 25%(3/12);One patient was received four times operation,accounted for 6.3%(1/12).The surgical treatments included of tracheotomy,neuromuscular pedicle transplantation,lateral cordopexy,the laryngoscope vocal cord operation by CO₂ laser and laryngofissure unilateral vocal cord resection. Conclusion There have a variety of surgical options for bilateral vocal cord paralysis.Clinicians should provide individualized treatment plans for patients combined with their specific circumstances.