目的 观察利伐沙班对心力衰竭（HF）合并心房颤动（AF）患者凝血因子及预后情况的影响。方法 采用前瞻性研究,纳入平顶山市第二人民医院2021年1月—2022年4月期间收治的123例HF合并AF患者,以数字随机表法将入组患者分为常规组（61例）和试验组（62）例,两组均行起搏器植入术（CRTD）治疗,常规组予以常规抗凝治疗辅助CRTD,试验组予以利伐沙班辅助CRTD,所有患者术后均开展一年随访,比较两组患者治疗前后的抗Xa凝血因子、心肌损伤标志物、心功能指标变化情况,以及术后血栓栓塞、心血管死亡事件发生情况。结果 治疗前,两组患者的Xa凝血因子,心肌损伤标志物,心功能指标比较差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）;在不同抗凝方案下,观察组治疗1 d后的抗Xa凝血因子为（130.44±20.18）IU/mg,治疗3 d后的抗Xa凝血因子为（115.36±20.77）IU/mg,治疗7 d的抗Xa凝血因子为（90.25±20.44）IU/mg,均低于常规组[（145.33±20.19）IU/mg、（128.45±20.16）IU/mg、（103.34±20.17）IU/mg],差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。治疗后,试验组的肌酸激酶同工酶为（7.52±2.16）U/L,心肌肌钙蛋白Ⅰ为（0.52±0.12）ng/mL,乳酸脱氢酶为（126.41±20.45）U/L,均低于常规组[（8.44±2.28）U/L、（0.94±0.31）ng/mL、（140.33±20.25）U/L],差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。治疗后,观察组的左室射血分数为（56.12±10.41）%,高于常规组（50.24±10.33）%,左室舒张末期内径为（47.11±10.25）mm,左室舒张末期容积为（36.72±10.43）mL,均低于常规组（53.28±10.14）mm、（42.77±10.36）mL,差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。随访期间,试验组的血栓栓塞事件发生率为4.84%（3/62）,心血管死亡事件发生率为3.23%（2/62）,均低于常规组[19.67%（12/61）、14.75%（9/61）],差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。结论 利伐沙班辅助CRTD能有效增强HF合并AF患者的抗Xa凝血因子活性,对减轻心肌损伤、改善心功能并降低血栓栓塞或心血管死亡风险均有积极意义。

Objective To observe the effect of rivaroxaban on coagulation factors and prognosis in patients of heart failure（HF）with atrial fibrillation（AF）．Methods This is a prospective study．The patients were included from January 2021 to April 2022 in Pingdingshan Second People’s Hospital．The study subjects were 123 patients with HF and AF．The enrolled patients were divided into the conventional group（61 cases）and the experimental group（62 cases）by the method of digital random table．Both groups were treated with cardiac resynchronization therapy with defibrillator（CRTD）．The conventional group was treated with conventional anticoagulation therapy to assist CRTD,and the experimental group was treated with rivaroxaban to assist CRTD．All patients were followed up for one year after surgery,the changes in anti-Xa coagulation factors,myocardial injury markers,cardiac function indicators,as well as the incidence of postoperative thromboembolism and cardiovascular death events between the two groups of patients before and after treatment were compared．Results Before treatment,there were no statistically significant differences in Xa coagulation factor,myocardial injury markers and cardiac function indicators between the two groups of patients（P>0.05）．Under different anticoagulation regimens,the anti-Xa coagulation factor levels in the observation group were（130.44±20.18）IU/mg after 1 day of treatment,（115.36±20.77）IU/mg after 3 days of treatment,and（90.25±20.44）IU/mg after 7 days of treatment,which were lower than that in the conventional group [（145.33±20.19）IU/mg,（128.45±20.16）IU/mg,（103.34±20.17）IU/mg]（P<0.05）．After treatment,the CK-MB level of the experimental group was（7.52±2.16）U/L,cTnI was（0.52±0.12）ng/mL,and LDH was（126.41±20.45）U/L,which were lower than that of the conventional group [（8.44±2.28）U/L,（0.94±0.31）ng/mL,（140.33±20.25）U/L]（P<0.05）．After treatment,the left ventricular ejection fraction of the observation group was（56.12±10.41）%,which was higher than the conventional group（50.24±10.33）%,left ventricular diameter was（47.11±10.25）mm,left ventricular end disastolic volume was（36.72±10.43）mL,which were lower than the conventional group（53.28±10.14）mm,（42.77±10.36）mL（P<0.05）．During the follow-up period,the incidence of thromboembolism events in the experimental group was 4.84%（3/62）,and the incidence of cardiovascular death events was 3.23%（2/62）,which was lower than the conventional group [19.67%（12/61）,14.75%（9/61）]（P<0.05）．Conclusions Rivaroxaban assisted CRTD can effectively enhance the activity of anti-Xa coagulation factors in patients with HF and AF,which has positive significance in reducing myocardial injury,improving cardiac function and reducing the risk of thromboembolism or cardiovascular death．

目的 探索心脏康复干预对房颤合并高血压患者的血脂血压变化、运动耐量、心脏功能、肺功能等指标的影响。方法 选取房颤合并高血压患者96例,随机分为常规治疗组和心脏康复(CR)组,每组各48例患者。常规治疗组给予规范的药物治疗,CR组在规范药物治疗的基础上予运动干预6个月,对比治疗前后2组甘油三酯(TG)、总胆固醇(TC)、低密度脂蛋白(LDL-C)水平,左心房直径(LA)、左心室射血分数(LVEF)、左心室舒张末内径(LVEDd),无氧阈值(AT)、峰值公斤摄氧量(PeakVO₂/kg)、峰值通气量(VEpeak)、每搏输出量(SV)、峰值氧脉搏(PeakO₂pluse),收缩压(SBP)与舒张压(DBP)变化情况,6分钟步行距离(6MWD),以及Borg劳累评估量表评分、焦虑自评量表(SAS)和抑郁自评量表(SDS)评分。结果 2组患者治疗6个月时,TC、TG、LDL-C水平以及SBP、DBP均下降(P<0.05),但2组之间比较,3项血脂指标无统计学差异(P>0.05),而CR组血压显著下降(P<0.05) 。2组患者治疗6个月时,LA、LVEDd减小(P<0.05),而LVEF无变化(P>0.05),CR组LA较常规治疗组缩小(P<0.05)。治疗6个月时,CR组AT、PeakVO₂/kg、VEpeak、SV和PeakO₂plus水平均升高(P<0.05),而常规治疗组的上述相关指标无明显变化(P>0.05)。治疗6个月时,2组患者6分钟步行距离均增加,CR组较常规组增加(P<0.05)。治疗6个月时,CR组Borg劳累评估量表评分、SAS评分及SDS评分均下降,而常规治疗组上述3项评分较治疗前无变化(P>0.05),与常规治疗组比较,CR组上述3项评分降低(P<0.05)。结论 以中等强度运动干预为主导的心脏康复治疗能够降低房颤合并高血压患者的血脂水平、控制血压状态、改善左心房及左心室结构重构,还可以增加该群体的运动耐力及心肺功能、减少消极情绪并提高生活质量。

Objective To evaluate the impact of cardiac rehabilitation on blood lipid level,blood pressure control,exercise endurance,cardiac function, quality of life and lung function in patients with hypertension and atrial fibrillation (AF). Methods This prospective cohort study enrolled 96 patients with AF and hypertension, who were randomly and evenly assigned to the conventional group and the cardiac rehabilitation (CR) group, both treated for at least 6 months. Research indicators included the levels of triglycerides (TG), total cholesterol (TC) and low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C); left atrial diameter (LA), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), left ventricular end diastolic diameter (LVEDd), anaerobic threshold (AT), peak oxygen uptake volume per kilogram (PeakVO₂/kg), peak ventilation volume (VEpeak), stroke volume (SV), peak oxygen pulse (PeakO₂pluse), changes in blood pressure, 6 minutes walking distance, Borg Fatigue Scale score, Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS) and Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS) scores. Results At the 6th month of the treatment, the levels of TG, TC, LDL-C, systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP) were significantly reduced (P<0.05) in both groups. However, there was no statistical difference among the three blood lipid indicators between the conventional group and the CR group after treatment (P>0.05). Blood pressure dropped significantly(P<0.05) in both groups, especially in the CR group. Meanwhile, after treatment, LA and LVEDd decreased significantly (P<0.05) in both groups, except LVEF. LA decreased significantly (P<0.05) in CR group, compared with conventional group. In addition, AT, PeakVO₂/kg, VEpeak, SV and PeakO₂pluse levels were significantly elevated (P<0.05) in CR group compared with the conventional group after the treatment. There was no significant difference (P>0.05) in the indicators above in the conventional group. Six minutes walking distance were significantly increased (P<0.05) in both groups at 6th month of treatment, compared with the conventional group, the CR group increased more (P<0.05). Borg Fatigue Scale score, SAS score and SDS score were significantly reduced (P<0.05) in CR group at 6th month of treatment, however, there was no statistical difference (P>0.05) in the conventional group compared with that before treatment. The scores above were significantly reduced (P<0.05) in CR group compared with the conventional group after the treatment. Conclusions Cardiac rehabilitation therapy dominated by moderate-intensity exercise intervention can reduce the blood lipid level of atrial fibrillation and hypertension patients, control the blood pressure, improve the left atrial and left ventricular structure reconstruction, increase the exercise endurance, improve cardiopulmonary function, reduce negative emotions and improve the quality of life.

目的 以单中心法研究心房颤动患者住院病死率的影响因素。方法 纳入2019年3月—2022年3月于我院住院治疗的338例心房颤动患者作为研究对象,统计住院病死率,并以单因素Logistic回归分析法,分析对患者病死率产生影响的风险因素。结果 统计结果显示,在338例患者中,住院死亡人数为13例,死亡率3.85%;经单因素分析发现,患者的年龄高龄、有慢性肾病病史以及机体贫血均是导致患者住院病死的主要影响因素;脂代谢异常、左房内径稍大、左室射血分数较高则是降低患者住院病死率的重要影响因素。结论 贫血、慢性肾病以及高龄均会提升房颤患者住院期间的病死率,而心功能较强的患者住院死亡率则明显降低,临床治疗期间需高度关注上述因素。

目的 观察伊伐布雷定对冠状动脉粥样硬化性心脏病（CHD,以下简称：冠心病）合并心律失常患者心率变异性（HRV）的影响,及对心房颤动（AF）的防治效果。方法 本文为前瞻性研究,病例纳入时间为2021年1月—2023年1月,研究对象为焦作市第二人民医院收治的125例CHD合并心律失常患者,采用随机数字表法对入组患者进行分组,分别列为常规组（62例）和联合组（63例）,常规组予常规药物治疗,联合组在常规药物治疗基础上联合伊伐布雷定治疗,比较2组患者治疗前后的HRV指标、血管内皮功能指标、心功能指标改善情况、心房颤动发生率及用药安全性。结果 治疗后,联合组24 h窦性心律RR间期标准差为（88.25±10.36）ms,24 h相邻正常RR间期差值均方根为（50.25±10.61）ms,24 h相邻正常RR间期差值>50 ms百分比为（12.04±3.41）%,均高于常规组[（81.44±10.77）ms、（43.28±10.71）ms、（10.77±3.08）%],组间比较差异具有统计学意义（P<0.05）。治疗后,联合组的血流介导下血管扩张程度为（12.33±3.27）%,硝酸甘油介导下血管内皮舒张程度为（9.83±2.21）%,均高于常规组[（10.25±3.23）%、（8.14±2.03）%]。AF发生率为4.76%（3/63）,低于常规组16.13%（10/62）,差异具有统计学意义（P<0.05）。治疗后,联合组的左室射血分数为（55.35±10.27）%,高于常规组（48.45±10.61）%,左室舒张末期内径为（40.24±10.37）mm,左室后壁厚度为（9.22±2.06）mm,均低于常规组[（46.33±10.28）mm、（10.88±2.46）mm],差异具有统计学意义（P<0.05）。治疗后,联合组的药物相关不良反应发生率为7.94%（5/63）,略高于常规组6.45%（4/62）,组间比较差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。结论 伊伐布雷定联合常规药物治疗CHD合并心律失常能有效改善患者HRV指标、血管内皮功能及心功能,降低AF发生率,且未增加药物不良反应发生风险。

Objective To observe the effect of ivabradine on heart rate variability（HRV）in coronary heart disease（CHD）patients with arrhythmia and its preventive and therapeutic effects on atrial fibrillation（AF）．Methods This is a prospective cohort study．The 125 CHD patients with arrhythmia were included from January 2021 to January 2023 and divided into the conventional group（62 cases）and the combined group（63 cases）by random number table．The conventional group was treated with conventional drugs,and the combined group was treated with ivabradine additionally．The HRV index,vascular endothelial function index,improvement of cardiac function indicators,incidence of AF and medication safety were compared．Results After treatment,the standard deviation of normal RR intervals in 24 h of the combination group was（88.25±10.36）ms,root mean square of successive RR interval differences in 24 h was（50.25±10.61）ms,and successive RR interval differences>50 ms was（12.04±3.41）%．Compared with the conventional group [（81.44±10.77）ms,（43.28±10.71）ms and（10.77±3.08）%],the above indicators were all higher（P<0.05）．After treatment,the flow-mediated dilation and nitrite-mediated dilation of the combination group were（12.33±3.27）% and（9.83±2.21）%,respectively．Compared with the conventional group（10.25±3.23）% and（8.14±2.03）%）,the above indicators were higher．The incidence of AF was 4.76%（3/63）,which was lower（P<0.05）than the conventional group of 16.13%（10/62）．After treatment,the left ventricular ejection fraction of the combination group was（55.35±10.27）%,which was higher than that of the conventional group（48.45±10.61）%．The left ventricular diastolic diameter was（40.24±10.37）mm and the left ventricular posterior wall thickness was（9.22±2.06）mm．Compared with the conventional group [（46.33±10.28）mm,（10.88±2.46）mm],the above indicators were all lower（P<0.05）．After treatment,the incidence of drug-related side effects in the combination group was 7.94%（5/63）,which was similar to 6.45%（4/62）in the conventional group（P>0.05）．Conclusions The combination of ivabradine and conventional drugs in the treatment of CHD complicated with arrhythmia can effectively improve HRV indicators in patients,promote the recovery of vascular endothelial cell function and cardiac function,reduce the incidence of AF,and do not significantly increase the risk of drug side effects．

目的 分析心力衰竭伴快速心房颤动(简称:心衰伴快速房颤)患者接受胺碘酮急诊抢救治疗的效果及对24 h心室率的影响。方法 将2017年1月—2020年12月急诊接诊且行西地兰治疗的60例心衰伴快速房颤患者作为对照组,将同期急诊接诊且行胺碘酮治疗的60例心衰伴快速房颤患者作为观察组,对组间心功能指标、炎症因子水平、心室率、临床疗效、药物不良反应展开分析。结果 ①组间心功能指标、炎症因子水平在治疗前无差异,P>0.05;观察组心功能指标、炎症因子水平在治疗后优于对照组,P<0.05;②组间心室率在治疗前无差异,P>0.05;观察组治疗后4 h、12 h、24 h心室率均低于对照组,P<0.05;③观察组5例无效(8.33%),对照组14例无效(23.33%),P<0.05;④观察组药物不良反应率(3.33%)与对照组药物不良反应率(5.00%)无差异,P>0.05。结论 在急诊抢救心衰伴快速房颤患者时采用胺碘酮,可以改善患者心功能、炎症反应、心室率,加之无明显不良反应,值得推广。

Objective To analyze the efficacy of emergency treatment with amiodarone and its influence on 24-hour ventricular rate in patients with heart failure and rapid atrial fibrillation. Methods From January 2017 to December 2020, 60 patients with heart failure and rapid atrial fibrillation who received emergency treatment and cedilanide treatment were selected as the control group, and 60 patients with heart failure and rapid atrial fibrillation who received emergency treatment and amiodarone treatment at the same period were selected as the observation group. Results ① There was no significant difference in cardiac function index and inflammatory factors level between the two groups before treatment, P>0.05.The cardiac function index and inflammatory factors level of the observation group were more improved than those of the control group after treatment, P<0.05. ② There was no significant difference in ventricular rate between the two groups before treatment, P>0.05.The ventricular rates of the observation group at 4 h, 12 h and 24 h after treatment were lower than those of the control group, P< 0.05. ③ Treatment for 5 cases (8.33%) in the observation group, 14 cases (23.33%) in the control group were ineffective, P<0.05. ④ There was no significant difference in the adverse drug reaction incidence between the observation group (3.33%) and the control group (5.00%), P>0.05. Conclusion Amiodarone could improve the cardiac function, inflammatory reaction and ventricular rate of patients with heart failure and rapid atrial fibrillation in emergency treatment, and there was no obvious adverse reaction, so it is worthy of promotion.

目的 探讨I¹³¹联合促甲状腺激素(TSH)抑制治疗对术后中高危组甲状腺乳头状癌(PTC)患者心肌纤维化及心房颤动(AF)的影响。方法 选取2016年8月—2017年8月南华大学附属第一医院收治的因PTC行甲状腺双侧腺叶全切术或近全切除术患者69例,根据复发危险度分层分为中危组(49例)和高危组(20例), 两组患者均行I¹³¹ 联合TSH抑制治疗,治疗后嘱患者3个月进行1次复诊或自觉不适及时复诊,观察患者心血管系统症状、心房颤动及心肌纤维化发生情况,患者治疗前后可溶性基质溶素-2(sST2)、生长分化因子-15(GDF-15)、半乳糖凝集素-3 (GAL-3)及血清乳酸脱氢酶(LDHA)含量变化。结果 I¹³¹联合TSH抑制治疗后患者心房颤动发生率和心肌纤维化相关指标水平明显高于治疗前,且高危组患者治疗后心房颤动发生率和心肌纤维化相关指标水平高于中危组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 I¹³¹联合TSH抑制治疗会增加PTC患者心肌纤维化和心房颤动的发生概率,且高危组PTC患者心肌纤维化和房颤的发生率高于中危组。

Objective To investigate the impact of I¹³¹ combined with thyroid-stimulating hormone(TSH) for suppressive treatment on myocardial fibrosis(MF) and atrial fibrillation(AF) in patients with papillary thyroid (PTC). Methods 69 patients with PTC undergoing total or subtotal thyroidectomy admitted into First Affiliated Hospital of University of South China from Aug. 2016 to Aug. 2017 were selected and divided into middle-risk group (49 cases) and high-risk group (20 cases) according to the recurrence risk stratification. Two groups of patients were given I¹³¹ combined with thyroid-stimulating hormone for suppressive treatment. The patients were instructed to undergo a follow-up visit every 3 months after treatment or whenever felt unwell. The incidences of cardiovascular system symptoms, atrial fibrillation and myocardial fibrosis, changes of contents of serum soluble ST2 (sST2), growth differentiation factor-15 (GDF-15), galectin-3 (GAL-3) and lactate dehydrogenase A (LDHA) were observed. Results After I¹³¹ combined with thyroid-stimulating hormone suppressive treatment, the incidences of atrial fibrillation and myocardial fibrosis after treatment were higher than that before treatment, and the incidences of atrial fibrillation and myocardial fibrosis of high-risk group were higher than those of the middle-risk group, with statistically significant differences (P＜0.05). Conclusion Combined use of I¹³¹ and thyroid-stimulating hormone for suppressive treatment can increase the incidences of atrial fibrillation and ventricular remodeling of patients with PTC, and the incidences of high-risk group were higher than those of the middle-risk group.

目的 了解住院老老年心房颤动(atrial fibrillation,AF)患者的临床特征及抗凝现况。方法 收集2015年6月—2017年9月住院老老年(≥80岁)房颤患者的抗凝用药,合并疾病,合并用药等临床信息,统计并分析,非正态分布的计量资料以中位数表示,采用秩和检验,两组计数资料采用χ²检验。结果 621例老老年患者根据性别分为男女两组,男354人,女267人,159例患者(25.6%)使用华法林,33例患者(5.31%)使用达比加群,30例患者(4.83%)使用利伐沙班,抗凝总人数为222例(35.75%)。174例患者(28.02%)使用阿司匹林,27例患者(4.35%)使用氯吡格雷,抗血小板总人数为201例(32.37%)。余198例患者(31.89%)未使用任何抗血小板或抗凝药物。结论 老老年房颤患者目前抗凝率低,抗凝药物以华法林为主。

Objective This study investigated the clinical characteristics and antithrombotic status in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation AF. Methods In this study, we collected, analyzed and characterized the data of the patients hospitalized at the First Affiliated Hospital of Shihezi Medical University from June 2015 to September 2017. Results 621 cases of elderly patients were divided into two groups according to their gender between men and women, 159 patients (25.6%) take warfarin, 33 patients (5.31%) with dabigatran, 30 patients (4.83%) uses of rivaroxaban, the total number of anticoagulation is 222 (35.75%),174 patients (28.02%) were treated with aspirin, and 27 patients (4.35%) used clopidogrel, and the total number of antiplatelet agents was 201 (32.37%). 198 patients (31.89%) did not use any antiplatelet or anticoagulant drugs. Conclusion patients with atrial fibrillation anticoagulant rate is low, and the anticoagulant is mainly warfarin.

       目的 探讨术中未恢复窦性心律需要行电复律的心房颤动（房颤）患者在清醒和镇静两种状态下的安全性及有效性。方法 选择2022年1月—2023年12月100例接受射频消融术中行同步直流电复律的持续性房颤患者进行研究，采用随机数字表法将患者分为观察组（清醒状态）和对照组（镇静状态），其中观察组和对照组各为50例。观察两组患者接受电复律的成功率、复发率和不良事件发生率（呼吸抑制、低血压、谵妄、肺水肿、心律失常）等指标。结果 观察组和对照组首次电复律成功分别有48、49例，成功率分别为96%、98%，组间比较差异无统计学意义（P=0.558）。观察组术后30 min内有2例复发，对照组术后30 min内无复发，组间比较差异无统计学意义（P=0.153）。在不良反应方面，观察组共发生1例心律失常事件，1例低血压事件，不良反应的总发生率为4%。对照组共发生3例呼吸抑制事件、2例谵妄事件、1例心律失常事件、2例低血压事件，不良反应的总发生率为16%，组间比较差异有统计学意义（P=0.046）。结论 对持续性房颤患者在射频消融术中，处于清醒状态下行电复律也具有良好的临床疗效，可以减少不良事件的发生，安全性更高。

  Objective  To compare the safety and efficacy of awake state and sedation state in patients with atrial fibrillation（AF）who did not recover sinus rhythm and needed electrical cardioversion during operation．Methods  A total of 100 patients with persistent atrial fibrillation who underwent synchronous direct current cardioversion during radiofrequency ablation from January 2022 to December 2023 were selected and divided into the observation group（awake state）and the control group（sedation state）according to the random number table method，with 50 cases in each group．The success rate of electrical cardioversion，recurrence rate and incidence of adverse events（respiratory depression，hypotension，delirium，pulmonary edema，arrhythmia）were observed．Results  The first electrical cardioversion was successful in 48 and 49 patients in the observation group and the control group，and the success rates were 96% and 98%，respectively．There was no significant difference between the two groups（P=0.558）．There were 2 cases of  recurrence in the observation group and no  recurrence in the control group within 30 minutes after operation，and there was no significant difference between the two groups（P=0.153）．In terms of adverse reactions，there were 1 case of arrhythmia event and 1 case of hypotension event in the observation group，and the total incidence of adverse reactions was 4%．There were 3 cases of respiratory depression events，2 cases of delirium events，1 case of arrhythmia events，and 2 cases of hypotension events in the control group．The total incidence of adverse reactions was 16%，and the difference between the two groups was statistically significant（P=0.046）．Conclusions  Electrical cardioversion in awake state during  radiofrequency ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation has a good clinical efficacy and safety，which can reduce the occurrence of adverse events．