目的 探究腔内微波消融(EMA)联合泡沫硬化剂治疗与腔内射频消融(RFA)联合泡沫硬化剂治疗下肢静脉曲张的临床疗效和并发症情况。方法 回顾性选择收集106例下肢静脉曲张患者的临床资料,其中54例患者(观察组)接受EMA联合泡沫硬化剂治疗,52例患者(对照组)接受RFA联合泡沫硬化剂治疗。比较2组患者相关临床指标及并发症发生情况。结果 观察组手术时间(34.92±2.35)min,对照组手术时间(46.33±2.71)min,观察组手术时间较短,差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05),其余手术参数差异不明显(P＞0.05)。观察组的住院费用(21 063.74±850.47)元,对照组住院费用(23 312.40±1 035.86)元,观察组住院费用较低,有统计学差异(P＜0.05)。2组间并发症发生率、总有效率和总满意度均无显著差异。对比2组患者手术前和手术治疗后1年的静脉临床严重程度评分、阿伯丁静脉曲张问卷评分,组间对比没有统计学差异(P＞0.05);而在患者手术1年之后的静脉临床严重程度评分、阿伯丁静脉曲张问卷评分均呈现出明显的下降趋势(P＜0.05)。结论 微波消融是有效治疗下肢静脉曲张的术式,与射频消融比较,具有同样良好的短期效果;微波消融所需的手术时间较短且费用较低。

Objective To compare the clinical efficacy and complications between endovascular microwave ablation (EMA) combined with foam sclerotherapy and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) combined with foam sclerotherapy in patients with varicose veins of lower extremity. Methods A total of 106 patients with varicose veins of lower extremity were included in the retrospective study.Among them, 54 patients (observation group) were treated with EMA combined with foam sclerotherapy, and 52 patients (control group) were treated with RFA combined with foam sclerotherapy.The related clinical indexes and complications between the two groups were compared. Results The observation group had a shorter procedure time than the control group (34.92±2.35 minutes vs 46.33±2.71 minutes, P＜0.05), and no significant differences were observed in the other procedure parameters.The hospitalization cost was (21063.74±850.47) yuan for the observation group and (23312.40±1035.86) yuan for the control group, and the hospitalization cost of the observation group was lower(P＜0.05).No significant differences were found in the total effective rate,total satisfaction and complication rate between the two groups.Comparison of venous clinical severity score (VCSS) and Aberdeen varicose vein questionnaire (AVVQ) scores before and one year after operation between the two groups showed no statistical differences (P＞0.05). While the VCSS and AVVQ scores of the patients showed a significant downward trend one year after operation (P＜0.05). Conclusions Microwave ablation is an effective treatment for varicose veins in the lower extremity, which has the same good short-term effect as radiofrequency ablation. Microwave ablation requires a shorter operation time and less cost.

目的 通过研究微泡超声空化增强微波消融对兔VX2肿瘤的热消融效应来探究其在肿瘤治疗中的价值。方法 24只肝脏移植瘤兔随机分为空白对照组、单纯超声空化治疗组、单纯微波消融治疗组、超声空化联合微波消融治疗组4组。利用增强超声显示每组治疗前后肿瘤的大小、形状和轮廓并通过温度针来检测治疗区域的局部温度。结果 联合治疗组血流灌注缺损最严重,微波消融组和联合治疗组缺损体积分别为1.53±0.20和1.68±0.43(P=0.117);微波消融组以及联合治疗组消融治疗时温度达平台时间分别为(21.7±5.0)s和(10.3±5.0)s(P<0.01),最高温度(℃)分别为100.9±5.0和134.1±6.0(P<0.01)。结论 MWA联合MEUS治疗肝癌可使治疗区局部温度急剧升高至峰值温度,有望提高肝癌治疗效果。

Objective To investigate the thermal ablation effect of microbubble ultrasound cavitation combined with microwave ablation on rabbit VX2 tumors. Methods Twenty-four rabbits with liver transplantation tumors were randomly divided into four groups: blank control group, ultrasound-only cavitation treatment group, microwave-only ablation treatment group, and ultrasound-cavitation combined with microwave ablation treatment group. Enhanced ultrasound was used to show the size, shape and contour of the tumor before and after treatment in each group, and the local temperature of the treatment area was detected by a temperature needle. Results The blood flow perfusion defect was the most severe in the combined treatment group. The defect volume of the microwave ablation group and the combined treatment group were 1.53±0.20 and 1.68±0.43 (P=0.117). The temperature reached the plateau time in the microwave ablation group and the combined treatment group. It was (21.7±5.0)s and (10.3±5.0)s (P<0.01), and the highest temperature (℃) was 100.9±5.0 and 134.1±6.0 (P<0.01). Conclusion MWA combined with MEUS for liver cancer can sharply increase the local temperature in the treatment area to the peak temperature, which is expected to improve the treatment effect of liver cancer.

目的 比较经阴道射频刀消融和经皮微波消融治疗单发黏膜下型子宫肌瘤短期临床效果的差异。方法 回顾性分析2013年3月—2014年3月21例经阴道射频刀消融治疗单发黏膜下型子宫肌瘤和 24 例经皮微波消融治疗单发黏膜下型子宫肌瘤的临床资料。结果 经阴道射频刀消融治疗单发黏膜下型子宫肌瘤和经皮微波消融治疗单发黏膜下型子宫肌瘤的临床结果差异有统计学意义(P＜0. 05) ,手术时间分别为(50.8±10.7)min,(60.4±11.3)min,术后住院时间为(2.5±1.2)天,(4.7±0.8)天。结论 经阴道射频刀消融术及经皮微波消融术治疗单发黏膜下型子宫肌瘤都使瘤体缩小并取得良好的短期临床效果,各有优、缺点,临床应视瘤体的具体情况选择。