目的 研究护理干预对慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者抑郁焦虑情绪的效果。方法 选取2015年2月—2017年3月我院收治的慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者84例为观察对象。2015年2月—2016年2月入院患者42例为对照组,遵医嘱给予治疗,同时均予以常规慢性阻塞性肺疾病知识宣教。2016年3月—2017年3月入院患者42例为观察组在对照组基础上予以优质护理干预。分别比较干预前后两组患者抑郁、焦虑及干预前后肺功能变化、患者满意度、生活质量。结果 干预后观察组抑郁自评量表(SDS)、焦虑自评量表(SAS)评分分别为(20.05±5.24)分、(21.57±6.03)分,均低于对照组(28.57±5.29)分、(31.72±6.14)分,差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05)。干预后观察组FEV1水平(2.00±0.33)L,高于对照组的(1.68±0.25)L、观察组FEV1/FVC水平分别为(69.50±7.95)%,高于对照组的(65.18±8.43)%,差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05)。观察组患者满意度为95.24%(40/42),高于对照组的73.81%(31/42),差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05)。观察组患者各项SF-36评分均高于对照组,均P＜0.05差异有统计学意义。结论 优质护理干预可缓解患者负性情绪,改善肺功能,提高满意度及生活质量。

Objective To study effects of nursing intervention in paitents with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Methods 84 patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease admitted to our hospital from February 2015 to March 2017 were selected as the observation objects. From February 2015 to February 2016, 42 patients admitted to the control group were treated with conventional therapy. From March 2016 to March 2017, 42 patients admitted to the hospital as the observation group were given quality nursing intervention on the basis of the control group. The depression, anxiety, lung function changes, patient satisfaction and quality of life before and after intervention were compared between the two groups before and after intervention. Results After the intervention, the SDS and SAS scores of the observation group were (20.05±5.24), (21.57±6.03), which were lowered than that of the control group (28.57±5.29), (31.72±6.14), the difference was statistical significance (P<0.05). After intervention, the level of FEV1 in the observation group (2+0.33) L was higher than that in the control group (1.68+0.25) L, and the FEV1/FVC level in the observation group was (69.50+7.95)%, which was higher than that in the control group (65.18+8.43)%,the difference was statistical significance (P<0.05). Satisfaction of patients in the observation group was 95.24% (40/42), higher than the control group 73.81% (31/42),the difference was statistical significance (P<0.05). The SF-36 scores of the observation group were higher than those of the control group, P<0.05, the difference was statistical significance. Conclusion High quality nursing intervention may effectively alleviate depression, anxiety and other negative emotions, improve lung function, satisfaction and quality of life.

目的 急性Stanford A型主动脉夹层(AAAD)患者往往需急诊手术,以挽救其生命。手术通常存在高风险。术后常见并发症包括:神经系统、呼吸系统、胃肠道、肝、肾脏等多器官系统的功能障碍,以及全身感染,其使得术后过程更加复杂。 因此, 围术期护理极为重要。方法 2016年2月—2018年2月, 共完成了24 例 AAAD患者的手术。术前所有病人收治科室ICU。手术方式为Bentall+Sun'氏术。 围术期,对患者随机分组进行密切观察和护理。A组:常规组(routine nursing):对患者给予常规护理;B组:整体组(integrated nursing):除了常规的基本护理外,加强了围术期镇静、镇痛和术后并发症的专业化的整合护理。结果 两组共24例成功完成了手术。两组术前资料比较,无显著差异。整体护理组ICU停留时间和住院时间短于常规组(P<0.05);护理满意度、生活质量比较,整体组患者优于常规组(P<0.05)。结论 护士提供的围术期专业化技术的整体护理,可改善患者围术期的治疗效果,促进康复。

目的 对临床护士实施预防住院患者误吸教育干预,评价干预措施对护士预防误吸知识及护理行为的影响。方法 选取我院神经系统相关科室的110名护士为研究对象,通过一系列教育干预,对比干预前后护士在预防误吸知识及护理行为等方面的改变,评估干预措施的效果。结果 110名护士均对培训满意;培训前护士预防误吸知识的平均得分为(65.6±9.6)分,培训后平均得分为(92.5±6.5)分,培训前后得分的差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。培训后89份(89%)跟踪调查卷明确表示护士在工作中运用了培训所学的知识。结论 对护士进行有组织、有计划的教育干预能提高护士预防与处理患者误吸的知识水平,并能对护士预防和处理患者误吸的行为产生积极影响。

Objective To evaluate the effect of educating nurses on how to prevent and reduce aspiration rate of patients. Methods 110 nurses were recruited from neurological department in our hospital and were trained systematically about the prevention and nursing of aspiration. We compared the scores they had before and after training. Results 110 nurses were all satisfied with the training. The pre-education test score about the aspiration knowledge was 65.6±9.6 while the post-education test score was 92.5±6.5. The difference of the score before and after training was statistically significant difference (P<0.05). The follow-up study indicated that 89% nurses are applying the knowledge gained from the training to their clinical work. Conclusion It's suggested that well-organized educational training may improve nurses' performance of preventing patients from aspiration and treating patients when they had aspiration, which left a positive effect on nurses' behavior.

目的 探究我院静脉用药调配中心（PIVAS）对不合理医嘱的干预效果。方法 选取我院未实施不合理医嘱干预期间（2016年1月—2016年5月）的237 385条医嘱,以及实施不合理医嘱干预期间（2017年1月—2017年6月）的238 643条医嘱进行统计分析,观察比较干预前后不合理医嘱发生情况（给药途径不合理、溶媒选择不合理、频次不合理、浓度不合理、配伍不合理、其他等）,以及比较不合理医嘱干预方法等相关知识考核成绩。结果 不合理医嘱发生情况,主要包括溶媒选择不合理、频次不合理、浓度不合理、配伍不合理、其他;干预后,不合理医嘱总处方数及溶媒选择不合理、频次不合理、浓度不合理、配伍不合理、其他等单独处方数均明显少于干预前,（P<0.05）。干预后,医务人员接受静脉用药医嘱相关知识培训后的考核成绩（93.33±6.39）分明显高于未干预的考核成绩（75.03±7.86）分,（P<0.05）。结论 PIVAS对不合理医嘱的干预效果显著,可使不合理医嘱发生情况明显减少,促使静脉用药具有安全性与科学性的特点。

早期干预是预防和减少早产儿神经系统损伤的有效措施,可以促进早产儿的正常发育并减轻神经系统伤残的发生,对提高儿童综合素质和家庭幸福都至关重要。在早产儿早期干预过程中存在与医学伦理原则不相适应的方面,如医疗设施不足、医疗措施不当、专业人员不足,早产儿干预预后的不确定性,治疗时机与家长经济及遵医行为之间的冲突,家长知情选择和知情同意不足等,本文结合医学伦理学的观点对0~3岁早产儿在早期干预中存在的问题进行分析并提出相应的建议。

Early intervention is an effective measure to prevent and reduce the nervous system injury in preterm infants,It can promote the normal development of preterm infants and reduce the occurrence of the nervous system disability.It is vital to improve the comprehensive quality of children and family quality of life. In the stage of premature infant intervention,there are some aspects that are incompatible with the medical ethics principle,i.e. inadequate medical facilities,improper medical measures,lack of professionals,premature infants intervention prognosis uncertainty,the conflict between the timing of treatment and the parents' economic and compliance behaviors,parents' informed choice and informed consent. etc. This paper analyzes the problems in early intervention of 0~3 year old preterm infants and puts forward corresponding suggestions according to the viewpoint of medical ethics.

目的 探究全程护理干预在门诊鼻咽喉部疾病检查中的应用效果,为纤维鼻咽喉镜应用的临床护理方式提供理论依据。方法 选择2015年7月—2016年6月在本院行纤维鼻咽喉镜检测的患者458例为研究组,同时选择2014年7月—2015年6月行纤维鼻咽喉镜检测的患者400为对照组例。对照组患者行常规护理模式,研究组患者行全程护理干预模式。对比两组患者护理效果、并发症率以及患者满意度。结果 研究组患者的呼吸频率、心率、舒张压以及收缩压均低于对照组患者指标,且两组数据对比差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05)。研究组患者的总并发症率为4.58%,对照组患者的总并发症率为24.00%,两组数据对比差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05)。研究组患者的总并发症率为4.58%,对照组患者的总并发症率为24.00%,两组数据对比差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05)。结论 在对老年患者行纤维鼻咽喉镜检查时,相对于常规护理模式,采用全程护理干预措施,可以提升患者的护理效果,降低并发症机率,同时可以提升患者的满意度,具有较高的临床应用和推广价值。

目的 对信息协作平台的社区结直肠癌三级防治及干预体系进行探索与实践。方法 对纳入本次研究的2 492名社区人群进行问卷调查,包括健康人群1 118人,1 374例肿瘤患者。分析健康人群和肿瘤患者关于肿瘤防治知识及途径的认知情况,比较健康人群和肿瘤患者就诊首选医院,了解肿瘤患者就诊流向和行为以及发现患癌的途径。结果 在肿瘤患者中知道癌前病变、早期肿瘤症状、高危人群的比例显著高于健康人群[26.93%(370/1 374)、39.96%(549/1 374)、46.00%(632/1 374)比14.49%(162/1 118)、21.91%(245/1 118)、26.92%(301/1 118)]。健康人群认为肿瘤三级防治网络可行、会参加三级防治网、有必要开展癌症筛查、会参加筛查的比率显著高于肿瘤患者[98.83%(1 105/1 118)、91.95%(1 028/1 118)、98.12%(1 097/1 118)、98.03%(1 096/1 118)比81.95%(1 126/1 374)、79.98%(1 099/1 374)、80.93%(1 112/1 374)、85.95%(1 181/1 374)],差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。健康人群把三甲医院视为就诊首选医院的比率显著低于肿瘤患者[32.56%(364/1 118)比86.97%(1 195/1 374)](P<0.05)。肿瘤患者中发现肿瘤及确诊医院、肿瘤复诊、康复医院的选取主要以三甲综合医院为主。在肿瘤患者中因身体不适到医院就诊发现患癌的比率显著高于单位员工体检、自检发现、社区卫生服务中心体检发现的比率。结论 我国目前肿瘤发病率和死亡率正处在快速上升的阶段,利用网络优势,加大肿瘤防治知识的宣传力度,建立社区、区域二级医院、三级医院优势互补的三级肿瘤防控体系,是当前我国肿瘤防治的迫切需求。

Objective To explore and practice the community tertiary prevention and intervention system for colorectal cancer based on information collaboration platform. Methods A questionnaire survey was conducted among 2 492 community residents which were included in this study, including the healthy crowd of 1 118 people, 1 374 cases of tumor patients. The study was to analyze the knowledge of cancer prevention and treatment in healthy people and cancer patients, to contrast the preferred hospital by healthy people and cancer patients, to acquaint the flow direction in seeking medical service, behavior and way to diagnosis cancer of tumor patients. Results In patients with cancer, the understanding proportion of patients with precancerous lesions, early tumor symptoms, and high risk groups was significantly higher than that in healthy people [26.93% (370/1 374), 39.96% (549/1 374), 46.00% (632/1 374) vs 14.49% (162/1 118), 21.91% (245/1 118), 26.92% (301/1 118)]. In healthy people, the proportion of identification of tumor three-grade prevention and control network, willing to participate in the tertiary prevention and control network, necessity to carry out cancer screening, willing to participate in screening was significantly higher than that in patients with cancer [98.83% (1 105/1 118), 91.95% (1 028/1 118), 98.12% (1 097/1 118), 98.03% (1 096/1 118) vs 81.95% (1 126/1 374), 79.98% (1 099/1 374) and 80.93% (1 112/1 374), 85.95% (1 181/1 374)]. There were significantly differences (P<0.05). Healthy people preferred to choose common hospital instead of 3A hospital as the first choice [32.56% (364/1 118) vs 86.97% (1 195/1 374)] (P<0.05). Discovery and diagnosis of cancer, further consultation, and rehabilitation were mainly carried out in 3A hospital. In patients with cancer, the cancer discovery ratio because of physical discomfort for medical attention was significantly higher than that in unit staff physical examination, self-inspection found, and physical examination in community health service center. Conclusion At present, the incidence and mortality of cancer in our country is in a stage of rapid rising. It's an urgent need for cancer prevention and control in China that making use of the advantage of network to improve the propaganda of the knowledge of cancer prevention and control, and establishing complementary advantages of the tertiary cancer prevention and control system by community, regional hospitals, and 3A hospitals.

目的 分析于剖宫产产妇围手术期实施针对性护理对其切口感染率及不良情绪的影响。方法 选取2015年6月—2016年4月于我院择期行剖宫产术的102例产妇,通过随机数表法分为观察组与对照组,各51例。给予对照组常规护理,在此基础上观察组给予针对性护理干预。对比两组术后恢复情况、护理前后疼痛评分(VAS)、抑郁评分(SDS)及焦虑评分(SAS)变化情况,并统计两组并发症发生率、护理满意度。结果 观察组肛门排气时间、切口愈合时间、24 h睡眠时间、住院时间、下床活动时间均少于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05);护理前两组SAS评分、SDS评分、VAS评分间无明显差异(P＞0.05),经护理干预,观察组SAS评分、SDS评分、VAS评分低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05);两组切口感染率、并发症发生率(1.96%、7.84%)低于对照组(15.69%、31.37%),差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05);两组护理满意度对比,观察组(98.04%)高于对照组(82.35%),差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05)。结论 给予剖宫产围术期产妇针对性护理疗效确切,可缓解不良情绪,减轻疼痛感,促使机体功能及早康复,减少切口感染与并发症发生。

目的 分析社区综合干预对小儿反复呼吸道感染的影响,为社区临床治疗小儿反复呼吸道感染性疾病提供理论依据。方法 采用随机抽签方式,从我社区2012年10月—2014年10月期间收治的小儿反复呼吸道感染患儿中,随机抽取60例纳入本项研究,依据就诊单双顺序,分为研究组30例(社区综合干预方式)和对照组30例(常规性治疗和常规措施进行干预),对两组患儿干预结果进行对比分析。结果 研究组治疗总疗效高于对照组(93.33% vs 76.67%),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。对比治疗干预过程中疾病发作次数、就诊次数状况,研究组优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。干预后研究组小儿呼吸道感染致病因素改善情况(除滥用抗生素外)优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 针对小儿反复呼吸道感染疾病可采用社区综合干预方式,可显著提升治疗有效率,缓解病情,降低反复感染发生率,效果突出,具有广阔应用前景。

目的 采用Meta分析系统定量地评价我国高中生与大学生艾滋病健康教育的干预效果,为在学生群体中开展艾滋病健康教育提供科学依据。方法 以“艾滋病”、“健康教育”、“大学生”和“高中生”为主题词和关键词联合检索PubMed、中国知网和万方数据库的相关文献,各数据库检索时间范围限定在2006年1月—2017年6月。对符合纳入排除标准的文献进行质量评价及摘录所需数据,以健康教育前后艾滋病常识得分作为效应值,运用Revman 5.3软件进行Meta分析。结果 共纳入19篇合格文献。Meta分析结果显示,健康教育对中学生与大学生艾滋病常识得分影响的标准均数差(Standard Mean Difference,SMD)=1.17(95% CI=0.88～1.47)。结论 健康教育对提高我国高中生与大学生艾滋病相关知识的知晓有较好的效果。